CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HLN Photo Requests


July 6, 2009
Posted: 10:41 AM ET
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) in 2007.
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) in 2007.

U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY) wants the media to "knock out the psycho-babble" and drop the coverage surrounding the death and funeral of Michael Jackson.

But he said more.

"He was a child molester. He was a pedophile. And to be giving this much coverage to him day in and day out, what does it say about us as a country?"

Read more and watch the video of Rep. King's comments here.

We need your opinion. Answer this quick poll, we will tabulate the results, and show them on today's Sanchez show at 3PM ET on CNN.

Filed under: Quick Poll Questions


Share this on:
Windfall   July 6th, 2009 10:54 am ET

He was acquitted on all charges, for pete's sake! People sued him to get rich quit. They used the poor guy.

flo   July 6th, 2009 10:54 am ET

Perhaps the congressman has lived in a hole these past years. Michael Jackson was aquitted on all charges. He should at least show some class. Maybe a "no comment" would have been best.

CindyOlson   July 6th, 2009 10:56 am ET

Jackson is news, especially since his death was under suspicious circumstances. Perhaps we should consider NOT covering Rep. King instead?!

Liz (lulubird102/twitter)   July 6th, 2009 10:56 am ET

Rick, MJ was never convicted. Doesn't Rep. King trust the democratic system he himself works?
-Liz

Rainforest Moon   July 6th, 2009 10:56 am ET

There should have been a fourth choice.

No...6 months of evidence in a court of law showed the allegations to be nothing but a witch hunt.

FERNANDO   July 6th, 2009 10:57 am ET

The 1st case was settled with 20 million dollars. If the allegation was real, no father will accept money just to keep things quiet.
The 2nd case: he was declared innocent.

M.J. was weird, unusual, but that has more to do with his environment. He was push to do those things.

Donna   July 6th, 2009 10:59 am ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty. Peter King, I'm sure, has never listened to MJ's music, except for MAYBE hearing Thriller or Billie Jean in a moment since EVERYONE knows those songs. Who cares what he thinks anyway? The media, including CNN, has to give just about everyone a platform so this is Peter King's. It's all babble to me and I'm good at turning a deaf ear on people like him. Michael Jackson's music has given most of us in the world who APPRECIATES music some beautiful memories.

Christine   July 6th, 2009 11:00 am ET

Absolutely do i agree with him!!! Thank the Lord someone has finally told the truth. Michael Jackson was a pedophile. I think it is important that we remember that.

Schrod   July 6th, 2009 11:01 am ET

It is a shame that they turned his death into a circus. I enjoy his music like I enjoy all other music. I worship no one.

T. J. Wilkinson   July 6th, 2009 11:04 am ET

Last I looked, MJ was found Not Guilty of these charges. Would I allow my kids to be with him? Yes. While I think MJ had some serious issues, I do not believe he would harm a child.

Since Rep. King is so certain, perhaps we should make some accusations against him, and then continue to promote them even after (and IF) he is found Not Guilty by a Jury.

Camilo   July 6th, 2009 11:05 am ET

While I think the media is definitely doing overkill on the life and death of Michael Jackson, he was indeed the King of Pop and larger in death than he was in the end of his life. People should celebrate him as they see fit. As far as being a pedophile, there is no proof. He was acquitted twice. Even OJ couldn't pull that off. Very rich people with very clear weaknesses are often the target of criminal allegations and financial blackmail. Unless someone emerges with proof, I doubt we'll ever know. And I doubt anyone will come forward unless they can see a way to make money off it.

Tracy Shook   July 6th, 2009 11:05 am ET

The interest in MJ represents such a small portion of the population. Give us something else to "chew" on for a while, I'm bored with MJ.

Lush Rimburger   July 6th, 2009 11:07 am ET

A.) Most of us cant believe we didnt see it before Peter brought it to light like that.... Michael Jackson was in fact a Republican politician? Wow.

B) If Peter Can pigeon hole MJ as a pedo/molester/perv etc, when he was acquitted of each attempted charge against him, then doesnt that also mean that Republicans dont believe in "Innocent until proven Guilty" and therefore, are also subject to their own beleifs in that Its apparently a pattern that Republicans who speak out the loudest and most obnoxiously about Values, and perversion are themselves Guilty of Adultery, Perversion, Crimes, and Illegal and Immoral activities?

Justin in NC   July 6th, 2009 11:11 am ET

What a class act this guy is! It's always fun to step on a dead guy. Even Virginia Foxx is taking the high road and hasn't called MJ a hoax.

jerry garcia   July 6th, 2009 11:12 am ET

The congressman said he's merely saying what others aren't, i'd merely ask WHO asked him to speak on their behalf. Also, his accusations are just that...he was never found guilty of any charges. Plus, just as a human being....a person has died, a person who was someone's sibling, someone's son, someone's son, someone's friend....show a little consideration, if not for MJ, then for the others. If the congressman is tired of all the coverage, just do what everyone else does when they don't like what's on tv, turn it off.....

Ben West   July 6th, 2009 11:13 am ET

It's important to separate the music from the allegations. Peter King obviously wasn't touched by the music, but for the millions of fans that were, this is a time to celebrate the life of the best performer (in my opinion) ever.

max   July 6th, 2009 11:14 am ET

This guy shouldn't be a Congressman if he doesn't recognize the judicial system.

Taylor_Taylor   July 6th, 2009 11:18 am ET

I am going to check my Twitter folowers to see if any of them vote in Peter King's district. I will lobby them to be sure and vote for the other person.

Albert Vazquez - Dallas City, IL   July 6th, 2009 11:18 am ET

Jackson, Spears, Cruise, Kanye, Ledger. What the difference? Their celebrity brings them to levels well outside the norm. So what's normal for them is not the same for us. We either accept it or call them Not! normal.

Deanna   July 6th, 2009 11:22 am ET

I am not a fan of Michael Jacksons and I find his past conduct suspect, though he wasn't been convicted of anything. I find any comments coming from any member of congress hypercritical considering all the affairs and misconduct they have displayed. Get your house in order before you start throwing stones.

Lissa from Montreal   July 6th, 2009 11:23 am ET

I definitely think the media is blowing this out of proportion. He was a fabulous, entertaining artist, but the 24/7 frenzy/circus is tiring and way overdone. Does his bizarre lifestyle factor into my thoughts? No. He was never convicted despite all the circumstantial elements that would have everyone thinking otherwise. But he contributed to music in ways we cannot ignore.

Still – Iran all but got pushed off the screen when MJ died. I'm tired of it, and have found myself turning off the reports because it's overkill. I won't even watch the memorial – I think that's also really exploiting his fame.

Just a humble opinion. Keep up the awesome work, Rick, I love your show!!

Ken Vinson   July 6th, 2009 11:27 am ET

I didn't really care for all the coverage Michael Jackson's death got. But I might remind this Rep. King that Michael Jackson was found INNOCENT of ALL charges in his trial. If Rep. King was put on trial and found innocent, would he want some jerk, upon HIS death to call HIM a pervert & pedophile? If HE diidn't do it? I don't know if MJ did it or not. But the jury found him not guilty. And that's good enough for me. It should be good enough for Rep. King too.

Mary Jacobsen   July 6th, 2009 11:31 am ET

No doubt he was extremely talented. Maybe a reason for some of the things he's done, but not an excuse. Sad that he's dead, but he was no hero.

ArmyWife   July 6th, 2009 11:32 am ET

Personally, I would not have went so far as to use the "child molester" and "pedophile" terms but Mr. King is only voicing something a lot of us feel...the media coverage of MJ has gone over the top.

It's why I've quit watching all TV news for the past week.

There were a lot of other high profile deaths in a one week span and none of them garnered the attention of the media as much as this.

What does it say about our country when all we want to report on is the death of someone was only important to a few people (his fans) and not the news that's actually important to the entire country/world?

I agree that enough is enough.

Ken, Sterling, VA   July 6th, 2009 11:33 am ET

He was found not guilty, despite what public sentiment might be – also see Simpson, OJ. That said, yes, the media should stop covering this story so much. In fact, hearing nothing at all today would make up for the incessant coverage tomorrow; I'm just glad I'll be driving and won't have to listen to it!

rena   July 6th, 2009 11:33 am ET

MJ was a child molester, as a victim of molestation, I am personally glad he's dead. The sooner coverage is over, the better. People who are waiting in line all day to see a dead guy are losers, loss of income in a time of recession is stupid, this guy did nothing to benefit anyone but himself.

Quentin Schroder   July 6th, 2009 11:37 am ET

In this country a person is innocent until proven guilty. Michael Jackson went to trial and was acquitted of the charges brought against him. The average person did not have access to the information that the jury received. I believe that if twelve independent jurors found him innocent, then he was innocent. Part of what bothers people is that he settled an earlier civil suit against him with allegations from a different child. Is Michael Jackson a pedophile? How would I know if he was or was not? It will always be a footnote in his history that there were allegations of inappropriate behavior with children. If people want to have that discussion, I think you should wait an appropriate time after their memorial out of respect for their family and friends.

Madam Mijanou   July 6th, 2009 11:38 am ET

Peter King should say the same about his good friend Al (the pig) D'Amato. King is shooting his mouth off just to get publicity for his 2010 run for the Senate. Just another media hog that must get his face out there every time he can. For the most part Long Island is a very racist place and he is just pandering to his constituents.

Rob   July 6th, 2009 11:43 am ET

If he was actually a child molester the victim's parents would have made sure that he was in jail for a long time, instead of settling out of court. And he shaped American pop music, if we are going to talk about a crazed pop star shaving her head then we should talk about this.

Gerry Benner   July 6th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Rick, to me CNN reports the news w/o taking sides. They present the facts, and hopefully focuses on new and current facts w/o getting involved in tons of political or misguided opinions.

Bonnie Pointer   July 6th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Someone needs to remind Rep King that Jackson was ACQUITTED of all charges and in this country that means he was found innocent.

What a fool that we have as a representative.

SunyVal   July 6th, 2009 11:46 am ET

I am not shocked at how the media and others are attempting to define and limit who Mike was or how we remember him. And its not just broadcast media or this congressperson grabbing some press. The popular online print-on-demand service Zazzle.com has chosen to censor/remove any Michael Jackson merchandise from their onlie marketplace. Any artwork or mention of the name Michael Jackson is being promptly removed.
I saw a CNN interview with Warren Ballentine on the subject of Unfair Media Coverage of Michael Jackson but somehow they ran out of time cutting short his view.

Peace
p.s. The choice of wording in your poll seems to be slanted in order to arrive at some desired response to support your views.

Pete B   July 6th, 2009 11:55 am ET

It would be a breath of fresh air if someone–anyone– in the GOP actually made a public statement that did not continue to depict them as brash, hypocritical, intolerant, narrow-minded, provincial, passe, out-of-touch, disparaging cry babies and intellectual lightweights!

DawnD   July 6th, 2009 11:55 am ET

I agree somewhat with U.S. Representative King. I think there has been too much coverage of Michael Jackson, whether positive or negative.
Especially in light of the fact that there have been so many Military events this past week; marked by the 4th of July on Saturday.

American soldiers began pulling out of Iraq, only to have Iraqi citizens celebrating in the streets. I think we should have spent more time honoring our brave soldiers. Did we have a homecoming parade for them?

I am of the MJ era and grew up in Michigan so I appreciate the whole Motown era; that's my era.

Michael Jackson did deserve coverage but I think it was too much. It's okay to follow his story and try to get the facts on his Death Investigation, but does CNN and other networks have to pick apart every detail?

As for the Pedafile thing, Michael Jackson was found innocent so it's wrong to call him one. Although his behavior with children was strange, we may never fully know what happened.

I do hate that we put entertainers on a pedestal, I know this is done by people wanting to promote them for money; fans act like they are Gods; this is what sells records, movies, etc.

Michael Jackson was a person, a gifted entertainer, but a person who had a troubled life. He was abused and exploited by his father, colleagues and some so-called friends.

He needed balance and love in his life and the media needs balance in their reporting.

Nathan   July 6th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

OK then, let's stop the MJ coverage and cover the scandals of politicians instead. Let us instead focus on their perversions!

What does this say about our country:

Marion Barry: past mayor of D.C, current council member. Arrested over the weekend for stalking a woman. Seen in video smoking crack. Failure to pay taxes.

Still voted for by the people. Some moral compass these people are!

Laura Thompson   July 6th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

CNN covers NEWS it can be anything from war to this.... who is this guy anyway? It's just another big mouth who want's attention.

RUBT   July 6th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

We have a judical system for a reason and the last time i checked he was found innocent, I never thought he was guilty in the first place. Let us remember the man who took the WORLD BY STORM. He has inspired and changed the music industry. I am grateful to have lived in his era.

Hershel   July 6th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

I think the congressman has chosen to ignore what the judicial system said about the accusations and simply place his own verdict out there as if it was the decision reached by the courts regarding Mr. Jackson. This is wrong and he needs to tune back into reality. That being said while I am a fan of Mr. Jackson's music and performance skills, I am bit concerned that the tragedy that is his death has overshadowed improtant issues that we need to be focusing on at home and abroad. The continuing economic crisis, the work being done on health care reform, Situations around the world with allies and nations withwhom our relations are strained or even non existent seem to me to be more pressing and important issues on which the media should focus its attention. In light of someones deazth we often hear people say Rest in Peace. Perhaps it is time for the sensationalism and speculation mongers to let go of the reigns that are steering media in a direction that does not really celebrate a life or bring closure in his death it merely feeds the circus atmosphere that they thrive on. Do us all a favor and say goodbye and get your eye back on the ball. The world has plenty of real issues that effect peoples daily lives here and around the world more deeply than the death of a celebrity no matter how popular.

Rest in Peace MJ

FOCUS CNN – News not sensationalism, shock and speculation!

tom   July 6th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

well judgement is the worst thing any one can do first there should be proof not to say that mj behavior was a bit odd, but mr king should not comment on this, his job is to work for the people and not to determine what the news covers.

Abbey   July 6th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

Wow, whatever your feelings on Michael Jackson or the media coverage his death has received, this guy is WAY out of line here.
"...he could sing and dance a little...:??? What planet have you been on man?
Michael isn't even buried yet and not here to defend himself against such attacks, Talk about disrespect. How would this guy's kids, family, friends feel if someone who never even met him went after HIM like this after his death but before he'd even been buried?.....and publicly? No class at all.

Lance   July 6th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

Those who yell the loudest are typically the one's we must keep an eye on. Why is it this Congressman is jumping up and demonizing Michael Jackson during a period of mourning his death? If you don't have anything good to say – then keep your mouth shut. NY, I'm sure, has a few more pressing issues the congressman could turn his attention to than whether MJ is celebrated for his lifelong achievement in creative artistry. King's remarks smack of smear, envy and fear of exaltation that inspires others to achieve their dreams. Only someone with a sick psyche would jump up and start slandering a dead man. Peter King sounds foolish but obviously represents that creepy group of hateful vengeful citizens who at another point during the 19th and 20th century would have led a vigilante group to chase Jackson down and hang him from a tree. That's what I hear when I see a congressman spewing out indictments that have not been proven in spite of Jackson's pay offs. Likely better to pay than to continue going through smear and misinterpretation. Other than that...Jackson is a product of a twisted American culture that has everything to do with his sad mis-identity crisis. Promoted by a predatory business culture that tries its best to market "white" as superior to Black, yet plagued by a population that historically has tried to soak up every little thing that is originated by Blacks, makes people like King furious and determined to do whatever to discredit the work of a Michael Jackson. Couple that with the ironic fact that Michael himself is the most likely victim of child abuse by fan-dom. Adult, both women and men likely preyed on him which is why he resorted to the honesty of children rather than the connivences and betrayals of adults. This really shouldn't come as any surprise that King and others like him will continue to shake down the imagery of one of the finest contributor to pop culture andl remain an ongoing mission for some hater within American society.

SwankySwanner   July 6th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

I would like to see the focus shift from MJ to someone else. I am getting sick of hearing about him. There are 15 year old girls who weigh 60 pounds.. Men with knives sticking out of their heads who WANT to go back to active duty and all we care about is this guy who cant get a good night sleep. The lessons we need to learn we choose to overlook. I have a great deal of empathy..but what I find utterly disgusting about our human condition is making someone like MJ so wonderful for no good reason. HE DANGLED HIS BABY over a balcony..!!!

"The media has sickened me with so much coverage on these cases. Heath Ledger, Anna Nicole..Michael Jackson.."

" ALL the firefighters and law enforcers combined who went inside the world trade centers KNOWING they would die got less coverage."
My brother and 15 yr old son just made these comments on July 4th.

We were remembering a few years back when we had a frightening experience with the very drug in question..My son was sedated with diprivan when he had spinal meningitis when he was 11. During the spinal tap he had a complication. I was so scared. His sats dropped out of nowhere. The alarms buzzed like crazy and they were injecting different things in the i.v.s while the tap was till in the epidural space. They were trying not to freak ME out..But they had to work fast.. and not paralyze him while bringing his blood pressure up so he did not die.

I cannot imagine what psycho gave Michael Jackson this drug for insomnia!!!

I do not even think the educational benefits would justify this much of a frenzy. Sensationalism disgusts me. What is funny to me is everyone knows how sick of it YOU GUYS ARE HA HA HA!

COME ON!! What you need to learn from this is NO MEANS NO!!!

Got a drug problem? Get some help..cant sleep? Find a different solution.. or plan your friggin funeral because this is russian roulette!!

When we look at a man such as MJ.. Perhaps we would have been seeing an unchanged species. He was always the "man in the mirror". What do you think you were looking at??? Artists are screwy people. He was the family paycheck! Maybe he was screwed up through the experiences he collected along the way. I personally believe I change with each experience but that I have always been this eccentric sort of weirdo. You throw in the family tree, spin the bottle with religion, alcoholism, drugs..and whatever you call this addiction to plastic surgery he had.. and BAM it smells like a hit song.
Don't get me wrong here..I think the guy had loads of talent and all the aforementioned ingredients only make it sell more..If you don't believe me, look at Elvis and James Brown..and pretty much anyone else..Dysfunction makes the artist, but just because someone is dead and has such a dysfunction it does not mean we want to hear it 24/7..and we have heard it ...grrrrrrrrrrr..see if I keep typing here, you will get sick sick of me telling you how sick I am hearing about it..

I grew up listening to Michael Jackson. I appreciate his talent. I have empathy for the child he was...well, maybe not completely. I was not a child star leaving a major mark on the world as did this man. However, I was the youngest of 6 with perfect pitch who could sing before I could speak. I studied dance. I had attention around me everywhere I went. I went through my own journey..Thank GOD I am even alive. My main focus has been on my own children..not screwing up other children.Of course, I am not making any allegations here. It just appears Michael had some issues to confront.

When you reach even one person flattery is a bit of an ego boost. Of course, transcending to a higher level as an artist means you do not need that sort of ego mania..and you really do it because it is who you are..especially if it sends a positive message. Conversely, if you have written something in a time of pain and you relate to someone in their time of need..this too is truly meaningful. Artists have a special place in our hearts. We share our emotions with these individuals. These people are not risking their lives to save anyone. I believe artists have a special connection to keep people in a specific mental space..but they do not stop bullets..and they do not refuse diprivan.

They just tweet metaphors over to Rick..

Michaelk42   July 6th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Pedophile or not (though more than likely true given the hush money paid out) it's sad that real news like Iran, Honduras, etc. gets ignored in favor of this fluff. Sure he could dance and sing and sell a lot of records; back in another age when people bought such relics.

Mike Bates   July 6th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

Several posters have cited Jackson's acquittal on the molestation charges. As I recall, almost immediately after the trial at least three jurors expressed skepticism about Jackson's innocence.

I don't presume to know their motivation, but find it interesting that some of the folks used as part of the "evidence" of Jackson's innocence flipped so quickly.

LJP   July 6th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

Michael WAS not guilty of any wrongdoing. He was completely innocent. And it's not that "he was so talented and such a genius, that we can forget any wrongdoing on his part". There was NO wrongdoing. If anyone says Michael Jackson was a child molester, would they please come forward and prove it. If they don't have any evidence (apart from the horrible, horrible tabloids), hey should just keep their mouths shut. I followed the MJ trial closely, and even though I have always been a loyal Michael Jackson fan since the age of 7, I kept my mind open, and I really wanted to be sure of his innocence. I read all the court documents and I am sure Michael Jackson was an innocent man. He was found NOT GUILTY on all counts, so why do we still have people calling him a pedophile when he clearly wasn't? It's no different that calling Michael Jackson a murderer. That's quite ridiculous, but I believe all these people calling him child molester do not even know what they're talking about. They get their information in their tabloid papers, and I feel sorry for them. Michael Jackson was an amazing human being, yes, there are a couple of things he said or did that I did not agree with, but in no way he was a bad person, he was not even capable of doing such horrible things he was accused of. Please, let the man rest in peace.

Greg   July 6th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

I strongly disagree with so-called U.S. Representative King. I do not feel that he followed the child-molesting accusation case from day one like I did. With that being said, I wonder how would he feel if I accuse Mr. King for witch-hunting people like he just did to Michael Jackson? I would never image Michael Jackson, the king of Pop, would even dream of hurting a child. I still to this day have a hard time believing he attempted to hurt a child either.

Kevin Leo   July 6th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

Rep King embarrassed himself and did a great diservice to the people that he was elected to represent! I am a lifelong Michael Jackson fan and have been following him for all of my 42 years of living. At the same time, I have also voiced my displeasure over the 24 hour coverage of Michael's death. That being said, for an elected official to go so over the top with his comments before the man has even been buried is totally uncalled for. Maybe the congressman should review the docment that he has sworn to uphold and protect as one of his primary duties – the Constitution!!! Whether you like it or not, whether you agree with it or not, really doesn't matter. MJ was tried and found NOT GUILTY in his court case. While he paid another family, that is not an admission of guilt. If that was the case, everyone who has ever done an out of court settlement to avoid expensive trials is guilty of far more offensive things than this!!!

cd   July 6th, 2009 12:33 pm ET

Everyone who believes Michael Jackson was a pedophile wants to question his innocence because he settled the civil case of 1993. Why don't you question the motives of the accuser and his parents for accepting the civil settlement but REFUSING to cooperate in the criminal case in putting a so-called pedophile behind bars? Hmm, I wonder WHY?

Rep. King, and people that share your mindset, EDUCATE YOURSELF ABOUT THE 1993 CASE AND THE 2005 TRIAL before being so quick to label Michael Jackson a pedophile. If you knew ALLof the facts about both cases and the REAL reason why they came about, you wouldn't be spouting off ignorant, vile comments about a dead innocent man.

Lisa   July 6th, 2009 12:33 pm ET

Do you suppose Rep. King would have said the same about Elvis?
Princess Diana? Frank Sinatra?
I'm not slamming any of them. But Rep. King needs to realize that the contribution of Mr. Jackson outweighs the accusations...and that is ALL they are, were accusations. A settlement does not a conviction make.

gregory   July 6th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

Ask Peter King if he'd take the "hush" money if his child was molested by Jackson? Taking the "hush" money and not going thru with a criminal trial speaks volumes. The Chandlers played that game.

jason from ocala   July 6th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

It is about time somebody said what alot of people were afraid to say.
this guy hit the nail on the head. how many of these people would've let their kids go to neverland ranch. he admitted to children sleeping in his bed, and said it was an expression of love. come on america, he was crazy when he was alive, and now that he is dead all is forgotten?? And people get mad at politicians for flip-flopping, enough of the hypocracy!!!! you all should be ashamed of yourselves!

Julian Rodriguez   July 6th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

I think that MJ changed music and people are celebrating that. I do think that after tomorrow the media needs to start covering more serious and relevant news that will affect people's lives. i.e the health care bill proposed by the HELP comittee in the senate that appears to be quite promising in terms of cost and coverage. It's sad that the media pounced on the over budgeted projections of a few weeks ago but has said nothing about the latest developments.

Raquel   July 6th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

Michael Jackson was an American Icon whos name will be remembered LONG after Peter king's name is forgotten. He was a huge part of our pop culture and he will be missed, but since Mr. King wants to reminisce about the negative, lets not forget the fact that Jackson was found NOT GUILTY!, obviously I am a MJ fan but having said that- I think that other stories are not receiving the coverage they should be. Lay off Michael a little.

jason from ocala   July 6th, 2009 12:53 pm ET

One more thing to think about; OJ was found not guilty of double homicide. How many of you people that are defending MJ will also go on the record right now while OJ is still alive and say that he is innocent of that crime. the judicial system is not perfect, innocent people go to jail and guilty people get off every day. stop with the stupid cliche "he was acquitted" and come back to reality!!!!

JR   July 6th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

Another useless republican who is trying to capture publicity. When will they realize spreading hate filled comments like this will get them no where.

Kelly   July 6th, 2009 1:07 pm ET

Michael deserves all of the positive media coverage he can get! If he was Elvis, no one would be complaining. And we all know that Mr. Presley had many skeletons in his closet as well. Let us not forget that Mr. Jackson went to trail and was found NOT GUILTY by a Jury of his peers. Let this GREAT man that touched so many lives REST IN PEACE.

joanne osinkowski   July 6th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

This fool King is precisely why the Republican Party are sitting in the back row. Garble and garbage that is being spewed from the likes of King and Palin is the reason Americans are fed up. The Republican party had better speak out and give these two a verbal lashing if they want to stay afloat.

Brian   July 6th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

Hey Rick,
I liked your question on FB. Keep reporting the news. All news! I believe that MJ was found not guilty and the only one that knows for sure is Michael. However, it amazes me that idiots like King will jump at the chance to voice what is obviously his opinion and not necessarily the truth. If Rep. King wants to discuss perversion and immorality, perhaps he should start within his own party. I personally find it quite stupid to talk about someone's behavior, when the behavior of the group I belong to runs rampant with the same.
Good job Rick, thanks for your efforts!

JazzyDray   July 6th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

Wow... Seriously? All this shows to me is that the people that help make the rules have no regard for the justice system and the verdict of a jury....

Michael Jackson was found NOT GUILTY on all charges. The accusers were proven to have lied under oath more than once. That trial was nothing more than a witch hunt perpetrated by a DA that was obsessed with bringing down a big target, which he failed to do anyway. Granted MJ's image was forever tainted, but he didn't get what he wanted, which was Michael Jackson behind bars.

I am a fan, yes, but I'm not a fanatic. I don't worship Mr. Jackson, I admire his talent, his vision, his craft, and his much less talked about humanitarian efforts. And for anyone that says "what humanitarian efforts," before you open-mouth-and-insert-foot, remember "We Are the World"? How about "Heal the World" which spawned not one but two charitable organizations... Heal the World, and Heal the Kids.

Admittedly, Michael appeared "eccentric" to a vast majority of people, but tell me this... what EXACTLY is the definition of normal?

Nicole Lewis   July 6th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

First of all it's one thing to voice your opinion about the media coverage, but to say these vile things after Michael Jackson who is NOW dead and was found NOT GUILTY by a jury of his peers is truly evil! He is nothing but another dirty, low life political figure who just wants his name attached to this. If the people of New York are smart, they would vote him OUT when it's time for him to be re-elected. So who cares about this loser, he can go straight to hell. Michael Jackson was a innocent man who was obviously framed when it came to these FAKE allegations! The world lost THE GREATEST ENTERTAINER of ALL time! RIP MJ, and I say keep honoring the man CNN. MJ changed the world with his music and love of humanity.

Mrs. Coles   July 6th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Congressman King should be ashamed of himself. Those remarks were not only unnecessary, they were classless, coming from a representative of this country.

Mr. Jackson was acquitted in a court of law and unless the Congressman has information to the contrary, he should really concentrate on what's going on in Albany.

In my opinion, the good Congressman sounds jealous!

Connie in Calgary   July 6th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found innocent of all the charges brought against him. The rightwingers that wont let things go, they're a problem. Dont they know that it's fundamentally corrupt to disregard things like the US Bill of Rights, and lawfully determined legal decisions? ? Simply to slam someone who very clearly cant defend himself, and to make a few quick & easy political points?

Jason Cruickshank   July 6th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

U.S. Representative Peter King is a child molester.

That statement has just as much conviction as any charge ever brought against Michael Jackson. If we cannot trust our courts to find the truth for us then why do they exist?

Gordon Miller   July 6th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Jackson was a musical-entertainment genius who crafted a mistique around his weird appearance and, unforturnately, self-destructed with self-confessed "giving love" to boys in his bed and developing a self-confessed addiction to drugs. Sure he deserves media coverage, but not to such an overwhelming 24-7 extent where he still gets more time on CNN than more significant national and world events.

