CNN TV
SCHEDULE ANCHORS & REPORTERS CONTACT US HLN Photo Requests


July 6, 2009
Posted: 10:41 AM ET
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) in 2007.
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) in 2007.

U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY) wants the media to "knock out the psycho-babble" and drop the coverage surrounding the death and funeral of Michael Jackson.

But he said more.

"He was a child molester. He was a pedophile. And to be giving this much coverage to him day in and day out, what does it say about us as a country?"

Read more and watch the video of Rep. King's comments here.

We need your opinion. Answer this quick poll, we will tabulate the results, and show them on today's Sanchez show at 3PM ET on CNN.

Filed under: Quick Poll Questions


Share this on:
Windfall   July 6th, 2009 10:54 am ET

He was acquitted on all charges, for pete's sake! People sued him to get rich quit. They used the poor guy.

flo   July 6th, 2009 10:54 am ET

Perhaps the congressman has lived in a hole these past years. Michael Jackson was aquitted on all charges. He should at least show some class. Maybe a "no comment" would have been best.

CindyOlson   July 6th, 2009 10:56 am ET

Jackson is news, especially since his death was under suspicious circumstances. Perhaps we should consider NOT covering Rep. King instead?!

Liz (lulubird102/twitter)   July 6th, 2009 10:56 am ET

Rick, MJ was never convicted. Doesn't Rep. King trust the democratic system he himself works?
-Liz

Rainforest Moon   July 6th, 2009 10:56 am ET

There should have been a fourth choice.

No...6 months of evidence in a court of law showed the allegations to be nothing but a witch hunt.

FERNANDO   July 6th, 2009 10:57 am ET

The 1st case was settled with 20 million dollars. If the allegation was real, no father will accept money just to keep things quiet.
The 2nd case: he was declared innocent.

M.J. was weird, unusual, but that has more to do with his environment. He was push to do those things.

Donna   July 6th, 2009 10:59 am ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty. Peter King, I'm sure, has never listened to MJ's music, except for MAYBE hearing Thriller or Billie Jean in a moment since EVERYONE knows those songs. Who cares what he thinks anyway? The media, including CNN, has to give just about everyone a platform so this is Peter King's. It's all babble to me and I'm good at turning a deaf ear on people like him. Michael Jackson's music has given most of us in the world who APPRECIATES music some beautiful memories.

Christine   July 6th, 2009 11:00 am ET

Absolutely do i agree with him!!! Thank the Lord someone has finally told the truth. Michael Jackson was a pedophile. I think it is important that we remember that.

Schrod   July 6th, 2009 11:01 am ET

It is a shame that they turned his death into a circus. I enjoy his music like I enjoy all other music. I worship no one.

T. J. Wilkinson   July 6th, 2009 11:04 am ET

Last I looked, MJ was found Not Guilty of these charges. Would I allow my kids to be with him? Yes. While I think MJ had some serious issues, I do not believe he would harm a child.

Since Rep. King is so certain, perhaps we should make some accusations against him, and then continue to promote them even after (and IF) he is found Not Guilty by a Jury.

Camilo   July 6th, 2009 11:05 am ET

While I think the media is definitely doing overkill on the life and death of Michael Jackson, he was indeed the King of Pop and larger in death than he was in the end of his life. People should celebrate him as they see fit. As far as being a pedophile, there is no proof. He was acquitted twice. Even OJ couldn't pull that off. Very rich people with very clear weaknesses are often the target of criminal allegations and financial blackmail. Unless someone emerges with proof, I doubt we'll ever know. And I doubt anyone will come forward unless they can see a way to make money off it.

Tracy Shook   July 6th, 2009 11:05 am ET

The interest in MJ represents such a small portion of the population. Give us something else to "chew" on for a while, I'm bored with MJ.

Lush Rimburger   July 6th, 2009 11:07 am ET

A.) Most of us cant believe we didnt see it before Peter brought it to light like that.... Michael Jackson was in fact a Republican politician? Wow.

B) If Peter Can pigeon hole MJ as a pedo/molester/perv etc, when he was acquitted of each attempted charge against him, then doesnt that also mean that Republicans dont believe in "Innocent until proven Guilty" and therefore, are also subject to their own beleifs in that Its apparently a pattern that Republicans who speak out the loudest and most obnoxiously about Values, and perversion are themselves Guilty of Adultery, Perversion, Crimes, and Illegal and Immoral activities?

Justin in NC   July 6th, 2009 11:11 am ET

What a class act this guy is! It's always fun to step on a dead guy. Even Virginia Foxx is taking the high road and hasn't called MJ a hoax.

jerry garcia   July 6th, 2009 11:12 am ET

The congressman said he's merely saying what others aren't, i'd merely ask WHO asked him to speak on their behalf. Also, his accusations are just that...he was never found guilty of any charges. Plus, just as a human being....a person has died, a person who was someone's sibling, someone's son, someone's son, someone's friend....show a little consideration, if not for MJ, then for the others. If the congressman is tired of all the coverage, just do what everyone else does when they don't like what's on tv, turn it off.....

Ben West   July 6th, 2009 11:13 am ET

It's important to separate the music from the allegations. Peter King obviously wasn't touched by the music, but for the millions of fans that were, this is a time to celebrate the life of the best performer (in my opinion) ever.

max   July 6th, 2009 11:14 am ET

This guy shouldn't be a Congressman if he doesn't recognize the judicial system.

Taylor_Taylor   July 6th, 2009 11:18 am ET

I am going to check my Twitter folowers to see if any of them vote in Peter King's district. I will lobby them to be sure and vote for the other person.

Albert Vazquez - Dallas City, IL   July 6th, 2009 11:18 am ET

Jackson, Spears, Cruise, Kanye, Ledger. What the difference? Their celebrity brings them to levels well outside the norm. So what's normal for them is not the same for us. We either accept it or call them Not! normal.

Deanna   July 6th, 2009 11:22 am ET

I am not a fan of Michael Jacksons and I find his past conduct suspect, though he wasn't been convicted of anything. I find any comments coming from any member of congress hypercritical considering all the affairs and misconduct they have displayed. Get your house in order before you start throwing stones.

Lissa from Montreal   July 6th, 2009 11:23 am ET

I definitely think the media is blowing this out of proportion. He was a fabulous, entertaining artist, but the 24/7 frenzy/circus is tiring and way overdone. Does his bizarre lifestyle factor into my thoughts? No. He was never convicted despite all the circumstantial elements that would have everyone thinking otherwise. But he contributed to music in ways we cannot ignore.

Still – Iran all but got pushed off the screen when MJ died. I'm tired of it, and have found myself turning off the reports because it's overkill. I won't even watch the memorial – I think that's also really exploiting his fame.

Just a humble opinion. Keep up the awesome work, Rick, I love your show!!

Ken Vinson   July 6th, 2009 11:27 am ET

I didn't really care for all the coverage Michael Jackson's death got. But I might remind this Rep. King that Michael Jackson was found INNOCENT of ALL charges in his trial. If Rep. King was put on trial and found innocent, would he want some jerk, upon HIS death to call HIM a pervert & pedophile? If HE diidn't do it? I don't know if MJ did it or not. But the jury found him not guilty. And that's good enough for me. It should be good enough for Rep. King too.

Mary Jacobsen   July 6th, 2009 11:31 am ET

No doubt he was extremely talented. Maybe a reason for some of the things he's done, but not an excuse. Sad that he's dead, but he was no hero.

ArmyWife   July 6th, 2009 11:32 am ET

Personally, I would not have went so far as to use the "child molester" and "pedophile" terms but Mr. King is only voicing something a lot of us feel...the media coverage of MJ has gone over the top.

It's why I've quit watching all TV news for the past week.

There were a lot of other high profile deaths in a one week span and none of them garnered the attention of the media as much as this.

What does it say about our country when all we want to report on is the death of someone was only important to a few people (his fans) and not the news that's actually important to the entire country/world?

I agree that enough is enough.

Ken, Sterling, VA   July 6th, 2009 11:33 am ET

He was found not guilty, despite what public sentiment might be – also see Simpson, OJ. That said, yes, the media should stop covering this story so much. In fact, hearing nothing at all today would make up for the incessant coverage tomorrow; I'm just glad I'll be driving and won't have to listen to it!

rena   July 6th, 2009 11:33 am ET

MJ was a child molester, as a victim of molestation, I am personally glad he's dead. The sooner coverage is over, the better. People who are waiting in line all day to see a dead guy are losers, loss of income in a time of recession is stupid, this guy did nothing to benefit anyone but himself.

Quentin Schroder   July 6th, 2009 11:37 am ET

In this country a person is innocent until proven guilty. Michael Jackson went to trial and was acquitted of the charges brought against him. The average person did not have access to the information that the jury received. I believe that if twelve independent jurors found him innocent, then he was innocent. Part of what bothers people is that he settled an earlier civil suit against him with allegations from a different child. Is Michael Jackson a pedophile? How would I know if he was or was not? It will always be a footnote in his history that there were allegations of inappropriate behavior with children. If people want to have that discussion, I think you should wait an appropriate time after their memorial out of respect for their family and friends.

Madam Mijanou   July 6th, 2009 11:38 am ET

Peter King should say the same about his good friend Al (the pig) D'Amato. King is shooting his mouth off just to get publicity for his 2010 run for the Senate. Just another media hog that must get his face out there every time he can. For the most part Long Island is a very racist place and he is just pandering to his constituents.

Rob   July 6th, 2009 11:43 am ET

If he was actually a child molester the victim's parents would have made sure that he was in jail for a long time, instead of settling out of court. And he shaped American pop music, if we are going to talk about a crazed pop star shaving her head then we should talk about this.

Gerry Benner   July 6th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Rick, to me CNN reports the news w/o taking sides. They present the facts, and hopefully focuses on new and current facts w/o getting involved in tons of political or misguided opinions.

Bonnie Pointer   July 6th, 2009 11:45 am ET

Someone needs to remind Rep King that Jackson was ACQUITTED of all charges and in this country that means he was found innocent.

What a fool that we have as a representative.

SunyVal   July 6th, 2009 11:46 am ET

I am not shocked at how the media and others are attempting to define and limit who Mike was or how we remember him. And its not just broadcast media or this congressperson grabbing some press. The popular online print-on-demand service Zazzle.com has chosen to censor/remove any Michael Jackson merchandise from their onlie marketplace. Any artwork or mention of the name Michael Jackson is being promptly removed.
I saw a CNN interview with Warren Ballentine on the subject of Unfair Media Coverage of Michael Jackson but somehow they ran out of time cutting short his view.

Peace
p.s. The choice of wording in your poll seems to be slanted in order to arrive at some desired response to support your views.

Pete B   July 6th, 2009 11:55 am ET

It would be a breath of fresh air if someone–anyone– in the GOP actually made a public statement that did not continue to depict them as brash, hypocritical, intolerant, narrow-minded, provincial, passe, out-of-touch, disparaging cry babies and intellectual lightweights!

DawnD   July 6th, 2009 11:55 am ET

I agree somewhat with U.S. Representative King. I think there has been too much coverage of Michael Jackson, whether positive or negative.
Especially in light of the fact that there have been so many Military events this past week; marked by the 4th of July on Saturday.

American soldiers began pulling out of Iraq, only to have Iraqi citizens celebrating in the streets. I think we should have spent more time honoring our brave soldiers. Did we have a homecoming parade for them?

I am of the MJ era and grew up in Michigan so I appreciate the whole Motown era; that's my era.

Michael Jackson did deserve coverage but I think it was too much. It's okay to follow his story and try to get the facts on his Death Investigation, but does CNN and other networks have to pick apart every detail?

As for the Pedafile thing, Michael Jackson was found innocent so it's wrong to call him one. Although his behavior with children was strange, we may never fully know what happened.

I do hate that we put entertainers on a pedestal, I know this is done by people wanting to promote them for money; fans act like they are Gods; this is what sells records, movies, etc.

Michael Jackson was a person, a gifted entertainer, but a person who had a troubled life. He was abused and exploited by his father, colleagues and some so-called friends.

He needed balance and love in his life and the media needs balance in their reporting.

Nathan   July 6th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

OK then, let's stop the MJ coverage and cover the scandals of politicians instead. Let us instead focus on their perversions!

What does this say about our country:

Marion Barry: past mayor of D.C, current council member. Arrested over the weekend for stalking a woman. Seen in video smoking crack. Failure to pay taxes.

Still voted for by the people. Some moral compass these people are!

Laura Thompson   July 6th, 2009 12:06 pm ET

CNN covers NEWS it can be anything from war to this.... who is this guy anyway? It's just another big mouth who want's attention.

RUBT   July 6th, 2009 12:12 pm ET

We have a judical system for a reason and the last time i checked he was found innocent, I never thought he was guilty in the first place. Let us remember the man who took the WORLD BY STORM. He has inspired and changed the music industry. I am grateful to have lived in his era.

Hershel   July 6th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

I think the congressman has chosen to ignore what the judicial system said about the accusations and simply place his own verdict out there as if it was the decision reached by the courts regarding Mr. Jackson. This is wrong and he needs to tune back into reality. That being said while I am a fan of Mr. Jackson's music and performance skills, I am bit concerned that the tragedy that is his death has overshadowed improtant issues that we need to be focusing on at home and abroad. The continuing economic crisis, the work being done on health care reform, Situations around the world with allies and nations withwhom our relations are strained or even non existent seem to me to be more pressing and important issues on which the media should focus its attention. In light of someones deazth we often hear people say Rest in Peace. Perhaps it is time for the sensationalism and speculation mongers to let go of the reigns that are steering media in a direction that does not really celebrate a life or bring closure in his death it merely feeds the circus atmosphere that they thrive on. Do us all a favor and say goodbye and get your eye back on the ball. The world has plenty of real issues that effect peoples daily lives here and around the world more deeply than the death of a celebrity no matter how popular.

Rest in Peace MJ

FOCUS CNN – News not sensationalism, shock and speculation!

tom   July 6th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

well judgement is the worst thing any one can do first there should be proof not to say that mj behavior was a bit odd, but mr king should not comment on this, his job is to work for the people and not to determine what the news covers.

Abbey   July 6th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

Wow, whatever your feelings on Michael Jackson or the media coverage his death has received, this guy is WAY out of line here.
"...he could sing and dance a little...:??? What planet have you been on man?
Michael isn't even buried yet and not here to defend himself against such attacks, Talk about disrespect. How would this guy's kids, family, friends feel if someone who never even met him went after HIM like this after his death but before he'd even been buried?.....and publicly? No class at all.

Lance   July 6th, 2009 12:16 pm ET

Those who yell the loudest are typically the one's we must keep an eye on. Why is it this Congressman is jumping up and demonizing Michael Jackson during a period of mourning his death? If you don't have anything good to say – then keep your mouth shut. NY, I'm sure, has a few more pressing issues the congressman could turn his attention to than whether MJ is celebrated for his lifelong achievement in creative artistry. King's remarks smack of smear, envy and fear of exaltation that inspires others to achieve their dreams. Only someone with a sick psyche would jump up and start slandering a dead man. Peter King sounds foolish but obviously represents that creepy group of hateful vengeful citizens who at another point during the 19th and 20th century would have led a vigilante group to chase Jackson down and hang him from a tree. That's what I hear when I see a congressman spewing out indictments that have not been proven in spite of Jackson's pay offs. Likely better to pay than to continue going through smear and misinterpretation. Other than that...Jackson is a product of a twisted American culture that has everything to do with his sad mis-identity crisis. Promoted by a predatory business culture that tries its best to market "white" as superior to Black, yet plagued by a population that historically has tried to soak up every little thing that is originated by Blacks, makes people like King furious and determined to do whatever to discredit the work of a Michael Jackson. Couple that with the ironic fact that Michael himself is the most likely victim of child abuse by fan-dom. Adult, both women and men likely preyed on him which is why he resorted to the honesty of children rather than the connivences and betrayals of adults. This really shouldn't come as any surprise that King and others like him will continue to shake down the imagery of one of the finest contributor to pop culture andl remain an ongoing mission for some hater within American society.

SwankySwanner   July 6th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

I would like to see the focus shift from MJ to someone else. I am getting sick of hearing about him. There are 15 year old girls who weigh 60 pounds.. Men with knives sticking out of their heads who WANT to go back to active duty and all we care about is this guy who cant get a good night sleep. The lessons we need to learn we choose to overlook. I have a great deal of empathy..but what I find utterly disgusting about our human condition is making someone like MJ so wonderful for no good reason. HE DANGLED HIS BABY over a balcony..!!!

"The media has sickened me with so much coverage on these cases. Heath Ledger, Anna Nicole..Michael Jackson.."

" ALL the firefighters and law enforcers combined who went inside the world trade centers KNOWING they would die got less coverage."
My brother and 15 yr old son just made these comments on July 4th.

We were remembering a few years back when we had a frightening experience with the very drug in question..My son was sedated with diprivan when he had spinal meningitis when he was 11. During the spinal tap he had a complication. I was so scared. His sats dropped out of nowhere. The alarms buzzed like crazy and they were injecting different things in the i.v.s while the tap was till in the epidural space. They were trying not to freak ME out..But they had to work fast.. and not paralyze him while bringing his blood pressure up so he did not die.

I cannot imagine what psycho gave Michael Jackson this drug for insomnia!!!

I do not even think the educational benefits would justify this much of a frenzy. Sensationalism disgusts me. What is funny to me is everyone knows how sick of it YOU GUYS ARE HA HA HA!

COME ON!! What you need to learn from this is NO MEANS NO!!!

Got a drug problem? Get some help..cant sleep? Find a different solution.. or plan your friggin funeral because this is russian roulette!!

When we look at a man such as MJ.. Perhaps we would have been seeing an unchanged species. He was always the "man in the mirror". What do you think you were looking at??? Artists are screwy people. He was the family paycheck! Maybe he was screwed up through the experiences he collected along the way. I personally believe I change with each experience but that I have always been this eccentric sort of weirdo. You throw in the family tree, spin the bottle with religion, alcoholism, drugs..and whatever you call this addiction to plastic surgery he had.. and BAM it smells like a hit song.
Don't get me wrong here..I think the guy had loads of talent and all the aforementioned ingredients only make it sell more..If you don't believe me, look at Elvis and James Brown..and pretty much anyone else..Dysfunction makes the artist, but just because someone is dead and has such a dysfunction it does not mean we want to hear it 24/7..and we have heard it ...grrrrrrrrrrr..see if I keep typing here, you will get sick sick of me telling you how sick I am hearing about it..

I grew up listening to Michael Jackson. I appreciate his talent. I have empathy for the child he was...well, maybe not completely. I was not a child star leaving a major mark on the world as did this man. However, I was the youngest of 6 with perfect pitch who could sing before I could speak. I studied dance. I had attention around me everywhere I went. I went through my own journey..Thank GOD I am even alive. My main focus has been on my own children..not screwing up other children.Of course, I am not making any allegations here. It just appears Michael had some issues to confront.

When you reach even one person flattery is a bit of an ego boost. Of course, transcending to a higher level as an artist means you do not need that sort of ego mania..and you really do it because it is who you are..especially if it sends a positive message. Conversely, if you have written something in a time of pain and you relate to someone in their time of need..this too is truly meaningful. Artists have a special place in our hearts. We share our emotions with these individuals. These people are not risking their lives to save anyone. I believe artists have a special connection to keep people in a specific mental space..but they do not stop bullets..and they do not refuse diprivan.

They just tweet metaphors over to Rick..

Michaelk42   July 6th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Pedophile or not (though more than likely true given the hush money paid out) it's sad that real news like Iran, Honduras, etc. gets ignored in favor of this fluff. Sure he could dance and sing and sell a lot of records; back in another age when people bought such relics.

Mike Bates   July 6th, 2009 12:20 pm ET

Several posters have cited Jackson's acquittal on the molestation charges. As I recall, almost immediately after the trial at least three jurors expressed skepticism about Jackson's innocence.

I don't presume to know their motivation, but find it interesting that some of the folks used as part of the "evidence" of Jackson's innocence flipped so quickly.

LJP   July 6th, 2009 12:22 pm ET

Michael WAS not guilty of any wrongdoing. He was completely innocent. And it's not that "he was so talented and such a genius, that we can forget any wrongdoing on his part". There was NO wrongdoing. If anyone says Michael Jackson was a child molester, would they please come forward and prove it. If they don't have any evidence (apart from the horrible, horrible tabloids), hey should just keep their mouths shut. I followed the MJ trial closely, and even though I have always been a loyal Michael Jackson fan since the age of 7, I kept my mind open, and I really wanted to be sure of his innocence. I read all the court documents and I am sure Michael Jackson was an innocent man. He was found NOT GUILTY on all counts, so why do we still have people calling him a pedophile when he clearly wasn't? It's no different that calling Michael Jackson a murderer. That's quite ridiculous, but I believe all these people calling him child molester do not even know what they're talking about. They get their information in their tabloid papers, and I feel sorry for them. Michael Jackson was an amazing human being, yes, there are a couple of things he said or did that I did not agree with, but in no way he was a bad person, he was not even capable of doing such horrible things he was accused of. Please, let the man rest in peace.

Greg   July 6th, 2009 12:24 pm ET

I strongly disagree with so-called U.S. Representative King. I do not feel that he followed the child-molesting accusation case from day one like I did. With that being said, I wonder how would he feel if I accuse Mr. King for witch-hunting people like he just did to Michael Jackson? I would never image Michael Jackson, the king of Pop, would even dream of hurting a child. I still to this day have a hard time believing he attempted to hurt a child either.

Kevin Leo   July 6th, 2009 12:25 pm ET

Rep King embarrassed himself and did a great diservice to the people that he was elected to represent! I am a lifelong Michael Jackson fan and have been following him for all of my 42 years of living. At the same time, I have also voiced my displeasure over the 24 hour coverage of Michael's death. That being said, for an elected official to go so over the top with his comments before the man has even been buried is totally uncalled for. Maybe the congressman should review the docment that he has sworn to uphold and protect as one of his primary duties – the Constitution!!! Whether you like it or not, whether you agree with it or not, really doesn't matter. MJ was tried and found NOT GUILTY in his court case. While he paid another family, that is not an admission of guilt. If that was the case, everyone who has ever done an out of court settlement to avoid expensive trials is guilty of far more offensive things than this!!!

cd   July 6th, 2009 12:33 pm ET

Everyone who believes Michael Jackson was a pedophile wants to question his innocence because he settled the civil case of 1993. Why don't you question the motives of the accuser and his parents for accepting the civil settlement but REFUSING to cooperate in the criminal case in putting a so-called pedophile behind bars? Hmm, I wonder WHY?

Rep. King, and people that share your mindset, EDUCATE YOURSELF ABOUT THE 1993 CASE AND THE 2005 TRIAL before being so quick to label Michael Jackson a pedophile. If you knew ALLof the facts about both cases and the REAL reason why they came about, you wouldn't be spouting off ignorant, vile comments about a dead innocent man.

Lisa   July 6th, 2009 12:33 pm ET

Do you suppose Rep. King would have said the same about Elvis?
Princess Diana? Frank Sinatra?
I'm not slamming any of them. But Rep. King needs to realize that the contribution of Mr. Jackson outweighs the accusations...and that is ALL they are, were accusations. A settlement does not a conviction make.

gregory   July 6th, 2009 12:38 pm ET

Ask Peter King if he'd take the "hush" money if his child was molested by Jackson? Taking the "hush" money and not going thru with a criminal trial speaks volumes. The Chandlers played that game.

jason from ocala   July 6th, 2009 12:42 pm ET

It is about time somebody said what alot of people were afraid to say.
this guy hit the nail on the head. how many of these people would've let their kids go to neverland ranch. he admitted to children sleeping in his bed, and said it was an expression of love. come on america, he was crazy when he was alive, and now that he is dead all is forgotten?? And people get mad at politicians for flip-flopping, enough of the hypocracy!!!! you all should be ashamed of yourselves!

Julian Rodriguez   July 6th, 2009 12:43 pm ET

I think that MJ changed music and people are celebrating that. I do think that after tomorrow the media needs to start covering more serious and relevant news that will affect people's lives. i.e the health care bill proposed by the HELP comittee in the senate that appears to be quite promising in terms of cost and coverage. It's sad that the media pounced on the over budgeted projections of a few weeks ago but has said nothing about the latest developments.

Raquel   July 6th, 2009 12:51 pm ET

Michael Jackson was an American Icon whos name will be remembered LONG after Peter king's name is forgotten. He was a huge part of our pop culture and he will be missed, but since Mr. King wants to reminisce about the negative, lets not forget the fact that Jackson was found NOT GUILTY!, obviously I am a MJ fan but having said that- I think that other stories are not receiving the coverage they should be. Lay off Michael a little.

jason from ocala   July 6th, 2009 12:53 pm ET

One more thing to think about; OJ was found not guilty of double homicide. How many of you people that are defending MJ will also go on the record right now while OJ is still alive and say that he is innocent of that crime. the judicial system is not perfect, innocent people go to jail and guilty people get off every day. stop with the stupid cliche "he was acquitted" and come back to reality!!!!

JR   July 6th, 2009 1:03 pm ET

Another useless republican who is trying to capture publicity. When will they realize spreading hate filled comments like this will get them no where.

Kelly   July 6th, 2009 1:07 pm ET

Michael deserves all of the positive media coverage he can get! If he was Elvis, no one would be complaining. And we all know that Mr. Presley had many skeletons in his closet as well. Let us not forget that Mr. Jackson went to trail and was found NOT GUILTY by a Jury of his peers. Let this GREAT man that touched so many lives REST IN PEACE.

joanne osinkowski   July 6th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

This fool King is precisely why the Republican Party are sitting in the back row. Garble and garbage that is being spewed from the likes of King and Palin is the reason Americans are fed up. The Republican party had better speak out and give these two a verbal lashing if they want to stay afloat.

Brian   July 6th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

Hey Rick,
I liked your question on FB. Keep reporting the news. All news! I believe that MJ was found not guilty and the only one that knows for sure is Michael. However, it amazes me that idiots like King will jump at the chance to voice what is obviously his opinion and not necessarily the truth. If Rep. King wants to discuss perversion and immorality, perhaps he should start within his own party. I personally find it quite stupid to talk about someone's behavior, when the behavior of the group I belong to runs rampant with the same.
Good job Rick, thanks for your efforts!

JazzyDray   July 6th, 2009 1:10 pm ET

Wow... Seriously? All this shows to me is that the people that help make the rules have no regard for the justice system and the verdict of a jury....

Michael Jackson was found NOT GUILTY on all charges. The accusers were proven to have lied under oath more than once. That trial was nothing more than a witch hunt perpetrated by a DA that was obsessed with bringing down a big target, which he failed to do anyway. Granted MJ's image was forever tainted, but he didn't get what he wanted, which was Michael Jackson behind bars.

I am a fan, yes, but I'm not a fanatic. I don't worship Mr. Jackson, I admire his talent, his vision, his craft, and his much less talked about humanitarian efforts. And for anyone that says "what humanitarian efforts," before you open-mouth-and-insert-foot, remember "We Are the World"? How about "Heal the World" which spawned not one but two charitable organizations... Heal the World, and Heal the Kids.

Admittedly, Michael appeared "eccentric" to a vast majority of people, but tell me this... what EXACTLY is the definition of normal?

Nicole Lewis   July 6th, 2009 1:14 pm ET

First of all it's one thing to voice your opinion about the media coverage, but to say these vile things after Michael Jackson who is NOW dead and was found NOT GUILTY by a jury of his peers is truly evil! He is nothing but another dirty, low life political figure who just wants his name attached to this. If the people of New York are smart, they would vote him OUT when it's time for him to be re-elected. So who cares about this loser, he can go straight to hell. Michael Jackson was a innocent man who was obviously framed when it came to these FAKE allegations! The world lost THE GREATEST ENTERTAINER of ALL time! RIP MJ, and I say keep honoring the man CNN. MJ changed the world with his music and love of humanity.

Mrs. Coles   July 6th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Congressman King should be ashamed of himself. Those remarks were not only unnecessary, they were classless, coming from a representative of this country.

Mr. Jackson was acquitted in a court of law and unless the Congressman has information to the contrary, he should really concentrate on what's going on in Albany.

In my opinion, the good Congressman sounds jealous!

Connie in Calgary   July 6th, 2009 1:18 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found innocent of all the charges brought against him. The rightwingers that wont let things go, they're a problem. Dont they know that it's fundamentally corrupt to disregard things like the US Bill of Rights, and lawfully determined legal decisions? ? Simply to slam someone who very clearly cant defend himself, and to make a few quick & easy political points?

Jason Cruickshank   July 6th, 2009 1:19 pm ET

U.S. Representative Peter King is a child molester.

That statement has just as much conviction as any charge ever brought against Michael Jackson. If we cannot trust our courts to find the truth for us then why do they exist?

Gordon Miller   July 6th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Jackson was a musical-entertainment genius who crafted a mistique around his weird appearance and, unforturnately, self-destructed with self-confessed "giving love" to boys in his bed and developing a self-confessed addiction to drugs. Sure he deserves media coverage, but not to such an overwhelming 24-7 extent where he still gets more time on CNN than more significant national and world events.

Marilyn from Tallahassee   July 6th, 2009 1:21 pm ET

Peter King is the one I'd call a pervert. He seems to think our justice system is perverted ... since he doesn't understand the concept of a "NOT GUILTY" verdict. LAPD at the time of Jackson's persecution was really subjecting lots of high profile black men to that type of harassment but what they did to Michael was wretched. They took a good and gentle man, a brilliant genius and made completely unsubstantiated claims against him. I for one will change the channels before listening to Peter King pass noxious gas through his mouth. Don't give him airtime!

If he wants to " knock out the psycho babble" he must want you to stop covering the clinically psychotic ramblings of Sarah Palin and Gov Sanford!

Yami   July 6th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

He is a Congressman? and He doesn't know the United States Constitution? Michael Jackson was acquitted of those BOGUS charges, the trial actually proved Michael was innocent, what is he talking about? he needs to seek for publicity using what really counts, which is the political talk..by HIM USING MICHAEL'S DEATH to serve his political agendas is low and declasse, btw this is the same anti-immigrant congressman who feels that discrimintation against immigrants is OK.. what a low life he is.
I know he must be hurting that Michael Jackson was bigger than LIfe.. and the world's reaction and coverage is proving that, wheather he likes it or not..

Soare Cecilia   July 6th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

Learn to do a poll. All choices imply that he might be guilty, even the so called 'positive' one. That one means that he is so great artist that it doens't matter if he did wrong or right....

So this poll is corrupted. I'ce expected more from cnn folks.... Learn to do polls first, ok?

( Cecilia/ Europe )

Ben   July 6th, 2009 1:29 pm ET

Mj was 200% innocent and if the media did their job evry would have seen it

Parisa   July 6th, 2009 1:32 pm ET

You have to remember you only heard from one side. You never heard from MJ regarding what actually happened between him and the boy. If MJ was really a child molester why did the authorities allow him to keep custody of his ADOPTED children.

The press convicted MJ like they do with ever sensationalized case.
Look what they did to that Senator Condit in the Chandra Levy case years ago. The police and the press convicted the man public. Everyone believed that this senator was guilty of murder. Nearly 10 years later you now find out half of what the press claimed to be true was a LIE. The senator was innocent but his life has been ruined.

Dan Janus   July 6th, 2009 1:35 pm ET

Well if this vote is a sign of us having to put up with more MJ then I guess I'll revert to what I have been doing since his death.

Turn off the TV and get my news from the web.

And that is sad when news media should be reporting all the news fairly not fixate on one celebrity.

J Darroll Hall   July 6th, 2009 1:50 pm ET

Peter King makes me very happy bot to live in NY what a loony....

Wayne D   July 6th, 2009 1:56 pm ET

Rep. King's comments, in my opinion, rise to the level of slander.
(I am not a lawyer, I make no accusation here.)

While I think the media could and should back off on the "psychobabble", and personally, I'm not paying any attention to the coverage until some politico decides to grandstand like this, if Mr King has new evidence, he should bring it forward. Until then I'll just grin whenever a politician decides to be a champion of good taste in the media.

Iyana McKiver   July 6th, 2009 1:58 pm ET

At first I was shocked at Rep. King insensitivity, but quickly I realized this is just another stunt for Republicans to get attention. First Gov. Sanford, then Sarah Palin, now Rep. King. We all have done things in our lives that we are not particularly proud of. Rep. King you are not a saint. Michael Jackson was not found guilty, so find some dignity and show some respect. If you do not have anything good to say do not say anything at all. The Republican Party is certainly not in good standing as of now and the more air time they steal, the deeper the hole their digging for their party. Also, Rep. King if you are unhappy with the coverage turn off the television, read a book, go for a walk, then come back and watch FOX news, that should be satisfying!!! CNN keep up the good work!
RIP MICHAEL <3

Steve DeMarte   July 6th, 2009 2:19 pm ET

Enough is enough with the coverage of Michael Jackson. Michael was a fantastic performer, a great humanitarian, and a son. His death should be mourned; his life celebrated.

How many soldiers, firemen, and police officers have died in the line of duty since Michael Jackson's death?

CNN, at times, in it's zeal to cover the big story, goes way over-board in doing so. MIchael Jackson is dead.

So too are Sgt. 1st Class Edward C. Kramer, 39, of Wilmington, N.C., Sgt. Roger L. Adams Jr., 36, of Jacksonville, N.C., Sgt. Juan C. Baldeosingh, 30, of Newport, N.C., Spc. Robert L. Bittiker, 39, of Jacksonville, N.C, and nary a word from CNN on them.

Steve DeMarte
Raleigh, NC

Jamila   July 6th, 2009 2:21 pm ET

For the record, I do not believe that MJ was a pedophile; there was no legal or substantial evidence to support that laim. I DO believe that his musical work, philanthropic work and cultural impact should be honored. That being said, your poll doesn't make any sense. The choices are "yes he's guilty" and "no, his legacy outweighs allegations." I'm sorry, but what does one's work have to do with wether or not they are guilty of criminal activity?

Tina laws   July 6th, 2009 2:26 pm ET

What Pete King said was outrageous, MJ was found Not Gulity, so he need to stop. MJ has kids they will hear someone call their Dad a Pervert, that's wrong and Mr. King needs to worry more about New York and Less about MJ. And King and other people like him can chill out, MJ is the KING OF POP and no one can change that . And CNN thanks for airing his comment, he's an idiot and he's disgraceful fool. New Yorker need to not re-elect him, he's worried about MJ, instead of New Yorker the ones who elected him into Office!!!

MarshallTalk   July 6th, 2009 2:29 pm ET

Rick, I really don't think this is a fair Poll. The man was accused of being a molestor because he was NICE to Kids. He was NOT convicted of a crime. It always amazes me, when someone accuses someone of something it becomes true if enough DIFFERENT people don't like the person. But then a Guilty person or Bad person is just accepted by all common people, example The Dog, Hilton, etc.

Let this guy RIP! As for Peter King he is just flat out EVIL, he will judge everyone except for his buddies which include Politicians and Personalities. We all know, but will not say Peter King has some serious issues with certain kinds of people!

Lastly a FAIR Poll would have just asked the question without the persumption of GUILT like "No. His artistry outshone any allegations of impropriety." Don't you think there should have been a "He was NOT Guilty so it doesn't matter what Peter Kings says" question? Remember to treat people the way you want to be treated in similar circumstances.

See ya on Twitter – MarshallTalk

tz37   July 6th, 2009 2:31 pm ET

Mr. King should be more careful of what he says. This man was aquitted of those charges and more people who knew him said he did not do those things. He will be judge by GOD and he alone. The coverage is warranted because he made a positive impact around the world. We are allowed to celebrate that. I would like to see more help and coverage for those men and women who are serving this country.

Mike Scavo   July 6th, 2009 2:34 pm ET

Nobody deserves this much news coverage when they die. Princess Diana didn't and MJ doesn't. He was a brilliant entertainer, smart business man and messed up human being. All of his friends should have been there to stop him from mutilating himself both physically and spiritually.

Milagros Garcia Villamil   July 6th, 2009 2:38 pm ET

Hey Rick; welcome back..

Heck no! what do we gain by not helping the world celebrate a man who touched us, our kids and even the President?
The last man to bust a person out ended up on the TV as well..Remember Sanford, from SC who flew to Argentina for bootay!?? duh!! The Congressman better make sure he covers his butt! or we will be telling his story on CNN! GO RICK!!

jnelyon   July 6th, 2009 2:40 pm ET

congressman king is a jerk and looks more like the typical pediphile than Michael Jackson. it unnerves me that we have a representative who does not believe in the justice system that acquitted Michael. i have experience as a juror and a grand jury panel. jury instructions are a solemn and serious matter. i personally am a cnn junkie and have not missed a single minute of coverage of iraq, afghanistan, iran, north korea, the deaths of all the others this past tragic two weeks, and all other coverage pertinent to this nation and international events all the while grieving over the loss of MJ. i grew up in motown and am michael's age. i always treasured his talent and allowed that he was not representative of mainstream america, however, i can now say unequivocably as a result of the coverage and interviews that i do not believe he had it in him to harm a child. i am however SICK TO DEATH OF GOVERNOR DIPSTICKS EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS. where are king's comments on that? one final comment, Michael will be with us for 1000 years, peter king will be on the list of "who's he?"

Tina laws   July 6th, 2009 2:41 pm ET

Rick, MJ was not found gulity in fact he was found not Gulity, and for a matter of fact MJ deserve all this attention, he gave Millions of dollars to charties, he was the first Black person to have a video on MTV, he's the KING OF POP, and anyone who says he don't deserve the attention is CRAZY. I'm tried of people making Mj look Bad he had thousands of kids at his Ranch, and only two made allegations, I was toched inappropriately, by my DAD, my mom did not ask for MONEY, she filed charages and He went to JAIL. MJ was just used and abused, but NO one can take his Legacy from him and his family. Not U Rick or Pete. So to the MEDIA keep paying tribute to a LEGEND!!! We love U MJ!!!!!

Jan   July 6th, 2009 2:42 pm ET

It's a shame that people show this kind of loyalty to one person but won't show LOYALTY to the United States. We watch TV too much, and PRAY too seldom. We have REDUCED our VALUES. If you can't see this then YOU are the reason we are having the issues we have today and this will cause our self destruction. It is time the citizens of the United States grew up and stopped wallowing in pity. We have Men and Women in other countries who die each day and they are not Celebrated as they should be.

Ken (california)   July 6th, 2009 2:42 pm ET

Michael had his demons in life...His talent was unbelievable and his concern for the disadvantaged of the world is well recorded..The coverage of his death has been overdone...however....Anna Nicole Smith got alot of coverage also and accomplished alot less in her life!! You report and we watch....

Milagros Garcia Villamil   July 6th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

Number one MJ was none of the above, he was found innocent of 15 charges in 1996? The first charges were settled out of court but now it has been established thAT perhaps those kids were preppsed to lie as well? Ricjk we can sit here all day and surmise ans guess but noone knows what happened in that bedroom.
Also why would MJ admit allowing kids to sleep with him if he treated them badly?? I believe the parents of those children lied and used thier kids..to get money for another trailor etc, theu used MJ after he was kind to them..$$$ was the motive money opportunity and jealousy.
This congressman must be a republican. besides if you look, most of the Gov. Mayors etc who have been accused lateley are republicans including his own GOV of NY Spitzer

nelson   July 6th, 2009 2:46 pm ET

It is enough.