Marilyn from Tallahassee   July 6th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Peter King is the one I'd call a pervert. He seems to think our justice system is perverted ... since he doesn't understand the concept of a "NOT GUILTY" verdict. LAPD at the time of Jackson's persecution was really subjecting lots of high profile black men to that type of harassment but what they did to Michael was wretched. They took a good and gentle man, a brilliant genius and made completely unsubstantiated claims against him. I for one will change the channels before listening to Peter King pass noxious gas through his mouth. Don't give him airtime!

If he wants to " knock out the psycho babble" he must want you to stop covering the clinically psychotic ramblings of Sarah Palin and Gov Sanford!

Yami   July 6th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

He is a Congressman? and He doesn't know the United States Constitution? Michael Jackson was acquitted of those BOGUS charges, the trial actually proved Michael was innocent, what is he talking about? he needs to seek for publicity using what really counts, which is the political talk..by HIM USING MICHAEL'S DEATH to serve his political agendas is low and declasse, btw this is the same anti-immigrant congressman who feels that discrimintation against immigrants is OK.. what a low life he is.
I know he must be hurting that Michael Jackson was bigger than LIfe.. and the world's reaction and coverage is proving that, wheather he likes it or not..

Soare Cecilia   July 6th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

Learn to do a poll. All choices imply that he might be guilty, even the so called 'positive' one. That one means that he is so great artist that it doens't matter if he did wrong or right....

So this poll is corrupted. I'ce expected more from cnn folks.... Learn to do polls first, ok?

( Cecilia/ Europe )

Ben   July 6th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Mj was 200% innocent and if the media did their job evry would have seen it

Parisa   July 6th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

You have to remember you only heard from one side. You never heard from MJ regarding what actually happened between him and the boy. If MJ was really a child molester why did the authorities allow him to keep custody of his ADOPTED children.

The press convicted MJ like they do with ever sensationalized case.
Look what they did to that Senator Condit in the Chandra Levy case years ago. The police and the press convicted the man public. Everyone believed that this senator was guilty of murder. Nearly 10 years later you now find out half of what the press claimed to be true was a LIE. The senator was innocent but his life has been ruined.

Dan Janus   July 6th, 2009 1:35 pm ET

Well if this vote is a sign of us having to put up with more MJ then I guess I'll revert to what I have been doing since his death.

Turn off the TV and get my news from the web.

And that is sad when news media should be reporting all the news fairly not fixate on one celebrity.

J Darroll Hall   July 6th, 2009 1:50 pm ET

Peter King makes me very happy bot to live in NY what a loony....

Wayne D   July 6th, 2009 1:56 pm ET

Rep. King's comments, in my opinion, rise to the level of slander.
(I am not a lawyer, I make no accusation here.)

While I think the media could and should back off on the "psychobabble", and personally, I'm not paying any attention to the coverage until some politico decides to grandstand like this, if Mr King has new evidence, he should bring it forward. Until then I'll just grin whenever a politician decides to be a champion of good taste in the media.

Iyana McKiver   July 6th, 2009 1:58 pm ET

At first I was shocked at Rep. King insensitivity, but quickly I realized this is just another stunt for Republicans to get attention. First Gov. Sanford, then Sarah Palin, now Rep. King. We all have done things in our lives that we are not particularly proud of. Rep. King you are not a saint. Michael Jackson was not found guilty, so find some dignity and show some respect. If you do not have anything good to say do not say anything at all. The Republican Party is certainly not in good standing as of now and the more air time they steal, the deeper the hole their digging for their party. Also, Rep. King if you are unhappy with the coverage turn off the television, read a book, go for a walk, then come back and watch FOX news, that should be satisfying!!! CNN keep up the good work!
RIP MICHAEL <3

Steve DeMarte   July 6th, 2009 2:19 pm ET

Enough is enough with the coverage of Michael Jackson. Michael was a fantastic performer, a great humanitarian, and a son. His death should be mourned; his life celebrated.

How many soldiers, firemen, and police officers have died in the line of duty since Michael Jackson's death?

CNN, at times, in it's zeal to cover the big story, goes way over-board in doing so. MIchael Jackson is dead.

So too are Sgt. 1st Class Edward C. Kramer, 39, of Wilmington, N.C., Sgt. Roger L. Adams Jr., 36, of Jacksonville, N.C., Sgt. Juan C. Baldeosingh, 30, of Newport, N.C., Spc. Robert L. Bittiker, 39, of Jacksonville, N.C, and nary a word from CNN on them.

Steve DeMarte
Raleigh, NC

Jamila   July 6th, 2009 2:21 pm ET

For the record, I do not believe that MJ was a pedophile; there was no legal or substantial evidence to support that laim. I DO believe that his musical work, philanthropic work and cultural impact should be honored. That being said, your poll doesn't make any sense. The choices are "yes he's guilty" and "no, his legacy outweighs allegations." I'm sorry, but what does one's work have to do with wether or not they are guilty of criminal activity?

Tina laws   July 6th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

What Pete King said was outrageous, MJ was found Not Gulity, so he need to stop. MJ has kids they will hear someone call their Dad a Pervert, that's wrong and Mr. King needs to worry more about New York and Less about MJ. And King and other people like him can chill out, MJ is the KING OF POP and no one can change that . And CNN thanks for airing his comment, he's an idiot and he's disgraceful fool. New Yorker need to not re-elect him, he's worried about MJ, instead of New Yorker the ones who elected him into Office!!!

MarshallTalk   July 6th, 2009 2:29 pm ET

Rick, I really don't think this is a fair Poll. The man was accused of being a molestor because he was NICE to Kids. He was NOT convicted of a crime. It always amazes me, when someone accuses someone of something it becomes true if enough DIFFERENT people don't like the person. But then a Guilty person or Bad person is just accepted by all common people, example The Dog, Hilton, etc.

Let this guy RIP! As for Peter King he is just flat out EVIL, he will judge everyone except for his buddies which include Politicians and Personalities. We all know, but will not say Peter King has some serious issues with certain kinds of people!

Lastly a FAIR Poll would have just asked the question without the persumption of GUILT like "No. His artistry outshone any allegations of impropriety." Don't you think there should have been a "He was NOT Guilty so it doesn't matter what Peter Kings says" question? Remember to treat people the way you want to be treated in similar circumstances.

See ya on Twitter – MarshallTalk

tz37   July 6th, 2009 2:31 pm ET

Mr. King should be more careful of what he says. This man was aquitted of those charges and more people who knew him said he did not do those things. He will be judge by GOD and he alone. The coverage is warranted because he made a positive impact around the world. We are allowed to celebrate that. I would like to see more help and coverage for those men and women who are serving this country.

Mike Scavo   July 6th, 2009 2:34 pm ET

Nobody deserves this much news coverage when they die. Princess Diana didn't and MJ doesn't. He was a brilliant entertainer, smart business man and messed up human being. All of his friends should have been there to stop him from mutilating himself both physically and spiritually.

Milagros Garcia Villamil   July 6th, 2009 2:38 pm ET

Hey Rick; welcome back..

Heck no! what do we gain by not helping the world celebrate a man who touched us, our kids and even the President?
The last man to bust a person out ended up on the TV as well..Remember Sanford, from SC who flew to Argentina for bootay!?? duh!! The Congressman better make sure he covers his butt! or we will be telling his story on CNN! GO RICK!!

jnelyon   July 6th, 2009 2:40 pm ET

congressman king is a jerk and looks more like the typical pediphile than Michael Jackson. it unnerves me that we have a representative who does not believe in the justice system that acquitted Michael. i have experience as a juror and a grand jury panel. jury instructions are a solemn and serious matter. i personally am a cnn junkie and have not missed a single minute of coverage of iraq, afghanistan, iran, north korea, the deaths of all the others this past tragic two weeks, and all other coverage pertinent to this nation and international events all the while grieving over the loss of MJ. i grew up in motown and am michael's age. i always treasured his talent and allowed that he was not representative of mainstream america, however, i can now say unequivocably as a result of the coverage and interviews that i do not believe he had it in him to harm a child. i am however SICK TO DEATH OF GOVERNOR DIPSTICKS EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS. where are king's comments on that? one final comment, Michael will be with us for 1000 years, peter king will be on the list of "who's he?"

Tina laws   July 6th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

Rick, MJ was not found gulity in fact he was found not Gulity, and for a matter of fact MJ deserve all this attention, he gave Millions of dollars to charties, he was the first Black person to have a video on MTV, he's the KING OF POP, and anyone who says he don't deserve the attention is CRAZY. I'm tried of people making Mj look Bad he had thousands of kids at his Ranch, and only two made allegations, I was toched inappropriately, by my DAD, my mom did not ask for MONEY, she filed charages and He went to JAIL. MJ was just used and abused, but NO one can take his Legacy from him and his family. Not U Rick or Pete. So to the MEDIA keep paying tribute to a LEGEND!!! We love U MJ!!!!!

Jan   July 6th, 2009 2:42 pm ET

It's a shame that people show this kind of loyalty to one person but won't show LOYALTY to the United States. We watch TV too much, and PRAY too seldom. We have REDUCED our VALUES. If you can't see this then YOU are the reason we are having the issues we have today and this will cause our self destruction. It is time the citizens of the United States grew up and stopped wallowing in pity. We have Men and Women in other countries who die each day and they are not Celebrated as they should be.

Ken (california)   July 6th, 2009 2:42 pm ET

Michael had his demons in life...His talent was unbelievable and his concern for the disadvantaged of the world is well recorded..The coverage of his death has been overdone...however....Anna Nicole Smith got alot of coverage also and accomplished alot less in her life!! You report and we watch....

Milagros Garcia Villamil   July 6th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

Number one MJ was none of the above, he was found innocent of 15 charges in 1996? The first charges were settled out of court but now it has been established thAT perhaps those kids were preppsed to lie as well? Ricjk we can sit here all day and surmise ans guess but noone knows what happened in that bedroom.
Also why would MJ admit allowing kids to sleep with him if he treated them badly?? I believe the parents of those children lied and used thier kids..to get money for another trailor etc, theu used MJ after he was kind to them..$$$ was the motive money opportunity and jealousy.
This congressman must be a republican. besides if you look, most of the Gov. Mayors etc who have been accused lateley are republicans including his own GOV of NY Spitzer

nelson   July 6th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

It is enough.

Linda Graham   July 6th, 2009 2:58 pm ET

What is wrong with those @#$%^@# Republicans??? This is EXACTLY why I switched parties and am now Democrat. I've come to realize how much they have their heads in the sand– self-righteous, close-minded, and just plain IDIOTS! They are still living in Medieval ages and need to EVOLVE like the rest of us!

Diane   July 6th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

Rick this comment about Michael Jackson is just disgusting and real bad timing. Was it really necessary for this REPUBLICAN Congressman to say these horrible things about MJ, I mean come on, if you feel this way keep it to your self especially now!! I for one never believed MJ was a child molester, he was just a man living out his child hood that was taken from him by his father!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Craig from Sacramento   July 6th, 2009 3:09 pm ET

CNN is now indistinguishable from Entertainment Tonight or E! You embarrass yourselves with the excessive Jackson coverage – regardless of whether he was a sinner or a saint.

junejokearoke   July 6th, 2009 3:09 pm ET

ask rep.king was elvis a pedophile, elvis fell in "love" with priciilla when she was 14 years old,
if you cant say anything good about the dead, dont say anything
love me some rick

Annette of Aurora, CO   July 6th, 2009 3:10 pm ET

Here we go again with another holier-than-thou Republican playing judge and jury. To my knowledge, Michael Jackson was never convicted of anything. Yet, there are Republicans that were caught red-handed doing stuff they should have been thrown under the jail for. Doesn't Rep Peter King of New York have some bills to read? He should focus on earning his pay rather than being a media critic. I wonder what dirt is forthcoming on Mr. King? Repubs like him always have some real skeletons in their closet!

dana lewis fayetteville GA   July 6th, 2009 3:13 pm ET

my letter to rep. peter king. submitted to his website:

your audacity to JUDGE Michael Jackson is astounding! you have no proof the man was a pedophile. you have no proof, only your opinion, to label the man as such. you should not use inflammatory words minus a conviction or definitive proof. Michael was besieged, blasted, hammered, with ALLEGATIONS! do you have a direct line to GOD? did god, thru divine revelation, reveal to you michael's guilt? I BEHOLD THE CHRIST IN MICHAEL. HIS MOTHER WOULD NOT HAVE STOOD BY A SON WHOM WAS CAPABLE OF SUCH. YOU HAVE TO GIVE THE WOMAN CREDIT FOR HER ABUNDANT COMMON SENSE AND PREVAILING GOODNESS. MICHAEL'S LOVE WAS A GIFT FROM HIS MOTHER. A SOUL, LIKE MICHAEL'S DESERVES THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT!! LOOK AT MICHAEL JACKSON AND JUST SAY "I BEHOLD THE CHRIST IN YOU" AND SEE IF YOUR JUDGEMENTAL RIGHTEOUSNESS IS TRULY WARRANTED. ALLOW THE NATION TO GRIEVE, CELEBRATE, AND LOVE, A TALENT,A GENIUS, A BODY,A SOUL,A DIVINITY, AND ALL THE LOVE THAT ENCOMPASSED MICHAEL. STOP BEGRUDGING!!!!!!! TO REALLY KNOW A PERSON, READ WHAT THEY WRITE. MICHAEL'S LEGACY OF WORDS SPEAKS VOLUMES. YOU KNOW NOT FROM WHENCE YOU SPEAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DANA LEWIS

scott taylor   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

I would suggest to everyone that within 3 years that Rep King will be caught with his hand in someone else's cookie jar and then let's see where he stands then- Respect MJ for his artistry- the allegations were just that- Allegations

Jamie B.   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

They really need to be doing the opposite of what they are doing, and actually be glad that Michael is finally gone. It's one less child molester we have to worry about in this nation.

Joy   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Rep. King can turn the channel if he does not like. Keep your thoughts to yourself. Just look what happened to Gov. Sanford. You have to know when to speak and when to be quiet!!!

Anthony Smith   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Peter King- New York Representative for NY Third District has came out and blasted Michael Jackson!! He has called Jackson a pervert and child molester and he haven’t even been buried yet!! King has a right to his opinion but when you’re a man of the law I would think it he should follow the letter of the law. Michael Jackson was found not guilty by a court of law!! And that’s that!! End of the story!! Peter King has no right IMO to come out as a man of the law and call him a child molester!!

I wonder what Peter King’s actual position on child molesters? Has he passed any strong laws against them? Probably not!! I looked up the child molester register for his office in Massapequa Park and found all kinds of weirdo looking men in his neigborhood. Take a look..http://www.familywatchdog.us/ShowMap.asp?frm=0

Alex Fleming   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

I AM OVER MICHAEL JACKSON! SKY SAXON! KARL MALDEN! FARRAH FAWCETT! MITSUHARU MISAWA! ROBERT MCNAMARA! ED MCMAHON! WHERE'S THE NEWS COVERAGE? WHERE'S THE TEARS!?

John   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

This Congressman needs to shut his FAT MOUTH. He looks like a pedophile

Aida   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Rick,

This is one guy who is the last to talk. Look at his co workers. Where are they now. South Carolina..yeah, lets talk more about that...lets talk about Gingrich and his mistress, lets talk about the tapping in the bathroom or another congressman who was having sex with underaged young boys.

No, there is no way he can talk a talk without pointing that first rock to his Republican friends first?? Did he do that, even once?

Tony Roof   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

I agree with the congressmen... There were other stars that died with in 3 weeks of Jackson and you are not doing anything for them... Then there was the stories you guys pushed when he was alive, hanging his kid of the balcony, the boys saying they were molested... but now you treat him like a king!

Why

T.Mitchell   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

He says Mike is a child molester i say he is a racist jack ass that has issues with his own sexuality. Mj was a wonderful man, performer, who didnt mind helping an adult or child in need.

marie flynn   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

yes

Bernadette Loesch   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Dear Rick, As a former New Yorker and having lived on Long Island, I know how Peter King engages in theatrics. He is the very last person to comment about Michael Jackson. Doesn't he have anything better to do, like upset the balance of power in DC?????

Edward Lovette   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

A jury of 12 people acquitted Michael Jackson but where there is smoke there is fire.

Georgia   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

There are more important things going on the world and all we see is Michael Jackson 24/7

Sandy   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

The congressman is a jerk, and should keep his opinion to himself. I would not be surprised if he has dark secrets hiding in his closet.

Rick Young   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Where does Rep. King stand on Barney Frank if he's tired of the MJ
coverage. I'm tired of the Barney Frank celebration.

Michelle   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

As I understand, Michael Jackson was found not guilty of the accusations. So what is the congressman ranting and raving about? Is he bored and wants to get 'into' something and this is it? Does he have no faith in our justice system? As I see it, people used Michael Jackson as a means to money instead of getting off their butts and earning their own livings. And another thing, Michael Jackson has donated more money to charity than any one out there according to the world records. Has the congressman mentioned how good that is? Or I'll go further, has the congressman put any money where his mouth is or is he satisfied with just running it? Was he concerned when Black artists weren't played on MTV? Was he concerned when Michael Jackson searched high and low for a kidney for a child and the child is alive because of that? Or is the congressman trying to be like others and ride Jackson's coattails, even in death? Congressman, get a life and do YOUR job.

Christopher   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

How easy it is to milk this story? Both from the side of the Media and now politicians looking for some family values face time. Please move on, there are bigger things that people care more about than Michael Jackson.

Courtney   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

It REALLY irritates me when people continue to drag Michael Jackson down, now KNOWING that he just passed away.

It makes me sick to my stomach, and I feel bad for the people who are doing it, because in my opinion what they are doing is terribly terribly wrong.... not to mention selfish.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Michael Jackson had to pay $20 million in hush mom to the family of a boy he molested. If this doesn't prove he was a child molester and pedophile, nothing else will.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

And you guys are giving this child molester a FULL DAYS coverage??

frank   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Michael jackson was scrutinized by every reporter and paparazzis. I wonder what we would find out about some republican politicians if they were submitted to the same scrutiny.

Debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

What happened to the judicial system? He was proved innocent!
It is in truely bad taste to bring this up at this time. We should all watch and dig into this guys life and see if we can find anything on him so that when a family member of his dies, we can make it the most horrible day of his life!

E.Roth   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Rick, this is a politician speaking. How dare he accuse MJ of anything he was acquitted of. Mr. King is merely concerned that his own celebrity spotlight isn't as bright.

Jessica   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

CNN U DISAPPOINT ME! HOW DISRESPECTFUL ARE YOU!?!? Michael's family and fans are grieving right now and you are showing idiots like this on your network?!?! I thought CNN showed coverage of facts, not rumors, that's reserved for E! and TMZ. I lost respect for you today. And in this time of grieving, the last thing I want to see is this idiot blabbing about things that he doesn't know and he has never even met Michael!!!! Show some f**king respect!

Tired of it   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

OJ Simpson was found innocent of murder. Did that mean he didn't do it? MJ was a pedophile and the truth will come out after the hoohah surrounding his death settles down. Yay to King for saying what those of us with brains knew all along

Ron   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

The only way Congressman king could know anything about anyones sexual proclivaty is if he has had sex with that person or witnessed the acts. Did he?

Brian Pittman   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

I am sorry, but what kind of society have we become when someone's artistry outweighs the fact that they are a pedophile? Let him hurt your child and let's see what your opinion is!

fareed   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

I don't think any one has any right to say any thing to Mr Jackson.

Annie   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

WOW, I certainly wouldn't want that guy sitting on a jury if I'd been accused of something! I guess he's one of those "guilty until proven innocent" kind of jerks who honestly thinks he's God, judge, and jury.

edward barnes   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

He was aquitted!!!!! NOT GUILTY!!! He deserves his coverage he was a special human. Thats why I dont like REPUBLICANS!! OLD WHITE PREJUDICE MEN!!

maxine   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Yes There maybe to much coverage of MJ, but please let the guy be laid to rest before knocking him like that. I think Rep. King comments was very offensive and cross the line. If MJ a low-life then some of Rep. King own republicans are too. Foley, Ensign, Vitter and Sanford to name a few!!

hm,florida   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

another idiot republican trying to get attention that he can not get himself so he starts stuff. kinda like sara palin.

Jennifer   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

I do agree that Michael Jackson had a wonderful career but.... who else could be accused of what he was and it all just forgotten just because he is dead? How does this publicity make those boys feel?

Rick from Portland   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

It is too much coverage for ANYONE! He just wasn't that big a deal. He's getting more coverage than Princess Diana for goodness sake, its just ridiculous and has gone on WAY TOO LONG, nothing to do with his "lifestyle".

Renee Farrar   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

As my daughter, Anna Dickson, has said Michael Jackson is the true Benjamin Buttons- An old man at too young an age who got younger as he aged.

Mar   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Maybe a pervert, certainly an artist, absolutely too much coverage.

Robert   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I never really liked MJ anyway. I'm sick of hearing these daily news updates on his death. Don't we have more important things to cover like Iran and North Korea? Sure MJ is the 'King of Rock' or whatever, but just because he's a famous celebrity doesn't mean he deserves this much coverage. I love how people put celebs above the average person.

Tom   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I agree that MJ was talented but I also feel that he was a pervert and liked to be around little boys...I can't wait for him to be put in the ground so that every time I try to watch the news his face isn't popping up...

Carla, Wyoming   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Another stupid, big-mouthed Republican! Poor Michael...he was acquitted, found innocent. Leave him in peace.

haram23   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

wasn"t michael jackson cleared of charges within so-called court of law

Gregory Drumwright   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I am outraged by Rep. King’s remarks and display of ignorance! New Yorkers should be ashamed of his comments on their behalf. While I concur with the portion of his comments which praise the contribution of civil servants, I cannot believe that he has chosen to lash out at the memorial coverage in respect to Mr. Jackson. Everyday, for the past seven years in America, mediums such as CNN have graciously reported and documented the noble acts of our esteemed service men and women throughout the world. Therefore, it is not a mistake or oversight on their behalf to offer extended coverage to MJ during the time of his immediate death.

Is not the fact that this one man has contributed over 300 million dollars to charities WORLDWIDE, in life, and stands to do more in death through the demands of his will, not enough to respect him as a servant, not just of America, but of the entire human race? Who else; what one person has matched that level of a charitable investment for the cause of greater good from their own personal fortune? How could anyone part their lips to say that Michael Jackson was “no good”. Apparently, it is because of the good he represented while he was with us, that in his passing he is receiving due attention.

Due to the fact that all allegations of sexual misconduct remained just that—ALLEGATIONS, I do not believe it warrants ANY further defense on his behalf in rebuttal to Rep. King’s statements. The period of his life that he was forced to deal with those matters only represented a small portion of the 50 years he was with us. Therefore, King’s comments reek with ignorance little basis of truth. Rep. King could only wish that the work of his life could have half the impact that Michael Jackson has had on people across the globe and eternally throughout generations; in word, song and in deed.

For the record, I am a former public school administrator and serve my local community as a minister and humanitarian.

Gregory B. Drumwright

Stacey   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Innocent until proven guilty.
Michael Jackson was never proven guilty, therefore he is an innocent man. Why would someone who had a terrible childhood and even suffered abuse at the hand of his father hurt another child.
He was a very talented man and he should be celebrated.

Peninnah   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I think that the congressman should be sued for defamation of character. Michael Jackson was not convicted of anything so therefore his speech is slander and defamation.

Being accused of something does not automatically make you guilty.

He should know better.

Amir   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Rep. King should realize that Michael Jackson was ACQUITTED on all charges of sexual molestation. Michael hasn't even been buried yet and this negative law maker already has his big mouth open.

Angela   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I found his behavior troubling. But I also found his artistry and entertaining style worthy of praise. I CHOSE to focus on his art, his music, his entertaining. The rest I leave in God's hands to judge.

DA   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Typical republican. It doesn't matter what you can prove only what you can make into an issue. They do it anytime they want to distract he American Public. No one ever proved that MJ was a pedophile but since he was accused it is OK for Republicans to make an issue of it.

Chris   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Who made Rep. King judge & jury? (Who is this guy anyway?). I think Michael was the victim of an overbearing father who never felt comfortable in his own skin. But his love for animals says something about his inner being. I can't know for sure but I think the child molestation stuff was manufactured by opportunist parents (now $25,000,000 richer).

brian   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

i think that representitive has issues was Micheal Jackson found guitly on those charges no so why is he blubberring his mouth off he should concentrate on his politics coz he is doing a terrible job in New York !!

Liam   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I think it is absolutely insane that this politician is making comments like these about a man like Michael Jackson. Everything that this man was saying were allegations against Jackson, nothing was ever proven. Michael Jackson was a tremendous artist, one of the best that will ever have lived, an icon. I don't feel as though these comments should even be publicized during this time of celebration for MJ's life.

M Burns   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

OMG are You serious Rep King....

Augustus Balasubramaniam   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Rick...my parents raised me never to speak ill of the dead...no matter what you think of them....i guess this congressman's parents just didn't o a good job...just goes to show...you can take the trash out of the trailer but you can't take the trailer out of the trash

Nita   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I truly thing Rep. King needed some attention. If he really felt this way why give more attention to the story? What is his reasoning for comming out talking about Michael Jackson? Why is he not doing some work of his own or do he have work? I would like to know if he has ever done ANYHING wrong and found guilty for it . I would like to look under his rug.

Lynn   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Americans are too nice to the deceased. I agree that way to many accolades are being given to Jackson.

Bill   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Too many people in this country are swayed by some sports figure, entertainer, or politician that steps out of bounds!
If this was you or me we were talking about...............we would have been chastised.

Fame & fortune do not buy taste or quality!

Elle Ondre   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I totally agree. So what Jackson was a star! He was just a man with alot of issues! The largest issue is Jackson being a pedophile. A sexual predator. Those mourning and crying wouldn't be doing so if it was their child who he violated!

K. Bolton   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Pediphil or not....way too much coverage.

michelle minick   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Tell that ignorant Republican to take a hike. We are celebrating Michael Jackson life, as an artist, a muscian, and an extrodinary man. The media has not taken the issue of the personal troubles he had as a definitive lead on his untimely death. Tell that a- to go work oin important things. RIP Michael, your talent and music will live on forever. On the other note, I think Katherine should not have the kids or be executor. She is just too elderly.

Mary Gean   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

No I do not agree with him. He is an ignorant Congressman, Seems like we have more and more of them lately. M.J. was not a child molester HE did in fact care about humanity and how we treat each other. If the people running our Country had just an ounce of HUMANITY as M.J. Did the world would be in better shape!! RIP M.J.

Sherita   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I have to say that I am shock and left without words that at the time of someone's death who had done so much to change the world and culture that there are still people out there who have so much hatred that they will "step" on someone's grave when they die. I hope he is able to sleep at night because my conscious wouldn't let me.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

The Representative is a disgrace to this country. Where is his morals? Whatever ones opinions may be about someone they should be kept to themselves. The King of Pop is not even buried yet and here this man representing America is publicly making allegations which have been proven false.

Maribel   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

If allegations were true, MJ would have been serving many years in prison, those are very very serious allegations. I think it was all about money and the accusers got what they wanted.

mike   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Perhaps Mr.King should take a lesson in respecting the dead. Enjoying the life of one of the greatest, if not the greatest entertainer the world has known, should be the concentration here.

sam   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

This man did have a great career and affected lots of people with his music, But what people are forgetting was that he was an accused pedophile more than once and that he paid off the families to keep quiet. I agree that all this hype should stop. If he wasn't famous he would have been another child molester that died in prison at age 50. He was a sick man for the things he did and that is what people should be remembering also.

suzy coyle   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Michael Jackson was never proven to have been a child molester. His last trial made his accusers look like a joke. He was a pure, clean innocent man who loved and adored children. He did not have a sick mind. America does. He went out of his way to help. He was a good man. He will be rewarded in heaven. We have lost someone wonderful. He gave the world so much.
R.I.P MJ
You were loved, appreciated and respected by many

Brian H.   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I'm going to be honest – I don't think he was a pedophile, however the media's hypocritical coverage is disappointing. These were the same blood hungry sharks who eagerly covered as neveraland got raided and imo really stacked the deck against Jackson. He was a legend and the media should be ashamed of their treatment.

Rosa   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I absoulutly agree...we are celebrating a man that has been on drugs for many years, who has been accused of molestation more than once. He has not been a good proformer in many years. This is getting way to much coverage, there are more important things we can focus on. Eather way I feel that being that there are children involved we need to give the children and family time to heal, too much coverage just don't help that! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!

JP   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I guess this congressman should keep his opinion for himself.Give Michael the respect that he deserves and have some respect for his family.

Courtney Anne   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Hi Rick,

Republican Peter King is a disgrace to our country, it is sad that Michael Jackson is not here to defend himself. This is why I can't stand the Republican party, because a lot of its members love to tear people down, especially celebrities. Remember, Barack Obama and the suggestion he might be a terrorist. Rest In Piece MJ, you are loved.

Sabal   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Does Mr. King understand the meaning of slander? All his allegations against Michael Jackson were never proven, and as a statesman, he should no better...

Susan   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Your poll question was difficult to answer regarding Michael Jackson...you should have asked if people thought he was guilty, not if his artistry outshone any allegations of impropriety. No one would agree with that, but people would have an opinion of whether or not he was guilty. He was never found guilty of anything.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

If he was not guilty, why did he pay $10 million to one family? with his money he could have fought it till the end.

sandeep kalirah   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I am Canadian, but I understand that the United States is not much different than the laws and values of Canada.

Both of these countires are democracies. Michael Jackson was tried under a United States Jury, and was found to be not-guilty of all charges. Therefore, for someone in such high prestige as Congressman King, should not be name calling in such a hateful manner. It is discrimination, and it does not have a place in a democratic government.

Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and Michael Jackson, who is no longer here to defend himself, was, under a court of law, found to be not guilty. Michael Jackson's legacy should never be subjected to such name calling, especially by someone who represents the nation and has a voice to reach millions of people across the globe.

Tim Louque (pronounced Luke)   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

This man could have made his point WITHOUT calling Michael Jackson names and he could have expressed his opinion with this deplorable grand standing for attention.

NO ONE who has the common sense of a horse would side with this guy.

THIS is the tip of the Rush Limbaugh iceberg of what is wrong with the mentality of the republican party ... all scare tactics, holier than thou attitude and complete lack of compassion for people ... even when they are dead.

John in La.   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I think that this is one of those times that proves no matter who you are, if you are black in America, being proven innocent by a court of law means nothing....

Beverly   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Who is this polititian talking about Michael Jackson. He is in poor taste and has no faith in the judicial system that proved him innocent.
Please, show some respect.

Mark Haury   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

All I hear is that Jackson was never convicted of child molestation charges. That's not the same as being innocent. Personally, I believe that where there is that much smoke, there is a fire somewhere. And when it comes to crimes against children, I will err on the side of children EVERY time.
Side note: There is too much coverage of this. I actually watched a 30 minute show on CNN yesterday with the subject being,"Is there too much coverage of Michael Jackson" Get back to news CNN! Enough is enough.

Alex   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Giving Micheal as much coverage as he has been getting is beyond obsurd our soldier over in Iraq putting thier lives on the line and the many that have died dont even get 2 minutes of coverage 90% of the time but just because Micheal lead a freak show of a life he gets days upon days. I'm not going to make anymore comments about this topic as someones family member has died and my remorse goes out to them. But enough is enough.

Paula   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Not only did he have questionable relationships with children, he also abused drugs, which probably hastened his death. He is not someone I want my boys to idolize, no matter how much talent he had. When are we going to get it right and encourage our kids to have heros that deserve such status?

ALBERT E.   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

What happens to innocent until found guilty. The last time I checked MJJ was not convicted of any crime. I hope our learned congressman is aware of this.

Mike   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rick;

These politicians should keep their mouth shut and let the family grieve. His personal opinion stating MJ was a molester and a pervert is nonsense and was found Not Guilty in both trials. The family should go after the Senator for slander and deflamation. Politicians always seem to be putting their nose in business where it don't belong. I dont think he ever molested anyone I think it was about money and those triasls were long over let it rest!

Delia   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

The congressman is an idiot..correct me if I am wrong..but was MIchael Jackson found guilty? Last I checked he was not..if he was I assume he would have been in Jail. No one cares about what the congressman feel...his feelings are totoally irrelevant..he is surely entitled to feel what ever he feels but show some respect..the man is dead..the family should sue for defamation of character...MICHAEL JACKSON WAS NEVER FOUND GUILTY CONGRESSMAN..PROVE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING...GO DO THE PEOPLES WORK..

Ada   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Peter King probably represents some Americans yes. The Americans who are quick to cut people down after building them up, who never want to see a person of color progress and be the best at their craft, and be successful. Michael Jackson is NOT a child molester, but of course, he was quite different from most people. But being weird is not a crime. Living in a bubble since you were 6, not being able to lead a normal life, and thinking as a grown man that it is okay to invite children to stay with you because you're trapped in that 6 year old's mind was his problem. He paid dearly for it with the false accusations, his reputation, his money, etc. He was GREAT entertainer, and we love him for that. Peter King can go to hell if he wants.

Shawna   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Whatever happened to innocent till proven guilty. He was found not guilty on I thnk it was 9 accounts. And according to America's judical system, HE IS INNOCENT. They were allegations and they could not prove that Michael was a pedophile. I hope that if Congress King is ever accused of anything, I hope the would see him as guilty, and even if proven innocent, we will still hold him as GUILTY and rub it in his face even after he dies.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

The last child that sued Michael Jackson stated his father made him do and that Michael didn't touch him. Where is the news now. Why isn't this information being reported. Could it be Michael couldn't sleep and the reason for that is that he was falsely accused...

Eleanor Parrish Wiltshire   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rep King needs to respect Michaels Family he had 3 children. He also demonstrates why Republicans are now in the toilet. Out of touch insensitve, sleazy politicians.

Paula   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of any crime. I thought in the United States you had to be found GUILTY in a trial before being labeled a crimminal for any offense!
Apparently not by Republicans...?

Phyllis Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

M. Jackson was a sick individual, and all this coverage making him into a saint just turns my stomach, and I am sick of hearing about him.

brianna   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

he was found innocent!!! you have no proof that he did this.. he didnt even know him!! he has no right to call michael jackson a pedophile especially when michael jackson has just passed away. Peter King should shut his mouth and keep his thoughts to his self

Dennis   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Would you not honor Elton John, just because of his questionable past. Which isn't in question at all. Let him die in peace.

Daniel J. Scheidt   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

First thing I said when the news of Michael Jackson's death became public "the children are safer today now hat he's dead." However, his artistry and his alleged behavior must be seperated in order to honor his legacy.

Mike   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rick,
Although MJ was an amazing artist, you have to allow thought of the charges and settlements that have been made against him. O.j was not convicted but many still think he did it. Enough on him and more on our troops.

Mykal   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

The congress man should be sued by the family who represent Jackson ,that is why the country is like that When we have dumb ass politician who does not take time to read and understand before making a statement .If he had read both court document he would not have made that comment

Cynobia   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I find it quite interesting that Mr. King has something to say about Michael when it is time to work on universal health insurance. Yea take the heat off the fact that you are not doing your job and following the will of the the American people. Michael was never convicted and is dead and can not defend himself, shame of you for not wanting to work for the American people Mr. king.

Donna fr. Canada   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Only in America can you be acquitted twice of a crime and still be found guilty by a Republican! Rep King, let's be frank, if this were Elvis Presley, your comments would be totally different! Not only do you expose you tonsils when you speak, but you also expose your ignorance!

Bob D   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rick, someone should ask Pete King if he's ever been to America. Because in this country, we have something called the "presumption of innocence". It's one of our most cherished legal principles. Jerry Lee Lewis was a pedophile. Michael Jackson has never been convicted of anything.

And yes, Michael Jackson is getting WAY too much coverage. But it has nothing to do with his personal life.

D Denton   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I totally agree with Mr. King...MJ was a pedophile/child molester/freak. CNN has went way over board on the coverage of another celebrity that died from a drug over dose.

John johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I totally agree with the congressman. Jackson WAS a great entertainer but turned into a pervert & child molester. If not for his fame & fortune he would have been locked up. & should have been anyway.

preston   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

i believe that jackson does deserve his proper credit for being the king of pop but i also agree that there is no need for a 2 month coverage and all of these special reports on his life just because he has passed away. i also believe he was a pedophile. as the comedian katt williams said : "what would a child molester need at his house to attract little children, i dont know maybe a theme park, carousel, a place named Neverland!". it makes sense to me

Daniel   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

This is a horrific allegation. I don't know why reporters just work hard on bringing people down. Michael was a great and loving person who loved kids. Because he allowed kids sleep in his bed doesn't mean he molested these kids . Michael worked hard to give kids the child hood he never had. This is Bull***t

Jasmine Skunk   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think this is the biggest mistake people make reguarding things heard in the media. There are several things that are bothering me. The first one is how the media keeps comparing him Elvis Presley. Michael Jackson touched BILLIONS of lives. He was known all over the world. His fame would be better compared to Jesus than Elvis. Or Ghandi... or Buddah. Michael always had a message of love. He tried to tell people to love eachother. This message was twisted later on to seem like it was some kind of perversion.
Which brings me to the second thing that is bothering me. Michael Jackson was never found guilty of anything . As a matter of fact he was found NOT GUILTY in a court proceeding that took over a week to deliberate. The jury didn't rush to their decision. They did, however find him innocent of all charges. We are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty in this country, but Michael Jackson was crucified before anything was heard in court of law. So why is this guy talking about the controversy as if it were a fact?
He should not judge someone he has never met and can only base his opinion on rumors passed throught the media.

Betty Scully   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I'm a Democrat and I totally agree with Congressman King. Irrespective of MJ's personal life, it is unseemly to be so over the top with respect to any entertainer's death...unless, of course, ones network is trying to attract a new and upcoming viewing audience...but what values are being supported thereby? Come on, lets get real....

awad   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

i think this guy is saying all this for some publicity. maybe this guy peter king needs make like mj and beat it....

D THOMSPON   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

AS A MAN EMPLOYED BY OUR GREAT COUNTRY, I BELIEVE IT IS VERY IRONIC THAT THIS MAN ,KING, DOES NOT BELIEVE IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. DID HE FORGET THAT JACKSON WAS ACQUITTED?

Quentin   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think we should celebrate his greatness and those that think the lesser of him, will have to waite to chim in on the matter. Last I heard, this country says that if you are found inocent, then you are just that, inocent. We need to think about the children in all of this, seeing that they can read & hear all the negative people are saying about their dad. We need to respect them first........

karen Stanley   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

He was a great artist, as many who have died before him. He had a questionable past, and we are overdoing it. Lets focus more on poverty and hunger in this country. Lets have more rallys in that direction.

jennifer ramos   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

THIS GUY (KING) IS A DISGUSTING PERSON. How can you make such allegations when MJ was found innocent in a court of law. DO YOU REALIZE everyone who knew MJ always says good things about him...???
The family that accused Michael took $$$$, because that is what they wanted. That family had a history of extortion as well....I would never take $$$ from anyone if they abused my child, i would want them in jail.

It's sickening, that this KING guy has to go and say that, he needs to keep his fat mouth shut. MJ was a huge part of American CULTURE and has done more for people, charities and children then that ignorant KING will ever do. Did you see how he addressed him? He said 'THIS INDIVIDUAL" – Are you kidding me??? SHOW SOME RESPECT King.

Darryl Richardson   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Michael Jackson is the "KING OF POP" he has never been found guilty og sexual crimes, Please leave him alone. Rep KIng needs to worry about being caught up in some republican sex scanal. Leave Michael Jackson alone.

Paul Anderer   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Although MJ was a great artist, with great probability he was also a pedophile. It is very sad that this very serious part of MJ's life is being IGNORED. It is also being rationalized by many, including high profile names, saying that he was tried and found innocent. Money buys freedoms.

What would have happened if MJ would have been found guilty of child molestation? Maybe he would have had to receive court ordered treatment on all the issues he was experiencing, including substance abuse.

Brian   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

please go back and see how much money he paid people! do you pay millions when your innocent? wake up!

Siggi   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

michael jackson was the best performer of our times. it was never proven that he molested anyone.
and who is that Representtavtive anyways?

Monique NYC   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Wow so now you are guilty even if you are found innocent??? Rick this guy should be sued for slander if anyone should be given limited airtime it should be Mis-Rep King. . A real class act NOT!!!

Em Vaughn   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I believe ythat one should keep his thought to himself. The Man is dead. What will pep[le say about you when you die.
The man had a God given talent that he gave to the world. Name calling is just not right.

nikki   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

they only got rich because he paid them all off to keep them quiet what grown man "sleeps" in bed with little boys? Jackson made me sick. and quite frankly im sick of hearing about him. great people die everyday and youll never hear about them!

Melinda Jones   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Hey Rick! I think that the coverage has been too much. I think that Michael Jackson deserves tributes and that kind of coverage but I don't like it taking place of other important news for as long as it has. And the news has become more about his drug abuse and claims that no one knows for sure anyway, so, it's like slander. And Rep Peter King should have an opinion about too much coverage but he doesn't have the right to slander anyone's name with his opinions and especially when someone has died, for the respect of his family. Thanks.

Webb   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

The issue is a slamming comment on the media covering the death of Michael Jackson. Last week Congress passed the largest tax increase in US history and all that was on the news was that Michael Jackson died. Now Congress is looking to change medical coverage that could cause our grandchildren to suffer but all we hear is that Michael Jackson's will is in dispute. Why can the news outlets not cover items that will affect our lives and but grandize the lives of celebrities that do not experience life as we do.

Ryan   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I am completely disgusted with how ignorant people like this can be. Especially someone who is supposed to be a leader?
This close minded individual (who obviously can't respect music or can't understand the beauty of it) is upset about something else in his life and enjoys taking out his frustration on other people. Mainly due to the fact that he knows he will be remembered for nothing when he dies and is jealous that Michael Jackson is remembered for so much, including all the boundaries he broke and innovations he brought to the entire entertainment industry. Should I even ask if he ever met MJ? I'm sure the answer would be no. Stop judging other people and start judging yourself and weather or not you're doing your job at being a so called "representative".

cher   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

let's investigate Mr. King! he probably has skeleton's in his closet. Michael Jackson was aquitted of all charges.

we celbrate Elvis and he was for sure a pedophile and a statutory rapist, drug addict, but that doesn't stop the people from celebrating his greatness. Peter King get a grip!!

Jonathan Evans   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think as a politician, he is completely out of place. He is commenting on the most influential man in the history of entertainment. There has never been a bigger star, ever to grace the stage or to pass. The Congressmens comments are completely ridiculous and unterly unjust. The "allegations" were never proven. He was NEVER convicted of anything. We need to remember the man in his good, for what he has done for the entertainment society, and for the world as a humanitarian, not for the un-proven allegations made. I agree with Rev. Al SHarpton, we owe it to Michael to remember him for what he has done, not for the ugly things that were said. Shame on you congressman, if you were from my state, i'd start a campaign against you to ensure this as your last term!!!

Pat   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

The coverage has been and continues to be too much. It has nothing to do with any human faults he may or may not have had. He was a wonderful talent and I love his music. His death is sad for his family, friends and fans, but enough is enough and I have had more than enough. I understand entertainment networks milking this, but not legitimate news networks. A couple of days would have been the most of plenty.

Linda Chavez   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think it is disgraceful, and just a plain sick individual who can't keep his remarks to himself, after a person any person has died!

I think that anybody who doesn't think that all of the publicity Michael Jackson received, even the negative was because of money. These human creatures were too spineless to make money on their own, and leached off Michael Jackson.

He had a great heart and all of these weird antics were for his fans and it cost him his life. We should celebrate his music and his talent.

Kesha   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

You would think that a congressman has better things to deal with. It is not effecting his state or his financial disposition. I was abused as a child myself by several people, but even I say give it a rest. You have to way the good and bad together. Regardless of his past MJ did do a lot for the good of people around the world. Also, remember that those who were abused as children have a higher rate of having problems as an adult. Let those who are mourning mourn. Now is not the time. He isn't even buried yet.

Melissa   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rick,
What happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty.

erick windsor   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Hi Rick! I'm a big fan of Michael Jackson's music, and I fully acknowledge the impact he's had on the whole music industry and millions of people's lives. I however do not agree on his fondness for little boys when he was alive. I apppluad the congressman for going against flow of the tide and voicing his opinion on Michael. It's not easy these days to say what's on your mind and not get lambasted right away just because you're not on the bandwagon, or because it's not politically correct". I cant even begin to tell you how disgusted i was when he walked out a free man in his last trial. IIt just goes to show how money, fame and a broken justice system can afford you freedom... Nobody calls you a child molester for at least a decade if there's no truth behind it... Wanna bet if it was some regular joe schmoe, it would have landed him in jail before you can even say time out? Thanks for reporting it as you calll it Rick.. I really appreciate your enthusiasm and honesty!

Giovanni   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I think that we just wont know for sure whether he was a child molester or not. People can and will lie for money and with fame and money can and will find a way out of the arm of the law. I say give the men a tribu help the economy and move on..!!

Alex in Miami   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ was acquitted. This congressman should educate himself before blabbing on National stage. Maybe because he is over 60 years old, he does not know what MJ contributed to the music industry and our history.

Terrence J. Allen   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

At the moment of someone's death it is not the time or place to be disrespectful, and Representative King at the very least is guilty of crossing the line of polite society levels of decency. What ever Michael Jackson may have been guilty of, now is not the time to rehash it. And in doing so I believe Rep. King is sadly simply being a Media Whore- something so prevelent now in our culture.

noreen salter   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I think that congressman should be leaving his job. Go figure a republican not believing in the american justice system. Michael Jackson was found not guilty and this man is still accusing an innocent man. People are thinking of soldiers but if the republicans didn't start the war in iraq many he wouldn't be compairing . He only wants to look at negative things. I feel bad for that poor state where he is.
Noreen

Danny   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

yes I agree with the congressmen, no doub, michael jackson was not only a pedifile, but also a junkee and who know what else, In my opinion, michael was a sick man from his youth, only heaven knows why, lets not forget all of the plastic surgeries, to praise michael is to be hippocritical, If it wasn't for his money, he be locked up along time ago, in a mental institution !!

MollyBeBe   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ was immensely musically talented and a sick pervert. I am only a few months older than he was yet I forgot he existed after he started messing with little boys. The coverage is way over the top. Stop it.

Kathylee   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

My experience is when someone like Rep. King comes out so strongly on something like he has experienced abuse himself. I would tell him do get help and confront who hurt you dont take it out on someone else.
I am with Whoopie Goldberg on this. Micheal may bave been odd but he would never hurt a child. What this world put him thru was an abuse in itself. There is not enough converstion about all the good he did as in for Aids.
King should go do his job and this isnt it.

paulus   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

hi,rick
I think they should bury him and forget about him. It's starting to piss me of that each and every time I turn on CNN his face is plastered over my tv screen. PS I agree with the congressman.

Recon Sergeant   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

One would hope that an elected official in the federal government would have the good sense not to make comments about allegations which Michael was never convicted of in a court of law. Michael was an eccentric individual as are many super celebrities who cannot escape the lime light, however, he was never convicted nor plead guilty to any of the charges against him. To speak of him as if he were found guilty in a court of law, simply because that is the verdict Representitive King came to in his own mind, is highly inappropriate.

sfmitch   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Michael gave time and money to help disadvantaged children. He visited hospitals, wrote "We Are the World", funded burn units and much much more. How can anyone say "there is nothing good about this person"? Mr. King is just looking for publicity and he's getting it. He's is just basking in some of Michael's light.

louis wesler   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Besides the fact the Congressperson has obivously not read the news, from several years ago, of Micheal Jackson's aquital on the very items he has charged Michael with, it is just one more example of the hate mongering from the Republican Party.

Joseph Eid   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Let Michael Jackson rest in peace!! They did not find him guilty and no one has proof that he ever did those nasty things people accused him of. There is plenty of proof, however, that he was an inspiring international musician and inspiration . . . for that, he should be honored.

Robyn Nikoll   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

This guy sounds like an idiot. A racist individual who cannot stand to see this man, a black man, so exhaulted honored and loved by millions all over the world. What has he contributed to the world in comparison with Michael Jackson? Hot air and bad breath!

donnie osmond   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

lets move on, at least our children are safe !!!!!!!!!

Lawrence   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rick, are you kidding me? For you to even provoke the question "does people across america feel the same sentiments about Michael as this crazy congressman" is totally out of line. It is you and the media who will continute instill this mean sprirted BS and make it acceptable. Everyone has a pass and I'm sure we can find dirt on you. When you die do you want your kids to hear about all the negative, and not that you did not even close to the good works Michael did?

B. Alvarez   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ's artistry is known worldwide. His mucical accomplishments are amazing. However, just because someone is rich and famous and talented, doesn't mean that his pedophile allegations, and improprieties should be forgotten. MJ is dead, and I was wondering if there are any ongoing investigations, and if so, will they be terminated due to his death?

George Subacs   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Typifies the view of this generation.... Celebrity tops all... Abuse all the little boys you want. This nation is more concerned with your moonwalk.

james   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

i completely agree with the represtitives comments. michael jackson at one time was an inpiration and a muscician, what he became is both a tragedy and should have been a crime. that man was a sick perveted pedophile who should of been taken out behind the woodshed and shot. i cannot beleive all the outpooring of support for that wackjob. whats really funny is shen you look at all the crackheads you see on the street supporting him, there the same idiots that were at his trials. funny how you dont see the "normal" Americans out there. probably because we all have jobs to and our regular lives to deal with. if michael jacksons death affects you that much you need to get counseling because you are crazy.

Zeke   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Who is this guy? I watch CNN religiously and have never heard of him before. I think he is just some back-bencher looking to make a name for himself. MJ was an icon of our time, and has NEVER been convicted of sexual assault. A civil case was settled out of court WITHOUT any admission of guilt. We will never know the truth because the"victims" would have to admit they lied, and then be open to prosecution themselves. Granted the coverage has been a bit over the top, but what else can you expect in this day and age of our celebrity obsessed society?

Vickie Purvis   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

It's not about Michael's legal/moral issues...
MJ's death has been given an ENORMOUS amount of coverage on CNN for a pop star!
Surely other things are happening in the world(?)

Susan   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I like Peter King, but he is totally out of line here...slanderous.

Kelly   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rick we need to end all the coverage of Micheal Jackson. Go back to the real news. People are being killed all over the world for the wrong reasons....... stop with the MJ news

carolyn   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Like many of these right wing Republicans who ride the moral high horse to death, Mr. King probably has his own scandalous secrets. I hope the public makes no excuses for him when he is exposed. It's curious that the term "innocent until proven guilty" only applies to "them." What about the parents who willingly sent their children to spend nights in Neverland. Either they thought he was innocent or they saw the dollar signs in potential accusations.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

YES! I agree 100% WITH REP. KING THE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE FOR THIS MAN IS OBSCENE. PUTTING THIS MAN OVER FOR ALL THE GOOD HE SUPPOSEDLY DID AND OVERLOOKING THE BAD IS A MISTAKE HE WAS A DRUG ADDICT AND A PEDOPHILE I DON'T CARE WHAT SONGS HE SANG OR WHAT CHARITIES HE SUPPORTED IT IS NOT WRONG TO SPEAK "ILL" ORF THE DEAD WHEN IT IS THE TRUTH AND INNOCENT PEOPLE DO NOT SCRATCH OUT 20 MILLION DOLLAR CHECKS TO MAKE "THINGS" GO AWAY THE FIGHT FOR THEIR INNOCENCE UNTIL THE END AND HE NEVER DID.HES IS DEAD ITS DONE AND OVER LET IT GO THERE IS TO MUCH REAL NEWS OUT THERE.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Yes Wacko Jacko is and was a pedophile and drug abuser. . In our society, we want to deify persons that die early. His fortune (which he squandered) was spent buying the silence of his victims. If Michael Jackson was white (although he tried to be), he would not be getting this sort of attention. Now we are being asked to forget his pedophilia and celebrate his bubblegum music.

KATY   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The media may, at times, go overboard, but that is with any story. I wonder how Mr. King was transformed into a fly on the wall of Mr. Jackson's bedroom and can make such factual statements out of mere opinion. "If you want to blame the media, Mr. King, so be it, but leave the dead alone and let us celebrate the constant of Michael Jackson which is a talent that changed the direction of pop music."

Jason Q   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The media has covered him too much. Not because he was a pervert (I'm not really convinced he was), but because he was just a singer. The world is dealing with stolen elections, corrupt politicians, rapidly changing policies, and, oh wait–nuclear weapons. But all we hear about right now is what some celebrity wrote in his last will and testament years ago. It's none of our business, and frankly, it doesn't matter to us.

dick   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The rich and powerful republicans believe in Rule of Law when it suits them but if they don't like you watch out...Jackson still a pervert, Iraq, pre-emtive war OK!

Ray   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I hope they make a statue of Peter King. It'll make a perfect target for the pigeons.

Grady Jones   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

In this matter the courts voice should outweigh that of Rep King. He should apoligize to the family for slanderizing the deceased. We should all learn when to keep our mouths shut!

Ron   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

This congressman is a right wing Republican, I would expect no less of him.

Nashone Holloway   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Jackson was a great artist and philanthropist, regardless of what he did when no one was looking. He should be honored. Of course, he had issues! Fact is, we are all flawed. We cannot point fingers until we clean up our act first. He understood the healing power of music, and he only tried to help. P.S.- I'm more than positive that this coverage has FAR more to do with the media earning money, than it does Michael himself. Let it go. Anytime you can sell one ticket for ten-thousand dollars on eBay, you're going to want to take it worldwide. Peace.

Jane O'Neil   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ was an enormously talented individual. But no amount of talent can 'outshine' being a pedophile. Does that mean that if you are charged with child molestation, your talents are taken into consideration? When OJ dies, will he be celebrated as a great football player, and his crimes ignored? MJ was a very twisted individual, and I wish his family could have buried him quietly and privately.

Karen A. Richards   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Michael Jackson was never convicted of pedophilia Rep. King. Worry about something pertinent to your job as a congressman. How about term limits, your term?

Sarah   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The congressman needs to shut up because Michael Jackson was aquitted in a court of law. He may find himself sued for slander and out of a job at election time.

katrina carter   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

how do you know if he was a pervert. you wasn't even there.the man is dead ,give him some respect. you wouldn't want anyone to say anything about you or your family members. now ,what skeletons do you have in your closet.

Carole McDonnell   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Most Americans I know - black or white– will be watching the funeral. Celebrities become part of our lives and bring us together, especially when most cable news shows are about politics which is so polarizing. As for Michael Jackson being a pedophile, we Americans have got to learn to accept the rule of law. Ever since OJ we've developed the habit of assuming people are guilty even when the law acquits them. If the law acquits a person, whether the law was right or wrong in that acquittal, we should not be judging someone as guilty. I suspect the folks in the US who have issues with MJ's coverage are people who consider themselves sane, righteous, and normal. However, the United States is full of not so perfect folks, folks with eccentricities, folks who are not highly polished. Folks like me. And for us, there is something more real about Michael;s nuttiness than the perfection of TV anchormen and the self-righteousness of politicians.

Eddie Cintron   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Let America understand that once a person is aquitted there is no reason to continue to judge and persecute this individual. There was a settlement but that was because Michael could not continue the the mental pressure he had to endure and he just wanted it to end. He looked to the hungry children in Africa, the ones with cancer and disabillities. The billionaires in America are not doing this he weas a voice for the ones that could not speak out.

Lis   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

We live in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty, Rep King can convict Michael, he owes the family and Michael's children an apology. Jerk!

Lopaca   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rep King is entitled to his opinion but I would think that a government official would respect in the justice system. MJ was found innocent of the charges and should not be branded with a particular crime that he was acquitted of.

kaye   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I don't necessarily agree with King's comments, but i do think you have gone overboard with your coverage of his death. Enough already!! He was not a president and you have covered his death much as you did President Reagan or President Kennedy and this should not be so!! He is not in the same class as they.

Sandra   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I do not believe that Michael molested any of those children. He was simply an adult, who was deprived of his children by his father. So he was innocently attempting to recapture his missed childhood by having sleep overs / slumber parties with the young boys. However, he was very naive to not understand that this action was inappropriate and because of his wealth this would make him a prime target for the children's greedy, opportunistic parents seeking to gain money by distorting the situation.

Cassandra   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I wonder how this man would feel if he were acquitted in a court of law but his life's accomplishments were negated by the accusations alone. I suspect his tune would quickly change.

Britney H   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I absolutely agree 110% that there has been a ridiculously excessive amount of coverage over Michael's death. The fact of the matter is that he was an entertainer- not a god. People die. Why are we focusing so much on this one person's death when there are so many other issues this country is facing now?