Linda Graham   July 6th, 2009 2:58 pm ET

What is wrong with those @#$%^@# Republicans??? This is EXACTLY why I switched parties and am now Democrat. I've come to realize how much they have their heads in the sand– self-righteous, close-minded, and just plain IDIOTS! They are still living in Medieval ages and need to EVOLVE like the rest of us!

Diane   July 6th, 2009 3:08 pm ET

Rick this comment about Michael Jackson is just disgusting and real bad timing. Was it really necessary for this REPUBLICAN Congressman to say these horrible things about MJ, I mean come on, if you feel this way keep it to your self especially now!! I for one never believed MJ was a child molester, he was just a man living out his child hood that was taken from him by his father!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Craig from Sacramento   July 6th, 2009 3:09 pm ET

CNN is now indistinguishable from Entertainment Tonight or E! You embarrass yourselves with the excessive Jackson coverage – regardless of whether he was a sinner or a saint.

junejokearoke   July 6th, 2009 3:09 pm ET

ask rep.king was elvis a pedophile, elvis fell in "love" with priciilla when she was 14 years old,
if you cant say anything good about the dead, dont say anything
love me some rick

Annette of Aurora, CO   July 6th, 2009 3:10 pm ET

Here we go again with another holier-than-thou Republican playing judge and jury. To my knowledge, Michael Jackson was never convicted of anything. Yet, there are Republicans that were caught red-handed doing stuff they should have been thrown under the jail for. Doesn't Rep Peter King of New York have some bills to read? He should focus on earning his pay rather than being a media critic. I wonder what dirt is forthcoming on Mr. King? Repubs like him always have some real skeletons in their closet!

dana lewis fayetteville GA   July 6th, 2009 3:13 pm ET

my letter to rep. peter king. submitted to his website:

your audacity to JUDGE Michael Jackson is astounding! you have no proof the man was a pedophile. you have no proof, only your opinion, to label the man as such. you should not use inflammatory words minus a conviction or definitive proof. Michael was besieged, blasted, hammered, with ALLEGATIONS! do you have a direct line to GOD? did god, thru divine revelation, reveal to you michael's guilt? I BEHOLD THE CHRIST IN MICHAEL. HIS MOTHER WOULD NOT HAVE STOOD BY A SON WHOM WAS CAPABLE OF SUCH. YOU HAVE TO GIVE THE WOMAN CREDIT FOR HER ABUNDANT COMMON SENSE AND PREVAILING GOODNESS. MICHAEL'S LOVE WAS A GIFT FROM HIS MOTHER. A SOUL, LIKE MICHAEL'S DESERVES THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT!! LOOK AT MICHAEL JACKSON AND JUST SAY "I BEHOLD THE CHRIST IN YOU" AND SEE IF YOUR JUDGEMENTAL RIGHTEOUSNESS IS TRULY WARRANTED. ALLOW THE NATION TO GRIEVE, CELEBRATE, AND LOVE, A TALENT,A GENIUS, A BODY,A SOUL,A DIVINITY, AND ALL THE LOVE THAT ENCOMPASSED MICHAEL. STOP BEGRUDGING!!!!!!! TO REALLY KNOW A PERSON, READ WHAT THEY WRITE. MICHAEL'S LEGACY OF WORDS SPEAKS VOLUMES. YOU KNOW NOT FROM WHENCE YOU SPEAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DANA LEWIS

scott taylor   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

I would suggest to everyone that within 3 years that Rep King will be caught with his hand in someone else's cookie jar and then let's see where he stands then- Respect MJ for his artistry- the allegations were just that- Allegations

Jamie B.   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

They really need to be doing the opposite of what they are doing, and actually be glad that Michael is finally gone. It's one less child molester we have to worry about in this nation.

Joy   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Rep. King can turn the channel if he does not like. Keep your thoughts to yourself. Just look what happened to Gov. Sanford. You have to know when to speak and when to be quiet!!!

Anthony Smith   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Peter King- New York Representative for NY Third District has came out and blasted Michael Jackson!! He has called Jackson a pervert and child molester and he haven’t even been buried yet!! King has a right to his opinion but when you’re a man of the law I would think it he should follow the letter of the law. Michael Jackson was found not guilty by a court of law!! And that’s that!! End of the story!! Peter King has no right IMO to come out as a man of the law and call him a child molester!!

I wonder what Peter King’s actual position on child molesters? Has he passed any strong laws against them? Probably not!! I looked up the child molester register for his office in Massapequa Park and found all kinds of weirdo looking men in his neigborhood. Take a look..http://www.familywatchdog.us/ShowMap.asp?frm=0

Alex Fleming   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

I AM OVER MICHAEL JACKSON! SKY SAXON! KARL MALDEN! FARRAH FAWCETT! MITSUHARU MISAWA! ROBERT MCNAMARA! ED MCMAHON! WHERE'S THE NEWS COVERAGE? WHERE'S THE TEARS!?

John   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

This Congressman needs to shut his FAT MOUTH. He looks like a pedophile

Aida   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

Rick,

This is one guy who is the last to talk. Look at his co workers. Where are they now. South Carolina..yeah, lets talk more about that...lets talk about Gingrich and his mistress, lets talk about the tapping in the bathroom or another congressman who was having sex with underaged young boys.

No, there is no way he can talk a talk without pointing that first rock to his Republican friends first?? Did he do that, even once?

Tony Roof   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

I agree with the congressmen... There were other stars that died with in 3 weeks of Jackson and you are not doing anything for them... Then there was the stories you guys pushed when he was alive, hanging his kid of the balcony, the boys saying they were molested... but now you treat him like a king!

Why

T.Mitchell   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

He says Mike is a child molester i say he is a racist jack ass that has issues with his own sexuality. Mj was a wonderful man, performer, who didnt mind helping an adult or child in need.

marie flynn   July 6th, 2009 3:14 pm ET

yes

Bernadette Loesch   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Dear Rick, As a former New Yorker and having lived on Long Island, I know how Peter King engages in theatrics. He is the very last person to comment about Michael Jackson. Doesn't he have anything better to do, like upset the balance of power in DC?????

Edward Lovette   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

A jury of 12 people acquitted Michael Jackson but where there is smoke there is fire.

Georgia   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

There are more important things going on the world and all we see is Michael Jackson 24/7

Sandy   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

The congressman is a jerk, and should keep his opinion to himself. I would not be surprised if he has dark secrets hiding in his closet.

Rick Young   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Where does Rep. King stand on Barney Frank if he's tired of the MJ
coverage. I'm tired of the Barney Frank celebration.

Michelle   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

As I understand, Michael Jackson was found not guilty of the accusations. So what is the congressman ranting and raving about? Is he bored and wants to get 'into' something and this is it? Does he have no faith in our justice system? As I see it, people used Michael Jackson as a means to money instead of getting off their butts and earning their own livings. And another thing, Michael Jackson has donated more money to charity than any one out there according to the world records. Has the congressman mentioned how good that is? Or I'll go further, has the congressman put any money where his mouth is or is he satisfied with just running it? Was he concerned when Black artists weren't played on MTV? Was he concerned when Michael Jackson searched high and low for a kidney for a child and the child is alive because of that? Or is the congressman trying to be like others and ride Jackson's coattails, even in death? Congressman, get a life and do YOUR job.

Christopher   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

How easy it is to milk this story? Both from the side of the Media and now politicians looking for some family values face time. Please move on, there are bigger things that people care more about than Michael Jackson.

Courtney   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

It REALLY irritates me when people continue to drag Michael Jackson down, now KNOWING that he just passed away.

It makes me sick to my stomach, and I feel bad for the people who are doing it, because in my opinion what they are doing is terribly terribly wrong.... not to mention selfish.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Michael Jackson had to pay $20 million in hush mom to the family of a boy he molested. If this doesn't prove he was a child molester and pedophile, nothing else will.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

And you guys are giving this child molester a FULL DAYS coverage??

frank   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Michael jackson was scrutinized by every reporter and paparazzis. I wonder what we would find out about some republican politicians if they were submitted to the same scrutiny.

Debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

What happened to the judicial system? He was proved innocent!
It is in truely bad taste to bring this up at this time. We should all watch and dig into this guys life and see if we can find anything on him so that when a family member of his dies, we can make it the most horrible day of his life!

E.Roth   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Rick, this is a politician speaking. How dare he accuse MJ of anything he was acquitted of. Mr. King is merely concerned that his own celebrity spotlight isn't as bright.

Jessica   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

CNN U DISAPPOINT ME! HOW DISRESPECTFUL ARE YOU!?!? Michael's family and fans are grieving right now and you are showing idiots like this on your network?!?! I thought CNN showed coverage of facts, not rumors, that's reserved for E! and TMZ. I lost respect for you today. And in this time of grieving, the last thing I want to see is this idiot blabbing about things that he doesn't know and he has never even met Michael!!!! Show some f**king respect!

Tired of it   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

OJ Simpson was found innocent of murder. Did that mean he didn't do it? MJ was a pedophile and the truth will come out after the hoohah surrounding his death settles down. Yay to King for saying what those of us with brains knew all along

Ron   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

The only way Congressman king could know anything about anyones sexual proclivaty is if he has had sex with that person or witnessed the acts. Did he?

Brian Pittman   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

I am sorry, but what kind of society have we become when someone's artistry outweighs the fact that they are a pedophile? Let him hurt your child and let's see what your opinion is!

fareed   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

I don't think any one has any right to say any thing to Mr Jackson.

Annie   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

WOW, I certainly wouldn't want that guy sitting on a jury if I'd been accused of something! I guess he's one of those "guilty until proven innocent" kind of jerks who honestly thinks he's God, judge, and jury.

edward barnes   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

He was aquitted!!!!! NOT GUILTY!!! He deserves his coverage he was a special human. Thats why I dont like REPUBLICANS!! OLD WHITE PREJUDICE MEN!!

maxine   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Yes There maybe to much coverage of MJ, but please let the guy be laid to rest before knocking him like that. I think Rep. King comments was very offensive and cross the line. If MJ a low-life then some of Rep. King own republicans are too. Foley, Ensign, Vitter and Sanford to name a few!!

hm,florida   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

another idiot republican trying to get attention that he can not get himself so he starts stuff. kinda like sara palin.

Jennifer   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

I do agree that Michael Jackson had a wonderful career but.... who else could be accused of what he was and it all just forgotten just because he is dead? How does this publicity make those boys feel?

Rick from Portland   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

It is too much coverage for ANYONE! He just wasn't that big a deal. He's getting more coverage than Princess Diana for goodness sake, its just ridiculous and has gone on WAY TOO LONG, nothing to do with his "lifestyle".

Renee Farrar   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

As my daughter, Anna Dickson, has said Michael Jackson is the true Benjamin Buttons- An old man at too young an age who got younger as he aged.

Mar   July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Maybe a pervert, certainly an artist, absolutely too much coverage.

Robert   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I never really liked MJ anyway. I'm sick of hearing these daily news updates on his death. Don't we have more important things to cover like Iran and North Korea? Sure MJ is the 'King of Rock' or whatever, but just because he's a famous celebrity doesn't mean he deserves this much coverage. I love how people put celebs above the average person.

Tom   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I agree that MJ was talented but I also feel that he was a pervert and liked to be around little boys...I can't wait for him to be put in the ground so that every time I try to watch the news his face isn't popping up...

Carla, Wyoming   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Another stupid, big-mouthed Republican! Poor Michael...he was acquitted, found innocent. Leave him in peace.

haram23   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

wasn"t michael jackson cleared of charges within so-called court of law

Gregory Drumwright   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I am outraged by Rep. King’s remarks and display of ignorance! New Yorkers should be ashamed of his comments on their behalf. While I concur with the portion of his comments which praise the contribution of civil servants, I cannot believe that he has chosen to lash out at the memorial coverage in respect to Mr. Jackson. Everyday, for the past seven years in America, mediums such as CNN have graciously reported and documented the noble acts of our esteemed service men and women throughout the world. Therefore, it is not a mistake or oversight on their behalf to offer extended coverage to MJ during the time of his immediate death.

Is not the fact that this one man has contributed over 300 million dollars to charities WORLDWIDE, in life, and stands to do more in death through the demands of his will, not enough to respect him as a servant, not just of America, but of the entire human race? Who else; what one person has matched that level of a charitable investment for the cause of greater good from their own personal fortune? How could anyone part their lips to say that Michael Jackson was “no good”. Apparently, it is because of the good he represented while he was with us, that in his passing he is receiving due attention.

Due to the fact that all allegations of sexual misconduct remained just that—ALLEGATIONS, I do not believe it warrants ANY further defense on his behalf in rebuttal to Rep. King’s statements. The period of his life that he was forced to deal with those matters only represented a small portion of the 50 years he was with us. Therefore, King’s comments reek with ignorance little basis of truth. Rep. King could only wish that the work of his life could have half the impact that Michael Jackson has had on people across the globe and eternally throughout generations; in word, song and in deed.

For the record, I am a former public school administrator and serve my local community as a minister and humanitarian.

Gregory B. Drumwright

Stacey   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Innocent until proven guilty.
Michael Jackson was never proven guilty, therefore he is an innocent man. Why would someone who had a terrible childhood and even suffered abuse at the hand of his father hurt another child.
He was a very talented man and he should be celebrated.

Peninnah   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I think that the congressman should be sued for defamation of character. Michael Jackson was not convicted of anything so therefore his speech is slander and defamation.

Being accused of something does not automatically make you guilty.

He should know better.

Amir   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Rep. King should realize that Michael Jackson was ACQUITTED on all charges of sexual molestation. Michael hasn't even been buried yet and this negative law maker already has his big mouth open.

Angela   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I found his behavior troubling. But I also found his artistry and entertaining style worthy of praise. I CHOSE to focus on his art, his music, his entertaining. The rest I leave in God's hands to judge.

DA   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Typical republican. It doesn't matter what you can prove only what you can make into an issue. They do it anytime they want to distract he American Public. No one ever proved that MJ was a pedophile but since he was accused it is OK for Republicans to make an issue of it.

Chris   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Who made Rep. King judge & jury? (Who is this guy anyway?). I think Michael was the victim of an overbearing father who never felt comfortable in his own skin. But his love for animals says something about his inner being. I can't know for sure but I think the child molestation stuff was manufactured by opportunist parents (now $25,000,000 richer).

brian   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

i think that representitive has issues was Micheal Jackson found guitly on those charges no so why is he blubberring his mouth off he should concentrate on his politics coz he is doing a terrible job in New York !!

Liam   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I think it is absolutely insane that this politician is making comments like these about a man like Michael Jackson. Everything that this man was saying were allegations against Jackson, nothing was ever proven. Michael Jackson was a tremendous artist, one of the best that will ever have lived, an icon. I don't feel as though these comments should even be publicized during this time of celebration for MJ's life.

M Burns   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

OMG are You serious Rep King....

Augustus Balasubramaniam   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Rick...my parents raised me never to speak ill of the dead...no matter what you think of them....i guess this congressman's parents just didn't o a good job...just goes to show...you can take the trash out of the trailer but you can't take the trailer out of the trash

Nita   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I truly thing Rep. King needed some attention. If he really felt this way why give more attention to the story? What is his reasoning for comming out talking about Michael Jackson? Why is he not doing some work of his own or do he have work? I would like to know if he has ever done ANYHING wrong and found guilty for it . I would like to look under his rug.

Lynn   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Americans are too nice to the deceased. I agree that way to many accolades are being given to Jackson.

Bill   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Too many people in this country are swayed by some sports figure, entertainer, or politician that steps out of bounds!
If this was you or me we were talking about...............we would have been chastised.

Fame & fortune do not buy taste or quality!

Elle Ondre   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I totally agree. So what Jackson was a star! He was just a man with alot of issues! The largest issue is Jackson being a pedophile. A sexual predator. Those mourning and crying wouldn't be doing so if it was their child who he violated!

K. Bolton   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Pediphil or not....way too much coverage.

michelle minick   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Tell that ignorant Republican to take a hike. We are celebrating Michael Jackson life, as an artist, a muscian, and an extrodinary man. The media has not taken the issue of the personal troubles he had as a definitive lead on his untimely death. Tell that a- to go work oin important things. RIP Michael, your talent and music will live on forever. On the other note, I think Katherine should not have the kids or be executor. She is just too elderly.

Mary Gean   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

No I do not agree with him. He is an ignorant Congressman, Seems like we have more and more of them lately. M.J. was not a child molester HE did in fact care about humanity and how we treat each other. If the people running our Country had just an ounce of HUMANITY as M.J. Did the world would be in better shape!! RIP M.J.

Sherita   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I have to say that I am shock and left without words that at the time of someone's death who had done so much to change the world and culture that there are still people out there who have so much hatred that they will "step" on someone's grave when they die. I hope he is able to sleep at night because my conscious wouldn't let me.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

The Representative is a disgrace to this country. Where is his morals? Whatever ones opinions may be about someone they should be kept to themselves. The King of Pop is not even buried yet and here this man representing America is publicly making allegations which have been proven false.

Maribel   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

If allegations were true, MJ would have been serving many years in prison, those are very very serious allegations. I think it was all about money and the accusers got what they wanted.

mike   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Perhaps Mr.King should take a lesson in respecting the dead. Enjoying the life of one of the greatest, if not the greatest entertainer the world has known, should be the concentration here.

sam   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

This man did have a great career and affected lots of people with his music, But what people are forgetting was that he was an accused pedophile more than once and that he paid off the families to keep quiet. I agree that all this hype should stop. If he wasn't famous he would have been another child molester that died in prison at age 50. He was a sick man for the things he did and that is what people should be remembering also.

suzy coyle   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

Michael Jackson was never proven to have been a child molester. His last trial made his accusers look like a joke. He was a pure, clean innocent man who loved and adored children. He did not have a sick mind. America does. He went out of his way to help. He was a good man. He will be rewarded in heaven. We have lost someone wonderful. He gave the world so much.
R.I.P MJ
You were loved, appreciated and respected by many

Brian H.   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I'm going to be honest – I don't think he was a pedophile, however the media's hypocritical coverage is disappointing. These were the same blood hungry sharks who eagerly covered as neveraland got raided and imo really stacked the deck against Jackson. He was a legend and the media should be ashamed of their treatment.

Rosa   July 6th, 2009 3:16 pm ET

I absoulutly agree...we are celebrating a man that has been on drugs for many years, who has been accused of molestation more than once. He has not been a good proformer in many years. This is getting way to much coverage, there are more important things we can focus on. Eather way I feel that being that there are children involved we need to give the children and family time to heal, too much coverage just don't help that! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!

JP   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I guess this congressman should keep his opinion for himself.Give Michael the respect that he deserves and have some respect for his family.

Courtney Anne   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Hi Rick,

Republican Peter King is a disgrace to our country, it is sad that Michael Jackson is not here to defend himself. This is why I can't stand the Republican party, because a lot of its members love to tear people down, especially celebrities. Remember, Barack Obama and the suggestion he might be a terrorist. Rest In Piece MJ, you are loved.

Sabal   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Does Mr. King understand the meaning of slander? All his allegations against Michael Jackson were never proven, and as a statesman, he should no better...

Susan   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Your poll question was difficult to answer regarding Michael Jackson...you should have asked if people thought he was guilty, not if his artistry outshone any allegations of impropriety. No one would agree with that, but people would have an opinion of whether or not he was guilty. He was never found guilty of anything.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

If he was not guilty, why did he pay $10 million to one family? with his money he could have fought it till the end.

sandeep kalirah   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I am Canadian, but I understand that the United States is not much different than the laws and values of Canada.

Both of these countires are democracies. Michael Jackson was tried under a United States Jury, and was found to be not-guilty of all charges. Therefore, for someone in such high prestige as Congressman King, should not be name calling in such a hateful manner. It is discrimination, and it does not have a place in a democratic government.

Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and Michael Jackson, who is no longer here to defend himself, was, under a court of law, found to be not guilty. Michael Jackson's legacy should never be subjected to such name calling, especially by someone who represents the nation and has a voice to reach millions of people across the globe.

Tim Louque (pronounced Luke)   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

This man could have made his point WITHOUT calling Michael Jackson names and he could have expressed his opinion with this deplorable grand standing for attention.

NO ONE who has the common sense of a horse would side with this guy.

THIS is the tip of the Rush Limbaugh iceberg of what is wrong with the mentality of the republican party ... all scare tactics, holier than thou attitude and complete lack of compassion for people ... even when they are dead.

John in La.   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I think that this is one of those times that proves no matter who you are, if you are black in America, being proven innocent by a court of law means nothing....

Beverly   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Who is this polititian talking about Michael Jackson. He is in poor taste and has no faith in the judicial system that proved him innocent.
Please, show some respect.

Mark Haury   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

All I hear is that Jackson was never convicted of child molestation charges. That's not the same as being innocent. Personally, I believe that where there is that much smoke, there is a fire somewhere. And when it comes to crimes against children, I will err on the side of children EVERY time.
Side note: There is too much coverage of this. I actually watched a 30 minute show on CNN yesterday with the subject being,"Is there too much coverage of Michael Jackson" Get back to news CNN! Enough is enough.

Alex   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Giving Micheal as much coverage as he has been getting is beyond obsurd our soldier over in Iraq putting thier lives on the line and the many that have died dont even get 2 minutes of coverage 90% of the time but just because Micheal lead a freak show of a life he gets days upon days. I'm not going to make anymore comments about this topic as someones family member has died and my remorse goes out to them. But enough is enough.

Paula   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Not only did he have questionable relationships with children, he also abused drugs, which probably hastened his death. He is not someone I want my boys to idolize, no matter how much talent he had. When are we going to get it right and encourage our kids to have heros that deserve such status?

ALBERT E.   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

What happens to innocent until found guilty. The last time I checked MJJ was not convicted of any crime. I hope our learned congressman is aware of this.

Mike   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rick;

These politicians should keep their mouth shut and let the family grieve. His personal opinion stating MJ was a molester and a pervert is nonsense and was found Not Guilty in both trials. The family should go after the Senator for slander and deflamation. Politicians always seem to be putting their nose in business where it don't belong. I dont think he ever molested anyone I think it was about money and those triasls were long over let it rest!

Delia   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

The congressman is an idiot..correct me if I am wrong..but was MIchael Jackson found guilty? Last I checked he was not..if he was I assume he would have been in Jail. No one cares about what the congressman feel...his feelings are totoally irrelevant..he is surely entitled to feel what ever he feels but show some respect..the man is dead..the family should sue for defamation of character...MICHAEL JACKSON WAS NEVER FOUND GUILTY CONGRESSMAN..PROVE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING...GO DO THE PEOPLES WORK..

Ada   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Peter King probably represents some Americans yes. The Americans who are quick to cut people down after building them up, who never want to see a person of color progress and be the best at their craft, and be successful. Michael Jackson is NOT a child molester, but of course, he was quite different from most people. But being weird is not a crime. Living in a bubble since you were 6, not being able to lead a normal life, and thinking as a grown man that it is okay to invite children to stay with you because you're trapped in that 6 year old's mind was his problem. He paid dearly for it with the false accusations, his reputation, his money, etc. He was GREAT entertainer, and we love him for that. Peter King can go to hell if he wants.

Shawna   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Whatever happened to innocent till proven guilty. He was found not guilty on I thnk it was 9 accounts. And according to America's judical system, HE IS INNOCENT. They were allegations and they could not prove that Michael was a pedophile. I hope that if Congress King is ever accused of anything, I hope the would see him as guilty, and even if proven innocent, we will still hold him as GUILTY and rub it in his face even after he dies.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

The last child that sued Michael Jackson stated his father made him do and that Michael didn't touch him. Where is the news now. Why isn't this information being reported. Could it be Michael couldn't sleep and the reason for that is that he was falsely accused...

Eleanor Parrish Wiltshire   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rep King needs to respect Michaels Family he had 3 children. He also demonstrates why Republicans are now in the toilet. Out of touch insensitve, sleazy politicians.

Paula   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of any crime. I thought in the United States you had to be found GUILTY in a trial before being labeled a crimminal for any offense!
Apparently not by Republicans...?

Phyllis Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

M. Jackson was a sick individual, and all this coverage making him into a saint just turns my stomach, and I am sick of hearing about him.

brianna   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

he was found innocent!!! you have no proof that he did this.. he didnt even know him!! he has no right to call michael jackson a pedophile especially when michael jackson has just passed away. Peter King should shut his mouth and keep his thoughts to his self

Dennis   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Would you not honor Elton John, just because of his questionable past. Which isn't in question at all. Let him die in peace.

Daniel J. Scheidt   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

First thing I said when the news of Michael Jackson's death became public "the children are safer today now hat he's dead." However, his artistry and his alleged behavior must be seperated in order to honor his legacy.

Mike   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rick,
Although MJ was an amazing artist, you have to allow thought of the charges and settlements that have been made against him. O.j was not convicted but many still think he did it. Enough on him and more on our troops.

Mykal   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

The congress man should be sued by the family who represent Jackson ,that is why the country is like that When we have dumb ass politician who does not take time to read and understand before making a statement .If he had read both court document he would not have made that comment

Cynobia   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

I find it quite interesting that Mr. King has something to say about Michael when it is time to work on universal health insurance. Yea take the heat off the fact that you are not doing your job and following the will of the the American people. Michael was never convicted and is dead and can not defend himself, shame of you for not wanting to work for the American people Mr. king.

Donna fr. Canada   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Only in America can you be acquitted twice of a crime and still be found guilty by a Republican! Rep King, let's be frank, if this were Elvis Presley, your comments would be totally different! Not only do you expose you tonsils when you speak, but you also expose your ignorance!

Bob D   July 6th, 2009 3:17 pm ET

Rick, someone should ask Pete King if he's ever been to America. Because in this country, we have something called the "presumption of innocence". It's one of our most cherished legal principles. Jerry Lee Lewis was a pedophile. Michael Jackson has never been convicted of anything.

And yes, Michael Jackson is getting WAY too much coverage. But it has nothing to do with his personal life.

D Denton   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I totally agree with Mr. King...MJ was a pedophile/child molester/freak. CNN has went way over board on the coverage of another celebrity that died from a drug over dose.

John johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I totally agree with the congressman. Jackson WAS a great entertainer but turned into a pervert & child molester. If not for his fame & fortune he would have been locked up. & should have been anyway.

preston   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

i believe that jackson does deserve his proper credit for being the king of pop but i also agree that there is no need for a 2 month coverage and all of these special reports on his life just because he has passed away. i also believe he was a pedophile. as the comedian katt williams said : "what would a child molester need at his house to attract little children, i dont know maybe a theme park, carousel, a place named Neverland!". it makes sense to me

Daniel   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

This is a horrific allegation. I don't know why reporters just work hard on bringing people down. Michael was a great and loving person who loved kids. Because he allowed kids sleep in his bed doesn't mean he molested these kids . Michael worked hard to give kids the child hood he never had. This is Bull***t

Jasmine Skunk   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think this is the biggest mistake people make reguarding things heard in the media. There are several things that are bothering me. The first one is how the media keeps comparing him Elvis Presley. Michael Jackson touched BILLIONS of lives. He was known all over the world. His fame would be better compared to Jesus than Elvis. Or Ghandi... or Buddah. Michael always had a message of love. He tried to tell people to love eachother. This message was twisted later on to seem like it was some kind of perversion.
Which brings me to the second thing that is bothering me. Michael Jackson was never found guilty of anything . As a matter of fact he was found NOT GUILTY in a court proceeding that took over a week to deliberate. The jury didn't rush to their decision. They did, however find him innocent of all charges. We are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty in this country, but Michael Jackson was crucified before anything was heard in court of law. So why is this guy talking about the controversy as if it were a fact?
He should not judge someone he has never met and can only base his opinion on rumors passed throught the media.

Betty Scully   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I'm a Democrat and I totally agree with Congressman King. Irrespective of MJ's personal life, it is unseemly to be so over the top with respect to any entertainer's death...unless, of course, ones network is trying to attract a new and upcoming viewing audience...but what values are being supported thereby? Come on, lets get real....

awad   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

i think this guy is saying all this for some publicity. maybe this guy peter king needs make like mj and beat it....

D THOMSPON   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

AS A MAN EMPLOYED BY OUR GREAT COUNTRY, I BELIEVE IT IS VERY IRONIC THAT THIS MAN ,KING, DOES NOT BELIEVE IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. DID HE FORGET THAT JACKSON WAS ACQUITTED?

Quentin   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think we should celebrate his greatness and those that think the lesser of him, will have to waite to chim in on the matter. Last I heard, this country says that if you are found inocent, then you are just that, inocent. We need to think about the children in all of this, seeing that they can read & hear all the negative people are saying about their dad. We need to respect them first........

karen Stanley   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

He was a great artist, as many who have died before him. He had a questionable past, and we are overdoing it. Lets focus more on poverty and hunger in this country. Lets have more rallys in that direction.

jennifer ramos   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

THIS GUY (KING) IS A DISGUSTING PERSON. How can you make such allegations when MJ was found innocent in a court of law. DO YOU REALIZE everyone who knew MJ always says good things about him...???
The family that accused Michael took $$$$, because that is what they wanted. That family had a history of extortion as well....I would never take $$$ from anyone if they abused my child, i would want them in jail.

It's sickening, that this KING guy has to go and say that, he needs to keep his fat mouth shut. MJ was a huge part of American CULTURE and has done more for people, charities and children then that ignorant KING will ever do. Did you see how he addressed him? He said 'THIS INDIVIDUAL" – Are you kidding me??? SHOW SOME RESPECT King.

Darryl Richardson   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Michael Jackson is the "KING OF POP" he has never been found guilty og sexual crimes, Please leave him alone. Rep KIng needs to worry about being caught up in some republican sex scanal. Leave Michael Jackson alone.

Paul Anderer   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Although MJ was a great artist, with great probability he was also a pedophile. It is very sad that this very serious part of MJ's life is being IGNORED. It is also being rationalized by many, including high profile names, saying that he was tried and found innocent. Money buys freedoms.

What would have happened if MJ would have been found guilty of child molestation? Maybe he would have had to receive court ordered treatment on all the issues he was experiencing, including substance abuse.

Brian   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

please go back and see how much money he paid people! do you pay millions when your innocent? wake up!

Siggi   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

michael jackson was the best performer of our times. it was never proven that he molested anyone.
and who is that Representtavtive anyways?

Monique NYC   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Wow so now you are guilty even if you are found innocent??? Rick this guy should be sued for slander if anyone should be given limited airtime it should be Mis-Rep King. . A real class act NOT!!!

Em Vaughn   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I believe ythat one should keep his thought to himself. The Man is dead. What will pep[le say about you when you die.
The man had a God given talent that he gave to the world. Name calling is just not right.

nikki   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

they only got rich because he paid them all off to keep them quiet what grown man "sleeps" in bed with little boys? Jackson made me sick. and quite frankly im sick of hearing about him. great people die everyday and youll never hear about them!

Melinda Jones   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Hey Rick! I think that the coverage has been too much. I think that Michael Jackson deserves tributes and that kind of coverage but I don't like it taking place of other important news for as long as it has. And the news has become more about his drug abuse and claims that no one knows for sure anyway, so, it's like slander. And Rep Peter King should have an opinion about too much coverage but he doesn't have the right to slander anyone's name with his opinions and especially when someone has died, for the respect of his family. Thanks.

Webb   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

The issue is a slamming comment on the media covering the death of Michael Jackson. Last week Congress passed the largest tax increase in US history and all that was on the news was that Michael Jackson died. Now Congress is looking to change medical coverage that could cause our grandchildren to suffer but all we hear is that Michael Jackson's will is in dispute. Why can the news outlets not cover items that will affect our lives and but grandize the lives of celebrities that do not experience life as we do.

Ryan   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I am completely disgusted with how ignorant people like this can be. Especially someone who is supposed to be a leader?
This close minded individual (who obviously can't respect music or can't understand the beauty of it) is upset about something else in his life and enjoys taking out his frustration on other people. Mainly due to the fact that he knows he will be remembered for nothing when he dies and is jealous that Michael Jackson is remembered for so much, including all the boundaries he broke and innovations he brought to the entire entertainment industry. Should I even ask if he ever met MJ? I'm sure the answer would be no. Stop judging other people and start judging yourself and weather or not you're doing your job at being a so called "representative".

cher   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

let's investigate Mr. King! he probably has skeleton's in his closet. Michael Jackson was aquitted of all charges.

we celbrate Elvis and he was for sure a pedophile and a statutory rapist, drug addict, but that doesn't stop the people from celebrating his greatness. Peter King get a grip!!

Jonathan Evans   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think as a politician, he is completely out of place. He is commenting on the most influential man in the history of entertainment. There has never been a bigger star, ever to grace the stage or to pass. The Congressmens comments are completely ridiculous and unterly unjust. The "allegations" were never proven. He was NEVER convicted of anything. We need to remember the man in his good, for what he has done for the entertainment society, and for the world as a humanitarian, not for the un-proven allegations made. I agree with Rev. Al SHarpton, we owe it to Michael to remember him for what he has done, not for the ugly things that were said. Shame on you congressman, if you were from my state, i'd start a campaign against you to ensure this as your last term!!!

Pat   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

The coverage has been and continues to be too much. It has nothing to do with any human faults he may or may not have had. He was a wonderful talent and I love his music. His death is sad for his family, friends and fans, but enough is enough and I have had more than enough. I understand entertainment networks milking this, but not legitimate news networks. A couple of days would have been the most of plenty.

Linda Chavez   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I think it is disgraceful, and just a plain sick individual who can't keep his remarks to himself, after a person any person has died!

I think that anybody who doesn't think that all of the publicity Michael Jackson received, even the negative was because of money. These human creatures were too spineless to make money on their own, and leached off Michael Jackson.

He had a great heart and all of these weird antics were for his fans and it cost him his life. We should celebrate his music and his talent.

Kesha   July 6th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

You would think that a congressman has better things to deal with. It is not effecting his state or his financial disposition. I was abused as a child myself by several people, but even I say give it a rest. You have to way the good and bad together. Regardless of his past MJ did do a lot for the good of people around the world. Also, remember that those who were abused as children have a higher rate of having problems as an adult. Let those who are mourning mourn. Now is not the time. He isn't even buried yet.

Melissa   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rick,
What happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty.

erick windsor   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Hi Rick! I'm a big fan of Michael Jackson's music, and I fully acknowledge the impact he's had on the whole music industry and millions of people's lives. I however do not agree on his fondness for little boys when he was alive. I apppluad the congressman for going against flow of the tide and voicing his opinion on Michael. It's not easy these days to say what's on your mind and not get lambasted right away just because you're not on the bandwagon, or because it's not politically correct". I cant even begin to tell you how disgusted i was when he walked out a free man in his last trial. IIt just goes to show how money, fame and a broken justice system can afford you freedom... Nobody calls you a child molester for at least a decade if there's no truth behind it... Wanna bet if it was some regular joe schmoe, it would have landed him in jail before you can even say time out? Thanks for reporting it as you calll it Rick.. I really appreciate your enthusiasm and honesty!

Giovanni   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I think that we just wont know for sure whether he was a child molester or not. People can and will lie for money and with fame and money can and will find a way out of the arm of the law. I say give the men a tribu help the economy and move on..!!

Alex in Miami   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ was acquitted. This congressman should educate himself before blabbing on National stage. Maybe because he is over 60 years old, he does not know what MJ contributed to the music industry and our history.

Terrence J. Allen   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

At the moment of someone's death it is not the time or place to be disrespectful, and Representative King at the very least is guilty of crossing the line of polite society levels of decency. What ever Michael Jackson may have been guilty of, now is not the time to rehash it. And in doing so I believe Rep. King is sadly simply being a Media Whore- something so prevelent now in our culture.

noreen salter   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I think that congressman should be leaving his job. Go figure a republican not believing in the american justice system. Michael Jackson was found not guilty and this man is still accusing an innocent man. People are thinking of soldiers but if the republicans didn't start the war in iraq many he wouldn't be compairing . He only wants to look at negative things. I feel bad for that poor state where he is.
Noreen

Danny   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

yes I agree with the congressmen, no doub, michael jackson was not only a pedifile, but also a junkee and who know what else, In my opinion, michael was a sick man from his youth, only heaven knows why, lets not forget all of the plastic surgeries, to praise michael is to be hippocritical, If it wasn't for his money, he be locked up along time ago, in a mental institution !!

MollyBeBe   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ was immensely musically talented and a sick pervert. I am only a few months older than he was yet I forgot he existed after he started messing with little boys. The coverage is way over the top. Stop it.

Kathylee   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

My experience is when someone like Rep. King comes out so strongly on something like he has experienced abuse himself. I would tell him do get help and confront who hurt you dont take it out on someone else.
I am with Whoopie Goldberg on this. Micheal may bave been odd but he would never hurt a child. What this world put him thru was an abuse in itself. There is not enough converstion about all the good he did as in for Aids.
King should go do his job and this isnt it.

paulus   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

hi,rick
I think they should bury him and forget about him. It's starting to piss me of that each and every time I turn on CNN his face is plastered over my tv screen. PS I agree with the congressman.

Recon Sergeant   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

One would hope that an elected official in the federal government would have the good sense not to make comments about allegations which Michael was never convicted of in a court of law. Michael was an eccentric individual as are many super celebrities who cannot escape the lime light, however, he was never convicted nor plead guilty to any of the charges against him. To speak of him as if he were found guilty in a court of law, simply because that is the verdict Representitive King came to in his own mind, is highly inappropriate.

sfmitch   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Michael gave time and money to help disadvantaged children. He visited hospitals, wrote "We Are the World", funded burn units and much much more. How can anyone say "there is nothing good about this person"? Mr. King is just looking for publicity and he's getting it. He's is just basking in some of Michael's light.

louis wesler   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Besides the fact the Congressperson has obivously not read the news, from several years ago, of Micheal Jackson's aquital on the very items he has charged Michael with, it is just one more example of the hate mongering from the Republican Party.

Joseph Eid   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Let Michael Jackson rest in peace!! They did not find him guilty and no one has proof that he ever did those nasty things people accused him of. There is plenty of proof, however, that he was an inspiring international musician and inspiration . . . for that, he should be honored.

Robyn Nikoll   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

This guy sounds like an idiot. A racist individual who cannot stand to see this man, a black man, so exhaulted honored and loved by millions all over the world. What has he contributed to the world in comparison with Michael Jackson? Hot air and bad breath!

donnie osmond   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

lets move on, at least our children are safe !!!!!!!!!

Lawrence   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rick, are you kidding me? For you to even provoke the question "does people across america feel the same sentiments about Michael as this crazy congressman" is totally out of line. It is you and the media who will continute instill this mean sprirted BS and make it acceptable. Everyone has a pass and I'm sure we can find dirt on you. When you die do you want your kids to hear about all the negative, and not that you did not even close to the good works Michael did?

B. Alvarez   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ's artistry is known worldwide. His mucical accomplishments are amazing. However, just because someone is rich and famous and talented, doesn't mean that his pedophile allegations, and improprieties should be forgotten. MJ is dead, and I was wondering if there are any ongoing investigations, and if so, will they be terminated due to his death?

George Subacs   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Typifies the view of this generation.... Celebrity tops all... Abuse all the little boys you want. This nation is more concerned with your moonwalk.

james   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

i completely agree with the represtitives comments. michael jackson at one time was an inpiration and a muscician, what he became is both a tragedy and should have been a crime. that man was a sick perveted pedophile who should of been taken out behind the woodshed and shot. i cannot beleive all the outpooring of support for that wackjob. whats really funny is shen you look at all the crackheads you see on the street supporting him, there the same idiots that were at his trials. funny how you dont see the "normal" Americans out there. probably because we all have jobs to and our regular lives to deal with. if michael jacksons death affects you that much you need to get counseling because you are crazy.