Trey   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found Not Guilty in a court of Law in the United States of America on 14 Counts of child molestation. As for the 1st trial the little kid was actually giving a hypnotic like substance before he even made allegations against MJ. To prove that MJ was a phedi, you would have to explain that famous taped convo between Evan Chandler and the other guy saying no way I loose, I will get everything that I want, and his career will be over he won't sell another record. What about the kid? Thats not important. What about that tape. And why was Jordan giving that hypnotic drug just to have a tooth pulled. Why did they settle for money instead of see to it that MJ was taken to jail, if he was a phedo. Also if he was a phedi, then why was it a 10 year gap. Explain to me why there is no evidence. King should get a life.

kirk   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

We celebrate Jackson's talent, not his personal life, which will be disputed forever.
Just like we celebrate all rock stars, and we "forgive" them for being addicts and alcoholics in their earlier lives.
Being celebrated too much in the news could be valid point, bit stop celebrating his music career because of mishaps in his life (which are not even verified) is wrong.
thanks!

Marcus P   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

The family and the fans haven't even been able to bury Michael Jackson yet. Why even make such of a comment during a time like this?

Chauncey Snyder   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Typical Republican hatred but I noticed that Mr. King did not react in outrage about Mark Folley and all the other Republican perverts. What's his point? MJ cannot defend himself now due to his death. Is this anything less racism?

Don Kleder   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

The guy was mental... listen to any of his interviews... And all of you that support him, let your children go to bed with him. Stop the coverage.

jean of ohio   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

too bad for mr. king .jackson getting more attn than the crooked
ones in our goverment.,trying to run the nation. is it alot of coverage yes. but michael entertained us not robbing us like many,in power.
further more who is he to judge michael.
god will be the real judge of us all. I'D sure hate to see our elected officials in gods judgment

hotdog   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I believe Michael Jackson was a strange person, but supposable they settled out of court and he was found not guilty. i think the rep. needs to worry more about things that our country is facing instead of worrying about a celebrity and do his job. instead of our time with just an opportunity to get his face on national t.v.

Ivan   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Pervert? Peter King is a member of a political party that has bankrupted this country through greed. They have abandoned and killed hundreds through their neglect in situations like Hurricane Katrina. They are responsible for maiming and killing thousands of innocent people in Iraq. And Peter King is calling Michael Jackson a pervert. Start by looking at "the man in the mirror" Mr. King.

Sheila   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Rick, leave it to the republicans to play god while they are alive.....pretty sure MJ is with his maker who is the only one who should judge him......all we can do is celebrate his extraordinary greatness and the contribution he made to this world while he was on this earth....or just shut up.....bloody republicans..........

shaun   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Representative King just needs to be quiet and let the man rest in peace, he speaks like he was there as a witness at neverland ranch which is clearly not the case. Doesn't he have more important things to do, like i don't know help fix the economy?

Jon Youngblood - Portland, Or   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

For a lawmaker Mr. King does not seem to respect the judgments of the court which found MJ not guilty. It shows the arrogance of Republicans in Office with spectacular clarity.

kelvin mays   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

its awful for a elected officialto open up his racist mouth and let everyone know how much of a racist he really is. The republican party and their members try to display how moral they are but everyday one of them gets caught cheating on their wife or in a bathroom touching someones feet. We are not worried about Micheal Jackson hes dead. We are wondering which republican will be next to cheat on his wife.

mary   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Hey Rick,

It's about time someone said the dam truth. He is being called a hero

from where. Hero are the soldiers who are defending us in Irag and

Afganistan.

Sincerely,
Mary Bustos

Stan   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Where is the innocent before proved innocent, or even the innocent after being found inocent? Forgive me but wasn't Michael jackson found innocent?

Pat   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I agree with Rep. Peter King! I can't believe this major hoopla over Michael Jackson that has been going on! He admitted to sleeping with young children in his own bed. What more do you want?!? He was a pedophile, yes. He paid millions of dollars to settle accusations. I'm sick of the so-called honors being bestowed upon this pervert!

Sharlisa   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

First, I don't like how the voting question is asked. Michael Jackson was never convicted of child abuse. MJ is an important figure for all Americans. His music inspired people in ways that is unmeasurable. My heart goes out to the Jackson family especially his children. And the reason why MJ is receiving so much coverage is because people truly cares about him and his family.

Kay   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Maybe he is just jealous of Michael's status. Let the man rest. If he did do it, he has a higher power to answer to. Who are we to judge??

not a jackson fan   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

The unrelenting coverage of this is getting on everyone's nerves. Hopefully Wednesday media reporting will get back to normal.

Acquitted or not there was still a $20 million dollar payoff in his first accusations in 1993.

I was never a fan of his music or his lifestyle.

Gerald   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I'm sure that if you look into the background of Mr. King, you will find that like many of his republican peers, he is just another demented questionable character trying to impress his constituency at the expanse of someone else, in this case Mr. Jackson. I'm waiting for the day when he will be exposed.

Michael   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a visionary artist. He was also a deeply disturbed and damaged individual. Look at the coverage of his death, and you can see why he was so damaged. We, the fans, did this to him. I think it was that damage that caused him to molest children. It's no excuse, but I think that is what happened.

Britney H   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

OJ Simpson was acquitted too.

Eleni Constantine   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I understand it was the July 4th weekend and it's a time to celebrate the mourn the soldiers who have died for our rights as US citizens, it would serve congressman King better to say that instead of bashing Michael Jackson. Michael was not just a pop icon, legend but he was a humanitarian who gave selfishly to so many organizations. In a country that we say not guilty until proven innocent Congressman King is making some very nasty claims. He should be embarrassed of his attitude and comments. RIP Michael Jackson you will always live on with your music, dance, videos and philanthropy.

Cher   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

OMG! Stop this coverage! I am so sick of hearing about this has been pedophile.

Robert   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick, Congressman King has no class and no respect. Michael Jackson may have had some issues in his life but who hasn't? No one can denie what the great things he did for humanity nor his legacy in music. It offends me that a congressman from the state of New York has the nerve to act below his office. MJ isn't even in the ground yet and King is talking junk. Figues...republicans

Debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

let him keep talking ... he makes it better for the Democrats! And they don't need more help right now!!

Judith Howard   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Where he was a "pervert" is beside the point. I'm in no position to prove that one way or the other. There is too much wall-to-wall coverage of his death–period. He was a great dancer/entertainer, he appears to have led a rather sad life, and he died young. Now can you go back to covering more important events with less sensationalism?.

Mother   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick,

I do not agree with Mr. King. MJ was the most amazing and famous performer in the world and that's why we talk about him.

Cedric   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Please Mr. King, you should try to solve the problems that face the American people and not comment on THE KING OF POP. He was not convicted of child molestation during his trial. He was acquitted by the judiciary system. Do not be disrespectful you lawmaker King Maybe Mr. King thinks that the court did a mistake in the Michael Jackson trial. Let him rest in peace, he is the Elvis of our generation, you Mr.King are nobody.

Alex From VA   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick the bottom line is michael was never convicted . This republican senator is just playing the age old political game of headline hunting. I bet you this guy dosen't care at all about michael he just wants to see his name in the news. These politicians need to focus on washington and let people make up thier own minds on how they want to remember MJ.

Lula Canty   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

The congressman needs to get his facts straight. Michael Jackson was not convicted of being a pervert or child molester. If he was not found guilty, he is innocent. His coverage has only been two weeks which is less than the months of coverage for Anna Nicole Smith ( a promiscuous gold digger), and Casey ( an alleged murderer). Why didn't the congressman complain about that?

mark james-robinson   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty of child molestation. the congressman should enlighten himself on what that means.

Dawn   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick,

I agree that the coverage has gotten a little out of hand with Michael Jackson. I know that you as a journalist should cover all angles but there has to be more pressing world news going on. I mean he died almost two weeks ago now and we still have to hear about his will, drug overdosing, and family arguments over his children. We get it! you could have covered his death and left it at that.
As far as the Pedifile and such that is a totally diffrent topic and if he did it or not at this point that's in the past. We should remember him for when he was MJ the "King of Pop" and not for when he went through his own personal trials and tribulations.

Dawn

Mary   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

I am never quick to agree with Republicans but this is seriously out of control. Every day all day on every news station is simply ridiculous for a man who has led a questionable life. If his intentions with children remain in question how can we celebrate his life so endlessly?

CAROL   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

JORDAN CHANDLER ADMITTED THAT HE LIED ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON AND THAT HIS FATHER PUSHED HIM UP TO FABRICATING THE STORY THAT LITERALLY RUINED HIS LIFE.........I ALSO RUSHED TO JUDGEMENT BUT AFTER ALL THIS COVERAGE, I HAS SEEN MICHAEL IN A DIFFERENT LIGHT. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT MICHAEL WAS CAPABLE OF HURTING ANYONE AND HE WAS ALSO FOUND NOT GUILTY. I THINK HE WAS TARGETED AS AN EASY MARK AND PEOPLE TRIED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF HIM. HE SHOULD BE CELEBRATED AS HE WAS A ONCE IN A LIFETIME PHENOMINAL ENTERTAINER

Michael Mitch   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Mr. King needs to stay out of the botox and let those eyebrows come down a few notches.

Dagmar   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Dear Rick,
I am so disappointed and tired of hearing of all the negative reports of Michael Jackson. Let the man rest in Peace!
Fact is:
Michael Jackson was the greatest Entertainer of all times, an Icon to billion of people worldwide.
He was the greatest Humanitarian! I don’t know of anybody who did as much as he did.
And lets not forget the fact, that he legally was acquitted by “the court of law” of all charges.
The media needs to stop talking about this and really start celebrating his legacy as what he was: The greatest Entertainer, an Icon and the greatest Humanitarian.
The medias has the power to stop it! Everyone needs to think about his children for a minute.
Why would you even publish a comment such the one from King, how dare he makes a comment like this. Disgusting!!! How much does a congressman respects the law?!!
I do agree, that the doctor’s who gave him all these drugs (if true), should be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law.
Dagmar -California-

Angela   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

There was a child who could identify a birthmark on his crotch. Come on, he was sick! Would all these fans let their kids spend the night with MIchael? Just curious. Presidents who have died got less coverage. It's getting disgusting. I love CNN, but I'd rather watch FOX then hear another word about that pedophile.

Jakman   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

I don't know if MJ was a pedophile. What I do know is that he was tried in court and found NOT GUILTY. Who does Pete King think he is to now serve as judge and jury to retry the case?

Kasele   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

We have all directly experienced his artistry and we love him for it. Everytime I see his face on screen, it makes me smile. Remember that the allegations are just allegations...I will celebrate what I have known of Michael Jackson.

Pierre Hilaire   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

What bothers me about this is, first, Al Sharpton showing up to totally discredit this event. This is just another photo-op for him. Secondly, Micheal was a phenominal entertainor BUt was sick. He did innapropriate things to young boys. He was warned about it and refused to stop. By speaking of him as they are doing now... we are enabling his behavior.

Great entertainer ...... Not such a great human being.

Omah Awozele   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

The whole world cannot be wrong, the whole world is mourning Micheal Jackson. What more do you need to prove Micheal was a gift to this world. The fact that he was different doesn't make him a pedophile. If he was, it won't be hard to tell.

That crazy republican peter still exhibit rigidity in ideas the very hallmark of the party he represents.

Look all around you to find the truth.

EAC   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Typical Republican I bet you he was a fan of 'Flock of Seagulls' or some other group back in the 80's and still hates MJ even today. Taking that anger out this way though he should be ashamed of himself.

ShannonL52   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

This congressman is a hateful pig and is a disgrace. As a public servant he should understand the concept of innocence until proven guilty which Michael Jackson NEVER WAS. Even if there are people who choose to believe he was guilty that is something one discusses in the privacy of their own home. . .to post a video to youtube is odd and distasteful. He is not even buried yet! Regardless of one's thoughts on Michael Jackson himself, he has a family that is mourning including three young children. Perhaps we should look into the congressman's backyard and make sure it's clean since he wants to gleefully throw stones at a dead man. It was people like this wretch who made Michael Jackson's life so miserable and now he's not content to let him rest in peace. Hateful people like this make me sick.

gina veshecco   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Is he for real. What a dope. I believe Jackson was found innocent by a jury of his peers. maybe he should bone-up on his high-school government and remember he lives in America where we are all entitled to the rights and and standards of decency that he is. Shame on him. he has lost his moral guide.

Danny   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

without a doubt Michael Jackson was a talent that will never be seen again in our lifetime. But that doesn't excuse his alledged inappropriate behavior with children. Let's be realistic, the only reason that it is alledged is because Mr. Jackson paid the victims families off.

Ronald W.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

He was acquitted on all charges, for crying out loud leave it alone People, they just wanted $$$$$. The justice department should in that congresman closet and see what kind of scelitons he have. its shamefull for him to bring attention to him self like that. he must not have nothing better to do. He really wastiing tax payers money doing this..he should be doing the poeple work not talking shit....

Rachel W.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

For the past week, all worldly news events have been put on
hold, so the media can be totally focused on the death of Michael Jackson. North Korea is no longer important. China is no longer important. Iran , Iraq , Israel , Palestine , are no longer important. The economy is no longer important. World hunger, terrorism, global warming, the energy crisis..not important!

When the news of the death of a member of the most dysfunctional
group of people in the United States of America (HOLLYWOOD)
takes precedence over worldly events that will have a lasting effect on the future condition of this planet, something is drastically wrong with our values.

Margery Lewis   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

The over-the-top coverage of Michael Jackson is absurd. Whether you think he was a pedophile or not, he was simply an entertainer not the king of the universe.

I have never seen such a plethora of coverage since perhaps the assassination of JFK. Enough already!

Dan B   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think that King is not all wrong with his comments...While Jackson was considered a great talent the amount of coverage over shadows others who have passed in the last 2 weeks. His life style was at the best strange and besides his music what did he do to better the world?

Maronda R.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I have learned in my life time to pay special attention to people who would put others down. I'm sure if he was investigated, that we all would be surprised at the things he has done in his lifetime. As a matter of fact, open up a file on him now!

To the judge that removed Katherine from being over her son's will, investigate him, too! There is a conspiracy against the Jacksons!

Melvin   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Why didn't they criticize Elvis Presley because he was a dope head and he didn't make the same impact on the world as Michael did.
I hope the Al Sharpton is listening because he is the ideal person to respond to this who is not only his personal friend and someone who has broken all musical boundaries

Ryan   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

It is very unfortunate that so many people are feeling that Michael Jackson should only be remembered for the good things he did. The guy revolutionized music, sure, but he also faced allegations that he was a child molester, one of the worst, most despicable things anyone could be, and the media is completely ignoring this controversy.

Even if you don't think that he is a pedophile, he is being mentioned too much, on here especially. I was working out at my gym, and I had to get them to change off CNN because you weren't talking about news–you were still, still talking about the death of a celebrity that happened over a week ago! He's dead, we get it, now please go back to covering real news.

Jason   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

For someone very popular, there should be an expectation of major coverage until the funeral of such an icon has completed. When Princess Diana passed away in 1997, there was a lot of coverage for a former princess that touched the lives of many around the world.

Michael Jackson touched a lot of people around the world being the "King of Pop" and donating money to lots of charities over his career. Yes he has been in many scandals, but the man had a heart and cared. Jackson may have been controversial over the last 10 years, but the scandals were mediocre compared to his music and the fan base he accumulated over close to 3+ decades.

Once his funeral is over, then the coverage will die off. However, I think Representative King should have the book thrown at him for his slander of a man who cannot defend himself anymore. Mr King should issue a statement of apology for the his use of words because the man did go through the court system and was found not guilty of doing any wrong in 2005. Just because he paid out money in 1993 doesn't make him a pedophile. Time for Mr King to put a sock in it and do his job and not talk bad about people.

Angel M. Hunter   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I can't believe you would even feature this Rep. King and his statement on CNN. Who died and made him the JUDGE of all? Tell me that. What about Elvis marrying such a young girl, what about Woody Allen marrying his stepdaughter...do I need to go on? They are still celebrated. There are so many more to name that have actually been found "GUILTY" of such acts and does CNN mention them? NO. I understand the MJ death news but damn, let a man rest in peace. Yes, there has been a lot of coverage but it's expected, television does overkill on any "hot topic". Is Rep. King's house in order? Is he perfect? The two allegations were about money, it's so damn obvious. Money can and will make people do some crazy stuff. Look at reality television. What Rep. King needs to do is shut up and focus on other issues at hand. How about that!!! Michael was stuck mentally maybe Rep. King is stuck somewhere as well.

Andrew   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rep. King is simply another 2012er who doesn't know when to say when. The country has a fair judicial system and the man went through it and won. Is that not enough anymore? But given recent revelations regarding some of King's friends, something will come up?

Soheila W   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think this congressman wants his 15 min fame as no one as heard of him..I wish he would ."Shut Up". Jackson did not do anything wrong, he was aquitted... his childhood was robbed from him by his father. He was an known worldwide artist..Leave the dead guy alone so he can have some dignity....there are worse people than Micheal Jackson in this wrold that need to be put away....very very disrespctfull congressman...it is not hist fault that the news media are trying to drive up their rating!!!!

J. David   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think Rep. King is being very subjective and judgmental. Michael Jackson was exonerated of all charges. He does not know Michael Jackson on a personal basis as close friends and family members. Rep. King is being mean-spirited and unfair. Let's celebrate Michael Jackson for the talent and good-will that he shared with the world.

nichole mcgee   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Shut up congressmen you are out of line and disrespectful. Michael went threw the justice system and he was found NOT GULITY!!!!!!! Give him the recpect he never got on earth and let him be at peace you idiot!!!!!

Joycelene   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Regardless of how rep. King feels about Michael Jackson he was & will remain a pop icon. His fame and fortune came from his music not his behavior . If mr king doesn't want to dwell on michael's death then don't say anything . Bad mouthing a man who changed the world of music in his 50 years of life only looks bad on him

Venus   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

He should be ashame of himself, what kind of person is he, the man is dead. Also he doesn't seem to have any faith in our judicial system, he was aquitted of all counts. He wouldn't want anyone saying those things about his family member, if they were true or false.

Vik   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rick,

Mr. King is just plain ignorant. Forget that MJ was tried and cleared of all charges – he was an amazing artiste and changed the music world forever. He had his low points, but he had a lot more high points in his life. No other human can come close to what MJ has done for the music industry and humanity as a whole. God Bless.

Kevin L. / Omaha, NE   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I thought we were at the point in this country that you think before you talk...and people elected this guy. OK, ok..., I understand that today was an important day for this guy's district in honoring vets which is important...BUT, this guy should know better and maybe he did and is acting a fool.

David McMillin   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

King has it right and thank goodness someone has the guption to stand and call a spade a spade. MJ stood for everything America has tried to weed out of it's society yet he overcame the allegations with money and buying his way out of some very serious charges. Forget the music genious if there was any spark of truth, which many of us believe there is, then maybe his passing makes the world a safer placer for our children! Our society is becoming desensitived to murderers, child molesters, and rapists thanks to the meia. Enough is enough and lets condemn and not praise artistry over serious criminal acts!

Ruby   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Peter King, if you recall, Michael Jackson was acquitted of ALL charges!

And personally I feel that you are just a bit jealous because Michael has gotten more media attention in his 50 years on earth than you would get if you lived 150 years!

Jealousy is such an ugly portrait of you!

ctlss   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rick, the last I heard, if you are tried and found innocent of a crime, then you are innocent. Michael Jackson was found not guilty of molestation, by a jury of his peers, and Rep. King would be well advised to watch the language that he uses. I would think that his accusations would leave him liable to lawsuits, since MJ was found innocent, and this "gentleman" is slinging slurs like the Missouri mud we experienced with the gully washers that we had on the Fourth of July. He needs to keep his OPINIONS to himself!! No one cares!!

Twila   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Enough is enough I have been turning the chanel when this coverage comes on. With so much going on in the world there is way to much air time devoted to his passing. What happened to news.

Marleen M. Baltimore, MD.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think it's horrible that the media coverage keep bring up Michael Jackson's pedophile charges. He was never convicted on ANY of these charges. And, if he was guilty, he is answering for it today. We are not GOD...So, stop judging people that are no longer here to defend theirselves!

Kana   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rep.King should keep his mouth shut........when someone is different, people like to believe the worst. Rep. King is no judge.......only God is!

Rudy   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Not surprising that this comment would come from a republican. Can this party possibly become anymore rediculous and irrelevant? Oh yeah: 2012 PALIN Limbaugh

Pointe   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

WHHYYYYYY CANT WE GET ALONG who cares what Micheal did we dont the facts but what we hear in the media and still he was found not guilty so why people are so quick to judge him for those crimes are people being people.RIP MICHEAL JACKSON

Sunny   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Peter King just wants attention. He's surely aware that his negative comments about Michael Jackson would stir up a lot of controversy and put him (Peter King) in the spotlight. What a jerk!

Samuel   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rick,
Peter King is a callous, ignorant politician who have no respect for the view of our judicial system. For the Record, Michael Jackson was tried and found NOT GUILTY of child molestation charges. Sharing a figment of one's uninformed opinion seem to earn free air time in America's media. Rep. King's irate views merits no serious response indeed.

jill bentsil   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

The congressman should go and work for The Enquirer. I am surprized that a lawmaker like the congressman makes public allegation about something that has not been proven. Shame on him!!

angie   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

It is so sad that Peter King has nothing else better to do than get his quick 10 minutes of fame by jumping on the Michael Jackson bandwagon. Like my grandmother always said " Sweep around your own front door before you try to sweep around his" Will Peter King be the next Republican with skeleton coming out of his closet?

Su Estrella   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Questionable reputation indeed! Disrepespectful cause he's dead? What about all those people that die on a daily basis, taking no credit, getting no money, and truly giving of themselves to children, to ignorance, to humanity and are completely ignored by the media simply because they are doing some good but have no money. Most people don't say anything cause he was black (?) and because everything black now is good whether it was right or wrong. He's dead? Well, hello, we all have a number – his number was up.

Caleb   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rep King is looking for 2minutes of fame. Suggest Rep King read ...
JORDAN CHANDLER MJ DID NOT MOLEST ME I LIED
Source: globalgrind.com
With the news of the passing of Michal Jackson, the truth about who MJ really was has been coming to light these pass days. And, now the little boy who claimed that Micheal Jackson "molested" him when...

Victoria   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

It sounds like to me that Rep. King is jealous that he will not be celebrated like Michael Jackson and he should be careful of the name calling because we all know that he has skeletons in his closet as well. I'm pretty sure that he'll want the same respect when he's found out. By the way, Michael was NEVER found guilty of anything.

Bonnie B.   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Hey Rick,
Rep King is quick to throw a stone. As usual the ones who appear to be so righteous until a skeleton appears in their closet. Who cares what his opinion is. Why do you give him media play??? Has anyone looked into his background?

Pam   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rep. King needs to realize that Michael Jackson was never CONVICTED of anything!!! As a politician he should be one of the FIRST people to know what it is like to have accusations thrown at you. Only GODcan judge us, so that is between him and Michael. Therefore, I am chosing to take the Christian way out and remember MJ for all of the good he has done. I am not going to point fingers and say horrible things about someone when I don't know the true facts. Maybe as a politician that is the way Rep. King is used to living his life so he thinks it is ok.

Tony Karaba   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Good job CNN, this idiot should be exposed, a good example of our elected incompetence. These are the kind of politicians we need to get rid of. I could care less what this guy thinks, but its a shame he has a "guilty until proven innocent" attitude.

chris   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

who cares senator!

have you been living under a rock? good or bad man he should definitely be getting coverage... clearly you didnt buy the album thriller and you also don't realize he virtually founded most modern dance moves... have you seen the moonwalk?

Michael   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Though Michael was never convicted of any crimes against children, it's unfair to call him a pedophile. But it's reasonable to be dubious of a man who was charged multiple times over many years with molesting children – an adult man who also said publicly it was appropriate for him to share his bed with children that weren't his. His fans have every right to mourn his loss. But he does not belong on a stamp.

pizza boy   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a great artist but the man was guilty and money and fame saved him

Felicia   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Michael Jackson is a legend, was a legend and will always be "a legend". Unfortunately those that are left defending him are the ones that he did not want to look like. The people that he wanted to look like are now turning their back on him. Go figure.

Tracy   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

It's nice to know that the death of Michael Jackson has stolen our nations attention from the trivial things like Iran, Iraq, serial killers, the debate on health care, the economy, North Korea, .... I could go on, but you get the point.
CNN really let me down these past days by straying from the things that really matter. Jackson is dead– let it go. Get back to the things in the world that ACTUALLY effect us.

Marlys Hobson   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I am glad that someone has put some perspective on Michael Jackson's death. There are so many important things going on in our world now and it bothers me that the media is spending so much time on this. He was acquitted of the pedophile charge, so that should not be an issue at this time. However, I am disgusted with the circus atmosphere that surrounds his death.

It's interesting that so many public figures have passed away in the past couple of weeks with little coverage of their lives. Why can Michael not go in peace also?

tiffany   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I think the whole m.jackson scene is over rated. An hour before he died he was just another pervert and pedofile BUT the second after he died he became an idol again. Its so stupid would you celebrate any other perverts life?

Gerald   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I totally disagree. First – He cannot accused someone of something he do not know the true facts about. Second – We never asked to stop the coverage on President Ronald Regan passing, or all of the good and negative comments that were talked about.

In our judicial system, your incident until proven gulity. It was never proved guilty. He making him gulity without any proof.

J Darroll Hall   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

On Palin; It seems rather clear they (the family) are deciding to cash-in and that will be born out rather quickly. As a recovering Repug. The party is in free fall with no sign of any turnaround in the near future...
Peter King must be needing some way back into the limelight, his choice of how to do it is despicable at best and horrific at worst, his motives are suspect regardless.

Nikki   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

This country prides itself in "innocent until proven guilty", however a member of our government comes out and characterizes a man by a charge, not a conviction. MJ has now been judged by the ONLY one that matters...GOD! Michael was an abused child who never lived as a child. Therefore, he may have had some issues with wanting to live as a child. However, out of thousands of children that stayed at his ranch (btw, I personally KNOW someone who stayed at Neverland because he is related to Ryan White) only 2 EVER tried to accuse MJ. The person that I KNOW that stayed there, spoke nothing but praises to MJ's generosity. MJ changed history, music, and the world as a whole. This should be celebrated!!!

Terry   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

The United States has the most efficient judicial system in the world. Michael Jackson went through the courts and was found not guilty for being pedifile, so he is innocent. So is OJ Simpson.

Juliet   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

The genius of our system is that one is presumed innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty; we must presume innocence, unless we accept a major flaw with the system. If we take his statement in the interview as admission of guilt then every parent who allows their children in their beds are perverts. Clearly is was not average, but the innocent until proven guilty should apply to him both in life and death. We are all entitled to our opinions about the man and the amount of coverage, but the gentleman's comments are slanderous, distasteful and downright hateful. Someone should take a look in his closet, we might be surprised.

tony frank   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I believe these charges false Rick, reason being I still have not heard
or seen any evidence of this, where are all the kids that have been molested I have not seen one step foward on camera in all these
years and give there story.

Tadashi Davis   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rick,

If MJ were alive right now this would be libel. It is unbecoming of a US Representative to even go there. First of all no matter what one thinks of MJ, he is dead. He cannot defend himself and to me a cowardly move of Kings behalf. I hope the estate of Michael Jackson seeks a libel suit. It is irresponsible on King's behalf. How should have shown more dicipline. If there are unproven allegations out there saying you are racist and you die, it is right of me to go on TV and say you should not be remebered for the civil servant you were or should tell everyone you were a biggot?!

jamie   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I agree with mr king why would Jackson pay millions if he was not guilty and if that happend to your kids what would you do

Freddie Hill   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Seems to me Rep. King is a Republican, All I have heard from the Republicans is a negative about anyone they can attack!

Rep King you cast out the 1st stone.

It would be nice if we all worked together, just because their are differences of opinions isn't cause for slander especially when one
doesn't know the actual trues about an individual not just on hear say!

Cheryl   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

People who live in glass houses should not throw stones. Remember Gov Stanford's remarks about President Clinton

Chauncey Snyder   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Peter King is a Racist like so many Republicans. Shame on the ungodly Republicans!

Janet   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I agree with the congressman. Michael Jackson was a pedophile. Just like O.J. he should have been convicted of the crime he committed. And Rep. King is not a holier-than-though person. He is right on the money on this one. When they found this "secret room" come on. He is and was a pervert.

Donna   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I am disgusted by the comments of this politician. I've never seen such ignorance and disregard. Michael Jackson was acquitted of charges and settled a case out of court...something that people do everyday. I would like to ask that jerk when is the last time he donated his salary to charity–Michael donated proceeds from his tours to charities allover the world. (Victory and History and perhaps others.) I'd like to ask that republican when is the last time he spearheaded and funded a campaign to help starving children. CNN should stop running that clip, he is blatantly telling lies about a person who is loved by hundreds of millions of people allover the world. I would really like to see what's hiding in his closet.

john kwakye   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

congressman king is one part per millionof peoplewho will critized the dead, he should have kept his mouth shut till he was burried. insensitve human being

Paul Arttemus   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I know there is much admiration for Michael Jackson's accomplishments but there is sufficient evidence to understand any parent, individual, or ardent critic to find pause and disgust with the elaborate and detailed coverage of Michael Jackson's death.

Diana   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

How dare this thing disrespect Michael Jackson especially now that he is no longer with us. Michael Jackson was the greatest entertainer of all time and was acquitted of all charges. Please stop giving this idiot camera time!!!

Joseph S. Hann   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I don't care how famous he was. He was a pervert that got away with what he did because he was rich and famous. He couldn't adopt or have any role in the inception of children so he bought them. I will not be watching CNN tomorrow when you begin your Michael Jackson
programming. You have and continue to waste the American publics time.

BJ   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

What can I say, "typical Republican comment." Republicans need to clean out their own closets!

James Nevill   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Does Rep. King recall the phrase "innocent until proven guilty?" MJ was aquitted of all charges. Only in case sof child molestation is the accused guilty EVEN IF proven innocent.

judy   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

rep.king statement is his personal opinion. i do agree that enough already with the coverage. i am sick and tired of all the media coverage.

judy

Samantha Cramer   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

From Omaha:

Yes, this should be obvious, it should have been a scrolling item at the bottom of the news screen at best, from the very beginning, especially given the situation in the world.

Seriously, when Iran was such big news one second, and the next it becomes a side note just because a "star" died... I truly looked for another news source as I lost ALL faith that CNN was reporting news, rather than whatever gets the most ratings.

Rick, you single-handedly saved CNN for me. You make me feel as if the public is being listened to, not just the bottom line $, when it comes to CNN reporting.

But other CNN reporters have lost me for good.

It is highly offensive to anyone compassionate toward children to have a known (OJ wasn't innocent either, no matter what happened in the courtroom) child molester, a known liar ("only 2 facial surgeries")
be emulated and treated... well... I am not sure if Jesus would have received this much coverage were He to die during the Iran crisis...
to be treated as a saint and "King".

This shows such a deep sickness in our global society that I am just beside myself. I had no idea that humanity was THIS blind and unable to see the truth.

How must his little victims feel right about now? Will they EVER recover?

jenice mouton   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

He was and still is the" KING OF POP" around the world GREAT ARTIST !!!
I didn't and don't believe that he caused any harm to any child. Did anybody see the Larry King show when he over heard tthese people when they admitted to extortion against Michael. Why are you Not repeating that.

The representative is a horrible person and will not be remembered maybe not even in his own state.

Jen

Trey   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

What happened to innocent until proven guilty. King is very wrong and he should be punished for it. I can't belive that people like him represent us.

Jonathan   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

The general public will never know if Michael was guilty, and it was both foolish and disrespectful for Congressman King to say what he did. With that aside, I have reached my saturation point ragarding Jackson. Enough is enough. I am quite sure that the coverage will continue well after his memorial. There are many more newsworthy stories that are not getting enough coverage.
STOP SUBJECTING US TO THIS TORTURE.

littleumgowa   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Wow, is this guy ill-informed or what?! Terrible.
There were 2 trials regarding MJ & kids. He paid off the first because he didn't want a drawn out court drama. The other case saw him acquitted on all charges. The kid who accused him in the 2nd trial has since come forward to say he lied about it...THE KID LIED!!!
Problem is, the more you hear a lie, the more you believe it (and repeat it).
Michael Jackson was an odd duck, sure. But can we please allow him to rest in the peace he was never given in life?

forreal   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

He should stick to commenting about his own party and their discretions. The justice system acquitted Michael of the charges. However, it does make me wonder, is timing for this ‘outcry’ a maneuver to promote a hided agenda?

Pat the FurryFaceFellow   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Does Sen. King, or anyone else for that matter, have the moral obligation to respect a court's (and judge's) final findings?

Is it morally correct to slander a person's name and reputation after he/she has died and can no longer defend themselves?

Should Sen. King be using his publicly appointed seat to speak ill of the dead.

He can have his personal opinion, but he learn not to speculate in matters that he is basing his opinion on article in the National Inquirer!

He should follow Gov. Palin!

Judith Nunez   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I think Peter King represents all the ignorant racist people in the United States today. It is 2009 and we are still dealing with this racist anomisity. This boy stated Michael Jackson never touched them. Days after Michael death the boys family called radio station and stated it was lie to make money.This boys family needs to speak up in public forum and aplogize. Regardless if they were awarded money. I am ashamed as a United Sates Citizen that this republican always been enviousof this African American man accomplishments.
Let's mourn peacefully and show the world that the United States people are not divided.

Greg   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

My response to Representative King would be: Let he who has never sinned cast the first stone. Apparently, Mr King has never sinned. Many of us have done things we are not proud of. Many of our Presidents have had affairs. Look at the recent murder of Steve Mcnair who apparently was a great person yet apparently was having an affair. In my opinion, a person who sins should not be villified when they are aware of the sin and have repented. This is because we are all human and are prone to sin. But a sinner becomes evil when they continue to sin and hurt others and are not willing to change. I belive most MJ fans are not blind. We realize he may have comitted those awful sins, but we are willing to forgive. We are celebrating the side of him that is great; his musical genius.

Lisa   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I think the Congress needs to remember that we are a Country that is "innocent until proven guilt". He was never convicted of those acussations. All I know is that he was an AWESOME artist and deserves recognition for what an impact he left behind. If it was left up to people like Peter King we'd all be doomed for hell. I don't think we should be judgemental of others, take care of your OWN issues in life Mr.King.

M.Irving   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I would like to preface by saying, "Michael is absolutely NOT GUILTY." Where does the congressman get off convicting a man that...his own laws that he supposedly....hold dear...says he is NOT GUILTY!!!!! I don't see or hear any of you talking about the Acess Holywood report of July 5, 2009...where Micheal said under hypnosis....."I would never molest a child." WHY DO YOU PEOPLE CONTINUALLY PERSECUTE THIS MAN???? Even if he was guilty....aren't children safe now that he is dead??? Or isn't that enough for you disgusting vipers???

Chris   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Say what you will about the man, his music was great.

Just a side note, OJ was aquitted too!

Donato Schimizzi   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

NO DOUBT the congressman believes his view of Michael Jackson right on, but basically it's a vicious attack just before the public memorial of a beloved cultural icon who gave the world (& will continue giving it) a ton of joy through his music.

All attacks on someone is a calling out for love -that's how I see this politician. He deserves our pity.

Larry Long   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Would you want to celebrate him if you were one of the parents of one of the kids that was sexually controlled by him?I wonder how the people that settlrd for the two and one half million dollar settlement really feel.There is to much good reporting that could be done right now instead of wasting all of our time on this.

Dee Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Rep. Peter King should keep his big trap shut. What is it that King wants the listening audience to know about teachers and firefighters anyway? Michael is innocent!!!! He was cleared and found not guilty! He is ovbiously jealous and angry because super star , Michael Joseph Jackson, is getting the attention and condolences that he deserves. The world loves Michael. The world is celebrating an icon and if Rep. King doesn't like it, well...tough cookie!

Elle Ondre   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael Jackson was just a man. Yes he was a famous man , but a man with many flaws. He was a pedophile and a sexual predator. He liked to "share his bed" with young boys. People are so upset that he is dead and it is sad, but people should stop glorifying his death. People out there wouldn't be so upset if he sexually abused their child!

allie sieloff   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

You think California is going crazy over MJ's death? Ya otta be living here in Motown ... it makes me sick to watch it and I actually turn off the TV when any more coverage begins. In fact, I almost turned you off, Rick, until you mentioned the brave politian who spoke up. Yes, MJ was a true talent and his work should be honored and remembered. However, he was still a drug doping weirdo with a very, very questionable lifestyle who shouldn't be idolizied!

Angel M. Hunter   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

I can’t believe you would even feature this Rep. King and his statement on CNN. Who died and made him the JUDGE of all? Tell me that. What about Elvis marrying such a young girl, what about Woody Allen marrying his stepdaughter…do I need to go on? They are still celebrated. There are so many more to name that have actually been found “GUILTY” of such acts and does CNN mention them? NO. I understand the MJ death is news, let a man rest in peace. Yes, there has been a lot of coverage but it’s expected, television does overkill on any “hot topic”. Is Rep. King’s house in order? Is he perfect? The two allegations were about money, it’s so obvious. Money can and will make people do some crazy stuff. Look at reality television. What Rep. King needs to do is shut up and focus on other issues at hand. How about that!!! Michael was stuck mentally maybe Rep. King is stuck somewhere as well.

chris   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

my mistake... .congressman....

D G Albright   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

MJ was a fantastic entertainer when he was a black performer. Then he turned himself into some kind of white want to be freak. His music suffered tremendously. Then the fooling around with little boys thing drove him even lower. Now I would just prefer to never hear anymore about him. He did this to himself. He is not a hero or deserving of all this new found fame. DG Albright

Linda   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael was acquitted of child molestation charges. I did not, and do not, believe he was guilty.

However, this coverage is getting to be a bit much. If you're not a fan, it is annoying to see. I was watching it very closely, as I liked Michael, until I realized nothing new was being reported on. It's the same news being churned over and over. The sources are unnamed or not verified. The nurse came out of nowhere to be a constant fixture on every channel.

There does not appear to be much hard news regarding Michael recently.

Lisa Kisner   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

I think Congressman King's comments are offensive and hypocritical. Michael Jackson had his day in court and was acquitted by his peers. Futhermore, the congressman himself is surrounded on the hill by a constant barrage of politicians falling due to improper behavior. My opinion is that in many cases MJ's contributions to the world amount to a lot more than many, many politicians can say for themselves. I think Congressman King had plenty of time to make his views public and it's disgraceful that he would wait until the death of such a beloved artist to smear Michael's name and what he stood for.

Eddie Cintron   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

This politician doesn't he have enough on his hands in Washington, how about getting the politicians that are having affairs with

linda noel   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guity in a court of law'
For heaven's sake leave him alone.He had been demonised sufficient
while alive.Let us hope,he is now at peace. I was thought to not speak evil of the dead.I wish more people would observe this simple rule. We respect first the law of God and the law of the land.He was acquitted under the latter,Let us show love and mercy under the former,

Kody's mom   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Rick:
Someone has to stop this insanity. Michael Jackson was a talented man, I grant you that – but he was a CELEBRITY – nothing else. He was, in all likelihood an addict – the rest of it has never been proven. But come on.......there are SO MANY more important things going on right now. American soldiers are being killed in increasing numbers in Afghanistan, the economy is a mess, I could go on and on. WHO THE H*** CARES ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON!! Robert McNamara died today – a crucial player during the VietNam era – It has received barely a mention. What funeral coverage will be done for him? CNN is a news source – not a celebrity network. Get with it, guys!

John   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

If it is true that Jackson paid about 20 million to the parents and kids of whom he was accused of pedophile, then you should not be celebrating Michael Jackson. Why did he pay the 20 million dollars?

bill lokin   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

he was a sicko the only reason he got away with it is by paying his way out, why do you think he was broke? because he had to pay to hide his very creepy, sick hiden life.

judy milton   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

I don't know why you always have some you know what who thinks his opinion matters. I think he should show some class and let his family, friends, and fans grieve. But if you don't have class, you act and talk like him. So, the old innocent until PROVEN guilty doesn't mean anything to him. If he doesn't like the coverage, turn off the t.v. Better yet, go dig a whole and put your head in it. Can he FINALLY rest in peace. STOP RIDICULING HIM. You are a congressman with NO class. And yes, I would have let my kids stay with him in a heartbeat. You need to show some respect.

MICHAEL MARKOVITCH   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Peter King is an opportunist politician who is tyring to capture some of the "limelight" at the expense of a great pop icon.

Michael L. Burdett   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

NO !!! - I sort of Wanted to vote with "I'm on the fence" but then I'm NOT! Michael's Philenthropic Feelings towards his cancer stricken child guest – I'm sure was heart-felt honestly by Michael Jackson, and the "giving" of his bed was NOT a pervertish offering but a loving offering -m just like the sharing of a Mother's and Dad's bed is while a very young child will come to the comfort of their parents in the hour of a horrific dream – or while they're sick. These children being on deaths door were very scared and Michael was just comforting tham in the best light of giving them all that he could!

The Congressman should be accused of the same accusations in which he is accusing Michael of. What skeletons are in the Congressmans closet?

No one likes the truth.   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

MJ's musical legacy is incomparable. However, he was still a man with flaws. Why are people so blind to defend celebrities? Had anyone "normal" been accused of similar things they would be crucified.

He slept with kids in his bed, surrounded himself with kids, made a playground of rides for kids. He was also raised by an abusive father, had obvious problems with normal male-female relationships, and has kids through science instead of sex with a woman. If you are not paying attention to these signs it is because you do not want to.

Kings comments were untimely and just plain stupid. Let those who want to celebrate him, celebrate him. But at that same time, I do not feel it's right to simply outright refuse that these issues existed.

Daniel Guerra   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael Jackson my have been a musical genius, but he also had many deficiencies and one of them was his sexual identity. He had this unusual and unhealthy attraction to little boys. He is not the biological father of his kids. Child molestation is all around us, and to glorify someone who has had various inappropriate interaction with minor boys is not healthy to our society. We also should not attempt to erase him from his place in history, but lets move on to other more important things that affect our world.

Elma Carey   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael Jackson went to court and was found not guilty of pedophilia. He was ajudicated not guilty. This is fundamental to our justice system.

How can a Congressman such as Peter King be so disrespectful of our judicial system. He is a mindless accuser and slanderer!

He is teaching the public that going to court is meaningless. His opinion is nothing but that, an opinion.

Perhaps we should shine the spotlight on him and see what comes up. Let him go to court and defend himself, win, and then have others
accuse him of being what he is. He is a slanderer and should be taken to court and sued.

I would rather leave my child/grandchild with Michael Jackson than with Peter King.

Vickie, Ladysmith Virginia   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

I agree with the Congressman. Being acquitted doesn't mean justice was serviced. Just ask anyone who believes OJ is guilty of murder. There have been way too many stories about Jacksons actions with young children for this to be a case of injustice. Where there's smoke there's fire. Enough of the coverage.

tabatabai   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

May be the congressman should start cleaning the scandals in his own party. It is so sad to see that Republicans are going backward in time , their racisme is becoming overwhelming. They have to mix everything with politics. It is so outrageous. I am very saddened by these iknd of remarks. COngressman should maybe focus more on his family, PArty and issues in the country. It is a shame to have Congressman with such mentality . Shame on you COngressman.

ROBERT SEDA   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Hi Rick,
I definately feel that Congressman Republican King is ignorant.We demand an apology from him as a member of congress representing himself in such a hostile manner.There is a big difference between him and Michael Jackson.His name is King BUT MICHAEL JACKSON IS THE KING OF POP!!HE IS IN THE GUINNESS BOOK OF WORLD RECORDS FOR CHARITABLE CAUSES TO HELP THE NEEDY ALL OVER THE WORLD.HE APPEALED TO ALL WHETHER BLACK OR WHITE.ASIAN OR HISPANIC.MAY HIS SOUL REST IN PEACE.MICHEAL JACKSON WILL ALWAYS BE KING LONG AFTER CONGRESSMAN KING IS GONE.

Beverly   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

On Congressman King, Republican still emphazing the Party Of NO!!!

Paul A   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

congressman king is way out of line. he should be complaining about the justice system because michael jackson was found innocent by jury of 12

kip   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

rick, i agree with rep. king., and i agree with his forcefullness.
jackson, set his whole "neverland" world up to smoke screen and enable his own "disfunctional personality". he simply had the money to do this, and "no one" around him ever questioned him.
he was a child molester, a pedophile, and a pervert. was he a talented musical artist..? yes, but there is NOTHING worse than the kind of abuse "i believe" he put on certain young boys.
afterall....he did pay 20 million dollars to make one case "go away".
i think this demonstrates his guilt. his fame should never "trump" this kind of disgusting behavior from anyone, no matter how much fame or money they have. thanks, kip

Jillpril   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

You know, OJ was found not guilty, too. But we all still have our doubts about him. So death makes him off limits? Or is it the fact that these statements were made by a REPUBLICAN representative?

Walter   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael Jackson paid $20 million to stay out of jail for child molestation. It really doesn't matter whether or not he was acquitted after being accused for a 2ND TIME, he had already paid multi-millions to avoid facing the music for pedophilia.

smoothoperator   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

I would have gladly left my children with Michael Jackson knowing they would be safe and well looked after. Mr. King is a media whore just taking advantage of Michael's spotlight.

Mark   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael was acquitted of pedophile charges. The fact that he settled out of court on another charge draws suspicion but Michael had a lot of money and might well have decided it better to settle out of court thereby avoiding another trial and all the press. A close friend of mine who has 2 young boys said if someone molested his boys no money in the world would keep him from bringing that person to justice. In that light, one could suspect Michaels' accusers of blackmail. I believe Michael was not a typical macho male. I believe he really loved children and didn't abuse them as we see some males do in our society. In any case, King used his position to accuse someone acquitted of all charges of committing a hideous crime, someone who can no longer defend himself. We should think of things to accuse Congressman King of after he dies.

debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

people should keep those kind of comments to themselves. MJ was very talented, he was never proven quilty. Yes they should keep the coverage coming, people like to see tthe coverage they are giving, and we are interested in what happened. They were only 7 counts against him, what about all the other kids that visited neverland. Seems as though people needing money were the ones accusing him. I dont believe a word of it. I loved watching him on tv, unfortunatly i never got to see him in person. I feel sadness for the world but more important for his family

Char   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Yes, it's okay to call him a pervert, despite his acquital, because, as Rep. King said, he ADMITTED to sleeping with young boys. That's a pervert in my dictionary...what does yours say?

Yes, he was a very talented performer, but his admission to this perverted behavior CANNOT be excused because of his talent.

Sheree   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael Jackson certainly had an impact on America pop culture and was a gifted artist, perhaps even a genius. I don't think that mitigates the bizarre aspects of his life and the allegations with regard to his conduct with young children. While I'm not sure Rep. King's remarks were as tactful as they perhaps should have been, I certainly understand the frustration. I, too, have been amazed at the wall-to-wall coverage. How many people have died in Iraq and Afghanistan since news of Jackson's death? All this Jackson mania has brought home to me again how upsidedown our country is: we treat something Hollywood creates as truly meaningful in our lives and treat wars in which our young men and women give their lives every day as nothing more real than a video game. I dare you to tell the American people about the American men and women who have lost their lives in the past week – their names, faces and life stories.

The Jackal   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

People need to stop elaborating over incomprehensable things like Micahel Jackson. So what he died no need to make a huge deal out of it. He stole the lime light from all the other Celeberaties that have died over the weeks and he may have been a pedophile but why dig up ancient past to ruin someones already destroyed reputation.

katrina carter   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

you are suppose to be a congressman.your suppose to think before you speak.i just thank god that i don't have to vote for youand if i had to vote for somebody it wouldn't be you.i think that you shouldn't be in congress. no, what you said wasn't right.i think that everyone should honor him.you need to give his parents and the rest of his family some respect.that being said ,"you don't respect yourself as a congressman. you need to step down.

khalid   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

NOT GUILTY. MEANING HE DID NOT DO IT.

Elizabeth   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

I say its people like Peter King who ought to keep their big mouths shut when they know nothing about it. Whether dead or alive, buried or not, just be quiet if you have nothing nice to say about MJ.

bobby rohloff   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

hi rick it is about time someone tells it like it is , especialy a political

JoJo   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Rick, I tell you, that was a shameful and disgraceful statement by Republican Peter King. Obviously, he is not a fan of Michael Jackson and is entitled to his opinion about the media coverage of Michael Jackson's death. But he did not have to resort to despicable name calling to express his opinion. Michael Jackson did more in his short life to promote America around the globe than Peter King has done in his long life up till now or will ever do in the rest of his life. Peter King is unworthy of being a United States congressman. Go get a life Peter King. Stop being a free-loader on the American tax-payer.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Shame on you!!!Mr.Congressman.M,j was a humanitarium an entertainer,and a good person he never talked bad about anyone. How about you,I think the one who has a perverted mind in the the with the dirty tongue.

Amy L   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I am very ashamed to say I was A republican, until Pres. Obama, I was very proud to vote for him. And now I'm really ashamed because of Rep. King's comments!! Shame on you Mr. King......Read the facts..Michael was cleared of all charges, leave him alone and let him rest in peace for once!!! Maybe Rep. King should give some advise to his own party..Sen. Sanford!!! What a disgrace!! Rest now my dear Michael.....no-one can ever hurt you again and your true fans will love you always!

patrick   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

rep. peter king and his likes, should keep their own openion to them selves, what mr peter should infact do, is to sit down with other members of congress and figure out how to fix our economy. please , mr peter, stop watching tv.

Vickie, Ladysmith Virginia   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I agree with the Congressman. Being acquitted doesn't mean justice was served. Just ask anyone who believes OJ is guilty of murder and got away with it. There have been way too many stories about Jackson's actions with young children for this to be a case of injustice. Where there's smoke there's fire. Enough of the coverage. There are many people who changed the course of music history. Don't inaugurate Jackson as the God of music for work that many have done over the past 40 years.

YENNYC   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

U.S. Representative Peter King. Shame on you!!!! EVIL MAN!!!! It is so sad and callous of this man to come out and say such vile words about a man who gave so much to the world through his artistry in music and especially at this time of his passing. How dare him or anyone judge MJ. Did he even know him? Maybe he should think about the fact that it is not MJ's who is paying so much attention to this passing. This same attention which was also done during the time of his accusation of the child mollesting case - This is all MEDIA'S DOING! WAKE UP!!! CNN should not even give this man the time of day. This kind of news casting is pointless. The world is already showing how much this one man has moved and affected billions of peoples' lives and hearts through his LOVE AND MUSIC!

King Mike Will Live Forever!!   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I feel Rep. King should be sued for slander. Michael Jackson was never convicted for any wrong doing. Does the ruling in a court of law stand for anything. Michael Jackson said there was never anything sexual and a conservative jury found him not guilty. He should pay more attention to his duties as a representative from NY. I'm sure they didn't elect him to give personal statements about a pop star! Be a rep. or go work for TMZ!!

Ace Greene   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Congressman King mentions at the end of his tirade that we need to honor people who volunteer with dying cancer patients, etc...that is EXACTLY what Michael Jackson did over the years; started foundations, gave millions, and helped, helped, helped people all over the world.

Jeff   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

In all reality all this hype over a known child molesters death is beginning to insult my inteligence...I mean really, I enjoy watching the news to remain current in our world affairs but I now turn the channel when I hear all these praises given to a pervert...Get over it and move on to the news... Please!!!

gary   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

There are serious questions whether the molestation charges were true or were financially motivated. To state, as fact, that Jackson was a pedophile, is just wrong. MJ has kids, he has parents, and family, and he has yet to be buried. This guy is using MJ's death to further his career. That is sick.

B. Wofford   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

He should address that to the Catholic Church and their Priest.

Kate Cline   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I, too, believed the last few years Michael Jackson to be a child molester, up until last week. Because I had also been a fan of his work up until the last child abuse investigation, I spent time looking at the whole of his body of work, the whole body of interviews held with him before, during and after all child molestation publicity and see a different man. He had a skewed sense of boundariesbetween adults and children that most of us recognize opens the possibility of inappropriate sexual contact, but he didn't. His father gave his such a twisted view of childhood and relationships with physical and emotional abuse, and further abusing with allowing, even encouraging, his boys to be sexualized far too young. Joseph Jackson, in front of his sons, was blatantly adulterous and even encouraging his sons to have sexual experiences with fans and prostitiutes. As only one of Joseph's sons has had a successful marriage and some have had 4 marriages or beaten their wives/girlfriends, it is clear all the Jackson children were deeply skewed morally by their father. Michael didn't intend harm and did not harm children, but in his craving for love and to give love (not sexual) he made himself appear irresponsible.

Mark   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Wow Peter King is out of his mind. Congressman watch out "Slander"

Mignon B.   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

King's comments were unwarranted and and disrespectful. His comments were insensitive to Michael's grieving family and three young children that are now fatherless. When press surrounded the death of Anna Nicole and the abduction of Jean Benet, no one complained about the widespread attention. A man his age should know what is appropriate to say and especially when something is appropriate. Michael Jackson received this kind of negativity in his life, please not in his death. He should speak respectfully of the dead and allow the world to grieve the loss of this phenomenal man.

Karen McMillan   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

It;s trully a shame that this so-called congressman has to stoop to this level of accussations. to boot Michael Jackson was not found guilty of these charges. He is dead now and you (King) should be respective of this untimely death.
sir it appears that there are some underlying issues of jealously with the coverage..so what have you done lately to get the same coverage.Michael will always be held in high regard and respect.

Jackie Woods   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Hi Rick,
I'm outraged!!!! Congressman King is an absolute insenative jerk. The world should be allowed to mourn Michael accordingly. We as fans,and admirors don't need to or want to hear this crazy, disrespectful stuff. Leave MJ alone and get to business of New York. Mr King should wish that he could leave the legacy that Michael is leaving. And in my opinion the world should stop tomorrow for the glorification of Michael. King owes the Jackson family an apology.

J Woods
New Orleans, La

Kemit   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rick, I believe the Jackson family should sue the representative King for slender and defamation of character. They have a serious case against the attention desperate congressman. I hope they sue him for more than 50 million dollars to end his career. We don't need people like him in Washington. THE LAWSUIT PLEAS !
The republicans are so desperate for attention these days that their phony morals are showing. How can you possibly denounce any immorality when you can't face your own lack of decency." First, Take a good look at yourself and make a change !!!"

Thank you Rick for your decency and professionalism. You are the reason why I watch CNN.

Alex   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

While I was never a big fan of Michael Jackson's and have my own opinions about his personal life, he was and is the King of Pop and that is the reason his death is receiving so much coverage. If Rep. King feels that the coverage is a waste of time, perhaps he should focus on doing his job and not wasting our time and money with his personal opinions about a non-issue.

AT   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

The Congressman needs to look at music history. And so does anyone else that has a problem with respecting Michael Jackson legacy. He took videos to another level and he needs to be respected. This man needs to keep his mouth shut I bet he's no angel. Let the man REST N PEACE God can only judge him not a Congressman. Don't watch if you don't like it .

Diane   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

People in government are entitled to having their own opinions just as anyone else is. I would think, and say, the exact same things about Michael Jackson whether he was dead or alive. He may have been a good singer but anyone who lives the lifestyle to even get mixed up in pedophile or molestation charges must have been doing something wrong. The extreme amounts of media coverage just shows how pathetic the U.S. media networks have become. We have soldiers dying for our freedoms everyday and all we care about is THIS? Pathetic, CNN.

Susan   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

This has gotten really funny...Rep. King talking about MJ sleeping with young children. All the parents I know have slept with, on a regular basis, if not every night, their young children. Does Mr. King not realize "sleep with" doesn't mean having sex with them? This has gotten so out of porportion. I wonder what would have happened if the reporter had asked Mr. King if he had ever slept with his young children?

Patti   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rep. King should not be getting this much press. The more this clip is shown the more of an idiot he appears. Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of anything and this congressman should apoplogize to Michael's family especially his children. Another thing, Michael Jackson is dead and can't defend himself against this false statement. Rep. King probably has no clue what an impact Michael had on pop culture and should be celebrated for that accomplishment not a false claim.

Travis   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

You know it is our congressional leaders duty to keep us abreast of their opinions on subjects that effect the country. Peter King, is a hateful man. Michael Jackson was a great entertainer, he was truly one of a kind in the music industry. However, he was acquitted of all the charges that were brought against him. Mr. King needs to pick up a law dictionary and look up the words libel, and slander. I'm sure that Rep. King has skeletons in his closet that would damage his reputation. However, the icon that Michael Jackson was, and what he did for charitable works in Africa, and for other foundations he deserves the coverage that he is recieving. Celebrities are a public arena that they can expect to have everyone in their lives, and everythin that they do under the microscope. Mr. King needs to go to work on the economy and the health care system, and stay out of the private life of a dead person.

Robin   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

It is absolutely scandalous for this politician to yell such horrid things about someone who just died and who's questionable reputation was built on allegations that weren't proven. It sickening to see that this individual is trying to further his career at the expense of children who should have the opportunity to preserve a positive image of their daddy. Because of people like Mr. King, these children will also endure having to wear a label: "a child of a paedophile" – which makes Mr' King a child molester as he is psychologically molesting Michael Jackson's kids.
What is the point of that man yelling and throwing such horrid labels at someone who might as well be innocent? Is he concerned about the safety of children and this is why he is crusading against Michael Jackson? No! Did he bring any new evidence to the table? No!
If Michael Jackson was who Mr. King says he is, then there would be dozens of families coming forward with a class action against Mr. Jackson and demanding damages. Isn't that obvious?
It is obvious to me that Mr. King has no conscience and is literally walking Michael Jackson's dead body to get to the Senate.