Zeke   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Who is this guy? I watch CNN religiously and have never heard of him before. I think he is just some back-bencher looking to make a name for himself. MJ was an icon of our time, and has NEVER been convicted of sexual assault. A civil case was settled out of court WITHOUT any admission of guilt. We will never know the truth because the"victims" would have to admit they lied, and then be open to prosecution themselves. Granted the coverage has been a bit over the top, but what else can you expect in this day and age of our celebrity obsessed society?

Vickie Purvis   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

It's not about Michael's legal/moral issues...
MJ's death has been given an ENORMOUS amount of coverage on CNN for a pop star!
Surely other things are happening in the world(?)

Susan   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I like Peter King, but he is totally out of line here...slanderous.

Kelly   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rick we need to end all the coverage of Micheal Jackson. Go back to the real news. People are being killed all over the world for the wrong reasons....... stop with the MJ news

carolyn   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Like many of these right wing Republicans who ride the moral high horse to death, Mr. King probably has his own scandalous secrets. I hope the public makes no excuses for him when he is exposed. It's curious that the term "innocent until proven guilty" only applies to "them." What about the parents who willingly sent their children to spend nights in Neverland. Either they thought he was innocent or they saw the dollar signs in potential accusations.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

YES! I agree 100% WITH REP. KING THE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE FOR THIS MAN IS OBSCENE. PUTTING THIS MAN OVER FOR ALL THE GOOD HE SUPPOSEDLY DID AND OVERLOOKING THE BAD IS A MISTAKE HE WAS A DRUG ADDICT AND A PEDOPHILE I DON'T CARE WHAT SONGS HE SANG OR WHAT CHARITIES HE SUPPORTED IT IS NOT WRONG TO SPEAK "ILL" ORF THE DEAD WHEN IT IS THE TRUTH AND INNOCENT PEOPLE DO NOT SCRATCH OUT 20 MILLION DOLLAR CHECKS TO MAKE "THINGS" GO AWAY THE FIGHT FOR THEIR INNOCENCE UNTIL THE END AND HE NEVER DID.HES IS DEAD ITS DONE AND OVER LET IT GO THERE IS TO MUCH REAL NEWS OUT THERE.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Yes Wacko Jacko is and was a pedophile and drug abuser. . In our society, we want to deify persons that die early. His fortune (which he squandered) was spent buying the silence of his victims. If Michael Jackson was white (although he tried to be), he would not be getting this sort of attention. Now we are being asked to forget his pedophilia and celebrate his bubblegum music.

KATY   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The media may, at times, go overboard, but that is with any story. I wonder how Mr. King was transformed into a fly on the wall of Mr. Jackson's bedroom and can make such factual statements out of mere opinion. "If you want to blame the media, Mr. King, so be it, but leave the dead alone and let us celebrate the constant of Michael Jackson which is a talent that changed the direction of pop music."

Jason Q   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The media has covered him too much. Not because he was a pervert (I'm not really convinced he was), but because he was just a singer. The world is dealing with stolen elections, corrupt politicians, rapidly changing policies, and, oh wait–nuclear weapons. But all we hear about right now is what some celebrity wrote in his last will and testament years ago. It's none of our business, and frankly, it doesn't matter to us.

dick   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The rich and powerful republicans believe in Rule of Law when it suits them but if they don't like you watch out...Jackson still a pervert, Iraq, pre-emtive war OK!

Ray   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I hope they make a statue of Peter King. It'll make a perfect target for the pigeons.

Grady Jones   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

In this matter the courts voice should outweigh that of Rep King. He should apoligize to the family for slanderizing the deceased. We should all learn when to keep our mouths shut!

Ron   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

This congressman is a right wing Republican, I would expect no less of him.

Nashone Holloway   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Jackson was a great artist and philanthropist, regardless of what he did when no one was looking. He should be honored. Of course, he had issues! Fact is, we are all flawed. We cannot point fingers until we clean up our act first. He understood the healing power of music, and he only tried to help. P.S.- I'm more than positive that this coverage has FAR more to do with the media earning money, than it does Michael himself. Let it go. Anytime you can sell one ticket for ten-thousand dollars on eBay, you're going to want to take it worldwide. Peace.

Jane O'Neil   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

MJ was an enormously talented individual. But no amount of talent can 'outshine' being a pedophile. Does that mean that if you are charged with child molestation, your talents are taken into consideration? When OJ dies, will he be celebrated as a great football player, and his crimes ignored? MJ was a very twisted individual, and I wish his family could have buried him quietly and privately.

Karen A. Richards   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Michael Jackson was never convicted of pedophilia Rep. King. Worry about something pertinent to your job as a congressman. How about term limits, your term?

Sarah   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

The congressman needs to shut up because Michael Jackson was aquitted in a court of law. He may find himself sued for slander and out of a job at election time.

katrina carter   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

how do you know if he was a pervert. you wasn't even there.the man is dead ,give him some respect. you wouldn't want anyone to say anything about you or your family members. now ,what skeletons do you have in your closet.

Carole McDonnell   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Most Americans I know - black or white– will be watching the funeral. Celebrities become part of our lives and bring us together, especially when most cable news shows are about politics which is so polarizing. As for Michael Jackson being a pedophile, we Americans have got to learn to accept the rule of law. Ever since OJ we've developed the habit of assuming people are guilty even when the law acquits them. If the law acquits a person, whether the law was right or wrong in that acquittal, we should not be judging someone as guilty. I suspect the folks in the US who have issues with MJ's coverage are people who consider themselves sane, righteous, and normal. However, the United States is full of not so perfect folks, folks with eccentricities, folks who are not highly polished. Folks like me. And for us, there is something more real about Michael;s nuttiness than the perfection of TV anchormen and the self-righteousness of politicians.

Eddie Cintron   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Let America understand that once a person is aquitted there is no reason to continue to judge and persecute this individual. There was a settlement but that was because Michael could not continue the the mental pressure he had to endure and he just wanted it to end. He looked to the hungry children in Africa, the ones with cancer and disabillities. The billionaires in America are not doing this he weas a voice for the ones that could not speak out.

Lis   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

We live in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty, Rep King can convict Michael, he owes the family and Michael's children an apology. Jerk!

Lopaca   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Rep King is entitled to his opinion but I would think that a government official would respect in the justice system. MJ was found innocent of the charges and should not be branded with a particular crime that he was acquitted of.

kaye   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I don't necessarily agree with King's comments, but i do think you have gone overboard with your coverage of his death. Enough already!! He was not a president and you have covered his death much as you did President Reagan or President Kennedy and this should not be so!! He is not in the same class as they.

Sandra   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I do not believe that Michael molested any of those children. He was simply an adult, who was deprived of his children by his father. So he was innocently attempting to recapture his missed childhood by having sleep overs / slumber parties with the young boys. However, he was very naive to not understand that this action was inappropriate and because of his wealth this would make him a prime target for the children's greedy, opportunistic parents seeking to gain money by distorting the situation.

Cassandra   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I wonder how this man would feel if he were acquitted in a court of law but his life's accomplishments were negated by the accusations alone. I suspect his tune would quickly change.

Britney H   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

I absolutely agree 110% that there has been a ridiculously excessive amount of coverage over Michael's death. The fact of the matter is that he was an entertainer- not a god. People die. Why are we focusing so much on this one person's death when there are so many other issues this country is facing now?

Trey   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found Not Guilty in a court of Law in the United States of America on 14 Counts of child molestation. As for the 1st trial the little kid was actually giving a hypnotic like substance before he even made allegations against MJ. To prove that MJ was a phedi, you would have to explain that famous taped convo between Evan Chandler and the other guy saying no way I loose, I will get everything that I want, and his career will be over he won't sell another record. What about the kid? Thats not important. What about that tape. And why was Jordan giving that hypnotic drug just to have a tooth pulled. Why did they settle for money instead of see to it that MJ was taken to jail, if he was a phedo. Also if he was a phedi, then why was it a 10 year gap. Explain to me why there is no evidence. King should get a life.

kirk   July 6th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

We celebrate Jackson's talent, not his personal life, which will be disputed forever.
Just like we celebrate all rock stars, and we "forgive" them for being addicts and alcoholics in their earlier lives.
Being celebrated too much in the news could be valid point, bit stop celebrating his music career because of mishaps in his life (which are not even verified) is wrong.
thanks!

Marcus P   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

The family and the fans haven't even been able to bury Michael Jackson yet. Why even make such of a comment during a time like this?

Chauncey Snyder   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Typical Republican hatred but I noticed that Mr. King did not react in outrage about Mark Folley and all the other Republican perverts. What's his point? MJ cannot defend himself now due to his death. Is this anything less racism?

Don Kleder   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

The guy was mental... listen to any of his interviews... And all of you that support him, let your children go to bed with him. Stop the coverage.

jean of ohio   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

too bad for mr. king .jackson getting more attn than the crooked
ones in our goverment.,trying to run the nation. is it alot of coverage yes. but michael entertained us not robbing us like many,in power.
further more who is he to judge michael.
god will be the real judge of us all. I'D sure hate to see our elected officials in gods judgment

hotdog   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I believe Michael Jackson was a strange person, but supposable they settled out of court and he was found not guilty. i think the rep. needs to worry more about things that our country is facing instead of worrying about a celebrity and do his job. instead of our time with just an opportunity to get his face on national t.v.

Ivan   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Pervert? Peter King is a member of a political party that has bankrupted this country through greed. They have abandoned and killed hundreds through their neglect in situations like Hurricane Katrina. They are responsible for maiming and killing thousands of innocent people in Iraq. And Peter King is calling Michael Jackson a pervert. Start by looking at "the man in the mirror" Mr. King.

Sheila   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Rick, leave it to the republicans to play god while they are alive.....pretty sure MJ is with his maker who is the only one who should judge him......all we can do is celebrate his extraordinary greatness and the contribution he made to this world while he was on this earth....or just shut up.....bloody republicans..........

shaun   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Representative King just needs to be quiet and let the man rest in peace, he speaks like he was there as a witness at neverland ranch which is clearly not the case. Doesn't he have more important things to do, like i don't know help fix the economy?

Jon Youngblood - Portland, Or   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

For a lawmaker Mr. King does not seem to respect the judgments of the court which found MJ not guilty. It shows the arrogance of Republicans in Office with spectacular clarity.

kelvin mays   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

its awful for a elected officialto open up his racist mouth and let everyone know how much of a racist he really is. The republican party and their members try to display how moral they are but everyday one of them gets caught cheating on their wife or in a bathroom touching someones feet. We are not worried about Micheal Jackson hes dead. We are wondering which republican will be next to cheat on his wife.

mary   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Hey Rick,

It's about time someone said the dam truth. He is being called a hero

from where. Hero are the soldiers who are defending us in Irag and

Afganistan.

Sincerely,
Mary Bustos

Stan   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Where is the innocent before proved innocent, or even the innocent after being found inocent? Forgive me but wasn't Michael jackson found innocent?

Pat   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I agree with Rep. Peter King! I can't believe this major hoopla over Michael Jackson that has been going on! He admitted to sleeping with young children in his own bed. What more do you want?!? He was a pedophile, yes. He paid millions of dollars to settle accusations. I'm sick of the so-called honors being bestowed upon this pervert!

Sharlisa   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

First, I don't like how the voting question is asked. Michael Jackson was never convicted of child abuse. MJ is an important figure for all Americans. His music inspired people in ways that is unmeasurable. My heart goes out to the Jackson family especially his children. And the reason why MJ is receiving so much coverage is because people truly cares about him and his family.

Kay   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Maybe he is just jealous of Michael's status. Let the man rest. If he did do it, he has a higher power to answer to. Who are we to judge??

not a jackson fan   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

The unrelenting coverage of this is getting on everyone's nerves. Hopefully Wednesday media reporting will get back to normal.

Acquitted or not there was still a $20 million dollar payoff in his first accusations in 1993.

I was never a fan of his music or his lifestyle.

Gerald   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I'm sure that if you look into the background of Mr. King, you will find that like many of his republican peers, he is just another demented questionable character trying to impress his constituency at the expanse of someone else, in this case Mr. Jackson. I'm waiting for the day when he will be exposed.

Michael   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a visionary artist. He was also a deeply disturbed and damaged individual. Look at the coverage of his death, and you can see why he was so damaged. We, the fans, did this to him. I think it was that damage that caused him to molest children. It's no excuse, but I think that is what happened.

Britney H   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

OJ Simpson was acquitted too.

Eleni Constantine   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

I understand it was the July 4th weekend and it's a time to celebrate the mourn the soldiers who have died for our rights as US citizens, it would serve congressman King better to say that instead of bashing Michael Jackson. Michael was not just a pop icon, legend but he was a humanitarian who gave selfishly to so many organizations. In a country that we say not guilty until proven innocent Congressman King is making some very nasty claims. He should be embarrassed of his attitude and comments. RIP Michael Jackson you will always live on with your music, dance, videos and philanthropy.

Cher   July 6th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

OMG! Stop this coverage! I am so sick of hearing about this has been pedophile.

Robert   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick, Congressman King has no class and no respect. Michael Jackson may have had some issues in his life but who hasn't? No one can denie what the great things he did for humanity nor his legacy in music. It offends me that a congressman from the state of New York has the nerve to act below his office. MJ isn't even in the ground yet and King is talking junk. Figues...republicans

Debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

let him keep talking ... he makes it better for the Democrats! And they don't need more help right now!!

Judith Howard   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Where he was a "pervert" is beside the point. I'm in no position to prove that one way or the other. There is too much wall-to-wall coverage of his death–period. He was a great dancer/entertainer, he appears to have led a rather sad life, and he died young. Now can you go back to covering more important events with less sensationalism?.

Mother   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick,

I do not agree with Mr. King. MJ was the most amazing and famous performer in the world and that's why we talk about him.

Cedric   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Please Mr. King, you should try to solve the problems that face the American people and not comment on THE KING OF POP. He was not convicted of child molestation during his trial. He was acquitted by the judiciary system. Do not be disrespectful you lawmaker King Maybe Mr. King thinks that the court did a mistake in the Michael Jackson trial. Let him rest in peace, he is the Elvis of our generation, you Mr.King are nobody.

Alex From VA   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick the bottom line is michael was never convicted . This republican senator is just playing the age old political game of headline hunting. I bet you this guy dosen't care at all about michael he just wants to see his name in the news. These politicians need to focus on washington and let people make up thier own minds on how they want to remember MJ.

Lula Canty   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

The congressman needs to get his facts straight. Michael Jackson was not convicted of being a pervert or child molester. If he was not found guilty, he is innocent. His coverage has only been two weeks which is less than the months of coverage for Anna Nicole Smith ( a promiscuous gold digger), and Casey ( an alleged murderer). Why didn't the congressman complain about that?

mark james-robinson   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty of child molestation. the congressman should enlighten himself on what that means.

Dawn   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Rick,

I agree that the coverage has gotten a little out of hand with Michael Jackson. I know that you as a journalist should cover all angles but there has to be more pressing world news going on. I mean he died almost two weeks ago now and we still have to hear about his will, drug overdosing, and family arguments over his children. We get it! you could have covered his death and left it at that.
As far as the Pedifile and such that is a totally diffrent topic and if he did it or not at this point that's in the past. We should remember him for when he was MJ the "King of Pop" and not for when he went through his own personal trials and tribulations.

Dawn

Mary   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

I am never quick to agree with Republicans but this is seriously out of control. Every day all day on every news station is simply ridiculous for a man who has led a questionable life. If his intentions with children remain in question how can we celebrate his life so endlessly?

CAROL   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

JORDAN CHANDLER ADMITTED THAT HE LIED ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON AND THAT HIS FATHER PUSHED HIM UP TO FABRICATING THE STORY THAT LITERALLY RUINED HIS LIFE.........I ALSO RUSHED TO JUDGEMENT BUT AFTER ALL THIS COVERAGE, I HAS SEEN MICHAEL IN A DIFFERENT LIGHT. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT MICHAEL WAS CAPABLE OF HURTING ANYONE AND HE WAS ALSO FOUND NOT GUILTY. I THINK HE WAS TARGETED AS AN EASY MARK AND PEOPLE TRIED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF HIM. HE SHOULD BE CELEBRATED AS HE WAS A ONCE IN A LIFETIME PHENOMINAL ENTERTAINER

Michael Mitch   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Mr. King needs to stay out of the botox and let those eyebrows come down a few notches.

Dagmar   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Dear Rick,
I am so disappointed and tired of hearing of all the negative reports of Michael Jackson. Let the man rest in Peace!
Fact is:
Michael Jackson was the greatest Entertainer of all times, an Icon to billion of people worldwide.
He was the greatest Humanitarian! I don’t know of anybody who did as much as he did.
And lets not forget the fact, that he legally was acquitted by “the court of law” of all charges.
The media needs to stop talking about this and really start celebrating his legacy as what he was: The greatest Entertainer, an Icon and the greatest Humanitarian.
The medias has the power to stop it! Everyone needs to think about his children for a minute.
Why would you even publish a comment such the one from King, how dare he makes a comment like this. Disgusting!!! How much does a congressman respects the law?!!
I do agree, that the doctor’s who gave him all these drugs (if true), should be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law.
Dagmar -California-

Angela   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

There was a child who could identify a birthmark on his crotch. Come on, he was sick! Would all these fans let their kids spend the night with MIchael? Just curious. Presidents who have died got less coverage. It's getting disgusting. I love CNN, but I'd rather watch FOX then hear another word about that pedophile.

Jakman   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

I don't know if MJ was a pedophile. What I do know is that he was tried in court and found NOT GUILTY. Who does Pete King think he is to now serve as judge and jury to retry the case?

Kasele   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

We have all directly experienced his artistry and we love him for it. Everytime I see his face on screen, it makes me smile. Remember that the allegations are just allegations...I will celebrate what I have known of Michael Jackson.

Pierre Hilaire   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

What bothers me about this is, first, Al Sharpton showing up to totally discredit this event. This is just another photo-op for him. Secondly, Micheal was a phenominal entertainor BUt was sick. He did innapropriate things to young boys. He was warned about it and refused to stop. By speaking of him as they are doing now... we are enabling his behavior.

Great entertainer ...... Not such a great human being.

Omah Awozele   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

The whole world cannot be wrong, the whole world is mourning Micheal Jackson. What more do you need to prove Micheal was a gift to this world. The fact that he was different doesn't make him a pedophile. If he was, it won't be hard to tell.

That crazy republican peter still exhibit rigidity in ideas the very hallmark of the party he represents.

Look all around you to find the truth.

EAC   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Typical Republican I bet you he was a fan of 'Flock of Seagulls' or some other group back in the 80's and still hates MJ even today. Taking that anger out this way though he should be ashamed of himself.

ShannonL52   July 6th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

This congressman is a hateful pig and is a disgrace. As a public servant he should understand the concept of innocence until proven guilty which Michael Jackson NEVER WAS. Even if there are people who choose to believe he was guilty that is something one discusses in the privacy of their own home. . .to post a video to youtube is odd and distasteful. He is not even buried yet! Regardless of one's thoughts on Michael Jackson himself, he has a family that is mourning including three young children. Perhaps we should look into the congressman's backyard and make sure it's clean since he wants to gleefully throw stones at a dead man. It was people like this wretch who made Michael Jackson's life so miserable and now he's not content to let him rest in peace. Hateful people like this make me sick.

gina veshecco   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Is he for real. What a dope. I believe Jackson was found innocent by a jury of his peers. maybe he should bone-up on his high-school government and remember he lives in America where we are all entitled to the rights and and standards of decency that he is. Shame on him. he has lost his moral guide.

Danny   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

without a doubt Michael Jackson was a talent that will never be seen again in our lifetime. But that doesn't excuse his alledged inappropriate behavior with children. Let's be realistic, the only reason that it is alledged is because Mr. Jackson paid the victims families off.

Ronald W.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

He was acquitted on all charges, for crying out loud leave it alone People, they just wanted $$$$$. The justice department should in that congresman closet and see what kind of scelitons he have. its shamefull for him to bring attention to him self like that. he must not have nothing better to do. He really wastiing tax payers money doing this..he should be doing the poeple work not talking shit....

Rachel W.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

For the past week, all worldly news events have been put on
hold, so the media can be totally focused on the death of Michael Jackson. North Korea is no longer important. China is no longer important. Iran , Iraq , Israel , Palestine , are no longer important. The economy is no longer important. World hunger, terrorism, global warming, the energy crisis..not important!

When the news of the death of a member of the most dysfunctional
group of people in the United States of America (HOLLYWOOD)
takes precedence over worldly events that will have a lasting effect on the future condition of this planet, something is drastically wrong with our values.

Margery Lewis   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

The over-the-top coverage of Michael Jackson is absurd. Whether you think he was a pedophile or not, he was simply an entertainer not the king of the universe.

I have never seen such a plethora of coverage since perhaps the assassination of JFK. Enough already!

Dan B   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think that King is not all wrong with his comments...While Jackson was considered a great talent the amount of coverage over shadows others who have passed in the last 2 weeks. His life style was at the best strange and besides his music what did he do to better the world?

Maronda R.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I have learned in my life time to pay special attention to people who would put others down. I'm sure if he was investigated, that we all would be surprised at the things he has done in his lifetime. As a matter of fact, open up a file on him now!

To the judge that removed Katherine from being over her son's will, investigate him, too! There is a conspiracy against the Jacksons!

Melvin   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Why didn't they criticize Elvis Presley because he was a dope head and he didn't make the same impact on the world as Michael did.
I hope the Al Sharpton is listening because he is the ideal person to respond to this who is not only his personal friend and someone who has broken all musical boundaries

Ryan   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

It is very unfortunate that so many people are feeling that Michael Jackson should only be remembered for the good things he did. The guy revolutionized music, sure, but he also faced allegations that he was a child molester, one of the worst, most despicable things anyone could be, and the media is completely ignoring this controversy.

Even if you don't think that he is a pedophile, he is being mentioned too much, on here especially. I was working out at my gym, and I had to get them to change off CNN because you weren't talking about news–you were still, still talking about the death of a celebrity that happened over a week ago! He's dead, we get it, now please go back to covering real news.

Jason   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

For someone very popular, there should be an expectation of major coverage until the funeral of such an icon has completed. When Princess Diana passed away in 1997, there was a lot of coverage for a former princess that touched the lives of many around the world.

Michael Jackson touched a lot of people around the world being the "King of Pop" and donating money to lots of charities over his career. Yes he has been in many scandals, but the man had a heart and cared. Jackson may have been controversial over the last 10 years, but the scandals were mediocre compared to his music and the fan base he accumulated over close to 3+ decades.

Once his funeral is over, then the coverage will die off. However, I think Representative King should have the book thrown at him for his slander of a man who cannot defend himself anymore. Mr King should issue a statement of apology for the his use of words because the man did go through the court system and was found not guilty of doing any wrong in 2005. Just because he paid out money in 1993 doesn't make him a pedophile. Time for Mr King to put a sock in it and do his job and not talk bad about people.

Angel M. Hunter   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I can't believe you would even feature this Rep. King and his statement on CNN. Who died and made him the JUDGE of all? Tell me that. What about Elvis marrying such a young girl, what about Woody Allen marrying his stepdaughter...do I need to go on? They are still celebrated. There are so many more to name that have actually been found "GUILTY" of such acts and does CNN mention them? NO. I understand the MJ death news but damn, let a man rest in peace. Yes, there has been a lot of coverage but it's expected, television does overkill on any "hot topic". Is Rep. King's house in order? Is he perfect? The two allegations were about money, it's so damn obvious. Money can and will make people do some crazy stuff. Look at reality television. What Rep. King needs to do is shut up and focus on other issues at hand. How about that!!! Michael was stuck mentally maybe Rep. King is stuck somewhere as well.

Andrew   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rep. King is simply another 2012er who doesn't know when to say when. The country has a fair judicial system and the man went through it and won. Is that not enough anymore? But given recent revelations regarding some of King's friends, something will come up?

Soheila W   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think this congressman wants his 15 min fame as no one as heard of him..I wish he would ."Shut Up". Jackson did not do anything wrong, he was aquitted... his childhood was robbed from him by his father. He was an known worldwide artist..Leave the dead guy alone so he can have some dignity....there are worse people than Micheal Jackson in this wrold that need to be put away....very very disrespctfull congressman...it is not hist fault that the news media are trying to drive up their rating!!!!

J. David   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think Rep. King is being very subjective and judgmental. Michael Jackson was exonerated of all charges. He does not know Michael Jackson on a personal basis as close friends and family members. Rep. King is being mean-spirited and unfair. Let's celebrate Michael Jackson for the talent and good-will that he shared with the world.

nichole mcgee   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Shut up congressmen you are out of line and disrespectful. Michael went threw the justice system and he was found NOT GULITY!!!!!!! Give him the recpect he never got on earth and let him be at peace you idiot!!!!!

Joycelene   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Regardless of how rep. King feels about Michael Jackson he was & will remain a pop icon. His fame and fortune came from his music not his behavior . If mr king doesn't want to dwell on michael's death then don't say anything . Bad mouthing a man who changed the world of music in his 50 years of life only looks bad on him

Venus   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

He should be ashame of himself, what kind of person is he, the man is dead. Also he doesn't seem to have any faith in our judicial system, he was aquitted of all counts. He wouldn't want anyone saying those things about his family member, if they were true or false.

Vik   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rick,

Mr. King is just plain ignorant. Forget that MJ was tried and cleared of all charges – he was an amazing artiste and changed the music world forever. He had his low points, but he had a lot more high points in his life. No other human can come close to what MJ has done for the music industry and humanity as a whole. God Bless.

Kevin L. / Omaha, NE   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I thought we were at the point in this country that you think before you talk...and people elected this guy. OK, ok..., I understand that today was an important day for this guy's district in honoring vets which is important...BUT, this guy should know better and maybe he did and is acting a fool.

David McMillin   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

King has it right and thank goodness someone has the guption to stand and call a spade a spade. MJ stood for everything America has tried to weed out of it's society yet he overcame the allegations with money and buying his way out of some very serious charges. Forget the music genious if there was any spark of truth, which many of us believe there is, then maybe his passing makes the world a safer placer for our children! Our society is becoming desensitived to murderers, child molesters, and rapists thanks to the meia. Enough is enough and lets condemn and not praise artistry over serious criminal acts!

Ruby   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Peter King, if you recall, Michael Jackson was acquitted of ALL charges!

And personally I feel that you are just a bit jealous because Michael has gotten more media attention in his 50 years on earth than you would get if you lived 150 years!

Jealousy is such an ugly portrait of you!

ctlss   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rick, the last I heard, if you are tried and found innocent of a crime, then you are innocent. Michael Jackson was found not guilty of molestation, by a jury of his peers, and Rep. King would be well advised to watch the language that he uses. I would think that his accusations would leave him liable to lawsuits, since MJ was found innocent, and this "gentleman" is slinging slurs like the Missouri mud we experienced with the gully washers that we had on the Fourth of July. He needs to keep his OPINIONS to himself!! No one cares!!

Twila   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Enough is enough I have been turning the chanel when this coverage comes on. With so much going on in the world there is way to much air time devoted to his passing. What happened to news.

Marleen M. Baltimore, MD.   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

I think it's horrible that the media coverage keep bring up Michael Jackson's pedophile charges. He was never convicted on ANY of these charges. And, if he was guilty, he is answering for it today. We are not GOD...So, stop judging people that are no longer here to defend theirselves!

Kana   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Rep.King should keep his mouth shut........when someone is different, people like to believe the worst. Rep. King is no judge.......only God is!

Rudy   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Not surprising that this comment would come from a republican. Can this party possibly become anymore rediculous and irrelevant? Oh yeah: 2012 PALIN Limbaugh

Pointe   July 6th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

WHHYYYYYY CANT WE GET ALONG who cares what Micheal did we dont the facts but what we hear in the media and still he was found not guilty so why people are so quick to judge him for those crimes are people being people.RIP MICHEAL JACKSON

Sunny   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Peter King just wants attention. He's surely aware that his negative comments about Michael Jackson would stir up a lot of controversy and put him (Peter King) in the spotlight. What a jerk!

Samuel   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rick,
Peter King is a callous, ignorant politician who have no respect for the view of our judicial system. For the Record, Michael Jackson was tried and found NOT GUILTY of child molestation charges. Sharing a figment of one's uninformed opinion seem to earn free air time in America's media. Rep. King's irate views merits no serious response indeed.

jill bentsil   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

The congressman should go and work for The Enquirer. I am surprized that a lawmaker like the congressman makes public allegation about something that has not been proven. Shame on him!!

angie   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

It is so sad that Peter King has nothing else better to do than get his quick 10 minutes of fame by jumping on the Michael Jackson bandwagon. Like my grandmother always said " Sweep around your own front door before you try to sweep around his" Will Peter King be the next Republican with skeleton coming out of his closet?

Su Estrella   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Questionable reputation indeed! Disrepespectful cause he's dead? What about all those people that die on a daily basis, taking no credit, getting no money, and truly giving of themselves to children, to ignorance, to humanity and are completely ignored by the media simply because they are doing some good but have no money. Most people don't say anything cause he was black (?) and because everything black now is good whether it was right or wrong. He's dead? Well, hello, we all have a number – his number was up.

Caleb   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rep King is looking for 2minutes of fame. Suggest Rep King read ...
JORDAN CHANDLER MJ DID NOT MOLEST ME I LIED
Source: globalgrind.com
With the news of the passing of Michal Jackson, the truth about who MJ really was has been coming to light these pass days. And, now the little boy who claimed that Micheal Jackson "molested" him when...

Victoria   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

It sounds like to me that Rep. King is jealous that he will not be celebrated like Michael Jackson and he should be careful of the name calling because we all know that he has skeletons in his closet as well. I'm pretty sure that he'll want the same respect when he's found out. By the way, Michael was NEVER found guilty of anything.

Bonnie B.   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Hey Rick,
Rep King is quick to throw a stone. As usual the ones who appear to be so righteous until a skeleton appears in their closet. Who cares what his opinion is. Why do you give him media play??? Has anyone looked into his background?

Pam   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rep. King needs to realize that Michael Jackson was never CONVICTED of anything!!! As a politician he should be one of the FIRST people to know what it is like to have accusations thrown at you. Only GODcan judge us, so that is between him and Michael. Therefore, I am chosing to take the Christian way out and remember MJ for all of the good he has done. I am not going to point fingers and say horrible things about someone when I don't know the true facts. Maybe as a politician that is the way Rep. King is used to living his life so he thinks it is ok.

Tony Karaba   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Good job CNN, this idiot should be exposed, a good example of our elected incompetence. These are the kind of politicians we need to get rid of. I could care less what this guy thinks, but its a shame he has a "guilty until proven innocent" attitude.

chris   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

who cares senator!

have you been living under a rock? good or bad man he should definitely be getting coverage... clearly you didnt buy the album thriller and you also don't realize he virtually founded most modern dance moves... have you seen the moonwalk?

Michael   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Though Michael was never convicted of any crimes against children, it's unfair to call him a pedophile. But it's reasonable to be dubious of a man who was charged multiple times over many years with molesting children – an adult man who also said publicly it was appropriate for him to share his bed with children that weren't his. His fans have every right to mourn his loss. But he does not belong on a stamp.

pizza boy   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a great artist but the man was guilty and money and fame saved him

Felicia   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Michael Jackson is a legend, was a legend and will always be "a legend". Unfortunately those that are left defending him are the ones that he did not want to look like. The people that he wanted to look like are now turning their back on him. Go figure.

Tracy   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

It's nice to know that the death of Michael Jackson has stolen our nations attention from the trivial things like Iran, Iraq, serial killers, the debate on health care, the economy, North Korea, .... I could go on, but you get the point.
CNN really let me down these past days by straying from the things that really matter. Jackson is dead– let it go. Get back to the things in the world that ACTUALLY effect us.

Marlys Hobson   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I am glad that someone has put some perspective on Michael Jackson's death. There are so many important things going on in our world now and it bothers me that the media is spending so much time on this. He was acquitted of the pedophile charge, so that should not be an issue at this time. However, I am disgusted with the circus atmosphere that surrounds his death.

It's interesting that so many public figures have passed away in the past couple of weeks with little coverage of their lives. Why can Michael not go in peace also?

tiffany   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I think the whole m.jackson scene is over rated. An hour before he died he was just another pervert and pedofile BUT the second after he died he became an idol again. Its so stupid would you celebrate any other perverts life?

Gerald   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I totally disagree. First – He cannot accused someone of something he do not know the true facts about. Second – We never asked to stop the coverage on President Ronald Regan passing, or all of the good and negative comments that were talked about.

In our judicial system, your incident until proven gulity. It was never proved guilty. He making him gulity without any proof.

J Darroll Hall   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

On Palin; It seems rather clear they (the family) are deciding to cash-in and that will be born out rather quickly. As a recovering Repug. The party is in free fall with no sign of any turnaround in the near future...
Peter King must be needing some way back into the limelight, his choice of how to do it is despicable at best and horrific at worst, his motives are suspect regardless.

Nikki   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

This country prides itself in "innocent until proven guilty", however a member of our government comes out and characterizes a man by a charge, not a conviction. MJ has now been judged by the ONLY one that matters...GOD! Michael was an abused child who never lived as a child. Therefore, he may have had some issues with wanting to live as a child. However, out of thousands of children that stayed at his ranch (btw, I personally KNOW someone who stayed at Neverland because he is related to Ryan White) only 2 EVER tried to accuse MJ. The person that I KNOW that stayed there, spoke nothing but praises to MJ's generosity. MJ changed history, music, and the world as a whole. This should be celebrated!!!

Terry   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

The United States has the most efficient judicial system in the world. Michael Jackson went through the courts and was found not guilty for being pedifile, so he is innocent. So is OJ Simpson.

Juliet   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

The genius of our system is that one is presumed innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty; we must presume innocence, unless we accept a major flaw with the system. If we take his statement in the interview as admission of guilt then every parent who allows their children in their beds are perverts. Clearly is was not average, but the innocent until proven guilty should apply to him both in life and death. We are all entitled to our opinions about the man and the amount of coverage, but the gentleman's comments are slanderous, distasteful and downright hateful. Someone should take a look in his closet, we might be surprised.

tony frank   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I believe these charges false Rick, reason being I still have not heard
or seen any evidence of this, where are all the kids that have been molested I have not seen one step foward on camera in all these
years and give there story.

Tadashi Davis   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Rick,

If MJ were alive right now this would be libel. It is unbecoming of a US Representative to even go there. First of all no matter what one thinks of MJ, he is dead. He cannot defend himself and to me a cowardly move of Kings behalf. I hope the estate of Michael Jackson seeks a libel suit. It is irresponsible on King's behalf. How should have shown more dicipline. If there are unproven allegations out there saying you are racist and you die, it is right of me to go on TV and say you should not be remebered for the civil servant you were or should tell everyone you were a biggot?!

jamie   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I agree with mr king why would Jackson pay millions if he was not guilty and if that happend to your kids what would you do

Freddie Hill   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Seems to me Rep. King is a Republican, All I have heard from the Republicans is a negative about anyone they can attack!

Rep King you cast out the 1st stone.

It would be nice if we all worked together, just because their are differences of opinions isn't cause for slander especially when one
doesn't know the actual trues about an individual not just on hear say!

Cheryl   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

People who live in glass houses should not throw stones. Remember Gov Stanford's remarks about President Clinton

Chauncey Snyder   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

Peter King is a Racist like so many Republicans. Shame on the ungodly Republicans!

Janet   July 6th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I agree with the congressman. Michael Jackson was a pedophile. Just like O.J. he should have been convicted of the crime he committed. And Rep. King is not a holier-than-though person. He is right on the money on this one. When they found this "secret room" come on. He is and was a pervert.

Donna   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I am disgusted by the comments of this politician. I've never seen such ignorance and disregard. Michael Jackson was acquitted of charges and settled a case out of court...something that people do everyday. I would like to ask that jerk when is the last time he donated his salary to charity–Michael donated proceeds from his tours to charities allover the world. (Victory and History and perhaps others.) I'd like to ask that republican when is the last time he spearheaded and funded a campaign to help starving children. CNN should stop running that clip, he is blatantly telling lies about a person who is loved by hundreds of millions of people allover the world. I would really like to see what's hiding in his closet.

john kwakye   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

congressman king is one part per millionof peoplewho will critized the dead, he should have kept his mouth shut till he was burried. insensitve human being

Paul Arttemus   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I know there is much admiration for Michael Jackson's accomplishments but there is sufficient evidence to understand any parent, individual, or ardent critic to find pause and disgust with the elaborate and detailed coverage of Michael Jackson's death.

Diana   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

How dare this thing disrespect Michael Jackson especially now that he is no longer with us. Michael Jackson was the greatest entertainer of all time and was acquitted of all charges. Please stop giving this idiot camera time!!!

Joseph S. Hann   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I don't care how famous he was. He was a pervert that got away with what he did because he was rich and famous. He couldn't adopt or have any role in the inception of children so he bought them. I will not be watching CNN tomorrow when you begin your Michael Jackson
programming. You have and continue to waste the American publics time.

BJ   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

What can I say, "typical Republican comment." Republicans need to clean out their own closets!

James Nevill   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Does Rep. King recall the phrase "innocent until proven guilty?" MJ was aquitted of all charges. Only in case sof child molestation is the accused guilty EVEN IF proven innocent.

judy   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

rep.king statement is his personal opinion. i do agree that enough already with the coverage. i am sick and tired of all the media coverage.

judy

Samantha Cramer   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

From Omaha:

Yes, this should be obvious, it should have been a scrolling item at the bottom of the news screen at best, from the very beginning, especially given the situation in the world.

Seriously, when Iran was such big news one second, and the next it becomes a side note just because a "star" died... I truly looked for another news source as I lost ALL faith that CNN was reporting news, rather than whatever gets the most ratings.

Rick, you single-handedly saved CNN for me. You make me feel as if the public is being listened to, not just the bottom line $, when it comes to CNN reporting.

But other CNN reporters have lost me for good.

It is highly offensive to anyone compassionate toward children to have a known (OJ wasn't innocent either, no matter what happened in the courtroom) child molester, a known liar ("only 2 facial surgeries")
be emulated and treated... well... I am not sure if Jesus would have received this much coverage were He to die during the Iran crisis...
to be treated as a saint and "King".

This shows such a deep sickness in our global society that I am just beside myself. I had no idea that humanity was THIS blind and unable to see the truth.

How must his little victims feel right about now? Will they EVER recover?

jenice mouton   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

He was and still is the" KING OF POP" around the world GREAT ARTIST !!!
I didn't and don't believe that he caused any harm to any child. Did anybody see the Larry King show when he over heard tthese people when they admitted to extortion against Michael. Why are you Not repeating that.

The representative is a horrible person and will not be remembered maybe not even in his own state.

Jen

Trey   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

What happened to innocent until proven guilty. King is very wrong and he should be punished for it. I can't belive that people like him represent us.

Jonathan   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

The general public will never know if Michael was guilty, and it was both foolish and disrespectful for Congressman King to say what he did. With that aside, I have reached my saturation point ragarding Jackson. Enough is enough. I am quite sure that the coverage will continue well after his memorial. There are many more newsworthy stories that are not getting enough coverage.
STOP SUBJECTING US TO THIS TORTURE.

littleumgowa   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Wow, is this guy ill-informed or what?! Terrible.
There were 2 trials regarding MJ & kids. He paid off the first because he didn't want a drawn out court drama. The other case saw him acquitted on all charges. The kid who accused him in the 2nd trial has since come forward to say he lied about it...THE KID LIED!!!
Problem is, the more you hear a lie, the more you believe it (and repeat it).
Michael Jackson was an odd duck, sure. But can we please allow him to rest in the peace he was never given in life?

forreal   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

He should stick to commenting about his own party and their discretions. The justice system acquitted Michael of the charges. However, it does make me wonder, is timing for this ‘outcry’ a maneuver to promote a hided agenda?

Pat the FurryFaceFellow   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Does Sen. King, or anyone else for that matter, have the moral obligation to respect a court's (and judge's) final findings?

Is it morally correct to slander a person's name and reputation after he/she has died and can no longer defend themselves?

Should Sen. King be using his publicly appointed seat to speak ill of the dead.

He can have his personal opinion, but he learn not to speculate in matters that he is basing his opinion on article in the National Inquirer!

He should follow Gov. Palin!

Judith Nunez   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I think Peter King represents all the ignorant racist people in the United States today. It is 2009 and we are still dealing with this racist anomisity. This boy stated Michael Jackson never touched them. Days after Michael death the boys family called radio station and stated it was lie to make money.This boys family needs to speak up in public forum and aplogize. Regardless if they were awarded money. I am ashamed as a United Sates Citizen that this republican always been enviousof this African American man accomplishments.
Let's mourn peacefully and show the world that the United States people are not divided.

Greg   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

My response to Representative King would be: Let he who has never sinned cast the first stone. Apparently, Mr King has never sinned. Many of us have done things we are not proud of. Many of our Presidents have had affairs. Look at the recent murder of Steve Mcnair who apparently was a great person yet apparently was having an affair. In my opinion, a person who sins should not be villified when they are aware of the sin and have repented. This is because we are all human and are prone to sin. But a sinner becomes evil when they continue to sin and hurt others and are not willing to change. I belive most MJ fans are not blind. We realize he may have comitted those awful sins, but we are willing to forgive. We are celebrating the side of him that is great; his musical genius.

Lisa   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I think the Congress needs to remember that we are a Country that is "innocent until proven guilt". He was never convicted of those acussations. All I know is that he was an AWESOME artist and deserves recognition for what an impact he left behind. If it was left up to people like Peter King we'd all be doomed for hell. I don't think we should be judgemental of others, take care of your OWN issues in life Mr.King.

M.Irving   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

I would like to preface by saying, "Michael is absolutely NOT GUILTY." Where does the congressman get off convicting a man that...his own laws that he supposedly....hold dear...says he is NOT GUILTY!!!!! I don't see or hear any of you talking about the Acess Holywood report of July 5, 2009...where Micheal said under hypnosis....."I would never molest a child." WHY DO YOU PEOPLE CONTINUALLY PERSECUTE THIS MAN???? Even if he was guilty....aren't children safe now that he is dead??? Or isn't that enough for you disgusting vipers???

Chris   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Say what you will about the man, his music was great.

Just a side note, OJ was aquitted too!

Donato Schimizzi   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

NO DOUBT the congressman believes his view of Michael Jackson right on, but basically it's a vicious attack just before the public memorial of a beloved cultural icon who gave the world (& will continue giving it) a ton of joy through his music.

All attacks on someone is a calling out for love -that's how I see this politician. He deserves our pity.

Larry Long   July 6th, 2009 3:24 pm ET

Would you want to celebrate him if you were one of the parents of one of the kids that was sexually controlled by him?I wonder how the people that settlrd for the two and one half million dollar settlement really feel.There is to much good reporting that could be done right now instead of wasting all of our time on this.

Dee Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Rep. Peter King should keep his big trap shut. What is it that King wants the listening audience to know about teachers and firefighters anyway? Michael is innocent!!!! He was cleared and found not guilty! He is ovbiously jealous and angry because super star , Michael Joseph Jackson, is getting the attention and condolences that he deserves. The world loves Michael. The world is celebrating an icon and if Rep. King doesn't like it, well...tough cookie!

Elle Ondre   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael Jackson was just a man. Yes he was a famous man , but a man with many flaws. He was a pedophile and a sexual predator. He liked to "share his bed" with young boys. People are so upset that he is dead and it is sad, but people should stop glorifying his death. People out there wouldn't be so upset if he sexually abused their child!

allie sieloff   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

You think California is going crazy over MJ's death? Ya otta be living here in Motown ... it makes me sick to watch it and I actually turn off the TV when any more coverage begins. In fact, I almost turned you off, Rick, until you mentioned the brave politian who spoke up. Yes, MJ was a true talent and his work should be honored and remembered. However, he was still a drug doping weirdo with a very, very questionable lifestyle who shouldn't be idolizied!

Angel M. Hunter   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

I can’t believe you would even feature this Rep. King and his statement on CNN. Who died and made him the JUDGE of all? Tell me that. What about Elvis marrying such a young girl, what about Woody Allen marrying his stepdaughter…do I need to go on? They are still celebrated. There are so many more to name that have actually been found “GUILTY” of such acts and does CNN mention them? NO. I understand the MJ death is news, let a man rest in peace. Yes, there has been a lot of coverage but it’s expected, television does overkill on any “hot topic”. Is Rep. King’s house in order? Is he perfect? The two allegations were about money, it’s so obvious. Money can and will make people do some crazy stuff. Look at reality television. What Rep. King needs to do is shut up and focus on other issues at hand. How about that!!! Michael was stuck mentally maybe Rep. King is stuck somewhere as well.

chris   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

my mistake... .congressman....

D G Albright   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

MJ was a fantastic entertainer when he was a black performer. Then he turned himself into some kind of white want to be freak. His music suffered tremendously. Then the fooling around with little boys thing drove him even lower. Now I would just prefer to never hear anymore about him. He did this to himself. He is not a hero or deserving of all this new found fame. DG Albright

Linda   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael was acquitted of child molestation charges. I did not, and do not, believe he was guilty.

However, this coverage is getting to be a bit much. If you're not a fan, it is annoying to see. I was watching it very closely, as I liked Michael, until I realized nothing new was being reported on. It's the same news being churned over and over. The sources are unnamed or not verified. The nurse came out of nowhere to be a constant fixture on every channel.

There does not appear to be much hard news regarding Michael recently.

Lisa Kisner   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

I think Congressman King's comments are offensive and hypocritical. Michael Jackson had his day in court and was acquitted by his peers. Futhermore, the congressman himself is surrounded on the hill by a constant barrage of politicians falling due to improper behavior. My opinion is that in many cases MJ's contributions to the world amount to a lot more than many, many politicians can say for themselves. I think Congressman King had plenty of time to make his views public and it's disgraceful that he would wait until the death of such a beloved artist to smear Michael's name and what he stood for.

Eddie Cintron   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

This politician doesn't he have enough on his hands in Washington, how about getting the politicians that are having affairs with

linda noel   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guity in a court of law'
For heaven's sake leave him alone.He had been demonised sufficient
while alive.Let us hope,he is now at peace. I was thought to not speak evil of the dead.I wish more people would observe this simple rule. We respect first the law of God and the law of the land.He was acquitted under the latter,Let us show love and mercy under the former,

Kody's mom   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Rick:
Someone has to stop this insanity. Michael Jackson was a talented man, I grant you that – but he was a CELEBRITY – nothing else. He was, in all likelihood an addict – the rest of it has never been proven. But come on.......there are SO MANY more important things going on right now. American soldiers are being killed in increasing numbers in Afghanistan, the economy is a mess, I could go on and on. WHO THE H*** CARES ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON!! Robert McNamara died today – a crucial player during the VietNam era – It has received barely a mention. What funeral coverage will be done for him? CNN is a news source – not a celebrity network. Get with it, guys!

John   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

If it is true that Jackson paid about 20 million to the parents and kids of whom he was accused of pedophile, then you should not be celebrating Michael Jackson. Why did he pay the 20 million dollars?

bill lokin   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

he was a sicko the only reason he got away with it is by paying his way out, why do you think he was broke? because he had to pay to hide his very creepy, sick hiden life.

judy milton   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

I don't know why you always have some you know what who thinks his opinion matters. I think he should show some class and let his family, friends, and fans grieve. But if you don't have class, you act and talk like him. So, the old innocent until PROVEN guilty doesn't mean anything to him. If he doesn't like the coverage, turn off the t.v. Better yet, go dig a whole and put your head in it. Can he FINALLY rest in peace. STOP RIDICULING HIM. You are a congressman with NO class. And yes, I would have let my kids stay with him in a heartbeat. You need to show some respect.

MICHAEL MARKOVITCH   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Peter King is an opportunist politician who is tyring to capture some of the "limelight" at the expense of a great pop icon.

Michael L. Burdett   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

NO !!! - I sort of Wanted to vote with "I'm on the fence" but then I'm NOT! Michael's Philenthropic Feelings towards his cancer stricken child guest – I'm sure was heart-felt honestly by Michael Jackson, and the "giving" of his bed was NOT a pervertish offering but a loving offering -m just like the sharing of a Mother's and Dad's bed is while a very young child will come to the comfort of their parents in the hour of a horrific dream – or while they're sick. These children being on deaths door were very scared and Michael was just comforting tham in the best light of giving them all that he could!

The Congressman should be accused of the same accusations in which he is accusing Michael of. What skeletons are in the Congressmans closet?

No one likes the truth.   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

MJ's musical legacy is incomparable. However, he was still a man with flaws. Why are people so blind to defend celebrities? Had anyone "normal" been accused of similar things they would be crucified.

He slept with kids in his bed, surrounded himself with kids, made a playground of rides for kids. He was also raised by an abusive father, had obvious problems with normal male-female relationships, and has kids through science instead of sex with a woman. If you are not paying attention to these signs it is because you do not want to.

Kings comments were untimely and just plain stupid. Let those who want to celebrate him, celebrate him. But at that same time, I do not feel it's right to simply outright refuse that these issues existed.

Daniel Guerra   July 6th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Michael Jackson my have been a musical genius, but he also had many deficiencies and one of them was his sexual identity. He had this unusual and unhealthy attraction to little boys. He is not the biological father of his kids. Child molestation is all around us, and to glorify someone who has had various inappropriate interaction with minor boys is not healthy to our society. We also should not attempt to erase him from his place in history, but lets move on to other more important things that affect our world.

Elma Carey   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael Jackson went to court and was found not guilty of pedophilia. He was ajudicated not guilty. This is fundamental to our justice system.

How can a Congressman such as Peter King be so disrespectful of our judicial system. He is a mindless accuser and slanderer!

He is teaching the public that going to court is meaningless. His opinion is nothing but that, an opinion.

Perhaps we should shine the spotlight on him and see what comes up. Let him go to court and defend himself, win, and then have others
accuse him of being what he is. He is a slanderer and should be taken to court and sued.

I would rather leave my child/grandchild with Michael Jackson than with Peter King.

Vickie, Ladysmith Virginia   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

I agree with the Congressman. Being acquitted doesn't mean justice was serviced. Just ask anyone who believes OJ is guilty of murder. There have been way too many stories about Jacksons actions with young children for this to be a case of injustice. Where there's smoke there's fire. Enough of the coverage.

tabatabai   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

May be the congressman should start cleaning the scandals in his own party. It is so sad to see that Republicans are going backward in time , their racisme is becoming overwhelming. They have to mix everything with politics. It is so outrageous. I am very saddened by these iknd of remarks. COngressman should maybe focus more on his family, PArty and issues in the country. It is a shame to have Congressman with such mentality . Shame on you COngressman.

ROBERT SEDA   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Hi Rick,
I definately feel that Congressman Republican King is ignorant.We demand an apology from him as a member of congress representing himself in such a hostile manner.There is a big difference between him and Michael Jackson.His name is King BUT MICHAEL JACKSON IS THE KING OF POP!!HE IS IN THE GUINNESS BOOK OF WORLD RECORDS FOR CHARITABLE CAUSES TO HELP THE NEEDY ALL OVER THE WORLD.HE APPEALED TO ALL WHETHER BLACK OR WHITE.ASIAN OR HISPANIC.MAY HIS SOUL REST IN PEACE.MICHEAL JACKSON WILL ALWAYS BE KING LONG AFTER CONGRESSMAN KING IS GONE.

Beverly   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

On Congressman King, Republican still emphazing the Party Of NO!!!

Paul A   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

congressman king is way out of line. he should be complaining about the justice system because michael jackson was found innocent by jury of 12

kip   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

rick, i agree with rep. king., and i agree with his forcefullness.
jackson, set his whole "neverland" world up to smoke screen and enable his own "disfunctional personality". he simply had the money to do this, and "no one" around him ever questioned him.
he was a child molester, a pedophile, and a pervert. was he a talented musical artist..? yes, but there is NOTHING worse than the kind of abuse "i believe" he put on certain young boys.
afterall....he did pay 20 million dollars to make one case "go away".
i think this demonstrates his guilt. his fame should never "trump" this kind of disgusting behavior from anyone, no matter how much fame or money they have. thanks, kip

Jillpril   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

You know, OJ was found not guilty, too. But we all still have our doubts about him. So death makes him off limits? Or is it the fact that these statements were made by a REPUBLICAN representative?

Walter   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael Jackson paid $20 million to stay out of jail for child molestation. It really doesn't matter whether or not he was acquitted after being accused for a 2ND TIME, he had already paid multi-millions to avoid facing the music for pedophilia.

smoothoperator   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

I would have gladly left my children with Michael Jackson knowing they would be safe and well looked after. Mr. King is a media whore just taking advantage of Michael's spotlight.

Mark   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael was acquitted of pedophile charges. The fact that he settled out of court on another charge draws suspicion but Michael had a lot of money and might well have decided it better to settle out of court thereby avoiding another trial and all the press. A close friend of mine who has 2 young boys said if someone molested his boys no money in the world would keep him from bringing that person to justice. In that light, one could suspect Michaels' accusers of blackmail. I believe Michael was not a typical macho male. I believe he really loved children and didn't abuse them as we see some males do in our society. In any case, King used his position to accuse someone acquitted of all charges of committing a hideous crime, someone who can no longer defend himself. We should think of things to accuse Congressman King of after he dies.

debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

people should keep those kind of comments to themselves. MJ was very talented, he was never proven quilty. Yes they should keep the coverage coming, people like to see tthe coverage they are giving, and we are interested in what happened. They were only 7 counts against him, what about all the other kids that visited neverland. Seems as though people needing money were the ones accusing him. I dont believe a word of it. I loved watching him on tv, unfortunatly i never got to see him in person. I feel sadness for the world but more important for his family

Char   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Yes, it's okay to call him a pervert, despite his acquital, because, as Rep. King said, he ADMITTED to sleeping with young boys. That's a pervert in my dictionary...what does yours say?

Yes, he was a very talented performer, but his admission to this perverted behavior CANNOT be excused because of his talent.

Sheree   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Michael Jackson certainly had an impact on America pop culture and was a gifted artist, perhaps even a genius. I don't think that mitigates the bizarre aspects of his life and the allegations with regard to his conduct with young children. While I'm not sure Rep. King's remarks were as tactful as they perhaps should have been, I certainly understand the frustration. I, too, have been amazed at the wall-to-wall coverage. How many people have died in Iraq and Afghanistan since news of Jackson's death? All this Jackson mania has brought home to me again how upsidedown our country is: we treat something Hollywood creates as truly meaningful in our lives and treat wars in which our young men and women give their lives every day as nothing more real than a video game. I dare you to tell the American people about the American men and women who have lost their lives in the past week – their names, faces and life stories.

The Jackal   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

People need to stop elaborating over incomprehensable things like Micahel Jackson. So what he died no need to make a huge deal out of it. He stole the lime light from all the other Celeberaties that have died over the weeks and he may have been a pedophile but why dig up ancient past to ruin someones already destroyed reputation.

katrina carter   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

you are suppose to be a congressman.your suppose to think before you speak.i just thank god that i don't have to vote for youand if i had to vote for somebody it wouldn't be you.i think that you shouldn't be in congress. no, what you said wasn't right.i think that everyone should honor him.you need to give his parents and the rest of his family some respect.that being said ,"you don't respect yourself as a congressman. you need to step down.

khalid   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

NOT GUILTY. MEANING HE DID NOT DO IT.

Elizabeth   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

I say its people like Peter King who ought to keep their big mouths shut when they know nothing about it. Whether dead or alive, buried or not, just be quiet if you have nothing nice to say about MJ.

bobby rohloff   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

hi rick it is about time someone tells it like it is , especialy a political

JoJo   July 6th, 2009 3:26 pm ET

Rick, I tell you, that was a shameful and disgraceful statement by Republican Peter King. Obviously, he is not a fan of Michael Jackson and is entitled to his opinion about the media coverage of Michael Jackson's death. But he did not have to resort to despicable name calling to express his opinion. Michael Jackson did more in his short life to promote America around the globe than Peter King has done in his long life up till now or will ever do in the rest of his life. Peter King is unworthy of being a United States congressman. Go get a life Peter King. Stop being a free-loader on the American tax-payer.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Shame on you!!!Mr.Congressman.M,j was a humanitarium an entertainer,and a good person he never talked bad about anyone. How about you,I think the one who has a perverted mind in the the with the dirty tongue.

Amy L   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I am very ashamed to say I was A republican, until Pres. Obama, I was very proud to vote for him. And now I'm really ashamed because of Rep. King's comments!! Shame on you Mr. King......Read the facts..Michael was cleared of all charges, leave him alone and let him rest in peace for once!!! Maybe Rep. King should give some advise to his own party..Sen. Sanford!!! What a disgrace!! Rest now my dear Michael.....no-one can ever hurt you again and your true fans will love you always!

patrick   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

rep. peter king and his likes, should keep their own openion to them selves, what mr peter should infact do, is to sit down with other members of congress and figure out how to fix our economy. please , mr peter, stop watching tv.

Vickie, Ladysmith Virginia   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I agree with the Congressman. Being acquitted doesn't mean justice was served. Just ask anyone who believes OJ is guilty of murder and got away with it. There have been way too many stories about Jackson's actions with young children for this to be a case of injustice. Where there's smoke there's fire. Enough of the coverage. There are many people who changed the course of music history. Don't inaugurate Jackson as the God of music for work that many have done over the past 40 years.

YENNYC   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

U.S. Representative Peter King. Shame on you!!!! EVIL MAN!!!! It is so sad and callous of this man to come out and say such vile words about a man who gave so much to the world through his artistry in music and especially at this time of his passing. How dare him or anyone judge MJ. Did he even know him? Maybe he should think about the fact that it is not MJ's who is paying so much attention to this passing. This same attention which was also done during the time of his accusation of the child mollesting case - This is all MEDIA'S DOING! WAKE UP!!! CNN should not even give this man the time of day. This kind of news casting is pointless. The world is already showing how much this one man has moved and affected billions of peoples' lives and hearts through his LOVE AND MUSIC!

King Mike Will Live Forever!!   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I feel Rep. King should be sued for slander. Michael Jackson was never convicted for any wrong doing. Does the ruling in a court of law stand for anything. Michael Jackson said there was never anything sexual and a conservative jury found him not guilty. He should pay more attention to his duties as a representative from NY. I'm sure they didn't elect him to give personal statements about a pop star! Be a rep. or go work for TMZ!!

Ace Greene   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Congressman King mentions at the end of his tirade that we need to honor people who volunteer with dying cancer patients, etc...that is EXACTLY what Michael Jackson did over the years; started foundations, gave millions, and helped, helped, helped people all over the world.

Jeff   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

In all reality all this hype over a known child molesters death is beginning to insult my inteligence...I mean really, I enjoy watching the news to remain current in our world affairs but I now turn the channel when I hear all these praises given to a pervert...Get over it and move on to the news... Please!!!

gary   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

There are serious questions whether the molestation charges were true or were financially motivated. To state, as fact, that Jackson was a pedophile, is just wrong. MJ has kids, he has parents, and family, and he has yet to be buried. This guy is using MJ's death to further his career. That is sick.

B. Wofford   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

He should address that to the Catholic Church and their Priest.

Kate Cline   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

I, too, believed the last few years Michael Jackson to be a child molester, up until last week. Because I had also been a fan of his work up until the last child abuse investigation, I spent time looking at the whole of his body of work, the whole body of interviews held with him before, during and after all child molestation publicity and see a different man. He had a skewed sense of boundariesbetween adults and children that most of us recognize opens the possibility of inappropriate sexual contact, but he didn't. His father gave his such a twisted view of childhood and relationships with physical and emotional abuse, and further abusing with allowing, even encouraging, his boys to be sexualized far too young. Joseph Jackson, in front of his sons, was blatantly adulterous and even encouraging his sons to have sexual experiences with fans and prostitiutes. As only one of Joseph's sons has had a successful marriage and some have had 4 marriages or beaten their wives/girlfriends, it is clear all the Jackson children were deeply skewed morally by their father. Michael didn't intend harm and did not harm children, but in his craving for love and to give love (not sexual) he made himself appear irresponsible.

Mark   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Wow Peter King is out of his mind. Congressman watch out "Slander"

Mignon B.   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

King's comments were unwarranted and and disrespectful. His comments were insensitive to Michael's grieving family and three young children that are now fatherless. When press surrounded the death of Anna Nicole and the abduction of Jean Benet, no one complained about the widespread attention. A man his age should know what is appropriate to say and especially when something is appropriate. Michael Jackson received this kind of negativity in his life, please not in his death. He should speak respectfully of the dead and allow the world to grieve the loss of this phenomenal man.

Karen McMillan   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

It;s trully a shame that this so-called congressman has to stoop to this level of accussations. to boot Michael Jackson was not found guilty of these charges. He is dead now and you (King) should be respective of this untimely death.
sir it appears that there are some underlying issues of jealously with the coverage..so what have you done lately to get the same coverage.Michael will always be held in high regard and respect.

Jackie Woods   July 6th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

Hi Rick,
I'm outraged!!!! Congressman King is an absolute insenative jerk. The world should be allowed to mourn Michael accordingly. We as fans,and admirors don't need to or want to hear this crazy, disrespectful stuff. Leave MJ alone and get to business of New York. Mr King should wish that he could leave the legacy that Michael is leaving. And in my opinion the world should stop tomorrow for the glorification of Michael. King owes the Jackson family an apology.

J Woods
New Orleans, La

Kemit   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rick, I believe the Jackson family should sue the representative King for slender and defamation of character. They have a serious case against the attention desperate congressman. I hope they sue him for more than 50 million dollars to end his career. We don't need people like him in Washington. THE LAWSUIT PLEAS !
The republicans are so desperate for attention these days that their phony morals are showing. How can you possibly denounce any immorality when you can't face your own lack of decency." First, Take a good look at yourself and make a change !!!"

Thank you Rick for your decency and professionalism. You are the reason why I watch CNN.

Alex   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

While I was never a big fan of Michael Jackson's and have my own opinions about his personal life, he was and is the King of Pop and that is the reason his death is receiving so much coverage. If Rep. King feels that the coverage is a waste of time, perhaps he should focus on doing his job and not wasting our time and money with his personal opinions about a non-issue.

AT   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

The Congressman needs to look at music history. And so does anyone else that has a problem with respecting Michael Jackson legacy. He took videos to another level and he needs to be respected. This man needs to keep his mouth shut I bet he's no angel. Let the man REST N PEACE God can only judge him not a Congressman. Don't watch if you don't like it .

Diane   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

People in government are entitled to having their own opinions just as anyone else is. I would think, and say, the exact same things about Michael Jackson whether he was dead or alive. He may have been a good singer but anyone who lives the lifestyle to even get mixed up in pedophile or molestation charges must have been doing something wrong. The extreme amounts of media coverage just shows how pathetic the U.S. media networks have become. We have soldiers dying for our freedoms everyday and all we care about is THIS? Pathetic, CNN.

Susan   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

This has gotten really funny...Rep. King talking about MJ sleeping with young children. All the parents I know have slept with, on a regular basis, if not every night, their young children. Does Mr. King not realize "sleep with" doesn't mean having sex with them? This has gotten so out of porportion. I wonder what would have happened if the reporter had asked Mr. King if he had ever slept with his young children?

Patti   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rep. King should not be getting this much press. The more this clip is shown the more of an idiot he appears. Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of anything and this congressman should apoplogize to Michael's family especially his children. Another thing, Michael Jackson is dead and can't defend himself against this false statement. Rep. King probably has no clue what an impact Michael had on pop culture and should be celebrated for that accomplishment not a false claim.

Travis   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

You know it is our congressional leaders duty to keep us abreast of their opinions on subjects that effect the country. Peter King, is a hateful man. Michael Jackson was a great entertainer, he was truly one of a kind in the music industry. However, he was acquitted of all the charges that were brought against him. Mr. King needs to pick up a law dictionary and look up the words libel, and slander. I'm sure that Rep. King has skeletons in his closet that would damage his reputation. However, the icon that Michael Jackson was, and what he did for charitable works in Africa, and for other foundations he deserves the coverage that he is recieving. Celebrities are a public arena that they can expect to have everyone in their lives, and everythin that they do under the microscope. Mr. King needs to go to work on the economy and the health care system, and stay out of the private life of a dead person.

Robin   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

It is absolutely scandalous for this politician to yell such horrid things about someone who just died and who's questionable reputation was built on allegations that weren't proven. It sickening to see that this individual is trying to further his career at the expense of children who should have the opportunity to preserve a positive image of their daddy. Because of people like Mr. King, these children will also endure having to wear a label: "a child of a paedophile" – which makes Mr' King a child molester as he is psychologically molesting Michael Jackson's kids.
What is the point of that man yelling and throwing such horrid labels at someone who might as well be innocent? Is he concerned about the safety of children and this is why he is crusading against Michael Jackson? No! Did he bring any new evidence to the table? No!
If Michael Jackson was who Mr. King says he is, then there would be dozens of families coming forward with a class action against Mr. Jackson and demanding damages. Isn't that obvious?
It is obvious to me that Mr. King has no conscience and is literally walking Michael Jackson's dead body to get to the Senate.

P.S. Michael Jackson never said he was sleeping with children in the same bed. He always mentioned that he was sleeping on the floor while he let the kids have his bed.

Please make that opportunist go away.

Sincerely,
Robin

Dimitri   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Michael Jackson is way more relevant in death than Rep. King will ever be in life! Suddenly, he's the judge, jury and executioner. His district is in trouble with comments like that.

Etcha   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I couldn't vote on the polling question because the options provided were not near exhaustive. They should have been an option that provides a 'No" because he was acquitted on all counts. The congressman should please stop being a hypocrite. He should remember the path on which a lot like him have walked after their hypocritical comments...Of recent memory are Ensign, Sanford and a host of others...

Ray Lee   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

There is a lot of similarity between M. J. and O. J. cases. Both found "not guilty" by a criminal jury. O. J. found liable by civil jury based on same evidence. M. J. not tried by civil juries because he paid millians in settlements to more than one claimant. Obviously, M. J. (and his advisors.) believed there was a strong probability of his being found liable by civil juries. He didn't pay just to make a donation.

Yes, I think Rep. King of N.Y. is "right on."

R Wharton   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Who the heck does this guy think he is? First off, Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of a crime! Secondly, these other people who passed got coverage (watch the news, not just the today show). They may have not gotten as much coverage, but they were not as BIG as Michael Jackson. I have not even heard of some of the people that is being discussed. Not that they are any less important and missed. But this congressman needs to get his crap together. I am sure when MJ was being accused of these crimes, he was not compaining of the news coverage. MJ deserves all the attention he is getting. He was an incredible person and he will be loved and missed by MILLIONS! Maybe someone should check this congressman's background. I am sure there are skeleton's in his closet. He needs to get over himself. He is just trying to get coverage for himself. Good luck on the next election congressman.

G. Grassman   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a talented entertainer known around the world. But his dark side; he was a first-class pedophile and although many didn't want to admit it it was true. I've heard enough now of Michael Jackson since his death and it's time to bring it to a screeching halt!
All this media coverage is repulsive. Enough is enough!!!!!

Jasmine Skunk   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Another thought...

Isn't it "wrong" to accuse someone who isn't even here to defend themself?

Carol   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I'm a Democrat, but agree with the Republican Congressman. There is too much coverage of celebrities, like Jackson, when they die. Other than his music, what did he contribute to the world? There are so many service men and women who have died in service to our country, and they don't get a moment of silence in Washington like Michael Jackson did. And, by the way, the Congressman has the freedom of speech, just like all of us citizens.

Linda Ines   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rick you know what King's problem is that the Republican are looking for anyway to be on TV. Thing aren't so good for them so i think he just wanna be on Tv to everybody to know that they are alive.

Michael Clancy   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Peter King is doing this for his own political gain .He has never had a nice thing to say about anybody but himself .I don’t think I’ve ever seen him with a smile or a kind word .He’s a very bitter person with no hope or charity in his heart .

vanessa   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rep. King, must have proof that the court of law didn't have because he was found innocent of all charges. The cases that he settled was because he didn't want to go through with the circus that the media makes out of all issues and mainly when a Black man is involve. The government on all levels have worse charges against men that is paid to govern our laws such as Rep. King, so don't throw stones unless your backyard is clean. You Rep. King may have dirty laundry that will shine next week and be begging for the public to forgive you.

Claire Kas   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I wish our soldiers were commemorated in the same way that this singer/dancer is being commemorated.

I liked his music and dancing, but the weirder he became, the less I liked him.

As far as his being acquitted of the molestation charges, what about the 8 figure settlement he made on the family of the other child who accused him of the same things.

Adults sleeping with children who are not related to them have a problem. It is not the "greatest form of love," it is perverted.

Claire
Bend, OR

Carl McMahon   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I think this is a travesty that the people that mourn his death think his pop-icon status in any way outweighs the person that he truly was. Bottom line...this guy was a pedephile that sexually abused kids. Bottom line...he was a pop icon indeed but his personal issues, in my mind, heavily trumped his status as a star that should warrant all this B.S. Hell O.J got away with it, just as Michael did. Thats the way I see it, and I am entitled to my opinion.

Sincerely,

CMAC

Dave Wosik   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

I think the easiest way to curb this kind of hate speech (short of Duct taping Peter King's mouth) is to NOT TELEVISE it... I feel as though, as much as I love your segments, you're glorifying an idiot and a hatemonger. Anything else, the reasoning and excuses and substantiations he offers...this is a post-hoc lynching. It's cheap. Please stop snowballing this embarrassing display.

Dwayne   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

This guy is obviously an idiot considering the fact that Michael was acquitted of all charges and the accuser is now admitting he lied. Michael Jackson was not only an icon but a genuinely nice and giving human. He's contributed to more charities than anyone. Ever!!! He built Neverland Ranch for sick and disabled kids to enjoy at no cost and the best thing you can say about a guy that's done so much for so many is these bias comments. Politicians have done more damage to this economy ever so I don't think he's in the position to talk down on anyone. I would be real surprised if this idiot is reelected with a mind frame like that. At the end of the day we are all guilty of assuming things that we have no clue about. Michael Jackson will have to answer to God if he did but in my honest opinion I really believe the kid lied (as recently admitted) for financial reasons. The court system is here to judge on earth and God will judge after. I believe he'll be innocent once again. Let him rest in peace and please don't let one negative assumption over shadow the millions of things he have done for this world.

Angela G.   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

It is not fair that someone can call a deceased person a pedifile. He was not convicted of something that he was accused of. I do believe the comment was made because he ( Michael) is black and was a legend in music. An apology needs to be made to the world in this rediculous statement made against Michael. Let it go. Besides he had done alot for children all over the world and is greatly loved and will always be missed!!

pripley   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

is there too much coverageYESwas he found not guilty?YES , jerry garcia should have gotten this kind of coverage , i am not sure that anyone changed music more than he did

Andrea   July 6th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

All of Michael Jackson fans have stood by him and know that he was innocent of the charges. Apparently, this person did not know that Michael Jackson was found NOT GUILTY. All of Michael Jacksons' fans want to hear everything especially since some of us cannot be there. This person needs to keep his opinions to himself because no one cares what he thinks. This "congressman" who is a public figure should know that making those comments will make people change their opinions about him. He does not know who Michael Jackson was and is taking about someone who has passed away. This congressman, whatever his name is, is bringing up things that he knows nothing about. LEAVE HIM ALONE!!! HE'S GONE!!! LET HIS FANS MOURN AND KEEP YOUR IGNORANT STATEMENTS TO YOURSELF!

Mike Cooper   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Just because M.J. was acquitted does not mean he was innocent.

Noeisha   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

I think the Congressman was way out of line. Michael Jackson was acquitted of the charges...how can he (the Congressman) go on national TV and label Michael as a pervert. The Congressman's job is to represent his district...not give his personal opinions about someone. How would he feel if someone went on national television and air out his dirty laundry. This Congressman is clearly racist and is jealous that Michael Jackson is getting a lot of media attention.

Sonny Harmon   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Why would anyone pay millions of dollars to pay to make a case "go away"? If it were me I would want my day in court. Interesting. Great music, sad life. CNN has a problem with a republican speaking out about Mr. Jackson simply because he's a republican. No big deal there as expected.

WIllie   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Rick
Enough is enough Micheal was aquited, but he paid out millions to settle out of court. If one poor guy admitted having sleepovers with little kids we would be fried. Michael did influence music but truth stands Michael was a wierdo

shawn allan   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Rep. Peter King :

is this why he was voted to be a congressmen to dishour the dead ?

My grandchildren and nephews spent time at Neverland and slept overnite and had nothing but fun fun fun .
i mean look at this congeressmen omg i wud not even like my little ones on the same street with him tell him to look in the miirror

Michele Voron   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

I think that Michaal Jackson was a very talented man that was tormented by his father, malaise from the burning incident. He did some stupid things with his life and his children, but now it is not time to concentrate on matters of state and let the man rest in peace.Our citizens looks for an escape from important realistic issues to deverts to a pop culture icon instead of being concerned about health issues, safe and secure homeland issues, and here they are mourning this guy who may have touched a lot of souls, but also hurt some in hi peculiat life style What about Farrah Faucet, and the others who recently died. It seems that MJ's death has taken away some of the notorioty from those who have fans and family too. If an ordinary guy in Camden NJ died from overuse of drugs and was known in his communitym would the entire world mourn him. One thing I just have to write is that you can not totally blame the doctors for giving him these illicit drugs. The man has been in pain for years since he got badly burned, and if you suffered from the kind of pain he has incurred wouldn't you want to take anything that helps. Now, we have to see if the doctor who gave him the annesthetic ligitimately got or stole it. I wonder. Can't blame the doctors for everything.

MV

Brit   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

ABSOLUTELY NOT! That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Someone whose gave millions to charities going to molest children. That's ridiculous.

Paul   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

The lawyers managing the Jackson brand should file a gag order to keep this Republican from libelous statements.
Just another Republican looking for face time on CNN.
I wonder how FOX is spinning this.

Melvin   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

The Congressman was fully aware that if he made a negative comment towards Michael,that he would get all the pleblicity for his own use.

Gregory Hess   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

During the Michael Jackson molestation trial CNN dug for every little incriminating piece of information. Now CNN acts as though any reference to his alleged activities ,both those charged and those settled out of court is way out of bounds. Give me a break

Ally   July 6th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

People make accusations against other people for a variety of reasons. Accussations aren't always true. That why we have laws.
I don't believe the Congressman is familiar with the Bill of Rights. Articles 7 and 8 say an individual is entitled to due process and to confront his accusers. Michael Jackson is dead and can't exercise these rights.
Mr King, you are violating a basic principle of this country – innocent until proven quilty.

michael   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

I think Senator King should as a matter of urgency establish his own media company to showcase his family and other things he believes in and also establish a court of law to prosecute Michael Jackson and others he desires so as to find them guilty of whatever crimes he so desires to bring up against them.

glenn choate   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

This guy was obviously ill. NO ONE pays an accuser $20 to keep silent unless they"re guilty. Stop glorifying this guy.

ron   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

P. KIng is spending a lot of time on a dead celebrity 3,000 miles out of his jurisdiction! I feel he is a flat-out racist, anyway! Has he ever been so vocal about the numerous unjustified shootings of blacks & latinos by the NYPD?

D. Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

One of the boys who accused Michael Jackson of molestation came on a radio station within the last two weeks and admitted that it was all a lie!!!! Why don't we hear news about this??? Let's contact (the boys) or probably their parents and put this on the news!!!

Robin Wood   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

I think Pete King just wants some attention. If a person is found NOT GUILTY by his peers then he is not guilty. To talk so badly after a person has died shows no class. His mother is still alive and hearing this slander. Someone could accuse King of the same thing and then what would he do?

Mary   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

Please stop celebrating this self-made freak and drug addict which we will probably find out in all actuality killed himself with drugs. Additionally, he obviously had some serious mental problems.

Billy   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

I agree with Pete King I work in television news as well and am horrified by all of the coverage you have given this pedophile There is a recession 2 wars and an Iranian revolution going on maybe if the media would cover some of this stuff more the average person can actually know whats going on.I have switched to NPR because of this and have been a cnn watcher all since you primered in the 80s and i know alot of others who have switched as well.

Brian Smith PhD   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

About Barney Frank…… as we have seen in recent days…. Politicians are hypocrites like Gov Sanford. So, isn't it indicative of politicians that if the protest too much, then they are likely failing to deal with their own demons. Therefore, since he has shot off his BIG FAT MOUTH, It would not surprise me if Frank turns out to be the biggest molester of them all.

Alexia Vernon   July 6th, 2009 3:30 pm ET

As someone who has survived childhood sexual abuse, what I find saddest about the coverage of Michael Jackson's death and sexual abuse allegations is that we're not engaging in a productive conversation about pedophilia. While Michael Jackson's behavior does indeed fit the classic profile of a child molester, he was acquitted and has passed on. What's most important is that we discuss the prevalence of childhood sexual abuse and realize that the obsessive attention MJ showed to children who passed through Neverland can be as damaging as inappropriate genital touching. It is NEVER okay for grown men to sleep in bed with other people's children and we MUST stop demonizing people we suspect of abuse and instead seek to intervene and get them help. Sexual abuse is a sickness. It's like a cancer. It spreads so quickly, often from one generation of young people in a family to the next because it's so hard and painful to confront those we suspect and so few children ever come forward. Let's substitute the harsh rhetoric for a discussion about how we make an impact by identifying and treating people we suspect of this behavior (e.g. the majority of whom were abused as boys themselves) and empower survivors to move on and lead healthy sexual lives.

Ruby Pace   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Hey Rick.
I think that Rep.King should keep his mouth shut. I have been telling everyone that it could be YOU someday just because you're accused. And everyone wanted Michaels money. And I come from a big family that it wasn't a bad thing to have kids on your bed. But with all these dirty minds out there you can't just love childern now days.
Ruby Pace........TN

Kellie   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty by 12 jurors in a very conservative community. Mr. King must not be a very good congressman if he were then he would know Michael is free and clear of all 14 charges. That is the whole bases our country was built around. I wonder how he would feel if he lost someone who got called a pervert . People like him should think of Michael's children they do not deserve this they Love their Dad. Mr. King is a very disrespectful human being speaking that way of someone kind, loving and givng who has passed on.
Kellie

Carl T. Williams, II   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Congress King, is a sad sick individual. I pray that he live to regret those slanderous and inflamatory statements. Congressman King is one of those self-righteous individuals who attempts to hold a flashlight on the negatives of others while hiding his dark and deprave sins in the dark. The Bible tells us our sins will find us.