P.S. Michael Jackson never said he was sleeping with children in the same bed. He always mentioned that he was sleeping on the floor while he let the kids have his bed.

Please make that opportunist go away.

Sincerely,
Robin

Dimitri   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Michael Jackson is way more relevant in death than Rep. King will ever be in life! Suddenly, he's the judge, jury and executioner. His district is in trouble with comments like that.

Etcha   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I couldn't vote on the polling question because the options provided were not near exhaustive. They should have been an option that provides a 'No" because he was acquitted on all counts. The congressman should please stop being a hypocrite. He should remember the path on which a lot like him have walked after their hypocritical comments...Of recent memory are Ensign, Sanford and a host of others...

Ray Lee   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

There is a lot of similarity between M. J. and O. J. cases. Both found "not guilty" by a criminal jury. O. J. found liable by civil jury based on same evidence. M. J. not tried by civil juries because he paid millians in settlements to more than one claimant. Obviously, M. J. (and his advisors.) believed there was a strong probability of his being found liable by civil juries. He didn't pay just to make a donation.

Yes, I think Rep. King of N.Y. is "right on."

R Wharton   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Who the heck does this guy think he is? First off, Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of a crime! Secondly, these other people who passed got coverage (watch the news, not just the today show). They may have not gotten as much coverage, but they were not as BIG as Michael Jackson. I have not even heard of some of the people that is being discussed. Not that they are any less important and missed. But this congressman needs to get his crap together. I am sure when MJ was being accused of these crimes, he was not compaining of the news coverage. MJ deserves all the attention he is getting. He was an incredible person and he will be loved and missed by MILLIONS! Maybe someone should check this congressman's background. I am sure there are skeleton's in his closet. He needs to get over himself. He is just trying to get coverage for himself. Good luck on the next election congressman.

G. Grassman   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a talented entertainer known around the world. But his dark side; he was a first-class pedophile and although many didn't want to admit it it was true. I've heard enough now of Michael Jackson since his death and it's time to bring it to a screeching halt!
All this media coverage is repulsive. Enough is enough!!!!!

Jasmine Skunk   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Another thought...

Isn't it "wrong" to accuse someone who isn't even here to defend themself?

Carol   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I'm a Democrat, but agree with the Republican Congressman. There is too much coverage of celebrities, like Jackson, when they die. Other than his music, what did he contribute to the world? There are so many service men and women who have died in service to our country, and they don't get a moment of silence in Washington like Michael Jackson did. And, by the way, the Congressman has the freedom of speech, just like all of us citizens.

Linda Ines   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rick you know what King's problem is that the Republican are looking for anyway to be on TV. Thing aren't so good for them so i think he just wanna be on Tv to everybody to know that they are alive.

Michael Clancy   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Peter King is doing this for his own political gain .He has never had a nice thing to say about anybody but himself .I don’t think I’ve ever seen him with a smile or a kind word .He’s a very bitter person with no hope or charity in his heart .

vanessa   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rep. King, must have proof that the court of law didn't have because he was found innocent of all charges. The cases that he settled was because he didn't want to go through with the circus that the media makes out of all issues and mainly when a Black man is involve. The government on all levels have worse charges against men that is paid to govern our laws such as Rep. King, so don't throw stones unless your backyard is clean. You Rep. King may have dirty laundry that will shine next week and be begging for the public to forgive you.

Claire Kas   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I wish our soldiers were commemorated in the same way that this singer/dancer is being commemorated.

I liked his music and dancing, but the weirder he became, the less I liked him.

As far as his being acquitted of the molestation charges, what about the 8 figure settlement he made on the family of the other child who accused him of the same things.

Adults sleeping with children who are not related to them have a problem. It is not the "greatest form of love," it is perverted.

Claire
Bend, OR

Carl McMahon   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I think this is a travesty that the people that mourn his death think his pop-icon status in any way outweighs the person that he truly was. Bottom line...this guy was a pedephile that sexually abused kids. Bottom line...he was a pop icon indeed but his personal issues, in my mind, heavily trumped his status as a star that should warrant all this B.S. Hell O.J got away with it, just as Michael did. Thats the way I see it, and I am entitled to my opinion.

Sincerely,

CMAC

Dave Wosik   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I think the easiest way to curb this kind of hate speech (short of Duct taping Peter King's mouth) is to NOT TELEVISE it... I feel as though, as much as I love your segments, you're glorifying an idiot and a hatemonger. Anything else, the reasoning and excuses and substantiations he offers...this is a post-hoc lynching. It's cheap. Please stop snowballing this embarrassing display.

Dwayne   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

This guy is obviously an idiot considering the fact that Michael was acquitted of all charges and the accuser is now admitting he lied. Michael Jackson was not only an icon but a genuinely nice and giving human. He's contributed to more charities than anyone. Ever!!! He built Neverland Ranch for sick and disabled kids to enjoy at no cost and the best thing you can say about a guy that's done so much for so many is these bias comments. Politicians have done more damage to this economy ever so I don't think he's in the position to talk down on anyone. I would be real surprised if this idiot is reelected with a mind frame like that. At the end of the day we are all guilty of assuming things that we have no clue about. Michael Jackson will have to answer to God if he did but in my honest opinion I really believe the kid lied (as recently admitted) for financial reasons. The court system is here to judge on earth and God will judge after. I believe he'll be innocent once again. Let him rest in peace and please don't let one negative assumption over shadow the millions of things he have done for this world.

Angela G.   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

It is not fair that someone can call a deceased person a pedifile. He was not convicted of something that he was accused of. I do believe the comment was made because he ( Michael) is black and was a legend in music. An apology needs to be made to the world in this rediculous statement made against Michael. Let it go. Besides he had done alot for children all over the world and is greatly loved and will always be missed!!

pripley   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

is there too much coverageYESwas he found not guilty?YES , jerry garcia should have gotten this kind of coverage , i am not sure that anyone changed music more than he did

Andrea   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

All of Michael Jackson fans have stood by him and know that he was innocent of the charges. Apparently, this person did not know that Michael Jackson was found NOT GUILTY. All of Michael Jacksons' fans want to hear everything especially since some of us cannot be there. This person needs to keep his opinions to himself because no one cares what he thinks. This "congressman" who is a public figure should know that making those comments will make people change their opinions about him. He does not know who Michael Jackson was and is taking about someone who has passed away. This congressman, whatever his name is, is bringing up things that he knows nothing about. LEAVE HIM ALONE!!! HE'S GONE!!! LET HIS FANS MOURN AND KEEP YOUR IGNORANT STATEMENTS TO YOURSELF!

Mike Cooper   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Just because M.J. was acquitted does not mean he was innocent.

Noeisha   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

I think the Congressman was way out of line. Michael Jackson was acquitted of the charges...how can he (the Congressman) go on national TV and label Michael as a pervert. The Congressman's job is to represent his district...not give his personal opinions about someone. How would he feel if someone went on national television and air out his dirty laundry. This Congressman is clearly racist and is jealous that Michael Jackson is getting a lot of media attention.

Sonny Harmon   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Why would anyone pay millions of dollars to pay to make a case "go away"? If it were me I would want my day in court. Interesting. Great music, sad life. CNN has a problem with a republican speaking out about Mr. Jackson simply because he's a republican. No big deal there as expected.

WIllie   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Rick
Enough is enough Micheal was aquited, but he paid out millions to settle out of court. If one poor guy admitted having sleepovers with little kids we would be fried. Michael did influence music but truth stands Michael was a wierdo

shawn allan   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Rep. Peter King :

is this why he was voted to be a congressmen to dishour the dead ?

My grandchildren and nephews spent time at Neverland and slept overnite and had nothing but fun fun fun .
i mean look at this congeressmen omg i wud not even like my little ones on the same street with him tell him to look in the miirror

Michele Voron   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

I think that Michaal Jackson was a very talented man that was tormented by his father, malaise from the burning incident. He did some stupid things with his life and his children, but now it is not time to concentrate on matters of state and let the man rest in peace.Our citizens looks for an escape from important realistic issues to deverts to a pop culture icon instead of being concerned about health issues, safe and secure homeland issues, and here they are mourning this guy who may have touched a lot of souls, but also hurt some in hi peculiat life style What about Farrah Faucet, and the others who recently died. It seems that MJ's death has taken away some of the notorioty from those who have fans and family too. If an ordinary guy in Camden NJ died from overuse of drugs and was known in his communitym would the entire world mourn him. One thing I just have to write is that you can not totally blame the doctors for giving him these illicit drugs. The man has been in pain for years since he got badly burned, and if you suffered from the kind of pain he has incurred wouldn't you want to take anything that helps. Now, we have to see if the doctor who gave him the annesthetic ligitimately got or stole it. I wonder. Can't blame the doctors for everything.

MV

Brit   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

ABSOLUTELY NOT! That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Someone whose gave millions to charities going to molest children. That's ridiculous.

Paul   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

The lawyers managing the Jackson brand should file a gag order to keep this Republican from libelous statements.
Just another Republican looking for face time on CNN.
I wonder how FOX is spinning this.

Melvin   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

The Congressman was fully aware that if he made a negative comment towards Michael,that he would get all the pleblicity for his own use.

Gregory Hess   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

During the Michael Jackson molestation trial CNN dug for every little incriminating piece of information. Now CNN acts as though any reference to his alleged activities ,both those charged and those settled out of court is way out of bounds. Give me a break

Ally   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

People make accusations against other people for a variety of reasons. Accussations aren't always true. That why we have laws.
I don't believe the Congressman is familiar with the Bill of Rights. Articles 7 and 8 say an individual is entitled to due process and to confront his accusers. Michael Jackson is dead and can't exercise these rights.
Mr King, you are violating a basic principle of this country – innocent until proven quilty.

michael   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

I think Senator King should as a matter of urgency establish his own media company to showcase his family and other things he believes in and also establish a court of law to prosecute Michael Jackson and others he desires so as to find them guilty of whatever crimes he so desires to bring up against them.

glenn choate   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

This guy was obviously ill. NO ONE pays an accuser $20 to keep silent unless they"re guilty. Stop glorifying this guy.

ron   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

P. KIng is spending a lot of time on a dead celebrity 3,000 miles out of his jurisdiction! I feel he is a flat-out racist, anyway! Has he ever been so vocal about the numerous unjustified shootings of blacks & latinos by the NYPD?

D. Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

One of the boys who accused Michael Jackson of molestation came on a radio station within the last two weeks and admitted that it was all a lie!!!! Why don't we hear news about this??? Let's contact (the boys) or probably their parents and put this on the news!!!

Robin Wood   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

I think Pete King just wants some attention. If a person is found NOT GUILTY by his peers then he is not guilty. To talk so badly after a person has died shows no class. His mother is still alive and hearing this slander. Someone could accuse King of the same thing and then what would he do?

Mary   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

Please stop celebrating this self-made freak and drug addict which we will probably find out in all actuality killed himself with drugs. Additionally, he obviously had some serious mental problems.

Billy   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

I agree with Pete King I work in television news as well and am horrified by all of the coverage you have given this pedophile There is a recession 2 wars and an Iranian revolution going on maybe if the media would cover some of this stuff more the average person can actually know whats going on.I have switched to NPR because of this and have been a cnn watcher all since you primered in the 80s and i know alot of others who have switched as well.

Brian Smith PhD   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

About Barney Frank…… as we have seen in recent days…. Politicians are hypocrites like Gov Sanford. So, isn't it indicative of politicians that if the protest too much, then they are likely failing to deal with their own demons. Therefore, since he has shot off his BIG FAT MOUTH, It would not surprise me if Frank turns out to be the biggest molester of them all.

Alexia Vernon   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

As someone who has survived childhood sexual abuse, what I find saddest about the coverage of Michael Jackson's death and sexual abuse allegations is that we're not engaging in a productive conversation about pedophilia. While Michael Jackson's behavior does indeed fit the classic profile of a child molester, he was acquitted and has passed on. What's most important is that we discuss the prevalence of childhood sexual abuse and realize that the obsessive attention MJ showed to children who passed through Neverland can be as damaging as inappropriate genital touching. It is NEVER okay for grown men to sleep in bed with other people's children and we MUST stop demonizing people we suspect of abuse and instead seek to intervene and get them help. Sexual abuse is a sickness. It's like a cancer. It spreads so quickly, often from one generation of young people in a family to the next because it's so hard and painful to confront those we suspect and so few children ever come forward. Let's substitute the harsh rhetoric for a discussion about how we make an impact by identifying and treating people we suspect of this behavior (e.g. the majority of whom were abused as boys themselves) and empower survivors to move on and lead healthy sexual lives.

Ruby Pace   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Hey Rick.
I think that Rep.King should keep his mouth shut. I have been telling everyone that it could be YOU someday just because you're accused. And everyone wanted Michaels money. And I come from a big family that it wasn't a bad thing to have kids on your bed. But with all these dirty minds out there you can't just love childern now days.
Ruby Pace........TN

Kellie   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty by 12 jurors in a very conservative community. Mr. King must not be a very good congressman if he were then he would know Michael is free and clear of all 14 charges. That is the whole bases our country was built around. I wonder how he would feel if he lost someone who got called a pervert . People like him should think of Michael's children they do not deserve this they Love their Dad. Mr. King is a very disrespectful human being speaking that way of someone kind, loving and givng who has passed on.
Kellie

Carl T. Williams, II   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Congress King, is a sad sick individual. I pray that he live to regret those slanderous and inflamatory statements. Congressman King is one of those self-righteous individuals who attempts to hold a flashlight on the negatives of others while hiding his dark and deprave sins in the dark. The Bible tells us our sins will find us.

Crystal   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

As I looked at your name, I wondered why you have your job as a representative. It shames me to think you have the position that you do and you are just realizing the state of our country with the death of Micheal Jackson. While I do not support his personal life or mistakes, or choices, there are many that enjoyed his talent and he deserves his moment for his success. Unfortunately our country has many talented people, with very troubled personal lives, MJ will not be the last. I can only hope that your good deeds in your current position tell us more about the good man you are than, what we will find in your closet when you die? Be care with the finger pointing, we already are watching the personal life of a governer, that was respected, being played out publicly. Let God judge them…….

Leopold Caudillo   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

I think Mike's death blew it for the people in Iran. Way to much media coverage for Michael Jackson.

Mari   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

I can't believe this guy has the nerve to be so judgemental! First of all, he was acquitted of the charges against him. So he is right in respect of something is wrong with this country when we put trust in the legal system only when it's convenient. Why have a trial for child molestation if you are going to be labeled regardless. Also, to say that there is nothing good about this guy is absolutely extreme. Being in the Guinness Book of Records for his humanitarianism I guess is evil. It's amazing how when Princess Diana got all the TV time and coverage after her death in spite of her infidelity at the time, no one complained. I hope he isn't going for re-election, his ignorance counts him out.

MO   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

If Rep. King is so tired of the Michael Jackson coverage then why is he adding to it? Oh wait, I get it, it's a media opportunity for him.

Wendy Thompson   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

I must say that I am feeling a little over inundated with the media coverage of Michael Jackson. However, Cong. King should be ashamed of himself over his comments: Michael was found Not Guilty of all charges by a jury of his peers, and as a result, Cong. King shows little respect for the letter of the law and the belief system of our own country. Michael Jackson touched many people, and many of those people feel a piece of their life has slipped away and they are grieving their loss enmasse– which in this case means in the public eye. Let them grieve–Lord knows, If I can't handle all the coverage, I can always change the channel.

Lonette   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

OMG!!!! what give you the right to call a deceased Icon such hateful things? you wouldn't like if those thing were said about your son after he died now would you Micheal Jackson open his heart and home to the world and shared his love of music with all not some but all the world you need to be a shame of yourself I hope you do not get another term as a prep for poeple cause we see where u want to lead back to 1955

Patrice   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Hey Rick,
While most appreciate the talents of Michael Jackson, his behaviour is not without tarnish. Consider the case of OJ Simpson, who was aquitted of 2 murders, yet I believe most people think he is guilty. Although Michael Jackson was aquitted in a court of law it doesn't mean he is not guilty. It just means at that time there was not enough evidence. That being said, a very talented and sad person is dead, mysteriously. Let's mourn his passing but stop glorifying his life. And everyone should stop trying to make a buck off a dead man!

JAJohnson   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

unreal that anyone that is a part of our goverment would make such a statement...
has he ever heard of, innocent until proven guilty??? Micheal Jackson is in the public eye & wide open in to many ways for years, for people to go after him... I could go on forever on this...
how sad that this man has stated such bad things of a man that can not do anything to defend himself... but then again he already has in the past & that should be all he had to do... just because you don't like how much media coverage he is getting & maybe your just tired of hearing the same thing over & over again, deal with it...
if he has the footage to prove Micheal Jackson is guilty of the things he has stated about him then let him show it... and if not I do hope that Micheal Jackson's family will now take him to court for making false statements...

Claudette Frenette   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Congressman King did not say alleged. Michael Jackson was acquitted and is now deceased and not yet buried. How would he feel if he was charged and acquitted and somebody would still accuse him. I bet he would bring them to justice.

René   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

The real heroes are defending our freedom & the right to choose who our idols are.

Just a small reminder....O.J. was also acquitted!

Avis Townsend   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

No arrest was ever made. People who knew Michael said that, because he had no childhood, Michael was childlike and wanted to share his fun with other children. Who are we to judge? Why not judge his father who was brutal to a small child and forced him to work 24 hours a day like he lived in a third world country.

Why are people so quick to crucify those they do not know?

I used to be a Republican but changed my affiliation years ago when I realized it was a party of hypocrites and naysayers. Let Michael rest in peace.

Michael was a child himself, mentally. He giggled and blushed and his actions made him different. Being different is not being perverted.
Hypocrites like Larry Craig are perverted.

I am looking forward to the sale of the video of his final dress rehearsal, and I am 62 years old and white. We aren't all prejudiced and disapproving.

Andrew Owen   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

I voted no but with half a heart. Based on what you're asking, you're asking us to say "yes" he's a pedophile or "no" it doesn't matter if he was a pedophile because he was an incredible music star. I'd like another option of "no, I disagree with Rep. King because Michael Jackson was never officially charged during his first court battle and was acquitted during his second."

Anna in Dallas   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Yes, I liked his music, but the guy, let's be honest, he just wasn't right. King is right, I would never leave my children or grandchildren with him.

Guilty or not, the justice system isn't always right. And as someone who was molested as a child I find all the coverage of Michael Jackson disturbing. The fact that he was accused on more than one ocassion really truly raises red flags and enough is enough.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

He made a big difference in this world, he did heal this world with his music,also he was a true humanitarium.Shame on Peter King with your dirty mind and tongue.What good are you doing,to heal this world????

Days   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

I believe that a person that is in the "industry" has a public life and a private life. The fact that they are miserable as a person doesnt stop the fact that they have an undeniable talent.

He was once accused of doing things that would sicken the majority of us but that at the same time doesnt take away from the fact that he changed the music world. Yet there comes a time when we all have to move along... I think that time has come.

Joy   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

I wish all the people who are tired of hearing about Michael Jackson would just take matters in there own hands and turn the channel, stop complaining, and respect greatness!

Daniel Guerra   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

The issue of M.J. being acquitted on child molestation charges is a joke, our jury system is a joke. I have been on various juries and they consist of a representation of our society; therefore, they consist of smart, dump and prejudice people. Juries make many mistakes, like letting O.J. get away with murder. But guess what, O.J. finally got what he deserved and maybe M.J.

Mark   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

He's playing to his masses. Easy talking point for the evangelical Neo-Conservatives. Did you expect any less than Slander and libel? I didn't.

J. Hunter   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

No one really cares what this Congressman had to say, I believe HE'S getting to much media coverage. I think he has other issues with MJ. Could it possibly be that a "BLACK" man is getting to much coverage?????

Amin   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Can the man Rest in Peace. What a moron to throw insults at the dead. Who is this Man anyway? Maybe he's tryna get some attention.

Byron Hamlar   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

He is full of crap. Michael Jackson was found not guilty. He must be a pervert to call someone else one when Jackson is dead and can't speak for himself. Peter is a congressman and talking about someone like that is not appropriate and he is telling lies because again Michael Jackson was NOT GUILTY.

poetry   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

It always amazes me when those blessed to be among the most educated of our society can show such little compassion towards those who have lived less conventional lives.

Especially those who are trained to be versed in the discernment of human rights and charged with the protection of our communities.

The fact that such harsh comments can so easily be dispensed by respected members of our own government, only seems to underline MJackson's message that this world needs healing.

As MJ's lyrics point out in his song Man in the Mirror, "If you want to make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make a change."

Compassion and Kindness have always had a far more profound effect on humanity and Condemnation and Judgement.

Lori   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

When did allegations become truth? All should ask, has everything said about your life/deeds/actions been accurate?

M.J. was acquitted by an all white jury that heard testimony against him from former staff and children. This tells me that the preponderance of evidence during the trail had to have been overwhelming in support of M.J.'s INNOCENCE.

lamont gladden   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

i think the congressman should be more concerned about the state of the New York economy than whether or not a dead celebrity was a pedophile/pervert! What is he doing to help the people in his state suffering from the economic hardships? His energies can be better spent focused on healthcare and other pertinent issues!

beau   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

im beau and im 13 and i do agree with that guy micheal is a pervert.and its stupid that they didnt find him gulity because hes a celeberty.i had a friend t went to jail because he ball tapt a kid its a game that all teenage kids do and he has to do 3 years in jail because someone said he touched a kid inappropriate and its just stupid that they would spend a week just remember a pervert

Andrew   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Name one entertainer more popular worldwide than Michael Jackson, who changed music more than he did, who sold over 50 million copies of one album, who could stand in front of hundreds of thousands of people and give them the greatest show of their life, who could make people faint left and right, who could dance the way he did.

YOU CAN'T.

And you still wonder why there is a lot of news coverage?

Use your common sense Peter King.

He slept in bed with children because he had a horrible childhood and would go to bed crying and wishing he had someone there to cheer him up after being constantly beaten by his father, degraded about his big nose and pimples by his cousins....

Way to be an example Peter King.
Way to be a respected and loving individual.
Thanks for allowing me to lose faith in Representatives.
THANK GOD I DON'T LIVE IN NEW YORK ANYWHERE NEAR WHERE YOUR STUPIDITY WOULD RUB OFF ON ME.

Tyron   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Congressman King needs to get over himself . Michael Jackson was a ledgend in his own time, not a pedophile, not a child molester, and absolutely not a pervert. He was found not guilty of ALL charges. Jackson contributed a huge amount of money in charities specified for children. No pedophile does that. Congressman King, DO NOT disrespect this great man in his death. You should be ashamed of yourself. Do not slander him, his legacy. You are so disrespectful but I forgot you are a republican

loic   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Hi Rick!
I really believe that, the beauty of the United State of America remains on the diversity of the attitudes, and behaviors of these personalities who had contributed to edify the American dream!
It mean, being legends haven’t keep them out of the weaknesses of humans!
Let’s just pay to Michael Jackson the tribute he deserves as, Elvis Presley, Marlon Brando, Frank Sinatra, etc.
They are not saints, they had just been greatest entertainers with some sins in theirs secrets gardens!
While politicians are the society’s nightmare, entertainer’s deliveries are, hope and joy!

Respect for theirs achievements!

Loic, Los Angeles, CA

Bret   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

He was acquitted of all charges and deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Please withhold my name.

kelvin mays   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

To be quite frank about it i'm tired of hearing about dead soldiers in Iraq. We know that they are there and killing bad people as well as innocent people but no ones talking about the innocent. So Rep King need to stop trying to make himself look good because were tired of that to.

LA   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Only in America is a person proven innocent or not convicted, but still found guilty. Happened with O.J.'s first trial! MJ has not been convicted of not even a parking ticket.

And quite frankly, if he really molested the first little boy, then I'd like to ask any parent in here how much is enough to by your silence if your child has been molested? This case was brought in LA, and in case anyone has forgotten, in LA a person can be convicted/not convicted and you can still sue!

So why did the parents take the money, if they could have sought to put MJ in jail for violating their child, and still sue him civilly? It's because the little boy was lying.

Kobe Bryant did the same thing. Paid her money, the case went away. I don't see anyone here calling Kobe Bryant a rapist.

Gloria Fontana   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

I think this politician likes attention. Congressman Peter King seems to have some kind of anger issues! But who am I to make that judgement? And who is he to make a public judgment about his personal opinion about Michael Jackson. Regardless of the contreversy that surrounds Michael Jackson's life it is not Congressman Peter Kings place to re-trial Michael Jackson. I think it's in very poor taste. If you are tired of listening or hearing about Michael Jackson turn your TV off or change the channel. It's that simple. Perhaps take care of what might be going on in your community. Or even better do some self improvement.

Richard   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

There is no question regarding this individual's contribution to the music world, he was a genius in many ways as he proved himself in that area many times; the concern is his relationships with young children and whether it was a way to relive his own childhood in a non destructive way/supportive way or if it was an opportunity to involve himself in some activity that might harm children – a trial was held and he was found not guilty – questions will always remain with us as adults who are in the business of protecting children – we can not help that.

noel   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Just because OJ Simpson also was not convicted of killing his wife does not mean he didn't do it. Even if Michael was innocent of child molestation, the coverage on him by the media is WAY OVERBLOWN. Our world and country are in serious trouble and there are so many issues on the economy, foreign policy, etc., that are not being seriously covered because of all this hype about MJ. Move on already!!!!!

JohnFlanders   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Yes, Michael Jackson was acquitted, but then again so was O.J. Simpson. When you have enough money, you can make anything slide under the rug.

Do you really think an innocent man would pay a settlement of TWENTY MILLION DOLLARS just to make some sad allegations "go away?" No, you wouldn't.

This guy was a sick, deranged freak. Yes, he had a bad childhood. Get over it. Lots of people have bad childhoods without the benefit of making millions and millions of dollars afterwards, and you don't hear them complaining.

Yes, he had some great songs and was an icon of the 90's... so what? I know plenty of sex offenders who live around my area... Would i let my children go SPEND THE NIGHT IN THEIR bed just because they have a great singing voice? Don't think so!!

You people need a serious reality check.

Vickie G. Leland,NC   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

I'm disgusted with most senators,especially sen. King and his remarks about Michael Jackson. This type of remark peased me off, perhaps if he would do his part as a senator, he wouldn't have the time to watch tv scenes of "The King of Pop"! (The senator must keep in mind,that the majority of senators are corrupt in their on way as well.) Respect Michael family if nothing else., ok???

Charles Long   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

The evidence was there to convict Jackson as a pedophile. The jury was starstruck and ignoramuses. That doesn't mean he wasn't guilty. OJ was not convicted either. You probably think he wasn't guilty either. You people are as stupid as the jury.

Laurette Barondess   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

The outpouring for Michael Jackson should be and I think is for his contribution to music and that legacy and not for his personal life. All of us may have things we would not want belabored at our memorial and I've never been to one where this was done. Let him rest in peace and may the naysayers never rest.

Kayli K   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

PLEASE just stop talking about MJ already! Although I disagree with 90% of what Peter King has to say there are so many more important things to discuss- what's going on in Iran? What about N Korea? Seriously who cares about a drugged out child abuser? It's sad that Americans are more interested in washed up weirdo "artists" than things that effect their daily lives like the Cap and Trade Bill!

Mariah Sanchez   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

The Congressman is just upset because no one will talk about him when he is gone. Michal Jackson has given us great music to listen to. He is the King of Pop and he will always be. That dumb guy is a nobody and he will always be a nobody. So the nobody needs to lay off someone who is a somebody. All that Peter wants is some fame. What a poor guy.

Namrata   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Michael Jackson himself was abused as a child, so why would he want to abuse other children?

Eddie Cintron   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

This Congressman should stay busy tending to government issues and not disrespect the legal system of America that acquitted Michael Jackson, he got his day in court andwas found not guilty. The Jackson Family can celebrate that justice was found for their dear son. May the Jackson family find comfort in this difficult time. God Bless you all.

LaVern Wilder   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Rep. Peter King is lost, he's commenting on a man who's done nothing but help children. Did King not hear the statement from the last alledged victim state that Michael never touched him. Please get your facts straight.

Walter   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

This just shows how disgusting Western society has become. It sickens me that people are more than willing to overlook the crimes of a child molester (who paid multi-millions to avoid jail time) just because he wrote dance music; as if dance music somehow turns pedophiles into heroes.