Crystal   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

As I looked at your name, I wondered why you have your job as a representative. It shames me to think you have the position that you do and you are just realizing the state of our country with the death of Micheal Jackson. While I do not support his personal life or mistakes, or choices, there are many that enjoyed his talent and he deserves his moment for his success. Unfortunately our country has many talented people, with very troubled personal lives, MJ will not be the last. I can only hope that your good deeds in your current position tell us more about the good man you are than, what we will find in your closet when you die? Be care with the finger pointing, we already are watching the personal life of a governer, that was respected, being played out publicly. Let God judge them…….

Leopold Caudillo   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

I think Mike's death blew it for the people in Iran. Way to much media coverage for Michael Jackson.

Mari   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

I can't believe this guy has the nerve to be so judgemental! First of all, he was acquitted of the charges against him. So he is right in respect of something is wrong with this country when we put trust in the legal system only when it's convenient. Why have a trial for child molestation if you are going to be labeled regardless. Also, to say that there is nothing good about this guy is absolutely extreme. Being in the Guinness Book of Records for his humanitarianism I guess is evil. It's amazing how when Princess Diana got all the TV time and coverage after her death in spite of her infidelity at the time, no one complained. I hope he isn't going for re-election, his ignorance counts him out.

MO   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

If Rep. King is so tired of the Michael Jackson coverage then why is he adding to it? Oh wait, I get it, it's a media opportunity for him.

Wendy Thompson   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

I must say that I am feeling a little over inundated with the media coverage of Michael Jackson. However, Cong. King should be ashamed of himself over his comments: Michael was found Not Guilty of all charges by a jury of his peers, and as a result, Cong. King shows little respect for the letter of the law and the belief system of our own country. Michael Jackson touched many people, and many of those people feel a piece of their life has slipped away and they are grieving their loss enmasse– which in this case means in the public eye. Let them grieve–Lord knows, If I can't handle all the coverage, I can always change the channel.

Lonette   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

OMG!!!! what give you the right to call a deceased Icon such hateful things? you wouldn't like if those thing were said about your son after he died now would you Micheal Jackson open his heart and home to the world and shared his love of music with all not some but all the world you need to be a shame of yourself I hope you do not get another term as a prep for poeple cause we see where u want to lead back to 1955

Patrice   July 6th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Hey Rick,
While most appreciate the talents of Michael Jackson, his behaviour is not without tarnish. Consider the case of OJ Simpson, who was aquitted of 2 murders, yet I believe most people think he is guilty. Although Michael Jackson was aquitted in a court of law it doesn't mean he is not guilty. It just means at that time there was not enough evidence. That being said, a very talented and sad person is dead, mysteriously. Let's mourn his passing but stop glorifying his life. And everyone should stop trying to make a buck off a dead man!

JAJohnson   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

unreal that anyone that is a part of our goverment would make such a statement...
has he ever heard of, innocent until proven guilty??? Micheal Jackson is in the public eye & wide open in to many ways for years, for people to go after him... I could go on forever on this...
how sad that this man has stated such bad things of a man that can not do anything to defend himself... but then again he already has in the past & that should be all he had to do... just because you don't like how much media coverage he is getting & maybe your just tired of hearing the same thing over & over again, deal with it...
if he has the footage to prove Micheal Jackson is guilty of the things he has stated about him then let him show it... and if not I do hope that Micheal Jackson's family will now take him to court for making false statements...

Claudette Frenette   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Congressman King did not say alleged. Michael Jackson was acquitted and is now deceased and not yet buried. How would he feel if he was charged and acquitted and somebody would still accuse him. I bet he would bring them to justice.

René   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

The real heroes are defending our freedom & the right to choose who our idols are.

Just a small reminder....O.J. was also acquitted!

Avis Townsend   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

No arrest was ever made. People who knew Michael said that, because he had no childhood, Michael was childlike and wanted to share his fun with other children. Who are we to judge? Why not judge his father who was brutal to a small child and forced him to work 24 hours a day like he lived in a third world country.

Why are people so quick to crucify those they do not know?

I used to be a Republican but changed my affiliation years ago when I realized it was a party of hypocrites and naysayers. Let Michael rest in peace.

Michael was a child himself, mentally. He giggled and blushed and his actions made him different. Being different is not being perverted.
Hypocrites like Larry Craig are perverted.

I am looking forward to the sale of the video of his final dress rehearsal, and I am 62 years old and white. We aren't all prejudiced and disapproving.

Andrew Owen   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

I voted no but with half a heart. Based on what you're asking, you're asking us to say "yes" he's a pedophile or "no" it doesn't matter if he was a pedophile because he was an incredible music star. I'd like another option of "no, I disagree with Rep. King because Michael Jackson was never officially charged during his first court battle and was acquitted during his second."

Anna in Dallas   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Yes, I liked his music, but the guy, let's be honest, he just wasn't right. King is right, I would never leave my children or grandchildren with him.

Guilty or not, the justice system isn't always right. And as someone who was molested as a child I find all the coverage of Michael Jackson disturbing. The fact that he was accused on more than one ocassion really truly raises red flags and enough is enough.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

He made a big difference in this world, he did heal this world with his music,also he was a true humanitarium.Shame on Peter King with your dirty mind and tongue.What good are you doing,to heal this world????

Days   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

I believe that a person that is in the "industry" has a public life and a private life. The fact that they are miserable as a person doesnt stop the fact that they have an undeniable talent.

He was once accused of doing things that would sicken the majority of us but that at the same time doesnt take away from the fact that he changed the music world. Yet there comes a time when we all have to move along... I think that time has come.

Joy   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

I wish all the people who are tired of hearing about Michael Jackson would just take matters in there own hands and turn the channel, stop complaining, and respect greatness!

Daniel Guerra   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

The issue of M.J. being acquitted on child molestation charges is a joke, our jury system is a joke. I have been on various juries and they consist of a representation of our society; therefore, they consist of smart, dump and prejudice people. Juries make many mistakes, like letting O.J. get away with murder. But guess what, O.J. finally got what he deserved and maybe M.J.

Mark   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

He's playing to his masses. Easy talking point for the evangelical Neo-Conservatives. Did you expect any less than Slander and libel? I didn't.

J. Hunter   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

No one really cares what this Congressman had to say, I believe HE'S getting to much media coverage. I think he has other issues with MJ. Could it possibly be that a "BLACK" man is getting to much coverage?????

Amin   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Can the man Rest in Peace. What a moron to throw insults at the dead. Who is this Man anyway? Maybe he's tryna get some attention.

Byron Hamlar   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

He is full of crap. Michael Jackson was found not guilty. He must be a pervert to call someone else one when Jackson is dead and can't speak for himself. Peter is a congressman and talking about someone like that is not appropriate and he is telling lies because again Michael Jackson was NOT GUILTY.

poetry   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

It always amazes me when those blessed to be among the most educated of our society can show such little compassion towards those who have lived less conventional lives.

Especially those who are trained to be versed in the discernment of human rights and charged with the protection of our communities.

The fact that such harsh comments can so easily be dispensed by respected members of our own government, only seems to underline MJackson's message that this world needs healing.

As MJ's lyrics point out in his song Man in the Mirror, "If you want to make the world a better place, take a look at yourself and make a change."

Compassion and Kindness have always had a far more profound effect on humanity and Condemnation and Judgement.

Lori   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

When did allegations become truth? All should ask, has everything said about your life/deeds/actions been accurate?

M.J. was acquitted by an all white jury that heard testimony against him from former staff and children. This tells me that the preponderance of evidence during the trail had to have been overwhelming in support of M.J.'s INNOCENCE.

lamont gladden   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

i think the congressman should be more concerned about the state of the New York economy than whether or not a dead celebrity was a pedophile/pervert! What is he doing to help the people in his state suffering from the economic hardships? His energies can be better spent focused on healthcare and other pertinent issues!

beau   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

im beau and im 13 and i do agree with that guy micheal is a pervert.and its stupid that they didnt find him gulity because hes a celeberty.i had a friend t went to jail because he ball tapt a kid its a game that all teenage kids do and he has to do 3 years in jail because someone said he touched a kid inappropriate and its just stupid that they would spend a week just remember a pervert

Andrew   July 6th, 2009 3:32 pm ET

Name one entertainer more popular worldwide than Michael Jackson, who changed music more than he did, who sold over 50 million copies of one album, who could stand in front of hundreds of thousands of people and give them the greatest show of their life, who could make people faint left and right, who could dance the way he did.

YOU CAN'T.

And you still wonder why there is a lot of news coverage?

Use your common sense Peter King.

He slept in bed with children because he had a horrible childhood and would go to bed crying and wishing he had someone there to cheer him up after being constantly beaten by his father, degraded about his big nose and pimples by his cousins....

Way to be an example Peter King.
Way to be a respected and loving individual.
Thanks for allowing me to lose faith in Representatives.
THANK GOD I DON'T LIVE IN NEW YORK ANYWHERE NEAR WHERE YOUR STUPIDITY WOULD RUB OFF ON ME.

Tyron   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Congressman King needs to get over himself . Michael Jackson was a ledgend in his own time, not a pedophile, not a child molester, and absolutely not a pervert. He was found not guilty of ALL charges. Jackson contributed a huge amount of money in charities specified for children. No pedophile does that. Congressman King, DO NOT disrespect this great man in his death. You should be ashamed of yourself. Do not slander him, his legacy. You are so disrespectful but I forgot you are a republican

loic   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Hi Rick!
I really believe that, the beauty of the United State of America remains on the diversity of the attitudes, and behaviors of these personalities who had contributed to edify the American dream!
It mean, being legends haven’t keep them out of the weaknesses of humans!
Let’s just pay to Michael Jackson the tribute he deserves as, Elvis Presley, Marlon Brando, Frank Sinatra, etc.
They are not saints, they had just been greatest entertainers with some sins in theirs secrets gardens!
While politicians are the society’s nightmare, entertainer’s deliveries are, hope and joy!

Respect for theirs achievements!

Loic, Los Angeles, CA

Bret   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

He was acquitted of all charges and deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Please withhold my name.

kelvin mays   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

To be quite frank about it i'm tired of hearing about dead soldiers in Iraq. We know that they are there and killing bad people as well as innocent people but no ones talking about the innocent. So Rep King need to stop trying to make himself look good because were tired of that to.

LA   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Only in America is a person proven innocent or not convicted, but still found guilty. Happened with O.J.'s first trial! MJ has not been convicted of not even a parking ticket.

And quite frankly, if he really molested the first little boy, then I'd like to ask any parent in here how much is enough to by your silence if your child has been molested? This case was brought in LA, and in case anyone has forgotten, in LA a person can be convicted/not convicted and you can still sue!

So why did the parents take the money, if they could have sought to put MJ in jail for violating their child, and still sue him civilly? It's because the little boy was lying.

Kobe Bryant did the same thing. Paid her money, the case went away. I don't see anyone here calling Kobe Bryant a rapist.

Gloria Fontana   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

I think this politician likes attention. Congressman Peter King seems to have some kind of anger issues! But who am I to make that judgement? And who is he to make a public judgment about his personal opinion about Michael Jackson. Regardless of the contreversy that surrounds Michael Jackson's life it is not Congressman Peter Kings place to re-trial Michael Jackson. I think it's in very poor taste. If you are tired of listening or hearing about Michael Jackson turn your TV off or change the channel. It's that simple. Perhaps take care of what might be going on in your community. Or even better do some self improvement.

Richard   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

There is no question regarding this individual's contribution to the music world, he was a genius in many ways as he proved himself in that area many times; the concern is his relationships with young children and whether it was a way to relive his own childhood in a non destructive way/supportive way or if it was an opportunity to involve himself in some activity that might harm children – a trial was held and he was found not guilty – questions will always remain with us as adults who are in the business of protecting children – we can not help that.

noel   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Just because OJ Simpson also was not convicted of killing his wife does not mean he didn't do it. Even if Michael was innocent of child molestation, the coverage on him by the media is WAY OVERBLOWN. Our world and country are in serious trouble and there are so many issues on the economy, foreign policy, etc., that are not being seriously covered because of all this hype about MJ. Move on already!!!!!

JohnFlanders   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Yes, Michael Jackson was acquitted, but then again so was O.J. Simpson. When you have enough money, you can make anything slide under the rug.

Do you really think an innocent man would pay a settlement of TWENTY MILLION DOLLARS just to make some sad allegations "go away?" No, you wouldn't.

This guy was a sick, deranged freak. Yes, he had a bad childhood. Get over it. Lots of people have bad childhoods without the benefit of making millions and millions of dollars afterwards, and you don't hear them complaining.

Yes, he had some great songs and was an icon of the 90's... so what? I know plenty of sex offenders who live around my area... Would i let my children go SPEND THE NIGHT IN THEIR bed just because they have a great singing voice? Don't think so!!

You people need a serious reality check.

Vickie G. Leland,NC   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

I'm disgusted with most senators,especially sen. King and his remarks about Michael Jackson. This type of remark peased me off, perhaps if he would do his part as a senator, he wouldn't have the time to watch tv scenes of "The King of Pop"! (The senator must keep in mind,that the majority of senators are corrupt in their on way as well.) Respect Michael family if nothing else., ok???

Charles Long   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

The evidence was there to convict Jackson as a pedophile. The jury was starstruck and ignoramuses. That doesn't mean he wasn't guilty. OJ was not convicted either. You probably think he wasn't guilty either. You people are as stupid as the jury.

Laurette Barondess   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

The outpouring for Michael Jackson should be and I think is for his contribution to music and that legacy and not for his personal life. All of us may have things we would not want belabored at our memorial and I've never been to one where this was done. Let him rest in peace and may the naysayers never rest.

Kayli K   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

PLEASE just stop talking about MJ already! Although I disagree with 90% of what Peter King has to say there are so many more important things to discuss- what's going on in Iran? What about N Korea? Seriously who cares about a drugged out child abuser? It's sad that Americans are more interested in washed up weirdo "artists" than things that effect their daily lives like the Cap and Trade Bill!

Mariah Sanchez   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

The Congressman is just upset because no one will talk about him when he is gone. Michal Jackson has given us great music to listen to. He is the King of Pop and he will always be. That dumb guy is a nobody and he will always be a nobody. So the nobody needs to lay off someone who is a somebody. All that Peter wants is some fame. What a poor guy.

Namrata   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Michael Jackson himself was abused as a child, so why would he want to abuse other children?

Eddie Cintron   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

This Congressman should stay busy tending to government issues and not disrespect the legal system of America that acquitted Michael Jackson, he got his day in court andwas found not guilty. The Jackson Family can celebrate that justice was found for their dear son. May the Jackson family find comfort in this difficult time. God Bless you all.

LaVern Wilder   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Rep. Peter King is lost, he's commenting on a man who's done nothing but help children. Did King not hear the statement from the last alledged victim state that Michael never touched him. Please get your facts straight.

Walter   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

This just shows how disgusting Western society has become. It sickens me that people are more than willing to overlook the crimes of a child molester (who paid multi-millions to avoid jail time) just because he wrote dance music; as if dance music somehow turns pedophiles into heroes.

Brittany   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

I just think that Peter King owes the Jackson Family an apology. To be a congressman, you should have a little more respect and decency toward others. If you don't have anything nice to say, you should not say it all. The comment was very rude and disrepectful. Something should really be done about it. Hey Peter King do us all a favor and shut up!!!

aymee   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

What I'm sick of is ignorance. Michael was found not guilty, drop it. The only ones that know the whole truth is michael, the accusers, and god...only one of those has the right to judge anyone. I pray Michael knew the lord and is no longer the sad soul he was on earth. Its a crying shame it took his death for people to look at what he did for this world while he was here.

Jervay   July 6th, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Let the man soul rest in peace for God's sake!!!

Donna   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

You know, I'm really not a fan of Michael's later work but was a huge fan 25 yrs ago when I was in high school. This is what's disturbing to me...all these politicians (actually people in general) who claim such conservatism and high moral standards, are always the first ones to judge someone based on what they believe instead of what the facts are. Regardless of whether you think he lived an odd life or not, he was acquitted of charges brought against him. Now, whether he did it or not it's still not for us to judge. As far as I can tell, the media is really only celebrating his music, not his person. I, too, agree that the media coverage has been too much but that doesn't give me a right to speak bad of him, nor does it give anyone else that right. Seems to me that the senator has a little too much time on his hands or not enough real issues to deal with...and that's hard to imagine.

Lis   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Remember this, agreeing to settle out of court is considered an intelligent legal strategy in many high profile cases, because legal fees and not to mention the media frenzy associated with high profile cases is insane. Agreeing to settle is NOT admission of guilt.
It is not enough to have tortured him while he was alive, now your leaving his children and family with this stigma to live with.
I get sick of congressmen's rhetoric, but I don't insult you publicly. Same goes for Media. People loved him deal with it!

Loren Zaleschuk   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Peter King should resign, anyman who is so disrespectful of the familys feelings and to bash a world wide icon the day before his funeral should NOT BE IN A POSITION OF POWER.
A angry mans feelings come out. Should this man beable to make descions for our familys. Not mine.
Loren

theresa   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

WHY ISN'T THAT WE DIDN'T HEAR COMMENT ABOUT HOW MUCH ANNA NICHOLE SMITH DEATH WAS COVER ON THE NEWS???

Dan Lepine   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I think the congressman should remember that M.J. has a family that is grieving the loss of a son right now, and try to be a little more respectfull.

Devon   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

this is a pretty big issue here
first, i want to say that this isnt "wedge issue" as you called it a moment ago, its a NON ISSUE. frankly he was a musician. thats it. why do we need DAYS of coverage on his personal life.
in fact i throw some of your hypocryisy your way. a moment ago you all said that should be focusing on his music and not his personal life..so why do you keep shoving information about his will, the costody of his children or his sexual preferences down our throats.

when presidents die they dont get this kind of coverage and its a sign of the times. its a syptom of the 24 hour news feeds. can you really tell me that right now at this moment there isnt something more important going on somewhere in the world?

as for what king said, well look the man was a pervert. CNN reported that he was in fact gay(not a perverted thing in and of itself mind you) he settled out of court at least once on this whole child molestation thing. someone you had one said that sometimes people with money will settle to make something go away. Really? you beileive that a man who was what 400 million in debt would just throw away what was it, 20 million? i dont think so, if you are innocent you dont settle.

i also want to ask you all this, did OJ kill his wife? because he was also aquitted, and well i think we all feel roughly the same about that one as well.

Susie   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

CNN has never been a channel to "reach" this hard for a story. No one cares what this blow hard has to say. STOP TRYING TO MAKE THIS STORY HAPPEN!

Duckkman   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

That comment was very ignorant!!! I can't say if he did these lewd acts that they said he did or not, but there are somethings you just don't say. Before he goes off at running at the mouth, he needs to ask his self these questions. Was he convicted of these crimes? Was he there to witness these crimes?
Just like any other artist he was a victim of good and bad rumors. We read these on text messages from phones, the Internet , and we here them from other people.
Yeah, he agree to a settlement for one or more of the cases. Hey, if I had the money(because that what the so called victim wanted any way) I would do the same because I would not have to commit those kinds of acts. Before anyone says anything negative please have some facts to back your statement up. RIP MJ "King of Pop"

RJ Fischer   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

The congressman has rights to say what he feels just like you and I do.
Don't give me Politically correct crap...
This clearly is FREEDOM OF SPEECH FOR ALL...!!!

Deanna Richardson   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Hey Rick! The Congressman may believe in freedom of speech. Maybe the American people need to re-evaluate whether this nation needs to accept freedom of speech or stem the flow of peoples thoughts and feelings like you seem to be, Congressman Peter Kings.

Lisa McKenzie   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

This man has no idea if his allegations are true or not. None of us will probably ever know for sure but Michael was acquitted of ALL charges when it was obvious that some people wanted him found guilty. This idiotic bigot congressman needs a pie in his face. This is not the time nor is it ever time for anyone to condemn a man who is not around anymore to defend himself. The coverage of Michael is NO DIFFERENT from the coverage when Princess Diana died . THEY ARE ICON's. I, for one ,want to know what is going on just like I did when Diana died. That lasted for months and with all the jackals out there salivating for the untold details of Michael's life and death, this coverage will last for months also. I commend CNN on their (mostly) fair coverage of this iconic man's life. Let him get buried for God's sake! If you don't like it, change the channel! Where is the pie?

goldenya   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

King is a Racist for sure it's not about a child thing every body knows he was not guilty. it's about how great he was , what he did for a lot of people King give me a break. you are jealous of M J .

Cause when you die no body ' s gonna know if ..........

Disgusted   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

If you are in the public eye you will always be the subject of percussion. Lies, Lawsuits, Jealousy, & Scandals. Unless you have ever been in the position of defending yourself for something you have not done. You will never know what it is like. Money is the root of all evil. Everyone is always trying to make the easy buck at someone else's expense, even after their death. Take a good long look in your own closet before pointing fingers. I'm sure your are going to have something come back to haunt you! Let the dead Rest In Peace.

M. Ashburne   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Everybody has a right to their own opinion, but his timing was very insensitive. He probably needs the air time and decided to voice his very insensitive opinion on television. Accusations and being found guilty are two different things. We could accuse Peter King for being a racist and an idiot, but that doesn't mean that they're actually true.

An opinion is definitely different than the actual facts.

Lorrie Brumley   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I appreciate all the Michael Jackson coverage and cannot believe he is gone.

My comment is for Candy Crowley. I don't know what she is doing – but she looks great. During the campaign, I'm sure the hours and stress beat her up – but she looks great and I think she is a gifted journalist.

If she has some tips for us out here – pls encourage her to post them because I would love to look healthier and younger like her.

Thanks! Lorrie Brumley

CC   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Why should one's opinion about someone change once they are deceased? This is the Representative's opinion whether anyone agrees with it or not. Granted, Jackson was found innocent in a court of law, but so was O.J. Simpson. If a public figure comes out and calls him a murderer once O.J. dies, would there be the same outrage? Public opinion, personal opinion, is just that, opinions, and thankfully, in the U.S. we are at liberty to state them.

Doug   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

This man should bow his head in shame for such comments. Katheryn Jackson is in mourning right now and does not need to hear such immature comments. Michael was found NOT guilty congressman.

Laura Fair   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I am appalled that a US Congressman could say such a thing about anyone that has been charged with a crime and acquitted. Michael Jackson, as we all know, was found innocent.

Now, I wonder how he would feel if somebody called him a pedophile, if he were charged with child abuse and subsequently acquitted.

Shame on him . . . shame on someone of his stature to say such a thing.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Shame on you ,Peter King what's in the heart comes out of the mouth.We all see whats in your heart wonder who's the pervert.

just another opinion   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

Rick,

I am sick of all the people like Mr. King that are quick to point the finger at Michael and his oddness throughout the years. I find the ones that have no compassion at this time are the ones that need to spend some time looking in their own yards and at themselves to determine what kind of person they are being with their time here on earth. Also, it seems those that point fingers usually do so at things they do not understand. Shows ignorance. His comments sure did seem judgemental of a situation that he was not involved in nor privy to all the information necessary to form an opinion. Even if he does not like MJ, he can keep his opinion to himself or just not be so hostile with his opinions. What example is this guy setting for his family, friends, people he represents? I cannot get enough of the coverage on this topic. I could stand for a Michael channel nonstop. And I am not a hard core fan. I am just simply interested in his life and his messages. And, as for all the other people complaining about how much coverage this is getting, the public is asking for it, they are blogging, and buying and reading and searching as I am. So, keep up the good work, I would be totally bummed and probably would have turned off cnn by now if you all had moved on quickly.

vadiva30   July 6th, 2009 3:34 pm ET

I don't have a problem with people expressing their opinions about Michael Jackson, but Mr. King used slanderous language that was irresponsible as a politician to use. Michael Jackson was acquitted of all charges in the court of law.

I am part of the MTV generation, unlike Rep King, so Michael Jackson was an Icon for someone like myself who enjoyed his music and his influence in the entertainment industry. Unfortunately Michael Jackson led the latter part of his life the way he died. RIP finally MJ!!!!

Sofia   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

The death of Michael Jackson has touched us all since it was a sudden death. The coverage is the least we can do in celebrating his accomplishments, and his ability to inspire so many people around the world.
Peter King, it is embarrassing, and disrespectful to the fans and family who are still grieving at this time. And to make such false accusations of Mr. Jackson, is absolutely shameful. Please spend your time in helping and improving public schools in New York City rather than making a ridiculous statements on something that does not need your opinion.

Faye in Arizona   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

MJ was found not guilty. Mr. King is a homophob who sees things in terms of black & white. MJ's admission of "sleeping" with children had nothing to do with a sex act or molestation. He was a victim of extortionists who took advantage of his misspeak to Martin B. MJ was a child in a man's body. Mr. King should have a deeper understanding of mental illness. Glad he's not in my state.

Connie Moore   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

King is entitled to his comments, however he should not have used the media as his speaking platform to voice his personal opinions of Mr. Jackson.

joe   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Cable Companies are the only reason that Michael Jackson is on 24/7.

It's the biggest story of the day. It is not homage or reverence it's money.

Why not blame the cable companies? All those people need something to talk about, after all they are being paid to comment on
whatever is the news of the day.

Michael Jackson is not promoting himself.

Ellen   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Who is this stupid Rep. King who called Michael Jackson a pervert? It is because of racist people like him that Michael had to die. You white racist people lie on him and broke his sprit. This representative can live to be 100 years, he will never get the recognition that Michael is getting. I feel so sorry for this white man.

Ellen, Minnesota

George Thompson   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Rick
This Congressman is unforturnately the last of the Klux Klux Klan
that represents what the GOP is left with. And this expains why
republicans have no solution alternatives to President Obama.
It is so sad that in this country when our own legal system states
a person is innocent, the racist bais comments are still allowed
to be made to the public. So much for " Freedom Of The Press".

EMMA H. KIRK   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Congressman King is merely pandering to his predominantly white conservative constituency. He should apologize to the Jackson family AND fans.

ROSIE   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS LET MICHAEL JACKSON REST IN PEACE. REP KING SHOULD BE ASHAME OF HIMSELF FOR SAYING THESE THINGS ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON. I WONDER HOW HE OR HIS FAMILY WOULD FEEL IF IT WERE HIM THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT. NOT A GOOD FEELING I AM SURE. SO SHUT UP ALREADY REP KING AND LET MICHAEL JACKSON RIP. WHO ARE YOU TO JUDGE...

Maria   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I'm outraged by Rep. Peter King comments about Michael Jackson. How dare him to disrespect the man after he is dead!! Let him be. Michael Jackson was found innocent in the court of his peers. He makes me sick. Rep. Peter King, you are a low life and you are very ignorant person. I bet you are corrupted within the politics that you are hiding. Look at yourself in the mirror before you talk about someone else. I'm praying you lose in your elections. yes, I would let my child alone with Michael Jackson in the room. I believe he never did nothing like that to any child. R.I.P Michael Jackson, you will be truly missed and you will live in our hearts forever and many generations to come. You are truly "The King of Pop." No one will ever take that title away from you. You are with the angels now. Be with the lord. I know you are looking down on your family and your fans. I can't wait until I get a Michael Jackson tattoo done. How about that Rep. Peter King. You are a nobody if you talk about someone like that. I hope Michael Jackson's family speaks out about your ignorant comments.

Robyn   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I'm sick of the haters who have no proof of their statements. No one complained like this when Elvis or John Lennon was mourned. Allow the fans to mourn and stop the hatred already. Enough is enough! People seem to forget the good MJ did because they are blinded by what the tabloids reported. Let's remember the good and let it go. He's dead and he's not coming back. Think about his family and his children left behind and be caring instead..

Mike   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

The only people I hear complaining about Michael Jackson are the same people who Are Not Music Lovers , they have little concept of Music but they Do have a concept of Fault Finding and Self Righteousness. My advice is 'Listen to the Music'.

Lisa Casey   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Mr. King wishes he had the attention alive Michael Jackson has dead.

Jacqueline   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

What right does Congressman King have to continue to call Michael Jackson a pedophile? Is King psychic? MJ was found innocent and the case is now closed on this issue. Furthermore, the timing on King's comments is very poor and he should be ashamed at continuing with these accusations at this time. My question is, "what does King think can be gained from accusing a dead man of pedophilia?" This is a cheap attempt at getting votes ...

My sympathies are with the family of Michael Jackson having to endure such comments and judgement during their time of mourning.

Vee   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

As long as there is an audience and an interest for MJ..the news wire will be hot...so tell Mr. King as long as there is an interest in MJ the media will be on it.

Peggi   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I think the main point is, enough harm has been done by a rich person who could pay to get out the consequences. Think of the kids.

ENOUGH OF MJ and get on with real news.

Travis L. Stokes   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Hey Rick,

Rep. King is flat out wrong and to suggest that he has justification for his comments is unthinkable. Michael Jackson did a lot of world charity work that is to be viewed in the likes of princess Diana and others. Michael was never convicted of anything and for Rep. King to be so dissrespectful and to have people believe that he is guilty after being proven not guilty is sad and rude. He needs to sweep around his own congressional door ( Gov. Stanford, i don't hear Rep. King saying that we should stop making his life news)before sweeping around Michael Jacksons.."He who lives in a glass house shall cast no stone"

muza   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

This congressman is a hater. Michael Jackson deserves the recognition for his talent. He broke barriers. It is unbelievable that MTV refused to show 'black' artist until Michael Jackson did his 'magic'. R.I.P M.J.

Robert Jones   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

The congressman must not get away with this if not the slender against MJ will not stop and can only increase.
Jackson family, what are you waiting for to send this guy to the gutter? No wonder MJ trusted strangers to execute his will. Show the world what you son and brother mean to you now. Please !!!
LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT LAWSUIT

David   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I agree with the congressman. Just because he wasn't convicted doesn't mean he wasn't guilty. There is much more important news and heros to celebrate: U.S. Troops, teachers, police officers.

Baymba Ellis   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I think the congress man just want to get some attention from the public. He does not realy know MJ. He need to shout up his month and pay more attention to his country that is facing serious finacial and job lost. The entire world singing with one voice Micheal Jackson who the hell are u congressman?

karl tollefson   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

rep. king is verbally bashing a dead individual and making comments not based on fact. Mr. Jackson was acquited wether rep. king likes it or not, perhaps we should look at mr kings behaviour and what he does when no onoe is looking and perhaps conjecture not based on fact could be said of him also. no wonder nothing gets done in washington when a republican is lambasting a dead person over non-factual evidence or charges. was mr jackson different...??? no doubt... does mr king recognize this... obviously not... i call on mr king to do his job and maybe go deal with real life situations.

Selena   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Some class Rep. King, at least show some respect for Michael Jackson's little kids instead of making such comments. And BTW, he was acquitted.

Sharon   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Yes, Michael Jackson was a talented singer. But he also was NOT a role model. Enough already about Michael Jackson. I will NOT be watching CNN tomorrow.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Maybe this tool's comments will take some of the heat off of that bimbo from Alaska and her impending down fall.

So THIS is what a congressman has to comment about. Why does he care what the free news media reports on? How about just turning the channel and watch 'Matlock'? Networks like CNN wouldn't give so much coverage unless it knew they would get such large viewership.

The republicans just keep the hits coming! Keep up the great work! It just helps guarantee that they'll be out of office through at least 2016!!

DBRodriguez   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

Hey Rick, your very own Nancy Grace made her read between the lines comments about M. Jacksons alledged molestation charges, "now its between him and God", using her disrespectful condesending tone.

Barbara   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

OJ wasn't convicted of double murder, either. Money buys "justice" in this country, or at least reasonable doubt. I'm sorry for his family, but more sorry for his victims.

Alice Williams   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

My comment for King as a last name only. Is there a motive for your hostile manner toward Michael Jackson the "King of PoP". Could it be that you don"t have anything else as a representative of this Country to contribute but, malicious slander, and filth. No, it hasn't been enough credit given. Michael deserves all he is receiving. What have you done lately to be recognized for? Your 10 minutes of stupidness is over. So please, not another peep!!!!!!

Michael's friend....

Lisa   July 6th, 2009 3:35 pm ET

I cannot believe that you are continuing this discussing story about
ONE MAN's slander on MJ. Stop it NOW!!!! I will never watch your show again. This was a bad decision on your part as a "journalist".
Also, for you to say that at "any" cocktail party your friends would
be saying the same thing is just prejudice. I suppose all of your
"friends" think the same way? JUST LIKE YOU!!!!

R.I.P. Michael Jackson, you are not a subjuct for slander you are to be
respected and loved forever!

Lisa NYC

J. Patrick   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Congressman King needed his 15 minutes of fame, it's too bad it just shows his stupidity. Where was he and his comments when his co-workers were cheating on their wives, not paying their taxes, and misusing OUR money? Michael is gone and nothing can hurt him anymore. I feel sad for his family, having to deal with all of this crap. If I were a Jackson, I would sue him for slander.

Dave   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

I agree with Congressman, King. I don't agree with Al Sharpton. I am still a MJ fan, but his life screamed "I need help!" But no one would listen. I just wonder how can a man be so talented that no one would give him a reality check and for him to get mental treatment. MJ's behavior was out of line. Shame on the Jacksons for allowing the ill behavior of MJ to be so out of line of the norm.

Susan S. Davis   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

For the record, Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of any crime. MJ is every bit as relevant as Frank Sinatra, Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly. As Barack Obama did in politics, MJ united people through his art. His artistry broke through racial and musical barriers that will transcend time. His humanity and charitable spirit will always be remembered the world over.

The social impact of a person of his artistic and humanitarian accomplishments, that motivates thousands of people to arrange their schedules on a weekday to attend memorial services demonstrates that the people have spoken: his music and entertainment are his legacy.

I hope that in his afterlife, Michael is able to see all of the tributes and fans remaining – and that he finally has the peace that so evaded him in his life on earth.

Sileshi   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

The congress man is a pervert himself. How could he say such things when people are very sad about the death of MJ.

The congress man is insulting the American judicial system. If a person is not convicted, that person is innocent. Doesn't the congressman believe in the American judicial system. If M.J. was guilty, he would have been in prison.

Pervert congressman.

Mauro Sandoval   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

M. Jackson was a great idol to all Americans. All his hard work change and altered America's Music to what it is today. I believe that he did no such thing. There is no concrete evidence that he ever did such thing. I doubt that he did. People just wanted to get money from him in any way possible. For those who judge him on such rumors should be ashamed, no evidence means no such crime was committed. It was one word versus another. He was not just an Idol but a father. Why would he be, in any case with other children? He has his own to take care of. None of the molestation charges were true or make sense. Nothing in this world is going to change M. Jackson's status, an Idol, a legend, an artist that will be dearly missed. Even if there was concrete evidence that he was a molester, we would still listen to his music, see his videos and buy his merchandise.

SF5   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Enough already.I was sick and tired of the coverage on the first day.Anybody with half a brain knows sleeping with kids is wrong.Money talks and if only the monkey could talk...........

Gloria Waechter   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

To portray Michael Jackson as a respectable celebrity is an insult to the children he molested. He was not only a deviant child molester, but a self mutilator, a drug addict, and NOT the type of person we would want any of our children to emulate. The message being sent to the public says a lot about the moral environment of our society. My personal opinion is "good riddance to bad rubbish"!

carl   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Peter King that's a Republican for ya. He need's to resign.

Erika   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Much of what we do in life has to do with our upbringing and environment. Michael was never given any defense to what he had to face in life. He was brought up without much care for his childhood and as he grew up he had too much money too soon and surrounded by unhealthy elements who still didn't teach him anything.

Just like Rep. King must have been brought up very sheltered and surrounded by ignorant people and in his adult life he is beholding to more ignorant people that's why scruples escape him.

Everybody has done and is doing something they don't want others to know. Can we please scrutinize King and see how much he stinks? On second thought, nevermind. He has not and will never make a positive difference in people's lives with MJ's magnitude so his useless thoughts and useless life is not worth talking about.

Rick why are you talking about him?

amanda   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

This guy is obviously crazy. Michael Jackson was a wonderful man that was found not guilty and all charges were dismissed. My question is why is everyone in the media attacking his legacy? If you want to get real about it Elvis died of a drug overdose on the toilet and he at the age of 25 pursued a 13 year old girl (priscilla) and know one attacked him this way! I am tired of the way the media is portraying MJ, He is was and will always be the greatest to ever live. People like this congressman need to think before they open there mouths and he better hope he is not up for re election anytime soon because the ENTIRE world is in mourning and will remember his comments.

Jasmine   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Instead of making laws like we pay Peter King with our tax dollars to do he has takin the Job of celeb gossip colum. Go work for the NATIONAL ENQUIRER Peter.
Michael Jackson has always delivered to us through his music.
America is currently in shams meanwhile "lawmaker" peter king is going around saying pointless things. He is currently juming from radio shows to news station trying justity his statements.
How about more law making.

Alpha girl   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

The man was a musical genius. Please celebrate the artist for what he contributed to the music world and leave the bad stuff until he is buried. We are not the judge or the jury now. He will have to account for all things he done here on earth and God has the final say now. Why don't you ask Sarah Palin and Mark Sanford how they feel about the coverage? I am sure they want more coverage on MJ to draw attention away from them.

Shadow Dancer   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Michael Jackson isn't even buried yet!! This congressman obviously wasn't taught that if you have nothing good to say, then say nothing. It's better to have people think you a fool, then to open your mouth and prove them right!

Janes the maint man   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Rick,

Michael Jackson was a very talent man, who was just judged and taken advantage of by a nasty world! He was no different the Elivis who was given a 3-day funeral event, but was not questioned or judged on his faults? Then there was Regan, who was also given a 3-day event. Why his this man judged so nasty? Can we just let his fans and family have this time to remember and celebrate this King of Pop within his final day! This congressman has no heart or soul if he could be so nasty and mean this time of sadness! Shame on him, he has no right to throw any stones! He is just another Rep. that is pulling another shadow on his already shamed party!

lezlee   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Another GOP psycopath rambling in delirium. Pete King.
This is news? NOT!

Kel   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Who left this Rep. King to decide MJ's fate. Michael was already tried for his "alleged" crimes. Rep King is looking for an easy way to draw attention to himself at the expense of Michael Jackson's death. Rep King acts as he is judge, jury & executioner. People need to be careful of what they say because karma is right around the corner. RIP Michael. Does this Rep. King have children? If so would he like it if people talked about him? He has NO respect for the death of an icon!

Lise   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Just another big mouth, probably pojecting all of the skeletons in his own closet. Stop making a name for yourself on the back of someone's death. Now that's sick!

Michele from Louisiana   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

if the truth be known we are all nosey and want to know what is going on. You couldn't win for losing. If you weren't covering it you would be critized for that.

Great job Rick and all of CNN,

Dave   July 6th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Peter King only wants his 15 mins of fame. Because we all know in 10 years from now, Who MJ was. Will we know who Peter King was? I rest my case.

Oh some advice for you Peter King. Have a wash before you go on TV. You look like you just walked out of a bar. Your SCUM, Did you even think, How MJ kids feel about your hateful comments? I hope you burn in HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lou solon   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Peter King is the pervert and a kook to boot. He's one of the most corrupt politicians in a sea of corrupt republican politicians. If you think "Duke" Cunningham was bad wait until the spotlight focuses on Peter King.

Michael Olschafskie   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Rep. King should leave out his opinions about Michael Jackson's lifestyle as he was cleared in a court of law. However, I do agree with Rep. King that there is far to much coverage in regards to Jackson while far more improtant events are taking place around the world. As a teacher I view this as the media once again contributing to misleading the young people in our country on what is really important. You coverage is telling children that wealthy famous people trump the events around the world. Events like those in China and the many lives of the not so famous that are being changed there as we speak. Shouldn't we be covering our troops on this 4th of July week/weekend and their role in maintaining the freedom we enjoy in this country. Jackson was a great and influential performer but this should be a secondary story at best, not you primary coverage. Does CNN have the courage to do whats right, not what sells?

Thank you,
Michael Olschafskie

Kris   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

I agree with Rep King. Michael Jackson did many inappropriate criminal acts, and we all know it. OJ Simpson was also acquited of a crime, but we all know he did the crime just as Michael Jackson comitted sexual crimes against children. He was no hero. Enough about him already.

Professor Joanne de Falla   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Rick- try watching the BBC to see how news should be delivered. I remember having to change channels whenever you appeared on Channel 7 news in Miami years ago- now you are on CNN- how on earth did this happen- your pretense at objectivity was transparent and the attempt to sound well educated comical. You interrupt your interviewees with a motivation to sensationalize. A true news anchor you are not.
As regards Michael Jackson, some of us are sick of this country's need to adore pop artists- as if they discovered a cure for cancer. He was talented long ago and I was one who thought Thriller one of the best albums of all time, but the last decade has been fraught with the personal libailities that led to the court case for child molestation. No one, no matter how famous, seems "normal" who cheerfully admits to sleeping with teenage boys and younger. Congressman King expresses the disdain many intellectuals in this country share- but then we are certainly not your intended audience.
Please inform your "expert" commentators as to the difference between "libel" and "slander."- that is, if you yourself know the difference.

As for me, I am off to change the channel.
exasperated from Coral Gables, Florida

D. Johnson   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

New Yorkers should be ashamed of their idiot representative for ovbiously voicing his own opinion about Michael. Rep King should be focusing on the parents and boys who LIED on Michael Jackson. He needs to investigate this BEFORE yapping off at the mouth!!

Soheila W   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Micheal settled his first case, becasue as an artist, he did not want publicity..he got acquited by Jury, if it was not for "Bashir" and the DA in Santa Barbara that was trying to get elected none of these would have happened..You are tired? so am I, We all are tired on this frenzy but who's fault is that? Micheal? instead of celebrating his life the New Agencies are sprading rummers and making everything worse>>> so congressman go to senate and instead of slaming a dead artist do somthing good and pass a law for the news agencies to limit their rummers and converage. Plus I think you should get your story right Micheal was not a petiflier and he was never charged, you should blame those parents that alowed their childern to go there without supervision, and than accusing him of untrue BS and get paid for it!!. Whom took advantage of whom? You should keep quite...or is it you need attention congressman???

sk   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Rick i just want to say this. peter King is a sick man

Angel   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Michael Jackson was found not guilty of the charges by a jury of citizens. God forbid Mr. King find himself in a similar position with the glare of the media and the world watching.

He was truly not only the king of pop but the king of music/dance in general. Michael, I never met you but I will truly miss you.

Valerie Cooksey   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

The court system found Michael Jackson "not guilty"! Michael Jackson was a victum of "Blood sucking vampires and leeches". They took advantage of him by any means necessary. Michael changed the face of the arts & entertainment industry. I think some people dont like the fact that he was somewhat greater han Elvis.

Also King never said anything before. Why wait until he dies to speak out. King is a coward. He is trying to get his 15 mins of fame. Shame on you King and shame on CNN for highlighting this.

Let Michael Jackson rest in peace. He is a Legend and the fans have spoken. He and his music will live forever.

P.S. CNN please try to get ratings another way. You are losing this way.

Penny   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

If you don't like the laws that are set then change them. For the Governor that made the statement, I think that it was out of content because he was found NOT GUILTY by our own judicial system. Based on that and that alone. Now let me ask the Governor a question, since all the other republicans have been pulled out onto the carpet, what secret sins do you have hiding.......be careful and speak slowly when you answer the question, someone might just call you a pervert.

Faye in Arizona   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

My comment to Preston: you're quoting a comedian? Your point has been taken and filed. He was no more a pedophile than you are blind, deaf and mute. And I don't even KNOW you.

John   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Congressmen (sic) King appears to be so concerned about the attention and support given to our deserving trros, firemen, policemen and teachers; how did he vite on bills supporting , the troops, education, etc.? I feel sorry for the people of NY

Leah   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Michael Jackson changed music into the best it could have possibly turned out to be. Regardless of his lifestyle, please remember him for his incredible talent that is very hard to find this day in age. This Congressman should be ashamed of himself and if people are sick of the coverage, turn off the t.v. and go out for a walk. I'm sure the majority or North Americans could use some good exercise.

dpinnegar   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Pervert or not he was a celebrity. I think the media spends too much coverage on celebrity's, especially dead ones. Do I really need to know who controls his assets or ends up getting them? The unfortunate thing is that other people do care and that that is what sells.

SKI   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

ELVIS PRESLEY BIRTHDAY AND OTHER MILESTONES SURROUNDING HIS CAREER ARE CELEBRATED YEARLY. ELVIS WAS SUSPECTED OF BEING A DRUG ADDICT AND ALCOHOLIC, AND DATED YOUNG WOMEN...NO ONE HAS ANY PROBLEMS WITH GLORIFYING HIM. ONCE AGAIN THE RACIST HEAD OF AMERICA REARS IT'S UGLY HEAD...NOT ONLY THAT BABE RUTH WHO WAS AN ALCOHOLIC BUM ALSO IS REVERED HIGHLY IN THE LIVES OF WHITE AMERICANS...

janel   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Why would he speak bad about michael, after he died..Rick im goin to pray that god has mercy on your soul.How could you say something like that and be okay about it.Michael JACKSON was proven NOT GUILTY. So i mean why would you say such harsh things.This man has gave the world his heart in soul and i think he deserves to be on the news EVERY SINGLE DAY.Michael is the king of pop and i respect him,he had a big heart.This hurts me to hear someone say such harsh things.But its alrite, the good out does the bad.You can say whatever you want let GOD decide what type of man he was.And i know Michaels in a better place.He deserves all the respect, after what he has done for the world

Rob   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Mr King aside,
was Michael Jackson aquited of all charges? I believe one of the cases was settled out of court, and he paid Millions. That is not an aquital. The King of Pop? Rather he can be crowned "The King of Controversy", in death as in life. Do those of us who listen to all the media coverage of Jackson think he is a pervert etc. although he was never convicted? Of course. Mr, King asked a thoughtful question when asking if any mother would leave her male child alone with Jackson when he was alive? Was Jackson talented, and did he change the face of music? Of course. Do any of the public have a need to know about his will, the disposition of his children and the fact that he died $400Million in debt? We already had enough of OJ and this is just more of the overexposed coverage we have come to expect when there is a topic that can be drawn out to fill up the news hours. Is there not other news investigation of legitimate topics which gets displaced when a news channel chooses to focus so many hours on the Jackson topic? Enough!!

sarce88   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

though i shared grief with millinons on MJ's passing, i agree with the opinion that there is an overkill on the coverage. CNN along with MSNBC, Fox and others are guilty on this. There are other more important news that is happening out there.

Natalie R.   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

This is, perhaps, the first time I have agreed with Representative King. The coverage of the Michael Jackson story is absurd. That kind of coverage should be reserved for a head of state. Jackson was a singer a dancer, and an entertainer at best. He was NOT a head of state. In addition, Representative Rangel calling for a national day of mourning is outrageous. Surely, the insanity of this story and the overboard coverage it has received can be seen by most in this country who have not lost their senses.

Tony   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

Congressman King's statements were uncalled for. He could have simply said he was tired of the media coverage. That I can understand.
Peter King is just another citizen who's eyes have been covered by the veil of tabloid media. He knows nothing of the real details behind the cases of the past, other than what was slanderously displayed over the years. MJ was acquitted of all charges in the last case. The settlement of the first was out of advice from his family and legal team, and I think it proved that all the original accusers wanted was money in the first place.
I know if someone molested my kids I would see them in the electric chair before I would take a settlement and let them walk free.
Let the man rest in peace, and let people talk. Michael Jackson accomplished more in his 50 years than Peter King could ever dream to accomplish in 5 lifetimes.

Shawn   July 6th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

From Canada: Can you sing like Michael? Would you put someone down with say an ilness like Cancer? Better yet, would you put that person who died of Cancer down? Doubt it, Michael was abused as a child, he lived in the spotlight since birth, these are well known facts. Being what he has been through anyone would be a little messed up. Court said he was innocent, are you questioning your own judicial system? Mental illness and Cancer are both just that, an illness. If you would slander a dead cancer victim, thats just sad. Respect him for his music, there will never ever be another star this big. Respect the family, and fans who are grieving, RIP MJ

kelvin mays   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Make up your mind do you or dont you want us to see the dead soldiers comming back.

Valerie   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

MJ WAS DECLARED INNOCENT U IDIOT! YOU WILL NEVER BE AN GLOBAL ICON LIKE HE IS STOP TRYING TO BIG YOURSELF UP WITH FOOLISHNESS! YOU WILL NEVER BE AN ASSET TO THIS COUNTRY LIKE MICHAEL HAS AND YOUR STILL LIVING!

Jervay   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

If the world doesn't know by now not to trust everything we hear, then go seek the knowledge as pertained to law and recognize that hear say is not acceptable in court or anywhere else for that matter.

Alex C. Jeans   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Mr.Sanchez you have a spectacular show but speaking of Rep. King he is a hatred man,full of anger.MJ was an icon a legend, he was global.MJ did a lof of great things speaking of charities around the world.People miss him and he is loved by the world.

herve   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

One day we might find out that king congressman IS NOT SO CLEAN ,AND WE WILL LEARN THAT HE ,had a affair with a teenage girl, or hE IS a pedophile OR ELSE ,( CHARGES THAT HE WILL FOR SURE DENIED )then and only then he will realise THAT JUDGING PEOPLES IS NOT ALWAYS THE WRIGHT THING TO DO ....

Janz   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I read that when Michael was young, he and his brothers would sleep together in the same and this was a time of security for the young Michael. This information was reveal my the ghost writer of the book "The Thriller" . He worked with Jackie Kennedy Onassis on this book and although the information about Michael and his other siblings being beatened by their dad, this information about Michael's memories as a young child and in some ways may explain his need to sleep with other young boys was never included in the book.
Whether he was a pedophilo, I can not say. Whether he was a prevert is simply an opinion. All I know is that one thing I have learned in my 66 years on this earth is that things are not always what they seem to be! Only Michael knows the truth and he isn't talking!

Beverly   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

MJ was a great artist, changed music, but in my opinion was a sick twist. The skin bleaching, the endless plastic surgeries, his comments about it being ok for him to sleep with little boys is a large part of him also. Big deal he wasn't convicted, neither was OJ, & in my opinion both were guilty.

I   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rick, the congressman is way off line. MJ was acquitted, and getting into the details of case 1 settled and case 2 acquitted..would be an entire different conversation from that of coverage from media. I would urge him to get his facts straight, the man was framed becuase of his money and the vulnerable spot he put himself in by some albeit innocent, questionable behavior by those who did not know him. At any rate the congressman is commiting libel by calling someone such a horreandous name about things that have not been proven. We ARE still a country of laws ...arent we?
I feel MJ is getting blamed even about the coverage he is getting now that he is not with us. What a shame?!! I too feel like the news should be covering the news and not bring anyone that CLAIMS to be the icons "FRIEND" on programs to just continuee gossip, hearsay and just plain speculation!! I cannot believe how many people I saw on the news in the last week claiming some sort of dubious unchecked connection with the pop star. Wow...so the blame is on the media outlets for not sticking to the facts and once again utilizing sensational journalism to keep viewers tuned in thru the commercial. How many times have we heard the words: shocking., said by cnn anchors promoting the next segment?? I cant even count. What happened to old fashion journalism where you just state the facts and attribute the source? Police said, authorities said, jackson family said?? Anyway....pretty dissapointing, but it is what it is! All about the benjamin baby!!

debbie   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

That comment was very uncalled for. what is wrong with people? He hasnt even been buried yet! If you dont like him , turn the channel or get up from in front of the tv. I myself have enjoyed watching. Listen to what he said in of his songs,"leave me alone". Michael Jackson was fabulous in my eyes, a great talented person. He should be remembered. For us that cant be at the memorial we are lookin forward to watching on tv.

Sharon Willmann   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rep. Peter King seems to have no regard for our legal system. They acquitted him and probably had more info than we do. To call him a pervert and pedophile seems like a talking point for the racist part of his Republican base. Anyone who knows anything about Michael (and it's a cinch that Rep. King did not) knows that he had NO childhood and loved children. He wanted to remain childlike and often said that he could be around children because they were the only people who were nice to him. The rest of the adults, King included, called him a freak.
Most other men would have a hard time saying they let children stay in their bedrooms. Michale Jackson was not a "regular guy". Did anyone ever think of this? Many children, now adults, said that they stayed with Michael and nothing inappropriate happened. They had a marvelous time.

Dez   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Peter King should have kept his mouth shut. Now, it's only right for him to be scrutinized by not only his peer, his constituents, and the media.
It's people like this is why there is so much hate in the world today.
M.J. provided music for people all over the world. The bottom line is people who have a voice & have a platform as wide as M.J., and made as much money as he did, OTHERS took advantage & just wanted a piece of the pie. M.J. lived in a lonely world, as many entertainers do today.

Peter King also had a voice. He didn't have to complain (but most Republicans simply do just that), he could have just simply stated what his biggest issue was – having coverage of 4th of July. He didn't have to mention M.J. Absolutely no reason too. Would he have said the same thing if the same amount of coverage was all about Farrah Fawcett, Billy Mays, or even Ed McMahon.

So, it really comes down to this:
What has Peter King done for the world & that can be remembered for?

What Peter King will be known for is being a typical republican. One who would rather make a complaint & not provide a solution.

I guarantee you he will NOT be re-elected next year because he was stupid enough to open his mouth.

Michael L. Burdett   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

How many cancer ridden children has Peter King helped with their sadness and scared feelings in his life?

How dare he accuse Michael Jackson of anything but humanitarian efforts towards these children!

This man needs a lawsuit put against him for the slander of the legacy of Michael Jackson's efforts to make this world a better place.

Indeed Peter King needs to look in the mirror and expect that man to change ... to make this world a better place. -Rather than pointing fingers at a dead man who did make the world - quite a bit of a better place.

May God find a special place in heaven for Michael Jackson and his music! My God smile upon Michael as he playes music for the heavenly host!

Rosy   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Yes Candy C. is a nice lady and always professional; however, she is wrong about KING! He is a political animal and always playing to the right wing nutty wing of their base. Right, that is all they have left i the right wing nutty 19% of their base. King like any other republican can be voted out of office and we will see to this loud mouth opportunist being outsed along with the rest of the repurg trash in congress.
Remember, Michael settle out of court on the liability suit against him; however, their were never any criminal charges brought against him in 1993 because the dad never had any intentions for this case to go to criminal court. He wanted money from day one and the police were very angry with the father because they were never able to confirm any of the allegation that the Father accused Michael of during this period in 1993. We need to remember this when you report this story; all I ask is that you all give all the facts!

Sarah Kay   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Representative Peter King though was expressing concern over lack of coverage on other national/world news, and is entitled to express himself, should not have slandered Michael Jackson as he did obviously calculated for sound-bite effect.

Michael Jackson was cleared of all charges, and those he made settlements with were on the advise of his legal team, so he could move on with his life as others do in all walks of life when faced with litigation.

The extensive coverage on Michael Jackson clearly exposes how willful he was, and answers to why he kept stating in interviews during that period where he kept asking why others thought sharing a bed with a child had a sexual or improper connotation.

He seemed unable to wrap around his mind/understanding why he was being charged of acts that would admittedly have never crossed his mind as he and numerous friends, family have expressed.

It would be interesting if those that accused him in due time/course and with the assurance of no charges to be brought against them from the family, etc., were to freely state if such acts they had claimed in fact, never happen – and what prompted their accusations; but if they hold to them, with maturity be able to further elaborate to the extent that they can.

Anna   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Well, we have another holier than thou Republican standing in front of of us passing judgement on the morality of someone who was acquitted of the crime he was accused of. How embarrassing that King is rejecting the American legal system that he is a part of. Those are the kind of people that later turn out to be hypocrites.

Marta   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Congressman King should be upset about Barney Frank! Now there's a $#@!&!! that should be jailed!!
Interesting that Congressman King is so ignorrant that he has no clue as to what our legal system means when a jury say "Not Guilty"!

Shame on you Peter King!

Crystal   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rick I think Peter King is a crazy fool. I hope the Jackson family will sue his stanking tail for slander. Michael Jackson was a genius,icon and loved all people.

Donna   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

MJ was not found guilty in any court of law. He has moved beyond to his Creator. His judgement will be the one that counts. Remember Congressman, that would be your Judge as well and, from what I have read, He's not cool with bearing false witness.

Mathew   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I belive that the only reason that all of these people are talking down to michael jackson is becuase of all the attention he is getting by the media and the news. It's nice that for a change that we don't hear about insurgents' and the war in afganistan & iraq. those stories are quite old and nobody , i am sure, wants to hear about them anymore!

yvonne limerick   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

all i have to say is if i can see this man i would slap him

Shivali   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Hey Rick. My first time posting! We are all innocent until proven guilty, and Michael Jackson was ACQUITTED It makes me nervous that this Congressman King- a representative of our country is comfortable making vicious, unfounded claims with such insensitive timing. I wonder how he would feel if he was labeled a pedophile AFTER he is dead and unable to defend himself. SHAME ON HIM for bringing hate to the news.

Richard   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Mr. King is a pathetic excuse for a human being to badmouth Michael Jackson before he has even been buried. It amounts to protesting at a funeral. Mr King has no respect and comes from a political party infamous for it's hypocritical views such as so called family values and moral superiority. Who the hell is he to pass judgement on another man's character, especially during a time of mourning. Michael Jackson brought never ending happiness to millions around the world. What has Mr King done other than spread his hatred and prejudice? Michael Jackson was aquitted of all charges and anybody who knows anything about the legal system knows there should have never even been a trial because the prosecution had NO CASE! Michael Jackson made this world a better place. Rep King has offered nothing but hate.

Wanda Humphries- Buena Vista, VA   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Michael Jackson did not know his own identity. His childhood was taken from him therefore he did not know what life was suppose to be. Not like what most of us had. His father was very controlling and he took Michael's life. I feel like Michael was trying to live his life as a young boy, but he is an adult trying to re-live what was robbed from him. I feel sorry for him and people should not be judging him. Was this Mr. King present at Michaels house when all this stuff was supposedly going on? The man is dead and still he has no peace.

Felicia   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Shame on Peter King! Michael Jackson was acquitted on all charges, and deserves respect! It is so sad that all these smallminded people can't get their facts straight and keep their oppinions to themselves.
Michael Jackson was a great man and he changed history! He definitely deserves the newscoverage and to be glorified. Although the media should pay tribute to the legend and his magical talent instead of his private life, rumours and innuendoes. Let the man rest in peace.

Tina   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I dare you try to criticize Michael Jackson. He was found innocent in the court of law or did you simply forget. Look at all the millions of dollars he donated to charities. When was the last time you donated anything including your time. If you are tired of looking at CNN with their wonderful coverage then I suggest you go and do something else with your time sir. Perhaps like speaking to your Republican brothers to stop having affairs across the state/country and leaving their poor wives at home to take care of the family. I wonder who is your soulmate. I'm sure your time would be more appreciated doing that instead of you slandering someones name when they are deceased.

Joe   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Rep. King is a hater!!! I think he is mad because when he finally kicks the bucket he wont get the same attention that Micheal has. He'll probably an an hour or a moment of silence, while Michael will probably get a national stamp or holiday!!!! Tell him to focus on his own personal life and stop judging other people!!!

Darrell   July 6th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

Did Congressman King speak out about ex Congressman Mark Foley? I don't recall him doing that; of course Foley was a Republican.

pam   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

i think peter king will be better of thinking about the perverts and adulterers in his own party instead of saying nasty things about the dead. i will not be surprised if he is also found out to be one of the holier than thou , cheating on their wives republicans. i don't think he will agree to being called a pervert if he sleeps with his kids at home. so shut up or put up peter king.

Darren   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Where was Rep. King's comments about Michael when he was alive. He has to wait til the man is dead to try to run his name through the mud. We seem to forget 3 children lost a father, a mother and father lost a son and the world lost the greatest entertainer ever. The bottom line is MICHAEL WAS ACQUITTED ON ALL CHARGES. Michael deserves all the coveraged he's getting on CNN and more.

Bonnie   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Rep. King, hope everyone feels the same when you die, or any of your family members.

Patty Graves   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Whether he is or isn't...this isn't something we should be discussing publicly. Isn't that slander? Can't we be more dignified and benevolent? There is too much coverage, though for one single human being.

Elmari   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Rick, I think Peter King is the PERVERT in this story. He obviously hates Michael Jackson for personal reasons- whether it be his conservative nature, bigotry, prejudice, or wanting to get a piece of the actions (which you guys ARE giving him, unfortunately). But this Peter King DOES NOT KNOW who Michael Jackson is and what kind of life he had and what he had to go through. All he knows is what he sees in the media. I've been watching CNN religiously since Michael's death and the network has talked to so many people who knew Michael on personal and professional levels and THEY HAVE ALL REITERATED that Michael was a gentle, loving person who was vilely misunderstood by the world. Peter King is spewing ignorant, salacious and libel comments because he has an agenda. Yes, there may be too much coverage on Michael Jackson's death, but this man has been part of the American landscape for OVER 40 YEARS. People grew up with him and feel like he is a part of their life. . . that is why there is so much interest and so much mourning. I hope Peter King gets some facts before going off and spreading salacious gossip about someone so many people loved.

Craig   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Mr. King is another great example of Republican bigotry. He needs to apologize to the family, friends, and world-wide fans of Michael Jackson for his recent comments. And then he needs to study up on our constitution so he clearly understands that in our country, you are innocent until proven guilty...and Michael was acquitted of all charges. But most important, he needs to get to work on the Country's business or he may just find himself without a job.

BETH   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

this congressman needs to apologize to the Jackson family and to the fans of MJ. this is outrageous. And he is disrespecting the greatest man who is not here by the way to defend himself. nobody is guilty of any crime unless they are found guilty under the USA conustitution. the fact that somebody has a gun, doesn't make that person a killer. unless crime is committed there is no victim, no bad person in that situation. MJ has done NOTHING WRONG. HE IS INNOCENT. LEAVE HIM ALONE. HATERS.

Tony Karaba   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Part of all the MJ coverage is finding out if his death could have been prevented. If everyone would quit freaking out about "face time" on TV and concentrate on what can be learned here and how we can prevent other deaths we might make some improvements as a society.

Lilly   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

It would be nice if Rep. King and all those who agree with him would remember that MJ was acquitted of child molestation charges (not to mention that there was a question about the family trying to extort money in the beginning and when they didn't get any decided to file charges) and that his first supposed victim has now admitted he lied.

In my opinion this is just another a-hole republican with bad taste. Want to bet he's a hypocrite who likes child porn? After all, what the seem to yell about the most seems to be what they are guilty of.

Lastly, to all these people who are complaining about this getting news coverage: GET A LIFE. This IS news. I don't care if you think pop culture matters or whatever your hissy fit is about. The man is a musical icon and has inspired many. If you think this isn't going to get a bunch of coverage then you are just nuts. Furthermore, if you think this doesn't deserve coverage you are nuts.

Anderson   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Congressman King is one million percent right! Jackson was a child molester who paid his acusers to make them go away. Two of the jury members from the 2005 case regret ever saying he was not guilty. There is no question of his musical talents and he may have helped some.

However, it is not ok to overlook child molestation because he helped a select few/group. Any activist or political figures have very poor judgement in celebrating Jackson's wrong doing. The lives of those Jackson molested are impacted for ever. Who is speaking for those whose lives were changed for ever because Jackson for many years lived above the law in secrecy in neverland while molesting kids in need or less fortunate. He took advantage of their life ending situations by molesting them while on the surface parading like he cared. Those molested should have never been victims because Jackson never had a childhood or had a bad childhood.

The tax payers of California should NOT have to pay for any expense related to Jacksons viewing or funeral. The Jackson family or private volunteers should pick up the entire expense. Jackson is being judged by a higher power now so it is out of our hands.

milesz   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

I laud Rep. King's for his candid observation – - – not so much for the adjective he used to descibe Mr. Jackson (I would have said a freakish human being who had talent), but for telling it like it is. Unfortunately, from the outpouring of responses (well over a million want to attend the memorial tomorrow at the Staples Center in LA, for example), perhaps a noted percentage of this country aligns itself more with the most unusual characteristics displayed by this artist than recognizing that talent of his ilk does not equate with the bizarre physical and mental behavior he displayed. And, yes, there has been wayyy too much coverage of this one individual – - – also symptomatic of what drives this country, or certainly the media outlets, including CNN. Again, thanks Rep. King.

I. TRESUN   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT JACKSON'S CHARACTER WAS -

HE'S GETTING MORE COVERAGE, FROM CNN ALONE, THAN ANY U.S.

PRESIDENT WHO HAS DIED. WHY???

THERE IS IMPORTANT NEWS AT HOME AND ALL OVER THE WORLD,

BUT WE'RE SUBJECTED TO THIS DRIVEL.

james harvey   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

what the hell is wrong w/ society and all of you people out there celebrating a child molestor.he wasn't found innocent in court,he paid the child's family $20,000,000 to drop the charges.if john wayne gacy,or jeffrey dahmer came out w/ a couple of #1 songs would we be praising them too.he was a sick perverted waste of a life and 6 feet under the ground is the only place that innocent kids will be safe from him.good riddance and may you rest in hell where you belong.our best hope is that the same will be done to him there.sing him a couple of great songs and then rape him.to all of those celebrating his predator lifestyle,see a shrink,you have issues.

marie   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

I AGREE WITH THE CONGRESSMAN KING, MICHAEL;S MUSIC
WAS GREAT,BUT HIS PERSONEL LIFE HAD A LOT OF PROBLEMS.
I WOULD NOT TRUST HIM WITH ANY CHILD.YOU CAN CELEBRATE HIS MUSIC NOT THE MAN.
THANK YOU.
M.W

Bree   July 6th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

I think Rep. King is a lot like most of us. I have witnessed the aftermath of the death of presidents, popes, Elvis, Princess Di etc,, but in my lifetime I have never witnessed anything such as we are experiencing with the death of M.J. So, Rep. King, don't feel bad, the rest of us have seen nothing like this before either, but you are dead wrong with your remarks. You'll get over it.

Simone   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

I think his statement is a totally in appropriate statement, shame, shame, shame. It is quite alarming for him to cast question on the justice system like that especially holding himself out as a member of the law. Michael Jackson was acquitted, frankly the trial was a complete fascade since the get go. This speaks volume to his character. Michael transends all, broke barriers with his brilliance as an artist. That is what we should remember and suppress all begrudgement.

James   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

It was very refreshing to hear King's stance on this excessive news coverage of the Jackson overdose. I was relieved of the news of Palin stepping down to offer some temporary relief of this overwhelming pedophile coverage. Unfortunately, you idiots are back at it again with his memorial; when will it stop?! It's nice to know I'm not the only one who realizes there are many more important issues in the world today and for this I would like to thank Sen. King.

Clarence Isler   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

WHY should it matter to the congressman what OTHERS do or feel about the life and death of Michael Jackson? Michael Jackson has not been proven guilty of anything. However, the congressman is guilty of picking on a dead man who can't fight back, guilty of insensitivity the man's mother, father, sisters, brothers, children, fans, and friends. If a man is to be judged by the content of his character, I would rather have Mr. Jackson's character than Mr. King's. When congressmen King dies, it will not matter to many that he lived or died. It mattered to me, and many that Michael Jackson lived.....and it mattered that he died.

Dave Morris   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Jackson was not "found Innocent" – ask the jurors!...

Numerous jurors in the Jackson case history have gone on record as saying they believe Jackson was guilty of molesting children. The problem was that they did not feel the crown made a strong enough legal case to support the guilty verdict.

Regards,
dave.

Diane (Alabama)   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Just one more reason to be very disappointed in our Congress.
Michael Jackson had more character than this man will ever have.

Brown   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Have Peter King been accuse of something he know that he has not done?
I sympathizes with Michael because, it has happen to me, the only reason it did not get any were I, did not have the kind of money he has.
When you have love for yourself and want to share it you show it give and all that is in you, you are invested in what you are doing, may be if Mr. Kind know what it is to beloved and or able to love without any conceived idea he would not take the stand that he took. Michael has done so much for people and the world, that if some of us would stop taking and do this world would be a better place.

dick roberts, NYC   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Michael Jackson was acquitted – end of story. As a congressman he should understand the Judicial system. Innocent until proven guilty. I think Mr. King needs to keep his out of term comments to himself and go back to your basic high school gov't class. He's just a hateful man.

Linda, a liberal Democrat   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

I don't agree with Rep. King on much, but this time I do. C'mon folks, we all know MJ had serious "issues", and although he was acquitted, he was not to be trusted with children, by his own admission in the Bashir interview. Who knows how many people were paid not to prosecute, at least two that we know of. And YES, there is too much coverage. He wasn't president of the US, for God's sake. I hope after the orgy of coverage CNN has planned for tomorrow you will finally GIVE IT A REST!

Barb   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Hey Rick!

Perhaps the Congress man is yet another spotlight-grabbing republican, who would rather the media focused on him instead of the ever talented and inspiring artist of all time. Congress man, please SHUT UP! Nobody wants to hear your idiotic, insensitive babbling! God speed Michael!

Don in Toledo   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

For crying out loud, are we so shallow anymore that we have to make a god out of someone that was very wealthy and pretty sick in the head when compared with everyday norms? There are many more important things we could be doing instead of worshiping Michael Jackson.

Ree Thomas   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Michael Jackson was a Pop Icon
Not an elected official entrusted with the present and the future.
Focus your time and energy on what your constituents elected you for
Let dead issues rest with those who feel touched by them
You are wasting air time by attaching yourself to the shirt tail of a dead man obviously you need to find a more worthy issue to sensationalize and get the free media publicity
You are one of the reasons people like myself have left NY
I feel sorry for the people of 3rd congressional and anyone who would consider you for the senate in 2010

Joe   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rep. King is a hater!!! I think he is mad because when he finally kicks the bucket he wont get the same attention that Micheal has. He’ll probably get an hour or a moment of silence, while Michael will probably get a national stamp or holiday!!!! Tell him to focus on his own personal life and stop judging other people!!!

Kurt Grossen   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

This U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY) SHOULD BE IMPEACHED!!!
He was proven to be NOT GUILTY!

HE WAS NEVER CONVICTED GET OVER IT!

Lon   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

What an idiot! This is what we get from our elected officials. Even if you feel this way, why would you go on national TV and say such things about a fellow human being. Have you no shame congressman?

Edward Bauerle   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

When you can sit here and explain to the American Public why it is that everyday Americans that are accused of Child Molestation, regardless if they are convicted or not, are considered some of the most cruel and evil individuals in the world, and their lives are completely destroyed. But when someone like Michael Jackson dies you celebrate this individual like he was some sort of Amercian Hero. He was accused not once, but twice for child abuse, or child molestation. When you start treating superstars, athletes, politicians, and Pop Stars with the same level you do other Americans, then you can spend more time on this guys death. Until then treat him like every other dirt bag that walks the face of god's green earth.

Charles R Carlson   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

CNN is supposed to be a news channel, reporting the latest important news from around the world. Coverage of one basic story for days on end destroys the importance and relevance of CNN as an important source of real news. You should limit coverage of such stories as Michael Jackson to no more than 15 minutes per hour.

Chuck

The Dungeon   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rick, Peter King can say what he likes. I personally think that you are a pretty good guy; but someone will say something bad about you when you die. I believe Michael did far more good in his life than he did bad.

Tom Alpeter   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rick,

Did Jacko's people buy CNN and change the name to Cnn Never News Land but jacko News? I'm sick of it.

Carl Homish   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Rep. King is correct. M. jackson was a pervert. What is wrong with the people. His music is great but he should never be considered a hero. Put him in the ground and get on with what really matters in this country.

SlimTheMan   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Micheal was found innocent in a court of law. For Peter King to come out and call him these names I believe the Jackson family should sue him for slander!!!

Greffen   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Thanks CNN for the coverage, I've been tuned in 24 hours,since Michael's death. I am heart broken by the death of Michael Jackson. King's comment angers me, there's nothing good about him either. I sure like to see his ugly face, when he lose a love one.

Charease   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

EVERYONE KNOWS MJ The KING of MUSIC is 100% Innocent I am disgusted that CNN is acknowledging this loser. I can NOT wait because here in NY I am getting a grass roots campaign started to vote Against a Disrespectful Loser like King. Michael Jackson would NEVER hurt a child. Those trials were more like extortion lies and money hungry devils.

Andrew   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

Michael Jackson was crap. Hid talent dried up decades ago. He hadn't made a decent song since the 1980s, when most of his idiot, Eurotrash fans weren't even born yet.

He was a self-centered, ego maniacal freak who butchered himself, died his skin, and was constantly in the company of little boys to satisfy his hunger to steal innocence and youth from children – an act of constant revenge against his abusive father.

I have no respect for the people who try to deify this scum bag.

Don Mc Rae   July 6th, 2009 3:40 pm ET

A person is innocent until proven guilty according to our legal system. In the case of Mr. Jackson he had his day in court and was acquitted of all charges. I believe that he was a good person and an outstanding artist.

M.Irving   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

Why does this so called...congressman...a representative of the citizen of America....insist on convicting a man without proof??? Could it be...that...he is trying to use Michael Jackson to cover up his own inadequacy??? I'm sure with even with just a few of the good things which got publicized about who Michael really was.....the congressman realizes that he could not measure up to Michael's greatness...even if he lives 10 more lifetimes. Peter King.....you should be ashamed of yourself for trying to use a dead man's name to get your name into the 'lime light'. You were a nobody before and you are even worst now!!!!! "Put up and SHUT UP."

C Diane Ealy, Ph.D.   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

As anyone with basic knowledge of human behavior knows, the congressman's comments are projections. In other words, if HE were in bed with a teenage boy, he would be having sex with that young person. So he can't imagine someone with a young person in his bedroom NOT having a sexual encounter. I wish people would stop projecting their dark sides onto other people.

Dave Allen   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

Rick:
As Michael Jackson goes, also goes a portion of our own lives. From singing "I'll Be There" with my sister while laying in our bunkbeds in 1971 to singing "Will You Be There" with my now wife when we started dating in 1992, Michael Jackson's music is the soundrtrack to many memories of my life.

We're not celebrating his legal issues or his morals... we're celebrating the end to a part of our own lives...the same way we did for Kennedy, King, Lennon, Presley, Diana and John Kennedy Jr.

As for the congressman's sleepover question: He's correct, I wouldn't leave my kids alone with Michael Jackson...or any adult...not even the morally utopian congressman.

Jo   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

I just can not believe the way people are behaving over Michael's death, Yes, he had great talant. But he earned the name "WACKO JACKO" for some reason!!!!!!
I was sorry to hear about Ed McMahon, but there was very little coverage of his passing, and THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN.
CHECK OUT HIS MILITARY HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He was the kind of man we should be Honoring.

Richard Zillion   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

Stop the madness.After he became famous he used his artistry to become a dangerous pedifile.The ranch the traveling with kids all because he was one of the biggest perves ever!Now Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpten are using this to promote their 10 minutes of fame.This whole mess speaks volumes of the type of society we have become.

Mike G.   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

So The choices for the poll are: "No. His artistry outshone any allegations of impropriety." or "Yes. Stop celebrating him." I voted in support for Representative King's remarks about Jackson. What the other option is saying is that as long as someone is a great artist they are exempt from morals? Jackson, just like you and I are human, not gods. So why is this, human, getting godlike, hero, status? He may have been acquitted but so was O.J. and if but nothing else you must believe he acted inappropriate around children. Should I repeat that... "Children".
But he is a great artist so I guess it makes it alright.

Tadashi Davis   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

If MJ were alive right now this would be libel. It is unbecoming of a US Representative to even go there. First of all no matter what one thinks of MJ, he is dead. He cannot defend himself and to me a cowardly move on Kings behalf. I hope the estate of Michael Jackson seeks a libel suit. Rep. King should have shown more dicipline.

Jen   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

The congressman is dead wrong, there are a lot going on. Americans need a break from economy issues. Entertainment, music is all we've got left and Micheal provided that. Please congressman allow Americans and the world to celebrate and mourn him.

Claudine   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

Look, no matter how you slice it, the Congressman's comments were in poor taste AT THIS TIME. It is unfortunate that his comments are getting so much attention when there are OTHER Michael Jackson related stories that can be covered from a more positive light. I mean, I had never even heard of this guy until he made these comments. He has a right to his opinions and he has a right to make an ass of himself. But I think the family of Michael Jackson has the right to a slander suit. Stating something in the way the congressman did, without the precurser of "I think..." or "I believe...." can get him into trouble....and he may very well deserve it.

Interested   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

This certainly doesn't sound like a comment coming from someone who represents the people. Congressman King looks and sounds angry. Does someone care to find out what's ailing him? Tell him to have some class and let the dead rest in peace. I find his comments very distasteful and offensive!

Janet   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

Rep Peter King's comments on Michael Jackson reflect more on King than on Jackson. Using Michael's death as a platform is acting in a shameful manner and speaks volumes about King's inner life. I think this will have the opposite effect than King had in mind. If the ratings for the news coverage were not there, if people were not interested and watching, other topics would take over. Obviously that has not happened and Rep King is unable to accept that people have forgiven Michael for the allegations at this moment of his untimely passing.

Faye in Arizona   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

To those who are disgusted w ith MJ media saturation: Please try to understand one thing. Musicians reach the heart and soul of some of us. Check out Dr. Oliver Sachs data. I cried like a baby when Sinatra, Lennon, Mercury and Michael Jackson died. I didn't know them. I loved their music and cry that they are silent forever. I watch every minute of MJ news I can find as I did with the other artists.

Richard   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

There is no question regarding Michael's contribution to the music world. He was a genius as he proved himself many times. The concern was his relationships with young children-whether it was a way to relive his own childhood in a non-destructive way or if it was an opportunity to involve himself in some activity that might harm children – questions will always remain – we can not help that

johnnie   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

lets get straight cnn and rick sanchez, you have sunken to a all time low, you know this idiot and moron is dead wrong, and you rick sanchez have no class in the promotion of this non story.cnn is trying to boot ratings, because rick sanchez you have terrible ratings ,because you are a republican errand boy. peter king is helping you and cnn become obsolete with the gop ,going into the abyss.you promote division,michael jackson gave love and united the world, what have you done rick sanchez to make the world a better place, nothing. your a disgrace to journalism and time is not on your side , this king guy just added a another lost to the gop. and wolf blitzer show today is not going to help him or you or cnn period.those are words of hate, michael was never found guilty of that charge by king. your just jealous that michael wil be bigger than elvis in death. rick sanchez you are a hot mess. grow up, oh but you cant. long live the king of pop, what are you the king of rick of. nothing but of the clowns.

don doxsee   July 6th, 2009 3:41 pm ET

steve

The comment made that Mike is a pediphile by this man He needs to look back at his own statement he said I think that mike is guility not I know that mike is guilty. I would sugjust that he turn off his media source or simply turn the chanel no one is making him watch the coverage given on mike. He is a man I take to be well educated right? Im gathering this from the type job he carries Well tell him to pick up his romote control and figure it out. And for his information myself and the rest of the world have not been told that mike is guilty
so yes we want to hear and see the last of what we can about mike and his great tallents. Also tell him that the wars that are happening will go on there will be plenty of time for that coverage.