Brittany   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

I just think that Peter King owes the Jackson Family an apology. To be a congressman, you should have a little more respect and decency toward others. If you don't have anything nice to say, you should not say it all. The comment was very rude and disrepectful. Something should really be done about it. Hey Peter King do us all a favor and shut up!!!

aymee   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

What I'm sick of is ignorance. Michael was found not guilty, drop it. The only ones that know the whole truth is michael, the accusers, and god...only one of those has the right to judge anyone. I pray Michael knew the lord and is no longer the sad soul he was on earth. Its a crying shame it took his death for people to look at what he did for this world while he was here.

Jervay   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Let the man soul rest in peace for God's sake!!!

Donna   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

You know, I'm really not a fan of Michael's later work but was a huge fan 25 yrs ago when I was in high school. This is what's disturbing to me...all these politicians (actually people in general) who claim such conservatism and high moral standards, are always the first ones to judge someone based on what they believe instead of what the facts are. Regardless of whether you think he lived an odd life or not, he was acquitted of charges brought against him. Now, whether he did it or not it's still not for us to judge. As far as I can tell, the media is really only celebrating his music, not his person. I, too, agree that the media coverage has been too much but that doesn't give me a right to speak bad of him, nor does it give anyone else that right. Seems to me that the senator has a little too much time on his hands or not enough real issues to deal with...and that's hard to imagine.

Lis   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Remember this, agreeing to settle out of court is considered an intelligent legal strategy in many high profile cases, because legal fees and not to mention the media frenzy associated with high profile cases is insane. Agreeing to settle is NOT admission of guilt.
It is not enough to have tortured him while he was alive, now your leaving his children and family with this stigma to live with.
I get sick of congressmen's rhetoric, but I don't insult you publicly. Same goes for Media. People loved him deal with it!

Loren Zaleschuk   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Peter King should resign, anyman who is so disrespectful of the familys feelings and to bash a world wide icon the day before his funeral should NOT BE IN A POSITION OF POWER.
A angry mans feelings come out. Should this man beable to make descions for our familys. Not mine.
Loren

theresa   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

WHY ISN'T THAT WE DIDN'T HEAR COMMENT ABOUT HOW MUCH ANNA NICHOLE SMITH DEATH WAS COVER ON THE NEWS???

Dan Lepine   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I think the congressman should remember that M.J. has a family that is grieving the loss of a son right now, and try to be a little more respectfull.

Devon   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

this is a pretty big issue here
first, i want to say that this isnt "wedge issue" as you called it a moment ago, its a NON ISSUE. frankly he was a musician. thats it. why do we need DAYS of coverage on his personal life.
in fact i throw some of your hypocryisy your way. a moment ago you all said that should be focusing on his music and not his personal life..so why do you keep shoving information about his will, the costody of his children or his sexual preferences down our throats.

when presidents die they dont get this kind of coverage and its a sign of the times. its a syptom of the 24 hour news feeds. can you really tell me that right now at this moment there isnt something more important going on somewhere in the world?

as for what king said, well look the man was a pervert. CNN reported that he was in fact gay(not a perverted thing in and of itself mind you) he settled out of court at least once on this whole child molestation thing. someone you had one said that sometimes people with money will settle to make something go away. Really? you beileive that a man who was what 400 million in debt would just throw away what was it, 20 million? i dont think so, if you are innocent you dont settle.

i also want to ask you all this, did OJ kill his wife? because he was also aquitted, and well i think we all feel roughly the same about that one as well.

Susie   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

CNN has never been a channel to "reach" this hard for a story. No one cares what this blow hard has to say. STOP TRYING TO MAKE THIS STORY HAPPEN!

Duckkman   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

That comment was very ignorant!!! I can't say if he did these lewd acts that they said he did or not, but there are somethings you just don't say. Before he goes off at running at the mouth, he needs to ask his self these questions. Was he convicted of these crimes? Was he there to witness these crimes?
Just like any other artist he was a victim of good and bad rumors. We read these on text messages from phones, the Internet , and we here them from other people.
Yeah, he agree to a settlement for one or more of the cases. Hey, if I had the money(because that what the so called victim wanted any way) I would do the same because I would not have to commit those kinds of acts. Before anyone says anything negative please have some facts to back your statement up. RIP MJ "King of Pop"

RJ Fischer   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

The congressman has rights to say what he feels just like you and I do.
Don't give me Politically correct crap...
This clearly is FREEDOM OF SPEECH FOR ALL...!!!

Deanna Richardson   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Hey Rick! The Congressman may believe in freedom of speech. Maybe the American people need to re-evaluate whether this nation needs to accept freedom of speech or stem the flow of peoples thoughts and feelings like you seem to be, Congressman Peter Kings.

Lisa McKenzie   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

This man has no idea if his allegations are true or not. None of us will probably ever know for sure but Michael was acquitted of ALL charges when it was obvious that some people wanted him found guilty. This idiotic bigot congressman needs a pie in his face. This is not the time nor is it ever time for anyone to condemn a man who is not around anymore to defend himself. The coverage of Michael is NO DIFFERENT from the coverage when Princess Diana died . THEY ARE ICON's. I, for one ,want to know what is going on just like I did when Diana died. That lasted for months and with all the jackals out there salivating for the untold details of Michael's life and death, this coverage will last for months also. I commend CNN on their (mostly) fair coverage of this iconic man's life. Let him get buried for God's sake! If you don't like it, change the channel! Where is the pie?

goldenya   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

King is a Racist for sure it's not about a child thing every body knows he was not guilty. it's about how great he was , what he did for a lot of people King give me a break. you are jealous of M J .

Cause when you die no body ' s gonna know if ..........

Disgusted   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

If you are in the public eye you will always be the subject of percussion. Lies, Lawsuits, Jealousy, & Scandals. Unless you have ever been in the position of defending yourself for something you have not done. You will never know what it is like. Money is the root of all evil. Everyone is always trying to make the easy buck at someone else's expense, even after their death. Take a good long look in your own closet before pointing fingers. I'm sure your are going to have something come back to haunt you! Let the dead Rest In Peace.

M. Ashburne   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Everybody has a right to their own opinion, but his timing was very insensitive. He probably needs the air time and decided to voice his very insensitive opinion on television. Accusations and being found guilty are two different things. We could accuse Peter King for being a racist and an idiot, but that doesn't mean that they're actually true.

An opinion is definitely different than the actual facts.

Lorrie Brumley   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I appreciate all the Michael Jackson coverage and cannot believe he is gone.

My comment is for Candy Crowley. I don't know what she is doing – but she looks great. During the campaign, I'm sure the hours and stress beat her up – but she looks great and I think she is a gifted journalist.

If she has some tips for us out here – pls encourage her to post them because I would love to look healthier and younger like her.

Thanks! Lorrie Brumley

CC   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Why should one's opinion about someone change once they are deceased? This is the Representative's opinion whether anyone agrees with it or not. Granted, Jackson was found innocent in a court of law, but so was O.J. Simpson. If a public figure comes out and calls him a murderer once O.J. dies, would there be the same outrage? Public opinion, personal opinion, is just that, opinions, and thankfully, in the U.S. we are at liberty to state them.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

This man should bow his head in shame for such comments. Katheryn Jackson is in mourning right now and does not need to hear such immature comments. Michael was found NOT guilty congressman.

Laura Fair   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I am appalled that a US Congressman could say such a thing about anyone that has been charged with a crime and acquitted. Michael Jackson, as we all know, was found innocent.

Now, I wonder how he would feel if somebody called him a pedophile, if he were charged with child abuse and subsequently acquitted.

Shame on him . . . shame on someone of his stature to say such a thing.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Shame on you ,Peter King what's in the heart comes out of the mouth.We all see whats in your heart wonder who's the pervert.

just another opinion   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Rick,

I am sick of all the people like Mr. King that are quick to point the finger at Michael and his oddness throughout the years. I find the ones that have no compassion at this time are the ones that need to spend some time looking in their own yards and at themselves to determine what kind of person they are being with their time here on earth. Also, it seems those that point fingers usually do so at things they do not understand. Shows ignorance. His comments sure did seem judgemental of a situation that he was not involved in nor privy to all the information necessary to form an opinion. Even if he does not like MJ, he can keep his opinion to himself or just not be so hostile with his opinions. What example is this guy setting for his family, friends, people he represents? I cannot get enough of the coverage on this topic. I could stand for a Michael channel nonstop. And I am not a hard core fan. I am just simply interested in his life and his messages. And, as for all the other people complaining about how much coverage this is getting, the public is asking for it, they are blogging, and buying and reading and searching as I am. So, keep up the good work, I would be totally bummed and probably would have turned off cnn by now if you all had moved on quickly.

vadiva30   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I don't have a problem with people expressing their opinions about Michael Jackson, but Mr. King used slanderous language that was irresponsible as a politician to use. Michael Jackson was acquitted of all charges in the court of law.

I am part of the MTV generation, unlike Rep King, so Michael Jackson was an Icon for someone like myself who enjoyed his music and his influence in the entertainment industry. Unfortunately Michael Jackson led the latter part of his life the way he died. RIP finally MJ!!!!

Sofia   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

The death of Michael Jackson has touched us all since it was a sudden death. The coverage is the least we can do in celebrating his accomplishments, and his ability to inspire so many people around the world.
Peter King, it is embarrassing, and disrespectful to the fans and family who are still grieving at this time. And to make such false accusations of Mr. Jackson, is absolutely shameful. Please spend your time in helping and improving public schools in New York City rather than making a ridiculous statements on something that does not need your opinion.

Faye in Arizona   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

MJ was found not guilty. Mr. King is a homophob who sees things in terms of black & white. MJ's admission of "sleeping" with children had nothing to do with a sex act or molestation. He was a victim of extortionists who took advantage of his misspeak to Martin B. MJ was a child in a man's body. Mr. King should have a deeper understanding of mental illness. Glad he's not in my state.

Connie Moore   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

King is entitled to his comments, however he should not have used the media as his speaking platform to voice his personal opinions of Mr. Jackson.

joe   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Cable Companies are the only reason that Michael Jackson is on 24/7.

It's the biggest story of the day. It is not homage or reverence it's money.

Why not blame the cable companies? All those people need something to talk about, after all they are being paid to comment on
whatever is the news of the day.

Michael Jackson is not promoting himself.

Ellen   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Who is this stupid Rep. King who called Michael Jackson a pervert? It is because of racist people like him that Michael had to die. You white racist people lie on him and broke his sprit. This representative can live to be 100 years, he will never get the recognition that Michael is getting. I feel so sorry for this white man.

Ellen, Minnesota

George Thompson   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Rick
This Congressman is unforturnately the last of the Klux Klux Klan
that represents what the GOP is left with. And this expains why
republicans have no solution alternatives to President Obama.
It is so sad that in this country when our own legal system states
a person is innocent, the racist bais comments are still allowed
to be made to the public. So much for " Freedom Of The Press".

EMMA H. KIRK   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Congressman King is merely pandering to his predominantly white conservative constituency. He should apologize to the Jackson family AND fans.

ROSIE   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS LET MICHAEL JACKSON REST IN PEACE. REP KING SHOULD BE ASHAME OF HIMSELF FOR SAYING THESE THINGS ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON. I WONDER HOW HE OR HIS FAMILY WOULD FEEL IF IT WERE HIM THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT. NOT A GOOD FEELING I AM SURE. SO SHUT UP ALREADY REP KING AND LET MICHAEL JACKSON RIP. WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE...

Maria   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I'm outraged by Rep. Peter King comments about Michael Jackson. How dare him to disrespect the man after he is dead!! Let him be. Michael Jackson was found innocent in the court of his peers. He makes me sick. Rep. Peter King, you are a low life and you are very ignorant person. I bet you are corrupted within the politics that you are hiding. Look at yourself in the mirror before you talk about someone else. I'm praying you lose in your elections. yes, I would let my child alone with Michael Jackson in the room. I believe he never did nothing like that to any child. R.I.P Michael Jackson, you will be truly missed and you will live in our hearts forever and many generations to come. You are truly "The King of Pop." No one will ever take that title away from you. You are with the angels now. Be with the lord. I know you are looking down on your family and your fans. I can't wait until I get a Michael Jackson tattoo done. How about that Rep. Peter King. You are a nobody if you talk about someone like that. I hope Michael Jackson's family speaks out about your ignorant comments.

Robyn   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I'm sick of the haters who have no proof of their statements. No one complained like this when Elvis or John Lennon was mourned. Allow the fans to mourn and stop the hatred already. Enough is enough! People seem to forget the good MJ did because they are blinded by what the tabloids reported. Let's remember the good and let it go. He's dead and he's not coming back. Think about his family and his children left behind and be caring instead..

Mike   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

The only people I hear complaining about Michael Jackson are the same people who Are Not Music Lovers , they have little concept of Music but they Do have a concept of Fault Finding and Self Righteousness. My advice is 'Listen to the Music'.

Lisa Casey   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Mr. King wishes he had the attention alive Michael Jackson has dead.

Jacqueline   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

What right does Congressman King have to continue to call Michael Jackson a pedophile? Is King psychic? MJ was found innocent and the case is now closed on this issue. Furthermore, the timing on King's comments is very poor and he should be ashamed at continuing with these accusations at this time. My question is, "what does King think can be gained from accusing a dead man of pedophilia?" This is a cheap attempt at getting votes ...

My sympathies are with the family of Michael Jackson having to endure such comments and judgement during their time of mourning.

Vee   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

As long as there is an audience and an interest for MJ..the news wire will be hot...so tell Mr. King as long as there is an interest in MJ the media will be on it.

Peggi   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I think the main point is, enough harm has been done by a rich person who could pay to get out the consequences. Think of the kids.

ENOUGH OF MJ and get on with real news.

Travis L. Stokes   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Hey Rick,

Rep. King is flat out wrong and to suggest that he has justification for his comments is unthinkable. Michael Jackson did a lot of world charity work that is to be viewed in the likes of princess Diana and others. Michael was never convicted of anything and for Rep. King to be so dissrespectful and to have people believe that he is guilty after being proven not guilty is sad and rude. He needs to sweep around his own congressional door ( Gov. Stanford, i don't hear Rep. King saying that we should stop making his life news)before sweeping around Michael Jacksons.."He who lives in a glass house shall cast no stone"

muza   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

This congressman is a hater. Michael Jackson deserves the recognition for his talent. He broke barriers. It is unbelievable that MTV refused to show 'black' artist until Michael Jackson did his 'magic'. R.I.P M.J.

Robert Jones   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

The congressman must not get away with this if not the slender against MJ will not stop and can only increase.
Jackson family, what are you waiting for to send this guy to the gutter? No wonder MJ trusted strangers to execute his will. Show the world what you son and brother mean to you now. Please !!!
LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT

David   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I agree with the congressman. Just because he wasn't convicted doesn't mean he wasn't guilty. There is much more important news and heros to celebrate: U.S. Troops, teachers, police officers.

Baymba Ellis   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I think the congress man just want to get some attention from the public. He does not realy know MJ. He need to shout up his month and pay more attention to his country that is facing serious finacial and job lost. The entire world singing with one voice Micheal Jackson who the hell are u congressman?

karl tollefson   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

rep. king is verbally bashing a dead individual and making comments not based on fact. Mr. Jackson was acquited wether rep. king likes it or not, perhaps we should look at mr kings behaviour and what he does when no onoe is looking and perhaps conjecture not based on fact could be said of him also. no wonder nothing gets done in washington when a republican is lambasting a dead person over non-factual evidence or charges. was mr jackson different...??? no doubt... does mr king recognize this... obviously not... i call on mr king to do his job and maybe go deal with real life situations.

Selena   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Some class Rep. King, at least show some respect for Michael Jackson's little kids instead of making such comments. And BTW, he was acquitted.

Sharon   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Yes, Michael Jackson was a talented singer. But he also was NOT a role model. Enough already about Michael Jackson. I will NOT be watching CNN tomorrow.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Maybe this tool's comments will take some of the heat off of that bimbo from Alaska and her impending down fall.

So THIS is what a congressman has to comment about. Why does he care what the free news media reports on? How about just turning the channel and watch 'Matlock'? Networks like CNN wouldn't give so much coverage unless it knew they would get such large viewership.

The republicans just keep the hits coming! Keep up the great work! It just helps guarantee that they'll be out of office through at least 2016!!

DBRodriguez   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Hey Rick, your very own Nancy Grace made her read between the lines comments about M. Jacksons alledged molestation charges, "now its between him and God", using her disrespectful condesending tone.

Barbara   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

OJ wasn't convicted of double murder, either. Money buys "justice" in this country, or at least reasonable doubt. I'm sorry for his family, but more sorry for his victims.

Alice Williams   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

My comment for King as a last name only. Is there a motive for your hostile manner toward Michael Jackson the "King of PoP". Could it be that you don"t have anything else as a representative of this Country to contribute but, malicious slander, and filth. No, it hasn't been enough credit given. Michael deserves all he is receiving. What have you done lately to be recognized for? Your 10 minutes of stupidness is over. So please, not another peep!!!!!!

Michael's friend....

Lisa   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I cannot believe that you are continuing this discussing story about
ONE MAN's slander on MJ. Stop it NOW!!!! I will never watch your show again. This was a bad decision on your part as a "journalist".
Also, for you to say that at "any" cocktail party your friends would
be saying the same thing is just prejudice. I suppose all of your
"friends" think the same way? JUST LIKE YOU!!!!

R.I.P. Michael Jackson, you are not a subjuct for slander you are to be
respected and loved forever!

Lisa NYC

J. Patrick   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Congressman King needed his 15 minutes of fame, it's too bad it just shows his stupidity. Where was he and his comments when his co-workers were cheating on their wives, not paying their taxes, and misusing OUR money? Michael is gone and nothing can hurt him anymore. I feel sad for his family, having to deal with all of this crap. If I were a Jackson, I would sue him for slander.

Dave   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

I agree with Congressman, King. I don't agree with Al Sharpton. I am still a MJ fan, but his life screamed "I need help!" But no one would listen. I just wonder how can a man be so talented that no one would give him a reality check and for him to get mental treatment. MJ's behavior was out of line. Shame on the Jacksons for allowing the ill behavior of MJ to be so out of line of the norm.

Susan S. Davis   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

For the record, Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of any crime. MJ is every bit as relevant as Frank Sinatra, Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly. As Barack Obama did in politics, MJ united people through his art. His artistry broke through racial and musical barriers that will transcend time. His humanity and charitable spirit will always be remembered the world over.

The social impact of a person of his artistic and humanitarian accomplishments, that motivates thousands of people to arrange their schedules on a weekday to attend memorial services demonstrates that the people have spoken: his music and entertainment are his legacy.

I hope that in his afterlife, Michael is able to see all of the tributes and fans remaining – and that he finally has the peace that so evaded him in his life on earth.

Sileshi   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

The congress man is a pervert himself. How could he say such things when people are very sad about the death of MJ.

The congress man is insulting the American judicial system. If a person is not convicted, that person is innocent. Doesn't the congressman believe in the American judicial system. If M.J. was guilty, he would have been in prison.

Pervert congressman.

Mauro Sandoval   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

M. Jackson was a great idol to all Americans. All his hard work change and altered America's Music to what it is today. I believe that he did no such thing. There is no concrete evidence that he ever did such thing. I doubt that he did. People just wanted to get money from him in any way possible. For those who judge him on such rumors should be ashamed, no evidence means no such crime was committed. It was one word versus another. He was not just an Idol but a father. Why would he be, in any case with other children? He has his own to take care of. None of the molestation charges were true or make sense. Nothing in this world is going to change M. Jackson's status, an Idol, a legend, an artist that will be dearly missed. Even if there was concrete evidence that he was a molester, we would still listen to his music, see his videos and buy his merchandise.

SF5   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Enough already.I was sick and tired of the coverage on the first day.Anybody with half a brain knows sleeping with kids is wrong.Money talks and if only the monkey could talk...........

Gloria Waechter   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

To portray Michael Jackson as a respectable celebrity is an insult to the children he molested. He was not only a deviant child molester, but a self mutilator, a drug addict, and NOT the type of person we would want any of our children to emulate. The message being sent to the public says a lot about the moral environment of our society. My personal opinion is "good riddance to bad rubbish"!

carl   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Peter King that's a Republican for ya. He need's to resign.

Erika   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Much of what we do in life has to do with our upbringing and environment. Michael was never given any defense to what he had to face in life. He was brought up without much care for his childhood and as he grew up he had too much money too soon and surrounded by unhealthy elements who still didn't teach him anything.

Just like Rep. King must have been brought up very sheltered and surrounded by ignorant people and in his adult life he is beholding to more ignorant people that's why scruples escape him.

Everybody has done and is doing something they don't want others to know. Can we please scrutinize King and see how much he stinks? On second thought, nevermind. He has not and will never make a positive difference in people's lives with MJ's magnitude so his useless thoughts and useless life is not worth talking about.

Rick why are you talking about him?

amanda   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

This guy is obviously crazy. Michael Jackson was a wonderful man that was found not guilty and all charges were dismissed. My question is why is everyone in the media attacking his legacy? If you want to get real about it Elvis died of a drug overdose on the toilet and he at the age of 25 pursued a 13 year old girl (priscilla) and know one attacked him this way! I am tired of the way the media is portraying MJ, He is was and will always be the greatest to ever live. People like this congressman need to think before they open there mouths and he better hope he is not up for re election anytime soon because the ENTIRE world is in mourning and will remember his comments.

Jasmine   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Instead of making laws like we pay Peter King with our tax dollars to do he has takin the Job of celeb gossip colum. Go work for the NATIONAL ENQUIRER Peter.
Michael Jackson has always delivered to us through his music.
America is currently in shams meanwhile "lawmaker" peter king is going around saying pointless things. He is currently juming from radio shows to news station trying justity his statements.
How about more law making.

Alpha girl   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

The man was a musical genius. Please celebrate the artist for what he contributed to the music world and leave the bad stuff until he is buried. We are not the judge or the jury now. He will have to account for all things he done here on earth and God has the final say now. Why don't you ask Sarah Palin and Mark Sanford how they feel about the coverage? I am sure they want more coverage on MJ to draw attention away from them.

Shadow Dancer   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Michael Jackson isn't even buried yet!! This congressman obviously wasn't taught that if you have nothing good to say, then say nothing. It's better to have people think you a fool, then to open your mouth and prove them right!

Janes the maint man   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Rick,

Michael Jackson was a very talent man, who was just judged and taken advantage of by a nasty world! He was no different the Elivis who was given a 3-day funeral event, but was not questioned or judged on his faults? Then there was Regan, who was also given a 3-day event. Why his this man judged so nasty? Can we just let his fans and family have this time to remember and celebrate this King of Pop within his final day! This congressman has no heart or soul if he could be so nasty and mean this time of sadness! Shame on him, he has no right to throw any stones! He is just another Rep. that is pulling another shadow on his already shamed party!

lezlee   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Another GOP psycopath rambling in delirium. Pete King.
This is news? NOT!

Kel   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Who left this Rep. King to decide MJ's fate. Michael was already tried for his "alleged" crimes. Rep King is looking for an easy way to draw attention to himself at the expense of Michael Jackson's death. Rep King acts as he is judge, jury & executioner. People need to be careful of what they say because karma is right around the corner. RIP Michael. Does this Rep. King have children? If so would he like it if people talked about him? He has NO respect for the death of an icon!

Lise   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Just another big mouth, probably pojecting all of the skeletons in his own closet. Stop making a name for yourself on the back of someone's death. Now that's sick!

Michele from Louisiana   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

if the truth be known we are all nosey and want to know what is going on. You couldn't win for losing. If you weren't covering it you would be critized for that.

Great job Rick and all of CNN,

Dave   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Peter King only wants his 15 mins of fame. Because we all know in 10 years from now, Who MJ was. Will we know who Peter King was? I rest my case.

Oh some advice for you Peter King. Have a wash before you go on TV. You look like you just walked out of a bar. Your SCUM, Did you even think, How MJ kids feel about your hateful comments? I hope you burn in HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lou solon   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Peter King is the pervert and a kook to boot. He's one of the most corrupt politicians in a sea of corrupt republican politicians. If you think "Duke" Cunningham was bad wait until the spotlight focuses on Peter King.

Michael Olschafskie   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Rep. King should leave out his opinions about Michael Jackson's lifestyle as he was cleared in a court of law. However, I do agree with Rep. King that there is far to much coverage in regards to Jackson while far more improtant events are taking place around the world. As a teacher I view this as the media once again contributing to misleading the young people in our country on what is really important. You coverage is telling children that wealthy famous people trump the events around the world. Events like those in China and the many lives of the not so famous that are being changed there as we speak. Shouldn't we be covering our troops on this 4th of July week/weekend and their role in maintaining the freedom we enjoy in this country. Jackson was a great and influential performer but this should be a secondary story at best, not you primary coverage. Does CNN have the courage to do whats right, not what sells?

Thank you,
Michael Olschafskie

Kris   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

I agree with Rep King. Michael Jackson did many inappropriate criminal acts, and we all know it. OJ Simpson was also acquited of a crime, but we all know he did the crime just as Michael Jackson comitted sexual crimes against children. He was no hero. Enough about him already.

Professor Joanne de Falla   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Rick- try watching the BBC to see how news should be delivered. I remember having to change channels whenever you appeared on Channel 7 news in Miami years ago- now you are on CNN- how on earth did this happen- your pretense at objectivity was transparent and the attempt to sound well educated comical. You interrupt your interviewees with a motivation to sensationalize. A true news anchor you are not.
As regards Michael Jackson, some of us are sick of this country's need to adore pop artists- as if they discovered a cure for cancer. He was talented long ago and I was one who thought Thriller one of the best albums of all time, but the last decade has been fraught with the personal libailities that led to the court case for child molestation. No one, no matter how famous, seems "normal" who cheerfully admits to sleeping with teenage boys and younger. Congressman King expresses the disdain many intellectuals in this country share- but then we are certainly not your intended audience.
Please inform your "expert" commentators as to the difference between "libel" and "slander."- that is, if you yourself know the difference.

As for me, I am off to change the channel.
exasperated from Coral Gables, Florida

D. Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

New Yorkers should be ashamed of their idiot representative for ovbiously voicing his own opinion about Michael. Rep King should be focusing on the parents and boys who LIED on Michael Jackson. He needs to investigate this BEFORE yapping off at the mouth!!

Soheila W   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Micheal settled his first case, becasue as an artist, he did not want publicity..he got acquited by Jury, if it was not for "Bashir" and the DA in Santa Barbara that was trying to get elected none of these would have happened..You are tired? so am I, We all are tired on this frenzy but who's fault is that? Micheal? instead of celebrating his life the New Agencies are sprading rummers and making everything worse>>> so congressman go to senate and instead of slaming a dead artist do somthing good and pass a law for the news agencies to limit their rummers and converage. Plus I think you should get your story right Micheal was not a petiflier and he was never charged, you should blame those parents that alowed their childern to go there without supervision, and than accusing him of untrue BS and get paid for it!!. Whom took advantage of whom? You should keep quite...or is it you need attention congressman???

sk   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Rick i just want to say this. peter King is a sick man

Angel   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty of the charges by a jury of citizens. God forbid Mr. King find himself in a similar position with the glare of the media and the world watching.

He was truly not only the king of pop but the king of music/dance in general. Michael, I never met you but I will truly miss you.

Valerie Cooksey   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

The court system found Michael Jackson "not guilty"! Michael Jackson was a victum of "Blood sucking vampires and leeches". They took advantage of him by any means necessary. Michael changed the face of the arts & entertainment industry. I think some people dont like the fact that he was somewhat greater han Elvis.

Also King never said anything before. Why wait until he dies to speak out. King is a coward. He is trying to get his 15 mins of fame. Shame on you King and shame on CNN for highlighting this.

Let Michael Jackson rest in peace. He is a Legend and the fans have spoken. He and his music will live forever.

P.S. CNN please try to get ratings another way. You are losing this way.

Penny   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

If you don't like the laws that are set then change them. For the Governor that made the statement, I think that it was out of content because he was found NOT GUILTY by our own judicial system. Based on that and that alone. Now let me ask the Governor a question, since all the other republicans have been pulled out onto the carpet, what secret sins do you have hiding.......be careful and speak slowly when you answer the question, someone might just call you a pervert.

Faye in Arizona   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

My comment to Preston: you're quoting a comedian? Your point has been taken and filed. He was no more a pedophile than you are blind, deaf and mute. And I don't even KNOW you.