Boyd Williamson   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

King should respect our justice system, and thus MJ.

Any cases settled out of court are just that: settled. I would also call into question the motivations of anyone who would accept the amount of money that these people did. In doing so, they have pimped their own children with a history that they will never live down, an outcome psychologically much worse than anything MJ is alleged to have done.

Congressman King is also likely aware that it is functionally impossible to be prosecuted for libeling a dead person, making his the cheapest of shots. Did King speak up about MJ while he was alive? Or is he simply pandering to a very lowest common denominator politically?

Jackson deserves to be remembered for being one of the hardest working, and most highly talented entertainers in the history of pop music, who not only brought a pinnacle of quality to his work, he also used his fame to spread a message of racial equality, and to initiate a huge effort to right some of the economic injustice in the world. Ask anyone who participated in "We Are The World" how Michael should be remembered, not Mr. King.

Curtis   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Did anyone tell this Rep. all the good did he's done for people and children around the world.? I guess he wanted less MJ and more on 4th of July. But I assume we'll have another 4th of July next year, but not another MJ ever. Also he was found not guilty of those charges, but that would also be bad judgement for parent to allow there child to stay with a grown man.

S. L. Blakemore   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Pete,

I am glad you finally showed your true self. I had been wondering about you for a long time. Now, we all know. It was your mentality that enslaved blacks from Africa. It was you who burned the cross and hid behind the cone head mask while castrating, raping, and lynching human beings. You will live to regret what you have done. You will be rudely awakened one day to the fact that "We are the World". Michael Jackson gave more money than you or anyone else to help feed the hungry and combat poverty.

Sheryl   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

I'm a single white 39 year old female. I am a big MJ fan and cannot get enough coverage of him. I feel as if i lost a family member and I respect Michael as an artist, a man and a father. Although I am very protective of my small children and don't typically leave them alone with any males who are not blood relatives, so I wouldn't find any reason to leave my children alone with MJ, HOWEVER, I do not believe MJ was a pervert at all. A strange and child like man, yes. But no pervert or child molester. He may have done things that other men wouldn't do, but he is not even close to a regular guy.

Love you Michael, miss you already.

sheryl

Anne   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Mr King's comments are his opinions based on inuendo and speculation. Facts were presented in a court of law and Michael Jackson was found innocent. PERIOD.
It's sad to know that a member of our legislature, has such disregard for the law and places his biased opionions as the higher authority.
No wonder the Republicans are in trouble... a Governor who disappears for 4 days because they feel like it, another Governor who disregards her oath to serve the office of Governor – 17 months before her term has ended, and a Congressman who believes his biased opinions are more valid than the legal process. Wow. Time for me to change parties.

John Neely   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

The Pentagon announced the death of six Marines in Afghanistan today. These are the true heros and once again they go unnoticed. Michael Jackson was a singer with a questionable past, nothing more, nothing less. Our media is out of control.

Jerry Bourgeois   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Dear Rick,

Even Peter King an obvious KINDERCHRISTIAN should know that Michael Jackson is no longer a sinner of any kind. The wages of his sins have been paid with his death. We honor Michael Jackson for his historical contribution to our cultural growth and the many causes he took on during his life. Mr King might not need or miss Michael but believe me hundreds of millions are mourning his death.

Such short sightedness and narrow mindness is a big part of the problems that the Republican Party is having to endure. In the words of some wiseman "if you snooze, you lose".

Love your show.

Soli   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

I am not surprise all the negative comments are coming from a Republician. Republicians have to leave their negative marks where ever they go. This goes to show- older age does not always equal to wisdom. Michael Jackson deserves all coverage he is getting.

Adam   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Welcome to the sissafication of America. A suspected pedophile,with basically white children and a Daddy dont like me disorder, who cares. BURY HIM ALREADY!!

mitzi mitchem   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Since when did a congressman become anyones judge and jury. He was found innocent or did you take the time to learn that. I am outraged that people think their opinions matter. Who cares what Peter King says, I'd have more confidence in Michael Jackson than anyone in Washington at this point. Is this what were paying our politicians for, to run down deceased individuals so they can't defend themselves. Why should politicians have the right to tell us what we should see and what we should not see. "You don't control my television". I can tell you one thing I would rather see Michael Jackson over and over again that to see. Sarah Palin step down as governer of Alaska anyday. I thing Peter King should be sued, he is a congressman that's not his job, his job is in Washington and from where i sit, Washington not looking so good so Mr King stick to your day job

Sharon A.   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Was Michael Jackson a controversial figure?- Yes! However, the last time I checked being acquitted by a jury of your peers still carries weight. Was this not the case with Michael Jackson? How sad that Rep. King is not content that the Judicial system that he represents found MJ not guilty. Given the fact that MJ has not even been buried yet, it seems to be the height of disrespect to publicly denounce him. While he is certainly entitled to his opinion, as a Congressional representative, he might consider that expressing his opinion is fine, but consider doing it with grace and class such as was the case of President Obama when recently remarking about Michael Jackson. Regardless of his opinion, Michael Jackson was a prolific, public figure who did more for unity across the globe, never mind music, than any single individual of the 20th century. How many people have achieved that? At least give the man his due.

Jeff   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

While no one disputes Michael was an unbelievable talent albeit one of the best performers of the 20th century. He is still a pedophile, drug addict who does not need to be celebrated to excess in the media. I am sick of hearing about him. Is there no other news in the world today?

Tina H., Arkansas   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

I think there should have been a 4th choice. He was absolutely NOT Guilty. The trial, the testimony, the witnesses... He was INNOCENT.
I find it reprehensible that a congressman would perpetuate these allegations when they are FALSE> Should he suffer some false allegations and see how it feels?! How about what statements from Rep. King is doing to Michael Jackson's children and mother and family? I am a longtime fan and my children are fans... we are grieving like we have lost a friend... not just a musical icon. Would I let my kids stay with Michael Jackson, Hell YES I would have. Eccentricities aside, this man was NO "pervert"... not even close.
Rep. King, you disgust me. The world is mourning and you want your 15 minutes... How about doing something positive instead of hanging on the coattails of a brilliant, giving, decent and astonishingly generous human being?

Walter   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

Rep. King should look into his own HOUSE before he starts throwing stones. There are a lot of perverts in congress.

shelly   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

I WOULD LIKE TO SAY ABOUT PETER KING REMARKS ABOUT MICHEAL JACKSON BEING A CHILD MOLESTER,FIRST OF ALL MICHEAL HAD 32 CHARITIES THAT HE WAS INVOLVED IN,HOW MANY DOES THE GREAT PETER KING HAS OR DOES HE HAVE ANY CHARITIES AT ALL THAT HE IS IN..HE WAS INNOCENCENT OF THE CHARGES HOW WOULD HE FEEL IF HIS FAMILY MEMBER WAS IN MICHEAL SHOES AND SOME IDOT TAKED ABOUT PETER FAMILY MEMBER LIKE HE DID....HE MIGHT THINKS THIS IS ENOUGH OF COVERAGE THATS FINE BUT HE NEEDS TO WATCH HIS MOUTH AND DON'T BE SUCH AN A********* ABOUT IT! THERE IS OTHER WAYS TO SAY THINGS INSTEAD OF BEING A JERK.....I WONDER WHAT IF NEWS PEOPLE LOOK IN PETER'S CLOSET WHAT WOULD THEY FIND....OR MAYBE NOT?EVEN IF IT WAS TRUE (I BELIEVE IT WASN'T,MICHEAL WOULD NEVER HURT A CHILD)HE STILL DESERVE EVERYTHING HE'S GOTTEN CUZ OF THE IMPACT HE HAD ON THIS WORLD.......IF MORE PEOPLE CARED LIKE MICHEAL THIS WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE INSTEAD OF PEOPLE OPENING THEIR MOUTHS AND NOTHING COMING OUT OF IT BUT GARBAGE CUZ MICHEAL WAS MORE CARING THAN PETER KING....WHAT THIS SO CALL CONGRESSMEN IS JEALOUS CUZ PEOPLE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT MICHEAL NOT HIM....PETER KING NEEDS TO WORRY ABOUT HIS AFFAIRS IN NEW YORK AND LEAVE THE REST OF US(MICHEAL FANS)ALONE SO WE CAN MOURN FOR A GREAT MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chrissy   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

I have NEVER been a M.J. fan but after watching all of the news shows about him I must admit I am a fan now! He did soooo much good for underprivaleged people, he was a wonderful father that is undisputable! Whatever happened in his personal life was undoubtable tragic but his good definately outweighed the bad. Please let this great person rest in peace!

Barb   July 6th, 2009 3:42 pm ET

HEy Rick,

Here's an idea! Can the Jackson sue the Congress man for slander?

Mark   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

In some ways Michael Jackson was not grown up but in others he was more mature than many of us. I've watched his amazing videos "Black Or White" and "We Are The World". In Black Or White he dances with dancers from different parts of the world and in the end of the video you see faces of many different faces morphing one into the next, each lip syncing to the music. It starts with an Asian male face. His turns into an African American female face. She turns becomes a White female face. It goes on like that for about a dozen faces. What a wonderful message the the images make together with the words "It doesn't matter if you're black or white"...in a world where so much racism exists. It was certainly a more positive message than anything Congressman King has brought to the world. That is why so many people miss him.

gbb   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

I agree that we should move on to some real news and information. I also feel that Congressman King's comments were out of line. There is less than no need to dredge up unsubstantiated allegations at this time. It is simply divisive and counterproductive. What possible good could be achieved from that? Congressman King may want to consider going back to work and earning his $174,000 annual salary, per diem, and other perks.

Ruby Coria LA., CA.   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

Rick, the part of who gets what? and how much drug played a part of? who cares! The fact is, The World Loves him, & he is King. To those who say this or that.. the fact is Not Guilty! Long live the King Jackson! see u.

tangledweb   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

I can't believe some of the things being written here! Have some of you lost your mind. MJ had mutiple big time problems. He DID give underage boys alcohol to drink! He DID sleep with underage boys in his bed! And multiple other things that are not considered normal behavior. Yes, he was a musical genious and no one will ever be able to arrange and dance a number like him or write his kind of music But, he was not a God. We can certainly celebrate his talent, but by no means celebrate or condone some of the things he did in his life. Actually very, very sad, for him, his family, fans, the children that he violated, but mostly HIS CHILDREN!!

msbay01   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

Why is no one saying anything about the boy (who is now a man) who was descent enough to come forward admitting that his mother put him up to accusing Michael Jackson of molesting him for money? He said the man didn't touch him and he apologized. It made the news then, it was some years ago after all of this happened.

Evelyn Mills   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

Rick,
If it walks,talks,and looks like a duck. It is a duck.You don't sleep with young boys,build a home like Neverland and pay millions to hush people . In the early years he was a great entertainer but that he all he was..Lay him to rest and move on.

Peter   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

A lot of people defend Jackson because he was acquitted of all charges. Rick, I've got news for you. SO WAS OJ! Do people actually believe OJ was not a murderer? You and I both know that the courts treat celebrities differently than the rest of the population. The media should stop glorifying the pedophile freak.

Morgan   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

Shame shame, shame on you congressman King. MJ, rest in peace!!!

brandon northe   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

this man is a real "donkey".......he needs to get back to his job and leave M.J alone and allow him to rest in peace. It was people like him that drove micheal to his death. Such a fool.

Cynthia J-Atolaiye   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

I think the statements were wrong. All the allegations against Micheal could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt and for God's sake, the guy is dead. Show some respect. I am highly disappointed that King is an elected official.

Tim   July 6th, 2009 3:43 pm ET

Rick – What the congressman said is completely inappropriate. That being said, I agree that comments like this will grow in number is the media doesn't stop the 24/7 Michael Jackson coverage after the memorial service. I was a big MJ fan, and Jackson was an amazing musician, but I am astounded and a bit embarrassed by the volume of coverage. I also find it a bit hypocritical that every network commentator in existence now seems to be a Michael Jackson worshiper, when over the past decade this artist has had basically no major coverage aside from his criminal proceedings and the negativity surrounding his personal life.

Sarah Lee   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

That foolish man King is evil, and that ugly woman Candy Crowley agreeing with him she is also evil and racist ,that woman hates Obama, how can you say evil things about people when they dead ,his time will soon come .

milesz   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

With all the whoopla surrounding Mr. Jackson's passing and the overwhelming attention given to it, I wouldn't be surprised if there are calls for him to be canonized, to become a saint, and then, gulp, resurrected and written into the New Testament as a savior of mankind. P.S. All this is said sarcastically, but it is said to show how many screws are becoming undone in this nation over this one individuals – - – who does not deserve it.

Rick, Florida   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

Regarding Rep. King; "Wow, a member of the "DO NOTHING Congress" is showing signs of jealousy towards Michael Jackson – a "DID SOMETHING American citizen." Michael was a "TRUE representative" of the people of the United States of America. Rep. King just wears the title.

Alayna   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

The Republicans once again show what hypocrites they are with this latest statement by Peter King. Aren't they supposed to be strict adherents to the laws and tenets of this country? If so, whatever happened to "Innocent until PROVEN guilty"?

Anyone with half a brain can see that MJ was a sitting target for any opportunist who wanted to hit him with a lawsuit with trumped up false charges, and the background of those who brought the lawsuit(s) was shady at best, including past attempts to extort money from JCPenney and other large entities with fabricated charges.

Once again, the party of "family values" show their true colors with this vicious attack so soon after the death of such a relevant icon. What about the feelings of his family? And on the heels of the whole Sanford and Palin debacles, no less. Stop making judgments about others and take care of the huge mess in your own house, Peter King.

Gerald   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

I wish people would stop dogging Michael Jackson. Peter King is an IDIOT for saying those words. Michael Jackson was and is loved world wide. This is the biggest shock that could ever happen. We have lost a great humanitarian, hero, and entertainer. Peter might have the last name King IDIOT, but we love and miss the KING OF POP!

Toronto.Al   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

All media readership & access is thriving with news on M.J.
i.e. The majority of the sensible world is for additional news.
In fact, more should be stated about how many thousands of lives were saved with the 'We Are The World' initiative.

Mathew   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

I thought to myself after I had watched the video of Peter King, How could a man who helped millions, donated more then 300 million dollars to charites and was just a child himself hurt children after the childhood that he has been through?

Donald Bigbee   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

when I hear or see anything about MJ while viewing..I hit the remote button to change channels. King is right. If coverage had stopped a
week ago, it would have been too much coverage. Please give the
viewers relief and stop worshipping this pervert.

Frank Dunlap   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

The courts found Jackson innocent the same way they did O. J. Simpson-Money!!!!!!!

Phil Eichinger   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

the stinken Republicans have ruined this country,
but they got this one right he was all of those things that Rep. King said.. Go Rick don"t be washey. pick a side and go with it .
thanks
Pe

j.colon   July 6th, 2009 3:44 pm ET

Mr. Peter King overreacted and sounds like a jealous child. The people have set him (Michael Jackson) free and Americans want more of him. We live in a land of laws. He appears to want to make up his own.

Get over it Mr. King – You chose the wrong time and place to hit below the belt on this one. jcolon

Stephania Burns   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

I think Congressman King's comments are ignorant and insensitive. I would think that a congressman would know that people are innocent until proven guilty in this country. Michael Jackson was aquitted on all charges brought against him and his out of court settlement on other allegations does not prove his guilt. It is disrespectful to make such comments about a man who is regarded by the world as the King of Pop. If the Congressman feels that the media has given too much attention to Michael Jackson, he is entitled to his opinion. But to call Michael a child molester and a pedophile is totally out of line.

Curtis   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

As I read this comments, I just have one question for those who is downing MJ. Are you saying that our court system is wrong? HMMMM

el1zabeth daniels   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

Mr. Sanchez,

You must be AWARE that Michael Jackson opened doors
for ALL of you..yes including YOU fore you are Hispanic.
So, honor him...take lessons from Mr. Lemmon!!!!!

Richard Warren Morris   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

Jackson is appearantly as guily as O.J. There have been nine days so far on this subject that should have been several 5 minute updates with new developements. ALL news was dropped for this musical felon. N. Korea was talking about nuking us for searching ships. Iran was killing its people and throwing out the press. Afganistan has gone red hot with Pakistan in it too. Honduras is having a civil war. CNN and all others STOPPED all of that for this freak. This country is approaching 350 MILLION people, a TINY PERCENTAGE give a damn about the child molester. WELL OVER 300 MILLION PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT THIS ASS.

To quote Mark Twain who covered this subject more than 100 years ago;

"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter
saying that I approved of it."

Kevin OConnor   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

I think Mr. Kings comments are in poor taste. His attempt to wave the flag for the troops overseas and insulting Michael Jackson makes me wonder who he is meeting in the men's room. Why did he join the National Guard in 1968, not to fight the war.

anka_m   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

as a former Soviet Union citizen i am HUGE fan of MJ. he is one of the most interesting people in the contemporary US history. Americans should be proud of him, exraordinary people like him is what makes America so interesting to the rest of the world. not, the wars Americans wage or crisises they create.

a.

Shivali   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

If a father accepts millions of dollars in exchange for an unsettled MOLESTATION CASE regarding his own son, clearly Michael Jackson is not the one with the problem. This world is full of greedy, selfish, attention seeking people- Congressman King included.

MICHAEL JACKSON WAS ACQUITTED! And I'm not sure King should be a congressman if he lacks basic understanding of our judicial system.

Last point- I HEARD CONGRESSMAN KING IS A PEDOPHILE! SPREAD THE RUMOR!

Donald in CA   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

Rep. King has always been a racist pervert. Rep. King has no complaint when Elvis is celebrated every day. You can even get married with Elvis look a likes in Vegas every day. Rep. King represents like minded people, so his seat isnt at risk.

karl tollefson   July 6th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

so since rep king was sooooo involved with the IRA in his travels to ireland and involvement with IRA members in the 1980's and even making this statement & i qoute"“We must pledge ourselves to support those brave men and women who this very moment are carrying forth the struggle against British imperialism in the streets of Belfast and Derry.”
oh so does that mean we should consider mr king a low life murderer with blood on his hands... hmnnn. get a grip rep king mr jackson was acquited in this countrys legal system wether you like it or not. have you been acquited of your involvment with the IRA and helping them with weapons and killings and death...???? should we start callling you a low life...??? how do we know you dont cheat on your wife like some politicians with a hooker or gay services..??? remember what goes around comes around in this world and your a sad sad man to bash a dead person.

Louis Bayard   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

I totally agree with what he says. You should not put someone accused of that kind of crime on a pedestal, regardless to his popularity .Anyone accused of child molesting is usually looked down upon by everyone. He paid to get off the first charge as to the second charge we all know about the court system. It is only as good as the lawyer you can afford. How many things were not admissible in trial. The famous charter of rights. Think about the parents and the kids that have been involved this will effect them for the rest of there life. As I always say, before you decide anything think to yourself what if it was a member of my family who would have been abused and gotten away with it. It is often people of high authority who get away with it such as religious persons, leaders of different club for kid's sport's etc

rory   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

It takes one to know one

Stephen   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

CNN, what a bunch of hypocrites! How many times did we hear about how OJ was guilty, _before_ the civil trial, from the same who cry about Jackson being acquitted? Sanchez, you complain about Rep. King having a soapbox that the ordinary guy on the street doesn't have, making his words more powerful. Yet you use your soapbox daily to spew vitriol against those whom you disagree with. I call you out, you hypocrite!

Hanna   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

who does he think he is He was found not guilty by his pears and no other charges where filed I thought you where inocent in the american justase system. If I was Mj lawyers I would be sueing him for slander.

Kenisha Marie   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

It's called " NEWS" and if people are disinterested in what "News" is being reported or covered, change the channel! As for the congressman, he is no humanitarian what so ever. Michael Jackson is dead, where was his big loud mouth comments while he was yet living. The congreeman can make a bold statement on camera now, I don't recall any statements as such during the trial periods of too much media when the media was busy poking and prying into the private life of Michael Jackson. This congressman has no dignity and obviously no morale for himself to make such a comment in the public eye. Children can hear his negative comments as well via the "NEWS", what is he influencing upon the children of America in all his politcal glory.

Pollyanna   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

How would Mr. King know if there is too much coverage of MJ? He must be watching all of it. Even though MJ passed on June 25, I am still so hurt and upset about it. I have his music in my cd player in my vehicle and before his death, I thought about changing it to something else. But, I didn't because his music makes my soul feel good. MJ has found his peace that he could not find on this earth.

Brandon - Jamaica, NY   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

Rick,

Though entitled to voice his opinion on the media's "extensive" coverage of Jackson's death, Rep. King should acknowledge people's ability to balance their adoration for Michael Jackson as a music artist with their ambivalence concerning the numerous allegations of pedophilia. To summarize his legacy by branding himas a deviant is terribly unfair, especially considering his acquittal several years ago. For all his tact on the subject, Pres. Obama's comments struck the appropriate tone.

Amber, Brooklyn   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

I found it very amazing that not ONE person who knew him personally had anything ill to say about him. This is a man with an extraordinary kind heart: they said that a gentler person you could not meet. With all his fame, both poor and rich, his personal friends and his employees said that he displayed such humility that was amazing for a person of such fame. He displayed love, kindness and generosity to those that matter most: the poor and children – that more than anything else reveals the condition of his heart. About him being a pedofile – his close friends' children who spend much time with him and even went on tour with him, all said that they never felt threatened and at no time did they even feel uncomfortable with him, e.g. the son of Brando. These facts leaves questions as to whether in fact Michael was framed and a victim of extortion. As to his sleeping with children: it appears to me that he was re-enacting what he wanted his father to do to him as a child – to tuck him in at night. He even said he thought it to be a natural act and he said it with such innocence as a person without anything to hide – to the pure all things are pure. I am not defending him by any chance, but you have to let a man's life be the judge of himself. Rest in peace Michael and I do trust that you had made your peace with the Lord. I even heard that he had called on a minister of the Gospel a few weeks before and that minister had presented the gospel to him and had given him that chance. Only God knows. Let us not be the judge, leave it to God.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

Shame on you Mr.Congressman.What comes out of the mouth shows us what's in the heart. Dirty words,dirty mind, Wonder who the real pervert is???

sylvie   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

Just like a republican,to say something like that.They are all the same,all attention seekers.they will say,do anything to be at the front of the news.wow you will never compare are comme close to be like michael.he will always be remembered for the good he as done.more then alot of republicans ever did.thank god democrats are in charge.

smartmove   July 6th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

How rude and insensitive. Who cares what representative King thinks. He is terribly out of line. What about respect for a grieving family. If Mr. King's personal opinion were so respected, he would have been the one to decide Michael Jackson's fate in court. Thank goodness, our legal system protects us from baffoons like this.

Mr. King is exactly what is wrong with the Republican party – closed minded, negative, mean and ignorant people. He is supposed to be representing our government and a judicial system that acquitted Mr. Jackson on all counts – 14 of them.

What an embarassment to the Congress and the people of New York. I hope someone sues this loud mouth.

N.J. Nieseler   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Didn't Michael Jackson say he DID not sleep in the "bed" with
I saw a TV interview, some time ago. where he said he slept on the floor. It is true that could pretain to one situation but I don't think so.
I do NOTagree with Senator King! Yes he is intitled to his own opinion. But to show such a vindictive statement, was not in my opinion, a very smart choice. I feel the man has a chip on his shoulder and sounds a bit hostel . Michael Jackson was proven NOT GUILTY. Might it not be rude, heartless, inconsiderate and crule, to make such a harsh statement, being a public figure, for the world to hear? If I lived in New York I sure as -- wouldn't vote for you a second time based on your accusatory accusations Peter King!

flutterfly55423@yahoo.com

Ms.Tiffany B.   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Rep. King should be ashamed of himself. How dare he speak that way about a man that has done so much good for the world! Michael Jackson was not only a great artist, who was full of creativity, but he was a humanitarian. Regardless of the media attention that this story is receiving, I believe rep. King just wants his 15minutes of FAME. He should have some respect and shut his mouth. R.I.P M.J.

la baha   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Rick

I'm not agree with King ,because M J was a great personality, a superstar it is a his last day on Earth please let him rest in peace he deserve that. King God only can judge us not you

Carl   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

I totally agree with Congressman King. We all know Jackson led a bizarre private life. He certainly had strange and suspicious events involving children. Paying off a case to make it go away, sleeping with children and admitting these weird occurrances makes it even more highly questionable. If not a pedofile, he certainly was flirting with that role regardless of the court decision. Why did a case even have to reach the court?? Why did he even have to pay off a family?? Extremely serious allegations that repeated over time. NOT JUST ONE EVENT.

The court aquitted OJ too, didn't they! How did we all feel about that decision... easy to forget when it is convenient.

drahcir61   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

I find it repulsive that anyone would judge Michael Jackson based solely on allegations against him. Terrible allegations do not make a man guilty. The reality is that many people saw an opportunity & extorted millions of dollars from him. Was he different? Of course. But our society created the frenzy that became his life.

Michael Jackson donated and raised millions of dollars for beneficial causes through his Heal the World Foundation, charity singles, and support of over 35 charities. I'm a white guy in my late 40s & I pose this simple question to Representative King, how do YOUR charitable contributions stack up against those of Michael Jackson's?

Kathie   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

I find Peter King's remarks revolting! I find that when someone makes such harsh remarks as those it usually is the person saying it that is hiding their own flaws. So could it be that Mr. King is a pervert? A pedophile? Child molester? Or just likes little boys??? Hmmm, I wonder, Mr. King!
Truthfully, it does not surprise me that these words come from a Republican...........they are the party of rich, old white men with very few women!
May Michael Jackson rest in peace and bless his family at this time! We have lost an icon much too soon but fortunately for us he will live on forever in his music and videos!

lucy   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Rick,
Doesn't Congress have enough to focus on without being concerned about Michael Jackson? And, isn't mentioning him in such a negative way just furthering the media coverage?
lucy

Belinda   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

I do believe Mr. Jackson was acquitted by his peers. If I was the Jackson's I would sue him. MJ was the greatest POP star of all times and brought about blacks on MTV and being accepted. No person is a saint but by all means lets let a Congressman or whatever he is tell the world MJ was no good. Remember thos who live in glass houses should not throw stones first.

yasmin espinoza   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Congressman King, seats on the Intelligence commeittee for this country! Wow can he read the FACTS first on mj trails first ,before comment are made .Please step aside.Your are what wrong with our elec officers.Dont know facts!! UH? Please turn the channel if you dont like what you see.

Randy   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Um, why focus on what the man was aquitted from? It's sad enough to lose a person, but to out right kick him and his family while in mourning is horrible. Let the man rest in peace with the name King of Pop, like we did when Elvis died, knowing he was a cocaine addict and known racist, he lays in peace and honored by the memory of great entertainment. Yeah Mike had some questionable actions and habits, but let him be. Congressman...focus on politics, your job. This is where freedom of speech is still free but awkward!

freida   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Let's see, Elvis was involved with Pricilla when she was 14yrs old. Jerry Lee Lewis married a 13yr old relative. MJ was dragged thru the mud and aquitted in court. The Congressman is old enough to remember Elvis and J. L. Lewis. Will he come out and say Elvis and J. L. Lewis are PERVERT'S.

Don in Toledo   July 6th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Granted, Mi8chael Jackson worked very hard when performing and was very good at what he did, but we paid him an awful lot of money to entertain us. That is all it is, we pay and you, Michael Jackson, will entertain us. If I'm going to celebrate anyone's death, I'll celebrate the First Responder that responded to my heart attack. He was more of a hero than Jackson ever will be (and that first responder got paid a lot less than Michael).

Yolanda   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

I find the first accusation as trying to "extort" money from Michael Jackson. The father making the accusation in a tape said that he... "if I go down with this, I will be making it big." The father got what he wanted. It took the innocence that Michael wanted to give to the children that were handicapped, poor, and had cancer. The second trail probably learning from the first...don't settle with money...was acquitted.

Courtney Anne   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

I am tired of hearing from all of the MJ haters, I hope someday they have a miserable life. He did not hurt children, and now he is in god's hands as an angel to the world.

Kiki   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

Congressman King is right on!!! Obama took 3 days to comment on the murder of the young recruiter gunned down by a Muslim terrorist on our very soil. And was this young man's commander-in-chief! And now obama has gone all out commenting on michael jackson and sending condolences to his family, etc. Where are HIS priorities? Congressman King is the true American with the guts to tell it like it is. Enough about michael jackson. Lets celebrate our true American heros that put their lives on the line everyday for us ungrateful, mindless nuts.

Jim Wellwood   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

I was watching a short piece on Iran today and I was struck once again the one thing that keeps us free and makes this country great. That is the freedom of the press, that estate that keeps us informed and makes sure that our leaders are held responsible for their actions. The politions and the beauracrats of this country cannot lie to us because you in the media will give us the truth.
Your breathless reporting on the minutia of the Jackson story is becoming embarassing. I watch CNN religously every day to get my news because I think your coverage of the events of world is the most even handed and fair. I realize that this man had an influence on our society, but so did Donald Runsfield, in fact I think there is a good argument for Mr. Runsfield having much more of an effect on this country and it's people than an entertainer who had what could be labled an ambiguous lifestyle. Iran is extremely important to our lives, our real hero's are fighting and dying in Afganistan.
I feel like I have been watching 'Entertainment Tonight' the last few days. I may not agree with the comments of this congressman about Jackson, but I do most assuredly think that the media has spent much too much time on this persons death.

Bob Perlman   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

Rick, I am a registered, card carrying, dues paying, Obama/Clinton loving Democrat. I hope I speak for others when I say that MJ was a freakish, perverted weirdo, albeit very a talented one. I fell sorry for his millions of fans. Not so much for the thousands of hangers on who have to look elsewhere for their next gravy train. I also believe that the cnn 24/7 nonstop news coverage is an embarrassment to our celebrity crazed culture. Come on people, get a life!

R. T. NICHOLAS   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

RICK, HERE IS A GOLD MINE OPPORTUNITY FOR ONE OF YOUR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTERS TO START LOOKING INTO THE PRIVATE LIFE ON CONGRESSMAN KING AND DEVELOPING A FOLLOW-UP STORY ON HIS COMMENTS OF THE KING, MICHEAL JACKSON. PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES SHOULD NOT THROW STONES.

Fiona   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

I find it funny that even in saying we should stop talking about him We still are. It's undeniable that Michael Jackson's music has touched people all over the world. I'm in Jamaica and we are all grieving here. Right now should be about celebrating his life and consoling his family. Anything else at this point is just ridiculous.

jessica, texas   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

Michael was AND STILL IS innocent!!!! Also, just because Rep. King hasnt been in the news that much and Michael has, doesnt mean he can say that. And if they dont want to see MJ's face, then dont watch it !!! But some other people do. LIKE ME!!!! Michael is very talented and amazing!
Rep. King just embarrassed himself, yeah buddy!

LEAVE MICHAEL IN PEACE ! I LOVE YOU VERY MUCH MJ & FAMILY!

Monika Half   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

sent to Mr. King on his website...

Why not focus on the perverts in your own party and stop deflecting to rumors and allegations that were disproved?

No one cares about your "opinion" regarding Michael Jackson, especially since it IS only an opinion and not based on proven fact. Who made you God? I would think that He is the only One in a position to judge at this time.

Does it anger you that people may be sick and tired of hearing about the current state of affairs regarding wars, economic chaos, greed, and political lobbying against the correct way forward? Michael Jackson spent millions on helping children and sharing Neverland with those who were sick and dying.It could be his parents were desperate and needed the money because of our sorry state of health care in this country. Why don't you work on fixing that?

mike   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

I wonder what Mr. King was doing on Elvis death day (August 16, 1977). Or was he mourning the loss of an overweight, prejudice, drunkard who rolled over in his grave at Graceland when MJ married his daughter? Media coverage is over the top, I agree, but to slander MJs name like that is just utter disrespect and to put it bluntly.... RACIST! Lng live the King of Pop!!!!!! ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bonnie   July 6th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

Rick,
For Rep King to make a comment so malicious about Michael Jackson is outrageous! MJ was cleared in court. Rep King is voicing his opinion to openly slander him. It's obvious he soliciting media attention. Shame on you Rep King.

OWL   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

DEAR RICK,

I AM A VET AND I RESENT THE ATTEMPT THAT REP KING IS TRYING TO SLANDER THE NAME OF MICHAEL JACKSON. THE MAN HAS NOT EVEBN BEEN INTERRED AND THIS QUOTE, "REPRESENTATIVE" HAS THE GALL TO DEFAME AND SLANDER HIM. MICHAEL JACKSON WAS TRIED AND ACQUITTED BY A JURY OF HIS PEERS. I REPEAT.. ACQUITTED. NOT CONVICTED.

WHAT IS KINGS CLAIM TO FAME? A VOTING RECORD IN CONGRESS THAT FOLLOWS THE SAME PARTY LINE THAT GOT THE REPUBLICANS THROWN OUT OF OFFICE IN THE LAST ELECTION. HOW MANY RECENT BILLS HAS HE SPONSORED THAT WERE PASSED? ZERO – ZIP – NONE. HERE IS THE LINK FOR HIS VOTING RECORD http://www.opencongress.org/people/voting_history/400219_peter_king

HE VOTES WITH THE PARTY LINE AND HE IS SOMEONE WHO IS OUT OF STEP WITH CURRENT ISSUES AND IS DOING NOTHING BUT TRYING TO GET HIS 15 SECONDS OF FAME AT THE EXPENSE OF MICHAEL JACKSON;S DEATH.

HE NEEDS TO STOP VOTING THE PARTY LINE AND REPRESENT THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED HIM, AND STOP TRYING TO SULLY THE NAME OF MICHAEL JACKSON. JUST BECAUSE HE IS A CONGRESSMAN DOES NOT GIVE HIM THE RIGHT TO DEFAME THE NAME AND REPUTATION OF SOMEONE THAT HAS DONE SO MUCH FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY AND BROUGHT SO MUCH JOY AND HAPPINESS TO PEOPLE WORLD WIDE.

Candice   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

He needs to not be a congressman if he does not have faith in the American legal system and believes that it let a man walk free who is blatantly obvious a child molestor. Also, how many times has he met Mr. Jackson in person to truly know his character and pass judgment. Grow up Congressman.

Paula Donovan   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

Yes, kudos to rep King for stating what many of us feel. I was so disgusted with my own home newspaper when they displayed large print at top of page one story of MJ death, but a small item at bottom of page the notice of Farah Fawsett's death. She contributed far more to this world (in my oppinion) than MJ. No, he wasn't found guilty in the courts of child molestation, but everyone that I have talked to, thinks he paid off a lot of people. Stop trying to stir up anger against Rep King, and for God's sake, take away the coverage of Jackson. Enough!

mari, MA   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

I forgot the time when was the first time that he started to say something about MJ, like that topic. What actually happen? Can we find "the victims, who need help" out? That is an important task!
(If I'm missunderstanding the situation, sorry, ignore this comment, please)

William Turner   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

Rep King is another demonstration of what it means to be republican.

Obama is a socialist ,Sotamyor is a racist and M. Jackson is a pervert. These names would never be used if the targets were a white male. Minorities and women are not worth the effort for common decency. My first thought on hearing his comments were, he's dead but his mother is still alive and has to listen to this crap from an elected official. Politally correct or incorrect it shows a complete lack of respect to his family, oh yes they are minorities so why bother?

Carol   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

Rick seems to have a hero complex and it's offensive. His bully-boy facial expressions as he described Peter King commenting on the excessive coverage of a very questionable icon shows tremendous bias and differs very little from someone supporting O J Simpson. The only mistake King made was to speak in absolutes rather than to use a term like "the man's reputation is too tainted and suspec for him to be held up as an icon to OUR CHILDREN under the circumstances". I also really dislike the stacked survey which seems to give you two choices – outright condemn Jackson as a more or less proven pervert or tell the media its OK in the warped message its sending our children. Quite trying to be such a nice guy Rick, it really doesn't fit.

Sharon   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

Sounds like to me the congressman is just a little jealous; he is also a jerk. Why would you talk about the dead like that. MJ can not defend himself and his family, especially his mother shouldn't have to hear about this noise in the news. Read this...http://awkwardstar.wordpress.com/2009/06/27/jordan-chandler-admits-he-lied-about-michael-jackson/

This kid Jordan Chandler lied about this case in 1993 so his father could get money, he claimed his father made him do it, now if the congressman want to say something about someone it should be about the father of the lying kid, and MJ was aquitted on the last case; so the congressman need to go and settle some real business in Washington and if he does something memorable when he dies they will have a lot of coverage on him. What will your dash say congressman? MJ's dash 1958 – 2009; although he had some bumps had a significant dash. God Bless Michael Jackson and his family.

s watkins   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

michael jackson was a great entertainer and performer..he was not, however, deserving of adulation to the point of making him mother theresa..even his friend lionel richey said neither he nor michael jackson could read or write music, which means they depended a lot on others..he was aquitted of the child molestation charges,and i truly believe he was just a confused grown man trying to recapture a childhood he never had thanks to his father..why however, did his other siblings and his mother never speak up against joe jackson and his treatment of mj as a child, but rather leave him to fight his demons alone?..

karl tollefson   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

moral compass of the country eh mr king.... yes we should really cover whats going on with our politicians who cheat... lie... & steal... not only from our countrys coifers and systems... but on their own families.... hmnnn wonder whats up in rep. kings closet....????

Roy Sutton   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

The Media would not be doing it's job if they did not cover Micheal the way they are. The fact is that Micheal is very special and he is loved by millions all over the world, The media only cover him because there is so much interest. The congress man should be a bit more sensitive then to seem so angry over something that so many people care so much about.

Roy Sutton

Karen   July 6th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

Let's put it this way.... I doubt all the media coverage going on is because I'm the only one watching. If the demand wasn't there, the media wouldn't be covering it. Obviously MJ had a large following, much more so than this congressman, what's his name again???

Brigid   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

I admire the work of Michael Jackson and his musical contribution but the coverage has been way overboard to the exclusion of serious issue happening around the world. Get real CNN!

Ryan (palm springs)   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

Um Michael (innocent..stop tainting) PALIN = "IF SHE QUIT AS LD SHE QUIT AS PRESIDENT?" SHE IS A NUTCASE that makes Michael Jackson look normal.

Kitty Williams   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

Can't wait for Peter King to be voted out of office, he's just trying to get votes from those people.

Dennis Hayes   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

By all means...deify pedophiles now.
Cleared of the charges? and how much
was the payout to the kids? Only in America. I rarely agree with Republican
anything, but I agree with this one.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

It is clear that Rep Peter King believes innocent until accused is the new premise of our justice system.

The question is not whether allegations are true or false but why Peter King is so jealous of Michael Jackson's universal adoration.

Could it be that King feels he is not receiving the adoration he deserves so is trying to take some of the lime light from Michael?