John   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Congressmen (sic) King appears to be so concerned about the attention and support given to our deserving trros, firemen, policemen and teachers; how did he vite on bills supporting , the troops, education, etc.? I feel sorry for the people of NY

Leah   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Michael Jackson changed music into the best it could have possibly turned out to be. Regardless of his lifestyle, please remember him for his incredible talent that is very hard to find this day in age. This Congressman should be ashamed of himself and if people are sick of the coverage, turn off the t.v. and go out for a walk. I'm sure the majority or North Americans could use some good exercise.

dpinnegar   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Pervert or not he was a celebrity. I think the media spends too much coverage on celebrity's, especially dead ones. Do I really need to know who controls his assets or ends up getting them? The unfortunate thing is that other people do care and that that is what sells.

SKI   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

ELVIS PRESLEY BIRTHDAY AND OTHER MILESTONES SURROUNDING HIS CAREER ARE CELEBRATED YEARLY. ELVIS WAS SUSPECTED OF BEING A DRUG ADDICT AND ALCOHOLIC, AND DATED YOUNG WOMEN...NO ONE HAS ANY PROBLEMS WITH GLORIFYING HIM. ONCE AGAIN THE RACIST HEAD OF AMERICA REARS IT'S UGLY HEAD...NOT ONLY THAT BABE RUTH WHO WAS AN ALCOHOLIC BUM ALSO IS REVERED HIGHLY IN THE LIVES OF WHITE AMERICANS...

janel   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Why would he speak bad about michael, after he died..Rick im goin to pray that god has mercy on your soul.How could you say something like that and be okay about it.Michael JACKSON was proven NOT GUILTY. So i mean why would you say such harsh things.This man has gave the world his heart in soul and i think he deserves to be on the news EVERY SINGLE DAY.Michael is the king of pop and i respect him,he had a big heart.This hurts me to hear someone say such harsh things.But its alrite, the good out does the bad.You can say whatever you want let GOD decide what type of man he was.And i know Michaels in a better place.He deserves all the respect, after what he has done for the world

Rob   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Mr King aside,
was Michael Jackson aquited of all charges? I believe one of the cases was settled out of court, and he paid Millions. That is not an aquital. The King of Pop? Rather he can be crowned "The King of Controversy", in death as in life. Do those of us who listen to all the media coverage of Jackson think he is a pervert etc. although he was never convicted? Of course. Mr, King asked a thoughtful question when asking if any mother would leave her male child alone with Jackson when he was alive? Was Jackson talented, and did he change the face of music? Of course. Do any of the public have a need to know about his will, the disposition of his children and the fact that he died $400Million in debt? We already had enough of OJ and this is just more of the overexposed coverage we have come to expect when there is a topic that can be drawn out to fill up the news hours. Is there not other news investigation of legitimate topics which gets displaced when a news channel chooses to focus so many hours on the Jackson topic? Enough!!

sarce88   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

though i shared grief with millinons on MJ's passing, i agree with the opinion that there is an overkill on the coverage. CNN along with MSNBC, Fox and others are guilty on this. There are other more important news that is happening out there.

Natalie R.   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

This is, perhaps, the first time I have agreed with Representative King. The coverage of the Michael Jackson story is absurd. That kind of coverage should be reserved for a head of state. Jackson was a singer a dancer, and an entertainer at best. He was NOT a head of state. In addition, Representative Rangel calling for a national day of mourning is outrageous. Surely, the insanity of this story and the overboard coverage it has received can be seen by most in this country who have not lost their senses.

Tony   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Congressman King's statements were uncalled for. He could have simply said he was tired of the media coverage. That I can understand.
Peter King is just another citizen who's eyes have been covered by the veil of tabloid media. He knows nothing of the real details behind the cases of the past, other than what was slanderously displayed over the years. MJ was acquitted of all charges in the last case. The settlement of the first was out of advice from his family and legal team, and I think it proved that all the original accusers wanted was money in the first place.
I know if someone molested my kids I would see them in the electric chair before I would take a settlement and let them walk free.
Let the man rest in peace, and let people talk. Michael Jackson accomplished more in his 50 years than Peter King could ever dream to accomplish in 5 lifetimes.

Shawn   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

From Canada: Can you sing like Michael? Would you put someone down with say an ilness like Cancer? Better yet, would you put that person who died of Cancer down? Doubt it, Michael was abused as a child, he lived in the spotlight since birth, these are well known facts. Being what he has been through anyone would be a little messed up. Court said he was innocent, are you questioning your own judicial system? Mental illness and Cancer are both just that, an illness. If you would slander a dead cancer victim, thats just sad. Respect him for his music, there will never ever be another star this big. Respect the family, and fans who are grieving, RIP MJ

kelvin mays   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Make up your mind do you or dont you want us to see the dead soldiers comming back.

Valerie   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

MJ WAS DECLARED INNOCENT U IDIOT! YOU WILL NEVER BE AN GLOBAL ICON LIKE HE IS STOP TRYING TO BIG YOURSELF UP WITH FOOLISHNESS! YOU WILL NEVER BE AN ASSET TO THIS COUNTRY LIKE MICHAEL HAS AND YOUR STILL LIVING!

Jervay   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

If the world doesn't know by now not to trust everything we hear, then go seek the knowledge as pertained to law and recognize that hear say is not acceptable in court or anywhere else for that matter.

Alex C. Jeans   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Mr.Sanchez you have a spectacular show but speaking of Rep. King he is a hatred man,full of anger.MJ was an icon a legend, he was global.MJ did a lof of great things speaking of charities around the world.People miss him and he is loved by the world.

herve   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

One day we might find out that king congressman IS NOT SO CLEAN ,AND WE WILL LEARN THAT HE ,had a affair with a teenage girl, or hE IS a pedophile OR ELSE ,( CHARGES THAT HE WILL FOR SURE DENIED )then and only then he will realise THAT JUDGING PEOPLES IS NOT ALWAYS THE WRIGHT THING TO DO ....

Janz   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I read that when Michael was young, he and his brothers would sleep together in the same and this was a time of security for the young Michael. This information was reveal my the ghost writer of the book "The Thriller" . He worked with Jackie Kennedy Onassis on this book and although the information about Michael and his other siblings being beatened by their dad, this information about Michael's memories as a young child and in some ways may explain his need to sleep with other young boys was never included in the book.
Whether he was a pedophilo, I can not say. Whether he was a prevert is simply an opinion. All I know is that one thing I have learned in my 66 years on this earth is that things are not always what they seem to be! Only Michael knows the truth and he isn't talking!

Beverly   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

MJ was a great artist, changed music, but in my opinion was a sick twist. The skin bleaching, the endless plastic surgeries, his comments about it being ok for him to sleep with little boys is a large part of him also. Big deal he wasn't convicted, neither was OJ, & in my opinion both were guilty.

I   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rick, the congressman is way off line. MJ was acquitted, and getting into the details of case 1 settled and case 2 acquitted..would be an entire different conversation from that of coverage from media. I would urge him to get his facts straight, the man was framed becuase of his money and the vulnerable spot he put himself in by some albeit innocent, questionable behavior by those who did not know him. At any rate the congressman is commiting libel by calling someone such a horreandous name about things that have not been proven. We ARE still a country of laws ...arent we?
I feel MJ is getting blamed even about the coverage he is getting now that he is not with us. What a shame?!! I too feel like the news should be covering the news and not bring anyone that CLAIMS to be the icons "FRIEND" on programs to just continuee gossip, hearsay and just plain speculation!! I cannot believe how many people I saw on the news in the last week claiming some sort of dubious unchecked connection with the pop star. Wow...so the blame is on the media outlets for not sticking to the facts and once again utilizing sensational journalism to keep viewers tuned in thru the commercial. How many times have we heard the words: shocking., said by cnn anchors promoting the next segment?? I cant even count. What happened to old fashion journalism where you just state the facts and attribute the source? Police said, authorities said, jackson family said?? Anyway....pretty dissapointing, but it is what it is! All about the benjamin baby!!

debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

That comment was very uncalled for. what is wrong with people? He hasnt even been buried yet! If you dont like him , turn the channel or get up from in front of the tv. I myself have enjoyed watching. Listen to what he said in of his songs,"leave me alone". Michael Jackson was fabulous in my eyes, a great talented person. He should be remembered. For us that cant be at the memorial we are lookin forward to watching on tv.

Sharon Willmann   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rep. Peter King seems to have no regard for our legal system. They acquitted him and probably had more info than we do. To call him a pervert and pedophile seems like a talking point for the racist part of his Republican base. Anyone who knows anything about Michael (and it's a cinch that Rep. King did not) knows that he had NO childhood and loved children. He wanted to remain childlike and often said that he could be around children because they were the only people who were nice to him. The rest of the adults, King included, called him a freak.
Most other men would have a hard time saying they let children stay in their bedrooms. Michale Jackson was not a "regular guy". Did anyone ever think of this? Many children, now adults, said that they stayed with Michael and nothing inappropriate happened. They had a marvelous time.

Dez   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Peter King should have kept his mouth shut. Now, it's only right for him to be scrutinized by not only his peer, his constituents, and the media.
It's people like this is why there is so much hate in the world today.
M.J. provided music for people all over the world. The bottom line is people who have a voice & have a platform as wide as M.J., and made as much money as he did, OTHERS took advantage & just wanted a piece of the pie. M.J. lived in a lonely world, as many entertainers do today.

Peter King also had a voice. He didn't have to complain (but most Republicans simply do just that), he could have just simply stated what his biggest issue was – having coverage of 4th of July. He didn't have to mention M.J. Absolutely no reason too. Would he have said the same thing if the same amount of coverage was all about Farrah Fawcett, Billy Mays, or even Ed McMahon.

So, it really comes down to this:
What has Peter King done for the world & that can be remembered for?

What Peter King will be known for is being a typical republican. One who would rather make a complaint & not provide a solution.

I guarantee you he will NOT be re-elected next year because he was stupid enough to open his mouth.

Michael L. Burdett   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

How many cancer ridden children has Peter King helped with their sadness and scared feelings in his life?

How dare he accuse Michael Jackson of anything but humanitarian efforts towards these children!

This man needs a lawsuit put against him for the slander of the legacy of Michael Jackson's efforts to make this world a better place.

Indeed Peter King needs to look in the mirror and expect that man to change ... to make this world a better place. -Rather than pointing fingers at a dead man who did make the world - quite a bit of a better place.

May God find a special place in heaven for Michael Jackson and his music! My God smile upon Michael as he playes music for the heavenly host!

Rosy   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Yes Candy C. is a nice lady and always professional; however, she is wrong about KING! He is a political animal and always playing to the right wing nutty wing of their base. Right, that is all they have left i the right wing nutty 19% of their base. King like any other republican can be voted out of office and we will see to this loud mouth opportunist being outsed along with the rest of the repurg trash in congress.
Remember, Michael settle out of court on the liability suit against him; however, their were never any criminal charges brought against him in 1993 because the dad never had any intentions for this case to go to criminal court. He wanted money from day one and the police were very angry with the father because they were never able to confirm any of the allegation that the Father accused Michael of during this period in 1993. We need to remember this when you report this story; all I ask is that you all give all the facts!

Sarah Kay   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Representative Peter King though was expressing concern over lack of coverage on other national/world news, and is entitled to express himself, should not have slandered Michael Jackson as he did obviously calculated for sound-bite effect.

Michael Jackson was cleared of all charges, and those he made settlements with were on the advise of his legal team, so he could move on with his life as others do in all walks of life when faced with litigation.

The extensive coverage on Michael Jackson clearly exposes how willful he was, and answers to why he kept stating in interviews during that period where he kept asking why others thought sharing a bed with a child had a sexual or improper connotation.

He seemed unable to wrap around his mind/understanding why he was being charged of acts that would admittedly have never crossed his mind as he and numerous friends, family have expressed.

It would be interesting if those that accused him in due time/course and with the assurance of no charges to be brought against them from the family, etc., were to freely state if such acts they had claimed in fact, never happen – and what prompted their accusations; but if they hold to them, with maturity be able to further elaborate to the extent that they can.

Anna   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Well, we have another holier than thou Republican standing in front of of us passing judgement on the morality of someone who was acquitted of the crime he was accused of. How embarrassing that King is rejecting the American legal system that he is a part of. Those are the kind of people that later turn out to be hypocrites.

Marta   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Congressman King should be upset about Barney Frank! Now there's a $#@!&!! that should be jailed!!
Interesting that Congressman King is so ignorrant that he has no clue as to what our legal system means when a jury say "Not Guilty"!

Shame on you Peter King!

Crystal   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rick I think Peter King is a crazy fool. I hope the Jackson family will sue his stanking tail for slander. Michael Jackson was a genius,icon and loved all people.

Donna   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

MJ was not found guilty in any court of law. He has moved beyond to his Creator. His judgement will be the one that counts. Remember Congressman, that would be your Judge as well and, from what I have read, He's not cool with bearing false witness.

Mathew   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I belive that the only reason that all of these people are talking down to michael jackson is becuase of all the attention he is getting by the media and the news. It's nice that for a change that we don't hear about insurgents' and the war in afganistan & iraq. those stories are quite old and nobody , i am sure, wants to hear about them anymore!

yvonne limerick   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

all i have to say is if i can see this man i would slap him

Shivali   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Hey Rick. My first time posting! We are all innocent until proven guilty, and Michael Jackson was ACQUITTED It makes me nervous that this Congressman King- a representative of our country is comfortable making vicious, unfounded claims with such insensitive timing. I wonder how he would feel if he was labeled a pedophile AFTER he is dead and unable to defend himself. SHAME ON HIM for bringing hate to the news.

Richard   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Mr. King is a pathetic excuse for a human being to badmouth Michael Jackson before he has even been buried. It amounts to protesting at a funeral. Mr King has no respect and comes from a political party infamous for it's hypocritical views such as so called family values and moral superiority. Who the hell is he to pass judgement on another man's character, especially during a time of mourning. Michael Jackson brought never ending happiness to millions around the world. What has Mr King done other than spread his hatred and prejudice? Michael Jackson was aquitted of all charges and anybody who knows anything about the legal system knows there should have never even been a trial because the prosecution had NO CASE! Michael Jackson made this world a better place. Rep King has offered nothing but hate.

Wanda Humphries- Buena Vista, VA   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Michael Jackson did not know his own identity. His childhood was taken from him therefore he did not know what life was suppose to be. Not like what most of us had. His father was very controlling and he took Michael's life. I feel like Michael was trying to live his life as a young boy, but he is an adult trying to re-live what was robbed from him. I feel sorry for him and people should not be judging him. Was this Mr. King present at Michaels house when all this stuff was supposedly going on? The man is dead and still he has no peace.

Felicia   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Shame on Peter King! Michael Jackson was acquitted on all charges, and deserves respect! It is so sad that all these smallminded people can't get their facts straight and keep their oppinions to themselves.
Michael Jackson was a great man and he changed history! He definitely deserves the newscoverage and to be glorified. Although the media should pay tribute to the legend and his magical talent instead of his private life, rumours and innuendoes. Let the man rest in peace.

Tina   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I dare you try to criticize Michael Jackson. He was found innocent in the court of law or did you simply forget. Look at all the millions of dollars he donated to charities. When was the last time you donated anything including your time. If you are tired of looking at CNN with their wonderful coverage then I suggest you go and do something else with your time sir. Perhaps like speaking to your Republican brothers to stop having affairs across the state/country and leaving their poor wives at home to take care of the family. I wonder who is your soulmate. I'm sure your time would be more appreciated doing that instead of you slandering someones name when they are deceased.

Joe   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rep. King is a hater!!! I think he is mad because when he finally kicks the bucket he wont get the same attention that Micheal has. He'll probably an an hour or a moment of silence, while Michael will probably get a national stamp or holiday!!!! Tell him to focus on his own personal life and stop judging other people!!!

Darrell   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Did Congressman King speak out about ex Congressman Mark Foley? I don't recall him doing that; of course Foley was a Republican.

pam   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

i think peter king will be better of thinking about the perverts and adulterers in his own party instead of saying nasty things about the dead. i will not be surprised if he is also found out to be one of the holier than thou , cheating on their wives republicans. i don't think he will agree to being called a pervert if he sleeps with his kids at home. so shut up or put up peter king.

Darren   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Where was Rep. King's comments about Michael when he was alive. He has to wait til the man is dead to try to run his name through the mud. We seem to forget 3 children lost a father, a mother and father lost a son and the world lost the greatest entertainer ever. The bottom line is MICHAEL WAS ACQUITTED ON ALL CHARGES. Michael deserves all the coveraged he's getting on CNN and more.

Bonnie   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Rep. King, hope everyone feels the same when you die, or any of your family members.

Patty Graves   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Whether he is or isn't...this isn't something we should be discussing publicly. Isn't that slander? Can't we be more dignified and benevolent? There is too much coverage, though for one single human being.

Elmari   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Rick, I think Peter King is the PERVERT in this story. He obviously hates Michael Jackson for personal reasons- whether it be his conservative nature, bigotry, prejudice, or wanting to get a piece of the actions (which you guys ARE giving him, unfortunately). But this Peter King DOES NOT KNOW who Michael Jackson is and what kind of life he had and what he had to go through. All he knows is what he sees in the media. I've been watching CNN religiously since Michael's death and the network has talked to so many people who knew Michael on personal and professional levels and THEY HAVE ALL REITERATED that Michael was a gentle, loving person who was vilely misunderstood by the world. Peter King is spewing ignorant, salacious and libel comments because he has an agenda. Yes, there may be too much coverage on Michael Jackson's death, but this man has been part of the American landscape for OVER 40 YEARS. People grew up with him and feel like he is a part of their life. . . that is why there is so much interest and so much mourning. I hope Peter King gets some facts before going off and spreading salacious gossip about someone so many people loved.

Craig   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Mr. King is another great example of Republican bigotry. He needs to apologize to the family, friends, and world-wide fans of Michael Jackson for his recent comments. And then he needs to study up on our constitution so he clearly understands that in our country, you are innocent until proven guilty...and Michael was acquitted of all charges. But most important, he needs to get to work on the Country's business or he may just find himself without a job.

BETH   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

this congressman needs to apologize to the Jackson family and to the fans of MJ. this is outrageous. And he is disrespecting the greatest man who is not here by the way to defend himself. nobody is guilty of any crime unless they are found guilty under the USA conustitution. the fact that somebody has a gun, doesn't make that person a killer. unless crime is committed there is no victim, no bad person in that situation. MJ has done NOTHING WRONG. HE IS INNOCENT. LEAVE HIM ALONE. HATERS.

Tony Karaba   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Part of all the MJ coverage is finding out if his death could have been prevented. If everyone would quit freaking out about "face time" on TV and concentrate on what can be learned here and how we can prevent other deaths we might make some improvements as a society.

Lilly   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

It would be nice if Rep. King and all those who agree with him would remember that MJ was acquitted of child molestation charges (not to mention that there was a question about the family trying to extort money in the beginning and when they didn't get any decided to file charges) and that his first supposed victim has now admitted he lied.

In my opinion this is just another a-hole republican with bad taste. Want to bet he's a hypocrite who likes child porn? After all, what the seem to yell about the most seems to be what they are guilty of.

Lastly, to all these people who are complaining about this getting news coverage: GET A LIFE. This IS news. I don't care if you think pop culture matters or whatever your hissy fit is about. The man is a musical icon and has inspired many. If you think this isn't going to get a bunch of coverage then you are just nuts. Furthermore, if you think this doesn't deserve coverage you are nuts.

Anderson   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Congressman King is one million percent right! Jackson was a child molester who paid his acusers to make them go away. Two of the jury members from the 2005 case regret ever saying he was not guilty. There is no question of his musical talents and he may have helped some.

However, it is not ok to overlook child molestation because he helped a select few/group. Any activist or political figures have very poor judgement in celebrating Jackson's wrong doing. The lives of those Jackson molested are impacted for ever. Who is speaking for those whose lives were changed for ever because Jackson for many years lived above the law in secrecy in neverland while molesting kids in need or less fortunate. He took advantage of their life ending situations by molesting them while on the surface parading like he cared. Those molested should have never been victims because Jackson never had a childhood or had a bad childhood.

The tax payers of California should NOT have to pay for any expense related to Jacksons viewing or funeral. The Jackson family or private volunteers should pick up the entire expense. Jackson is being judged by a higher power now so it is out of our hands.

milesz   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

I laud Rep. King's for his candid observation – - – not so much for the adjective he used to descibe Mr. Jackson (I would have said a freakish human being who had talent), but for telling it like it is. Unfortunately, from the outpouring of responses (well over a million want to attend the memorial tomorrow at the Staples Center in LA, for example), perhaps a noted percentage of this country aligns itself more with the most unusual characteristics displayed by this artist than recognizing that talent of his ilk does not equate with the bizarre physical and mental behavior he displayed. And, yes, there has been wayyy too much coverage of this one individual – - – also symptomatic of what drives this country, or certainly the media outlets, including CNN. Again, thanks Rep. King.

I. TRESUN   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT JACKSON'S CHARACTER WAS -

HE'S GETTING MORE COVERAGE, FROM CNN ALONE, THAN ANY U.S.

PRESIDENT WHO HAS DIED. WHY???

THERE IS IMPORTANT NEWS AT HOME AND ALL OVER THE WORLD,

BUT WE'RE SUBJECTED TO THIS DRIVEL.

james harvey   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

what the hell is wrong w/ society and all of you people out there celebrating a child molestor.he wasn't found innocent in court,he paid the child's family $20,000,000 to drop the charges.if john wayne gacy,or jeffrey dahmer came out w/ a couple of #1 songs would we be praising them too.he was a sick perverted waste of a life and 6 feet under the ground is the only place that innocent kids will be safe from him.good riddance and may you rest in hell where you belong.our best hope is that the same will be done to him there.sing him a couple of great songs and then rape him.to all of those celebrating his predator lifestyle,see a shrink,you have issues.

marie   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

I AGREE WITH THE CONGRESSMAN KING, MICHAEL;S MUSIC
WAS GREAT,BUT HIS PERSONEL LIFE HAD A LOT OF PROBLEMS.
I WOULD NOT TRUST HIM WITH ANY CHILD.YOU CAN CELEBRATE HIS MUSIC NOT THE MAN.
THANK YOU.
M.W

Bree   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

I think Rep. King is a lot like most of us. I have witnessed the aftermath of the death of presidents, popes, Elvis, Princess Di etc,, but in my lifetime I have never witnessed anything such as we are experiencing with the death of M.J. So, Rep. King, don't feel bad, the rest of us have seen nothing like this before either, but you are dead wrong with your remarks. You'll get over it.

Simone   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

I think his statement is a totally in appropriate statement, shame, shame, shame. It is quite alarming for him to cast question on the justice system like that especially holding himself out as a member of the law. Michael Jackson was acquitted, frankly the trial was a complete fascade since the get go. This speaks volume to his character. Michael transends all, broke barriers with his brilliance as an artist. That is what we should remember and suppress all begrudgement.

James   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

It was very refreshing to hear King's stance on this excessive news coverage of the Jackson overdose. I was relieved of the news of Palin stepping down to offer some temporary relief of this overwhelming pedophile coverage. Unfortunately, you idiots are back at it again with his memorial; when will it stop?! It's nice to know I'm not the only one who realizes there are many more important issues in the world today and for this I would like to thank Sen. King.

Clarence Isler   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

WHY should it matter to the congressman what OTHERS do or feel about the life and death of Michael Jackson? Michael Jackson has not been proven guilty of anything. However, the congressman is guilty of picking on a dead man who can't fight back, guilty of insensitivity the man's mother, father, sisters, brothers, children, fans, and friends. If a man is to be judged by the content of his character, I would rather have Mr. Jackson's character than Mr. King's. When congressmen King dies, it will not matter to many that he lived or died. It mattered to me, and many that Michael Jackson lived.....and it mattered that he died.

Dave Morris   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Jackson was not "found Innocent" – ask the jurors!...

Numerous jurors in the Jackson case history have gone on record as saying they believe Jackson was guilty of molesting children. The problem was that they did not feel the crown made a strong enough legal case to support the guilty verdict.

Regards,
dave.

Diane (Alabama)   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Just one more reason to be very disappointed in our Congress.
Michael Jackson had more character than this man will ever have.

Brown   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Have Peter King been accuse of something he know that he has not done?
I sympathizes with Michael because, it has happen to me, the only reason it did not get any were I, did not have the kind of money he has.
When you have love for yourself and want to share it you show it give and all that is in you, you are invested in what you are doing, may be if Mr. Kind know what it is to beloved and or able to love without any conceived idea he would not take the stand that he took. Michael has done so much for people and the world, that if some of us would stop taking and do this world would be a better place.

dick roberts, NYC   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Michael Jackson was acquitted – end of story. As a congressman he should understand the Judicial system. Innocent until proven guilty. I think Mr. King needs to keep his out of term comments to himself and go back to your basic high school gov't class. He's just a hateful man.

Linda, a liberal Democrat   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

I don't agree with Rep. King on much, but this time I do. C'mon folks, we all know MJ had serious "issues", and although he was acquitted, he was not to be trusted with children, by his own admission in the Bashir interview. Who knows how many people were paid not to prosecute, at least two that we know of. And YES, there is too much coverage. He wasn't president of the US, for God's sake. I hope after the orgy of coverage CNN has planned for tomorrow you will finally GIVE IT A REST!

Barb   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Hey Rick!

Perhaps the Congress man is yet another spotlight-grabbing republican, who would rather the media focused on him instead of the ever talented and inspiring artist of all time. Congress man, please SHUT UP! Nobody wants to hear your idiotic, insensitive babbling! God speed Michael!

Don in Toledo   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

For crying out loud, are we so shallow anymore that we have to make a god out of someone that was very wealthy and pretty sick in the head when compared with everyday norms? There are many more important things we could be doing instead of worshiping Michael Jackson.

Ree Thomas   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a Pop Icon
Not an elected official entrusted with the present and the future.
Focus your time and energy on what your constituents elected you for
Let dead issues rest with those who feel touched by them
You are wasting air time by attaching yourself to the shirt tail of a dead man obviously you need to find a more worthy issue to sensationalize and get the free media publicity
You are one of the reasons people like myself have left NY
I feel sorry for the people of 3rd congressional and anyone who would consider you for the senate in 2010

Joe   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rep. King is a hater!!! I think he is mad because when he finally kicks the bucket he wont get the same attention that Micheal has. He’ll probably get an hour or a moment of silence, while Michael will probably get a national stamp or holiday!!!! Tell him to focus on his own personal life and stop judging other people!!!

Kurt Grossen   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

This U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY) SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!!!
He was proven to be NOT GUILTY!

HE WAS NEVER CONVICTED GET OVER IT!

Lon   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

What an idiot! This is what we get from our elected officials. Even if you feel this way, why would you go on national TV and say such things about a fellow human being. Have you no shame congressman?

Edward Bauerle   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

When you can sit here and explain to the American Public why it is that everyday Americans that are accused of Child Molestation, regardless if they are convicted or not, are considered some of the most cruel and evil individuals in the world, and their lives are completely destroyed. But when someone like Michael Jackson dies you celebrate this individual like he was some sort of Amercian Hero. He was accused not once, but twice for child abuse, or child molestation. When you start treating superstars, athletes, politicians, and Pop Stars with the same level you do other Americans, then you can spend more time on this guys death. Until then treat him like every other dirt bag that walks the face of god's green earth.

Charles R Carlson   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

CNN is supposed to be a news channel, reporting the latest important news from around the world. Coverage of one basic story for days on end destroys the importance and relevance of CNN as an important source of real news. You should limit coverage of such stories as Michael Jackson to no more than 15 minutes per hour.

Chuck

The Dungeon   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rick, Peter King can say what he likes. I personally think that you are a pretty good guy; but someone will say something bad about you when you die. I believe Michael did far more good in his life than he did bad.

Tom Alpeter   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rick,

Did Jacko's people buy CNN and change the name to Cnn Never News Land but jacko News? I'm sick of it.

Carl Homish   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rep. King is correct. M. jackson was a pervert. What is wrong with the people. His music is great but he should never be considered a hero. Put him in the ground and get on with what really matters in this country.

SlimTheMan   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Micheal was found innocent in a court of law. For Peter King to come out and call him these names I believe the Jackson family should sue him for slander!!!

Greffen   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Thanks CNN for the coverage, I've been tuned in 24 hours,since Michael's death. I am heart broken by the death of Michael Jackson. King's comment angers me, there's nothing good about him either. I sure like to see his ugly face, when he lose a love one.

Charease   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

EVERYONE KNOWS MJ The KING of MUSIC is 100% Innocent I am disgusted that CNN is acknowledging this loser. I can NOT wait because here in NY I am getting a grass roots campaign started to vote Against a Disrespectful Loser like King. Michael Jackson would NEVER hurt a child. Those trials were more like extortion lies and money hungry devils.