Baymba Ellis   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

If I could had the chance to meet with this congressman, I will tell him is his face that he is very stupid and his statement on MJ death ,show to the world that he is not a stateman but a dump ass.

Anastasia   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

He was an amazing person and soul, and everyone who knew him say so. It breaks my heart to hear this. He was aquitted of all charges, so leave him alone! The man hasnt even been put to rest yet and you are bashing at him. Shame.

Chris from Laguna Beach   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

While it's true Michael Jackson was never convicted of child molestation, his behavior was certainly suspect. Court settlements and acquittals don't necessarily prove innocence. Surely no one believes our legal system gets it right every time, especially when expensive lawyers are involved. By his own admission he slept in the same bed as children that were not his own. This behavior from anyone else would clearly be considered inappropriate at best, if not down right perverted. Even after the $20 million settlement of the first allegation he continued to engage in inappropriate relationships with children. There was obviously a compulsion on Michael Jackson's part to create and maintain these inappropriate relationships. Given his prolonged disturbing behavior, calling Jackson a pervert and a pedophile isn't unreasonable. No good parent would let their children go to Michael's for a sleep over. I find it doubtful that even his most ardent supporters would.

Tanya   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

Rep.Peter King,is sooo cold hearted and cruel,and have no respect for the Jackson family,Michael Jackson or nobody else.What he needs to do is to learn some respect for others.Michael have been soooo damaged by the press that it makes no sense.If he would have hardened up a bit and told the press and Mr. Peter King where to go,he would not be in this position.The stress,pressure and strain of the press and other ignorant people like them pushed Michael to the breaking point.Where as he had to take pain killers.The man had too much pain in his life.And the press and other people took advantage of him just pushed him further.He could not have had me for a wife.Because I would have told all of them where to go.They worried about that man`s money,why,why what is it to you all.He`s the one that bledded,sweated,cried and went threw hell for that money.He can do whatever the hack he wanted to with it.It`s his and it is none of nobody`s bussiness what the hack he do with it,It`s his WILL stop being so daggon noisey and think about the good he had done.And the charges was dropped against him.Stop dragging that man`s name threw the mud.Give him his respect and his Family they just lost a son,brother,uncle,cousin and friend.Weeeeeeeeee love Michael stop dogging him.

cynthia futrell   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

good afternoon,....in response to all the negative talk....did the little boy..now an adult come out and said that he was never touchd by m.jackson. his money hungry father put him up to it. its a same that in life, now in death m.jackson has so many haters and people are so miserable. there are hundreds of channels...change the channel ...dont hate on m.jackson...in reguads to peter kinks commit about the locks or hidden locks... i have a lock on my bed room door,..i also have a sercurity system that has zones that protects me in my very little house in farrockaway ny.....just like im sure peter king does in his mansion...he's the worst...he's to old to be a hater of the capacity.

Ronny   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

I have to say this... Representative King... needs keep his stupid comments to himself and get back to work... "We The People" pay his Salary to work on Government Affairs. Maybe if he would focus on his job as much as he focuses on the MJ issues... our Government would be in a better place. Leave the bereavement to those that MJ touched or just change your damn channel. If YOU were so concerned with what the people wanted – he would leave the news to the news journalist and stop trying to be one himself. "Do" the Job WE pay YOU to "Do" and if you have something to say to the press... let it be on the CONTENT you were hired to do! Ronny (someone who enjoyed his music, I understood he had issues {as we all do} and am sad to know the music genius dies with him.) When you die... do you think anyone will care... don't be hating – because you're JEALOUS!

LoriMissouri   July 6th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

He was acquitted... so was OJ. Pedophilia does not constitute "private life" issues. Being gay is a private life issue. Liking to be spanked is a private life issue. Infidelity is a private life issue. Pedophilia is a crime with real victims who will never fully recover. It doesn't matter what a jury of California celebrity-loving sycophants say... the damage does not go away because a jury says it didn't happen. Nicole Simpson didn't come back to life upon OJ's acquittal. Bonnie Bakley didn't come back to life because Robert Blake was acquitted. Michael Jackson's victims will not suddenly no longer be victims because 12 people said they are lying.

NO amount of fame or talent should EVER overshadow the victimization of children. The mere asking of this question is offensive.

Gina Moore   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

I wouldn't let my children sleep over at M Jackson or Rep. P King's house. The question is what were their parent's thinking? Bottom line is "our" legal system acquitted him. So what does that say about the legal system? Are we to believe that Mr. King thinks he has more power than our legal system? I think not! I think Mr. King is trying to get his 15 min. of fame like all the other people speaking out about Michael Jackons's aledged drug activity. Michael Jackson was a very talented artist and no matter what some people may think or say, their comments can not and will not change that fact. To Michael Jackson "REST IN PEACE." your job is done.

Donna   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

OJ wasn't convicted of murder ...but that didn't make him innocent. It just meant he had a darn good lawyer. Was MJ a pedophile? Maybe, maybe not. It doesn't matter now what people choose to believe, the man is dead and regardless of innocence or guilt, now it's a matter only between himself and his maker. He lived a what has been described as a tortured and lonely life that ended tragically too soon. Out of respect for MJ, his family and the fans who loved him it's time to move on and let him finally rest in peace.

Scola   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

Idiot King should be ashame of himself, he should read up on Mr. Jackson before he speak, but that is typical of those people and you know what I mean about those people.. Micheal gave to so many charities that he is the World Book of Records, can Idiot king say that?
In his will the breakdown was said to be 40% to his mother, 40% to his children and 20% to charities.. I think that is wonderful person, that cares about others and he always have...

Peter King is an IDIOT and should read before he opens his pie hole.

Lonnie   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

Micheal Jackson was found not guilty on all counts. Peter King was wrong in calling Mike a pervert, pedophile and child molester. As far as the 1993 case that was settled out of court, from what I understand the then 13 year old boy came forward after Micheal Jackson's death and said he lied about Mike ever touching him. He said that his father made him say all those things just to get money out of Micheal Jackson. I think CNN should look into that. I agree that there has been a lot of coverage on Micheal Jackson, but face it Peter King, Micheal Jackson is big news, Bigger news than you will ever be Peter King. Micheal Jackson has done more to try to make this world a better place and has been honored by the late President Ronald Reagan and many other high ranking ppl around the world.

Ash Paul from PA   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

First off, as few other people said, your poll is definitely messed-up. To me, the second choice is slanting towards the idea that "Yeah, the man might have been a pedophile, BUT...".

Anyway, apparently the word 'acquitted' means nothing to the congressman, who is essentially, in my opinion, bashing a legal system that he follows under. And countering what King had said before, I would have allowed (if I had any) my kids or grandkids to be in the same room as Michael Jackson. And I'm pretty sure many others would've too.

I believe the first allegation was only for the money. I can honestly say if someone had hurt a loved one, no amount of green would stop me from taking that person down. And the second time? Michael was found innocent. Insufficient evidence, stories from the so-called 'victim' and his brother that contradicted each other, and just...Tom Sneddon.

Michael Jackson has given many philanthropic and humanitarian contributions in his life, things that I think people sometimes ignore when looking at Jackson's legacy. And these are the type of things that SHOULD NOT be ignored.

He deserves all this POSITIVE coverage, especially after having so much negative attention while he was alive...

Too much? In my opinion, not at all, not at all.

rod   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

if you are tired of all the media covering the king of pop, turn to another channel it`s just that simple. my mother told me along time ago, if you don`t have anything nice to say don`t say anything. so get ready for super tuesday cause it`s going to be on all day.
people are going to talk negative no matter what, because they are negative, and those are the ones i don`t associate with. most of them don`t even have a life!!

r.i.p. micheal !!

Neecie   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

I'm no "congressman" nor "congresswoman," but maybe I should consider running for office if it's that easy to put even the "ignorant" in office! Is he angry that once he's "expired," that there wouldn't be an eighth of people at his funeral as it will be for the "preverted," Child of God by the name of Michael Jackson? Did his mother teach him this simple concept, "If you don't have something NICE to say, then dont say ANYTHING AT ALL??" OR Maybe this one, "Judge not, that YOU be not judged," since the congressman, I'm sure, believes in God, at least. SIMPLY PUT, MR. "Lead by example," Congressman-Michael Jackson was acquitted of every charge of child molestation and done so by a jury of his peers in our "justice system." So, either you don't believe in that "justice system" MR CONGRESSMAN or there is some other underlying CAUSE for your flat out borderline EVIL and unnecessary comments about a DECEASED man that you NEVER even SPOKE TO, not to mention, spending any time getting to KNOW HIM for yourself so that you can make an adequate "assessment" of his character and THEN SPEAK ON WHO HE IS AND WAS...What's in your closet, sir?? And how much money have you contributed to ANY worthy cause as the "pedophile" did?? God help us elect better officials to REPRESENT US. People like you make me ashamed to be HUMAN...Stop "Bearing False Witness Against Your Neighbor," CONGRESSMAN..or have you found FAULT in the 10 Commandments as well? I will pray for you. –God Bless–

Henry Taru   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

Rick, the US Justice System is the best an finest on earth. It is just like the Military; unrivaled. What that bigot is doing is but displaying the corrosive effect of little or no knowledge at all. The King of Pop was found innocent by the best there is. To all bigots like him I say please get educated this is a brand new world, let us celebrate the legacy of the world's best entertainer ever.

Marques   July 6th, 2009 3:51 pm ET

Rep. King does not represent me or the real "KIng" whether it is Martin Luther King or the King of Modern Pop Culture, Mr. Michael Jackson. Rep. should get a life and help to solve some of the economic woes of this country. Trying to sidetrack real work by critcizing Michael who was not convicted in any court of law is a cheap way for this politician to make himself relevant. Michael has more talent in his pinky toe right now than this jerk has in his entire "overweight body". How many are gonna' show up for his very heavy casket funeral? Certainly not as many as at Michael's.

Sounds like the "Ghost of Jealousy" as Michael once sang.

TreeHugginMama   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

OJ was found "not guilty" too- maybe CNN should consider spending more time reporting on the failures of the justice system than where Michael Jackson's tv was in his bedroom. WTG Peter King! I wouldn't leave my kids alone with Jackson- most people in their right mind wouldn't consider it. This subject is dead- move on!

LA   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

MJ has done more for the poor and disadvantaged kids in the world than you, that idiot King, and the entire U.S. government put together.

I hope the Jackson's do like Bailin' Palin and sue the pants off that fool. I'm sure he didn't think the same when Elvis or Sinatra or Princess Di died. How do these fools get elected to make decisions for Americans is beyond me?!

oxElle   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

OMG I agree with a Republican!!!
I am from the Santa Barbara County, let's not forget his music NOR the fact that he had numerous boy magazines at his ranch and child images on his confiscated computer! Enough! Remember his music but.... please remember the victims as well.

celia Harvey   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

Please tell Republican Congressman King to find something to do! Michael Jackson fans and friends do not need him to speak for us. (Heaven forbid.) I am 66 years old and have loved Michael since the Jackson 5. I do not believe any of those rediculous charges. It was all done for money. Ask his to go and do his job before he gets voted out!

Curtis Baker   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

Can you name me 5 people whose name and face is recognized world wide? (Probably not) Give MJ his due, there has never been anyone who has transcended race had an affect on all demographics through his artistry the way he has. My suggestion, if you don’t like to watch turn the channel.
I want to express my love and condolences to the Jackson family. And to all The MJ haters (GET OVER IT)

Patty   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

I am so saddened by King's comment. It's too bad he's sick of all
the coverage and that he feels comfortable calling MJ "a pervert"
after he was aquitted. I believe in my heart MJ was innocent and
I am enjoying all the coverage on him. I think he was the
greatest entertainer of all time and I am still wondering who
could ever replace him. After watching the BET awards, there
just is no one out there who has that kind of talent and
love for everyone. I would never vote for King.

adela palenzuela   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

To me MJ was a marvelous entertainer, but hes was also a freak......

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

No doubt he was extremely talented. Maybe a reason for some of the things he’s done, but not an excuse. But Michel Jackson is the poster
Child for Drug ABUSE!

LA   July 6th, 2009 3:53 pm ET

BTW.......if Martha Stewart invited a bunch of cancer ridden kids to her house for a sleepover, would you say the same about her?

Anastasia   July 6th, 2009 3:53 pm ET

What nerve! This man did not know michael, and I personally don't even think he knows his music. I would expect no less.

We love you Michael, you will always live in our hearts

george oyemu   July 6th, 2009 3:53 pm ET

Rick. First of all, my message to Rep. Peter King is to shut his big mouth. Second of all, the guy sounds more like a dictator when he wants the media to drop the coverage sorrounding the death and funeral of great legend Michael Jackson. Shame on him.

Tripp   July 6th, 2009 3:53 pm ET

Rick, these people say he was aquitted. Yes that is true, but they all knew he was guilty. Just like people knew OJ was guilty but he was aquitted also. He shared the same bed with other children. These children were not cousins, not his neices or nephews, they were not related to him in any way what so ever. So he could not claim a close bond to them. Some say, his good deeds should out weigh his bad deeds. Yeah right. So if I find a cure for cancer, then it is ok for me to rape and murder, Yeah right. Now about his children. He gave the mother of the children a contract before she had the children. He flashed millions of dollars in her face. Who would not take the money even if the contract was very unfair. Maybe she thought she could live with it. So I do not blame her for not being able to see the children, I blame him, MJ. Hell he would not even let their own mother have pictures of her own damn children in her house. What kind of father "MONSTER" would do that? Well MJ I guess. Also he made it near impossible for her to see the children. Come on a 10 day notice then to meet the children is some undisclosed place, probably somewhere to make it even more difficult for her to see them, and then sometimes he would not even show up with the children. I am sorry, but her is and was a child molester and a MONSTER as a father. No amount of good can beging to out weight the ba he has done. We would not allow this for someone who was not famous to say he did a lot of good to out weigh being a child molester, not even a doctor who saves countless lives, but we do for a celebrity. What is happening to us as a nation that we are willing to allow this type of behaviour just because he was famous. As I said he was aquitted but he did admit to sleeping in the same bed with some children, and that is not proper behaviour, so please people stop glorifying MJ which he does not deserve.

Kenneth Youngblood   July 6th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

Who cares what this Congressman thinks.....he should be talking about why does the media still waste airtime with talk of Sarah Palin and her meaningless contribution to the country.

Celina Bartolomei   July 6th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

What is wrong with you people? Enough of Michael Jackson. People are dying in Honduras, China, Iran and the wars where our young people are fighting. The President is on an important trip and all you are doing is covering Michaels story? Are you also planning a National Holiday? Enough!!!!!!! Celina Bartolomei, Phoenix, AZ

Bree   July 6th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

Hey Rick:

Rep. King thinks M.J. is guilty because he had xtra security leading to his bedroom. Along with everything else going on with M.J., he was paranoid. I live alone in a home with an alarm, and still I put something behind my bedroom door at night bkz I too am paranoid/afraid and I ain't molesting anyone.

C Edgar   July 6th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

I keep wondering how it is that this guy is held up as such an enormous figure of respect. He was a child molester. Since when do we just erase that fact from discussion!? I keep hearing all the people who worship this character talking about how unfair it is that the word, "pedophile" is attached to any reporting. Good Grief!! HE WAS A PEDOPHILE!!

John   July 6th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

A great entertainer but I WOULD NOT LET HIM NEAR MY CHILDREN !

deLeon   July 6th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

Rep. King- you ought to know. Just take a look at yourself &. your colleagues on the Hill and then perhaps you'd shut up. What secrets are you hiding? How do you label yourself when you look at 'the man in the mirror?' Aah, Rep. King, trust me, you are not without sin, nor are your fellow Reps. Airport trysts w/ young men, affairs galore, lies, lies & more lies- You Reps. never learn. Let Michael get his well deserved glory- He gave this country and the world an awful lot. You are posturing for re-election.. Duly Noted. However, do you have any respect for the law of this great land?... MJ was acquitted,or haven't you heard. He was never found guilty of anything- they were allegations, or don't you care about the findings of the court of law. Remember when you point your fingers at anyone...the thumb is pointing back at you... Granny wisdom King...

matthew1924   July 6th, 2009 3:54 pm ET

This was a stupid way to put the question. His talent was legendary but did not outshine any impropriety. There was no impropriety but perhaps awful judgment. Michael was always childlike and very pure intentioned. I think he was a-sexual though he says he liked girls, If he was anything more than a big brother or best friend to any of these boys I would be very surprised and on that ground on;y God knows what is in any mans heart. I know the jury found him innocent.

Peter King imagines he knows every dirty detail of MJ's heart, and I am sure envisions Michael vividly romping with young boys every night . Even if these were suggestions from tabloids, rumours and inuendo.
Perverts are good at calling others disgusting, pros at accusing others of what they are guilty of... in their hearts.

Let's not allow Peter King to make us forget Micheal was acquitted on all charges. The Jackson family should sue Peter King on behalf of Micheal's children, his memory and his estate – for liable.

Michael   July 6th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

Michael Jackson has given a great deal to our wourld thru his music and charities. Why not remember him for all the good he has contributed? I believe that the side you fall on reguarding this issue shows and exposes the true self and nature of the person. For me in this case One bad Apple does not spoil the whole bunch.

Dee   July 6th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

I do not agree with the comments this so called U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY) has made about Mr. Michael Jackson. This shows that even in death people can't get any peace. The Congressman is ridiculous, rude and disrespectful to the dead. Mr. Michael Jackson is not even alive to defend himself from such crude comments Congressman Peter King has made against him. I wouldn't trust my children around Congressman Peter King with a mouth as foul as his. Congressman Peter King, show some respect and learn some manners. There are better ways to communicate how you feel about the media coverage without tearing down individuals character.

Angela   July 6th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

THE SENATOR NEED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES THAT THE PEOPLE ELECTED HIM TO DO. HE IS OBVIOUSLY A RACIST, I DID NOT HEAR HIM OFFER ANY COMPLAINTS ABOUT ANN NICOLE OR ELVIS PRESLEYS COVERAGE. THEY WERE CONTRAVERSAL FIGURES YET PEOPLE STILL THINK ELVIS IS ALIVE. I THINK IT IS SAD THE MINDSET OF THIS MAN, CAN HE REALLY REPRESENT THE INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE OF NY CONSIDERING HIS VIEWS OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM HE REPRESENTS WHO HAS ACQUITTED MICHAEL JACKSON. HE ACTUALLY SAYS HE IS GUILTY OF THINGS THAT HE WAS NOT EVEN CHARGED FOR. SENATOR KING IS A DISGRACE TO HIS POLITICAL CAREER

miss Jay   July 6th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

THIS MAN IS SO INCONSIDERATE!!! THE MAN JUST DIED AND THIS IS WHAT HE IS ADVERTISING HIM TO BE. DOESN'T HE REALIZE THE FAMILY IS MOURNING HIS LOST NOW. ALL THOSE ALLOCATIONS I THINK WERE JUST LIES TO GET HIS MONEY. I KNOW M.J ADMITTED TO HAVE BEEN SLEEPING WITH LITTLE CHILDREN. HE SAID THAT IN AN INNOCENT WAY. DOES THAT MEAN HE DID SOMETHING TO THEM. HE WAS JUST SHOWING THEM LOVE LIKE ANY GOOD HUMAN BEING WOULD DO TO ANOTHER HUMAN BEING IN A POSITIVE AND RESPONSIBLE MANNER. HE LOVED CHILDREN. AND MR. PETER KING WAS THE ONLY PERSON WHO CAME ON CNN NEWS AND SAID SOMETHING BAD ABOUT M.J!!!! M.J GAVE CHILDREN THE THINGS HE DIDN'T HAVE WHILE HE WAS GROWING UP BECAUSE OF HIS ABUSIVE FATHER.(E.G NEVERLAND) I TRULY DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT PETER KING IS SAYING.......BEING ALL CRITICAL.... WHY WOULD A JUDGE AND JURY ANNOUNCE HIM INNOCENT IN COURT ?? WHY???? CAN HE ANSWER THAT?

Solange Silvanie   July 6th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

Shame on this stupid Peter King. Defending those opportunistic parents that settled for millions of $. That's pervert parents. Gold diggers. If my kid was molested I would never settled for any money in the world. Michael had done more for the world in his life than this fustrated man had done in 2x his lifetime He better start doing 1/10 of what Michael jackson had done for the world and than start critisizing . May be if he start working in benefit of the people, people might celebrate his life after dead too!

The world have every right to celebrate his life

If he don't want to see or hear about MJ, there is e remote, use it and switch channel!

rod   July 6th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

there`s no such thing as to much coverage for the KING OF POP!!

long live the king!!

r.i.p.

matthew   July 6th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

military coup or not the RIGHT person is out off in Honduras

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

I don't agree at all with P.K. .Michael deserves all this attention because he gave himself completely.He was a kind and gentle person pure in his heart.He never spoke unkindly about anyone nor did he judge .Shame on those who are still judging him maybe you should look in the mirror?Maybe then you'll make a difference!

Kristen Knight   July 6th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

Your answer choices for the poll are all negative. Even the "no" option is loaded. You're CNN – can't you do better than that?

Michael Jackson was acquitted. In a US District Court. Yes, the same US which King "represents" as a Congressman. My God, I thought after Bush left office, we were finally rid of a great majority of seemingly stupid, ill-informed cretins. Then along comes King to prove me wrong. Wow, way to carry the torch.

Even if Michael had not been acquitted, he was not a child molester, or a pedophile, or a pervert, or a low-life.

I acknowledge that each is entitled to his/her own opinion, but at this moment in time – when Michael's family is trying to cope with his sudden death, and when Michael's friends are reeling from his loss, and when fans all over the world are overwhelmed with grief – it would have been completely appropriate for Mr. King to keep his bloody mouth SHUT. Just because he has an opinion (and a CAMERA pointed in his face) does not mean we all need to hear him expound on it. In fact, I don't ever recall asking him for his thoughts about Michael Jackson.

Incidentally, I care very much about the troops and was cited in my local newspaper for sending care packages. So my comment is not about me not caring, or understanding *part* of the point King was trying to make. But he easily could have done so without ever once mentioning Michael Jackson. Instead, he chose to sink to the lowest level a human being can, in my opinion.

Low-life, indeed. Thanks for the example of one, Mr. King - you sure do know what you're talking about.

Daisy Water   July 6th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

This man is entitled to his own opinion of Michael Jackson but as a senator of the state of NY...he has crossed the line by making a public opinion of calling MJ such a name. This was never proved by any court of law. The Jackson family should sue him.

Michael McDowell from Ft Hood Texas   July 6th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

Rick, the country has to admit that Wacko Jacko was probably the weirdest entertainer to have ever lived. His eccentricities are known throughout the world. And his own admission of sleeping with children plus his strange and bizarre behavior brought a lot of criticism which resulted in his reputation as a superstar entertainer being brought into question. Michael's denial of having plastic surgery, when a blind man could see the man had probably dozens of surgeries over his adult life, only added to the jokes and comments. I don't agree with the blatant use of "pedophile" and "pervert" being used by Phil King of New York, any more than he would appreciate being labeled a "thief" and "bought and paid for corrupt politician". Having said that, the coverage of Michael Jackson has been ad nauseum, but I understand what feeds the ratings of news organizations, and if one doesn't run with the ball, then one of your competitors will! Let's let Michael reputation as a great entertainer be the focus for his fans, and let's stop the namecalling Congressman.
If you want to be judgmental, then first of all look within your own body politic and cast your stones of ridicule there!!!

Vivene   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

How dare you use your political status to come in public and bash Michael Jackson-an American icon. What you have essentially done as a public servant is insult the American justice system that found Mr. Jackson innocent. YOU OUGHT TO BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE! Mr. Jackson has done more for humanity than you could ever dream of in your lifetime. People like you thrive on negativity and hate. You are no better than the the Salem Witch hunters. Do us a favor and disappear back in your worthless corner.

JOHN   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

SINCE FACT'S DON'T COUNT TO REPUBLICANS MIKE WAS AQUITED BUT PETER'S THE BIGGEST HYPOCRITE BEING THAT WITH THEY'RE WARMOGERING IN IRAQ THEY'VE HURT AND KILLED MORE TROOPS BY PUTTING THEM IN HARM'S WAY THAN N E TERROIST'S. BLACK'S HAS ALWAY'S KNOWN THAT THE KLAN JUST TURNED TO REPUBLICANS AND THEY HATE AKNOWLEDGING AFRICAN AMERICANS INCLUDING OBAMA..
WHATS NEW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sandi   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

When did Michael Jackson admit to sleeping with children? He never said that. He said the children sleep in his bed and he sleeps on the floor. That is not sleeping with children. He was acquitted of all charges by a jury of his pears. Now unless Peter King has seen Michael being inappropriate with children then this Peter King guy needs to put up or shut up. Show us where Michael admitted to sleeping with children.

Besides, Michael Jackson is dead and cannot defend himself. So it's ok for Peter King to defame him? No it is not. It's disrespectful and wrong.

Gloria G.   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

In relation to the ousting of the Honduras president by forcing him out of his home and country in a plane to Costa Rica, what do you mean Rick by "maybe that is the way they do it there" as opposed to impeachment? Are you implying that those who ousted the president are entitled to ignore the constitution because 'they' found it appropriate? Imagine a similar situation in the US, it would be interpreted as a violation of the constitution and not as an American way of dealing with politics. This is why this is creating such a turmoil. By all definitions this is a coup, and that is the news that ought to be reported. Stop trying to justify it by 'explaining' why this is an exception! Precisely, a democracy is a system that guarantees that a group of individuals does not run a nation as if it were its private property.

Steve   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

No doubt he was extremely talented. Maybe a reason for some of the things he’s done, but not an excuse. Sad that he’s dead, but Micheal Jackson was a Drug Abuser !

matthew   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

How can you just ignore the dark side of Michael Jackson as if it never happened? I agree This is a hero?

Marcus Jalal   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

Pedophile? Pervert? is the Rep. talking about Michael or some of his politician buddies. Let's wait and see what girls or guys surface from HIS past. I'm willing to bet any amount that Heavy K, like too many politicians with mistresses, ain't squeaky clean either. Maybe this fella' needs to start with the "Man in the Mirror"!

delight   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

If California is so broke, how can they possibly pay for all of this for M.J. and still hand out I.O.U.s???? Sick & tired of all the publicity!

Jacqueline   July 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET

Peter King is wrong for his outburst of the coverage of Michael Jackson...his personal feelings and views are not represented of everyone . This man Peter King has made statements against the outcome of the Law 's decision on his guilt . Everyday rich people buy their way out of messes they get in why is Michael Jackson being slandered because he is now dead ? Our Country is already looked at in a pitiful light for not helping their own people when the devastation to Hurricane Katrina victims went unnoticed until they felt like it ...Michael Jackson's troubles with the law never stopped this man from helping people no matter whom they were . If we are gonna be crucufied by a congressman after the courts have already made their decison as to his guilt then why do we have laws ?
Peter King is a disgrunted old man that doesn't realize he is a Congressman and expected to abide by our courts as well .
How dare he call this man " a pedifile and pervert " on national T.V.
AFTER the courts cleared him ? Michael Jackson has a Mother and family that love and do not condone those outrageous inuendo's he's spouting out of his mouth .Our children are listening to his hateful words but then our children see what so called adults do and then mimick there ways .Peter King as a Congressman is showing the world he dioesn't believe in his own court system and that the men and women that are called on to decide the guilt or non-guilt of a person isn't worth anything therefore he doesn't respect our authorites which doesn"t say a whole lot for him as a Congressman or person period . He needs to close his mouth and stop looking like a ignorant fool !

adela palenzuela   July 6th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

MJ was acquitted of child molestation..........so was OJ....remember?
Please separate the man from his music...

BLA$IAN   July 6th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

MJ WAS ACQUITTED OF 14 CHARGES, INCLUDING 10 FELONIES. HE HAD SO MANY TESTIFY IN HIS DEFENSE INCLUDING CHILD ACTOR MCAULY CAULKIN. AND IN THE 1993 CASE, THE KIDS OWN MOTHER SAID THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST JACKSON WERE NOT TRUE! AND IN THE MOST RECENT CASE I FIND IT FUNNY THAT THE ALLEGATIONS WERE BROUGHT FORTH AFTER THE CONTROVERSIAL MARTIN BASHIR VIDEO WAS PUBLISHED THE KIDS THAT WERE AROUND JACKSON WERE OFTEN POOR AND SICK CHILDREN. DURING MJ'S LIFETIME HE ALWAYS HAD GREEDY PPL AROUND HIM, ALWAYS BEING SUED, PPL WRITING BOOKS. SAD STUFF HERE.

Tim   July 6th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

Last I checked in this country, you are innocent until proven guilty and Michael Jackson was proven innocent. What Rep King said was hypocritical as a lawmaker and totally disrepectfull to Michael Jackson's family as well as his fans. I think Rep King is worried that when his time comes, he won't receive the same fanfare, which chances are he won't because up until today I never knew or cared that he even existed. This man has given the world his gift of music, sold out stadiums all over the world, and donated millions of dollars to charity. What have you accomplished Mr King? Allow me to be the first to stand up and say Rep Peter King, we don't need you!

karl tollefson   July 6th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

this is frm an article in the New York Sun dated june 22,2005

"Six weeks after September 11, 2001, he told WABC radio that the military should use tactical nuclear weapons in Afghanistan if it was believed that Islamic terrorists would deploy chemical weapons on American soil. Last year, he inflamed American Muslim groups when he said that 85% of mosques in this country have extremist leaders and that Muslims in this country were reluctant to help law enforcement.'

thats just so laughable... once agin peter king attacking a person or group on non factual basis... 85% of mousqes... oh thats right he was a bushite... peter king you sir are an idiot and as i dig deeper i find more and more laughable statements by you...
be back soon... digging up more statements by the misinformed rep... errr.. maybe thats why hes making stuff up...??? isnt what they did to start the war..??? wheres the info of mass destruction... LMFAO

kal tollefson

R.Garcia   July 6th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

Peter King is your typical racist blowhard. Can't stand the fact that a black person is renowned around the world for his music and dancing. King and his ilk are always dismissing African Americans who are achievers in any field on the world stage.

Timothy   July 6th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

I am 3 months older than Michael and as someone growing up in the USA,I experienced his music and later music videos since age 11.By the time I was 21 or 22yrs old I realized that Michael was probably gay because I had several gay relatives and I could see it.However,by the time Neverland started,it was clear to me that he was a gay pediphile and the ranch was started because Michael could not get a job as a towel boy at the local YMCA or Boys Club.

Alan Bernstein   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

With Republicans currently on a roll, it wouldn't surprise me if Peter King were soon caught with his own pants down around his ankles.

Vincent Spoons   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

Hey Rick, It was hard at first to tell only knowing him from the media.
Trying to put together his very wierd life stile.And it was very odd.
Until he lied about never having surgery on his face. Thats when
I knew , He looked dead into that camera and said; with that scary
voice.No I never had surgery...People are just making these things up to hurt me. He had neverland.now that is a pedophiles dream.
He wanted to be peter pan.That would make him the pidepiper of
pedophiles. Yes its sad.He was very talanted and we do love his music.But he had enough money to silence people.And thats sad too.
But now that hes gone do they still have to be quit? Its like O.J. we know the truth......

OLSCKOL   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

I think the congressmen should save his comments for his home,and not voice them to the public.The facts are that M Jackson was aquitted of all charges and for the sentor to now come out calling M Jackson a prevert is just ridiculous,GET a Life (KING)Thats why we have a legal system.Some how the senator thinks he's a better judge of the FACTS THAN THE COURTS.M JACKSON NEVER SAID HE HAD SEX WITH YOUNG KIDS HE DID SAY HE HAS SLEPT IN THE THE SAME BED WITH THEM..AS STRANGE AS THAT MAY SOUNDS FROM A GROWN MAN, IT'S NOT A CRIME....Micheal just never wanted to grow up...(Peter Pan)But what he did do was show the world how much of a entertainer he was and he always wanted to change the world.At least now he's in a better place God Bless You Micheal...People with money settle cases all the time...That dosn't make them guilty

Pamela Brown   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

I think Peter King is an insensitive slimeball for making those comments about MIchael, especially during the Jackson Family's time of grieving and mourning. Stop giving PETER KING all the media attention. I've never heard of him and I'm a New Yorker.... an ashamed one at that to know that this guy is representing NY. Seems to me that because he's thinking about running for Senator, he needed some media attention and what better way then to mock and slander a wonderful man during the world's , hear me... WORLD's Grief.

darlene   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

Ain't this America.
mich jackson was a great entertainer but enough is enough
let him rest in peace

This should make every American ashamed. America
> as a whole paid more attention to the death of an
> entertainer than the death of an American Soldier.
>
>
>
> An American soldier died today (6-24-09).
> I do not know his name.
> His country called him and he answered with his
> life.
> He did not squander billions of dollars
> nor did he sleep with little boys.
> Was he acknowledged on the news?
> Was his picture on national television?
>
> An American soldier died today.
> I do not know his name.
> He is the one the nation should be mourning,
> I will mourn for him and his family.
> I will remember him and his sacrifice!

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

I don't agree withP.K. at all.He should listen to Man in the mirror and start looking at himself, and changing himself instead of others!!!

Audrey   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

I am totally disgusted with his comments. Michael has never been convicted of any crime. If people like the Congressman would listen to the message in his music and stop trying to pander for votes, they could learn a lot about Michael, the person. Michael has done more for humanity than the self-righteous politicians and so-called non-biased media have ever done. Those who say there is too much coverage are just shocked to see so many loved Michael and were not duped by the lies. It is also probably shocking to him to know that thousands and thousands of people think for themselves and don't just accept whatever they are told. This country did not deserve the genius and talent that Michael gave it. Thank God those in other countries have accepted him. I also hope those that have gained from demonizing Michael can sleep at night, but I don't see how they can.

Daniel Penalva   July 6th, 2009 3:59 pm ET

Hi Rick,
Honduras needs your help, the biggest problem is the control that Hugo Chavez has over Mr Zelaya as well as the OEA and the UN secretary for Latin America.
Chavez was bragging on his tv network (Telesur) about how he is going to do anything in his power to put Mr Zelaya back in power.

PLEASE HAVE YOUR CHANNEL SHOW THE VIDEOS OF THE HUNDREDS OF HONDURAS WHO WANT PEACE.......
Thank You....
Daniel

yvan0566   July 6th, 2009 4:00 pm ET

ok rick this is the gop again. a bunch of haters. MJ has never been a pervert or pedophile.where is peter king with sc gov sanford, with sen ensign, larry craig, these are MJ last moments, so peter king we know you're the voice of haters, keep going .from now we will vote forever for those who work universal health cares, for ending the wars, investing the money on those who pay taxes.obama should stop please the gop by funding wars. at the end PETER KING WILL BE THE NEXT GOP TO BE A PERVERT,A PEDOPHILE like larry craig,sanford,ensign

Sarah   July 6th, 2009 4:00 pm ET

Congressman King...how long before we find out what you are hiding in your closet? There are many like you who are quick to condemn and then we see you on the news saying I had an affair or something worst...God usually exposes it!

MJ was a child in his mind, so he behaved like a kid and that's what he meant about kids sharing his bed...do you think if those gold diggers really believed he was like that they would have allowed their kids there and continued to send them there? no!...but when he made his documentary to explain, the gold diggers saw dollar signs flash before their eyes, but a lot of us understood exactly what he was saying. Takes a pervert to know a pervert!

Lollie Wong   July 6th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

A superb world talent such as Michael Jackson is going to come under attack by certain people who have no real knowledge of who he really was. They engage themselves in ridiculous comments without considering the real facts of any given situation.

There have been numerous situations where a celebrity has paid off accusations, not because they were guilty, but just to stop the harassment and get on with their life. There are a lot of cruel people out there that will condemn other people purely by hear say. They must have an illusion that they are God.

Michael Jackson was one of the kindest people in the world and would NEVER harm a child in anyway. He was only re-living a childhood that he never had. He is completely innocent of any wrong doing. Some people just need to get their heads out of the sand and wake up.

Shane   July 6th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

I never liked Michael Jackson. He was a pervert that's why they gave him the nickname
"Wacko Jacko". Any grown man who sleeps in the same bed at the same time is
looking for something.

I agree with the congressman. They are treating this man like a God and he's far from
It. I believe he molested those children and the reason he got away with it is because
he was a celebrity. All the little boys can sleep better tonight.

ENOUGH ALREADY on this Michael Jackson crap!!!

I will NOT be watching tv tomorrow because of this crap.

Leen   July 6th, 2009 4:01 pm ET

Once again another mindless statement by a republican. He may have the right to feel that to much time is being spent but he doesn't have the right to call names and slander. M Jackson was aquitted of this charge. Micheal Jackson was admired throughout the world. He will be celebrated. Get over it.

Cedric Forbes   July 6th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

I absolutely agree with Peter King, and additionally, I wonder who pays Rick Sanchez? Certainly, it cannot be a news orgainization.

He must be paid by the administration or the DNC. I am embarrassed for CNN.

His question to Crowley about whether Rep. King is playing to his Republican constituency is a classic low on a news program.

Natasha   July 6th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

pick me please!!!!!

Mathew   July 6th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

It's true that michael jackson was a very influential man to many. It is also true that the heros of this country are in iraq. But this war has waged on for the last 8 years. Its even up to debate as to why we waged war on that country anyways. Everyone needs to get on with thier lives and let the media do whatever they want and stop acting like little kids all of you.

Corliss Tuttle   July 6th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

If your tired of the Micheal Jackson coverage then for goodness sakes turn off your TV. I'm pretty sure it has a off button!!

Gloria   July 6th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

Peter King is ignoring the laws of this country, he too can be called a pervert and pedophile, since laws don't mean anything to him. Peter is a hater! If he goes before I do, I'll remember not to watch. Since Michael Jackson passed, even the boy, now a man, has admitted that
Michael never did anything to him. The boy's greedy, lying parents
forced him to lie. Now , there's a story that should be on Rick/CNN.
That story could help many envious haters like Peter King, Diane Dimond, and others who don't think that our laws were written to
protect, the Pop Star, Michael Jackson too.

Elsa Paredes   July 6th, 2009 4:02 pm ET

It's one thing to be tired of seeing Michael all over the news, but it's another to label him as a pervert and petafiler. If you don't like it, turn it off. Michael Jackson was an icon all over the world, his passing is deserving of all this media coverage. His body will be laid to rest tomorrow and then we can move on to other news. Until then, Rep. King should keep his comments and accusations to himself. Michael was never found guilty and unless Rep. King was in the bedroom and saw something inappropriate with his own eyes, he should just shut his mouth.

Jervay   July 6th, 2009 4:03 pm ET

Show your true colors by seeking that two minutes of fame and get slapped in the face in return, serve you right Petey boy.

You will turn out to be a sucker for punishment now for disrespecting the dead, just watch. I'll be watching.

eddie   July 6th, 2009 4:03 pm ET

hi ric, rep king should know when a mother lost a son he should not be insulting her son.

Jerry   July 6th, 2009 4:03 pm ET

Michael was aquitted on all charges, he paid off more than he should have. There is no proof of evidence other than Michael was different. Had Michael have survived the near death experience, would the congressman made the allegation.

I think the congressman is a coward and a national disgrace to the united states and the republican party. Dick Cheney and he need to go hunting together. maybe a good shot in the ass is what this congressman needs.

He is coward because he can not make the allegation while Michael was alive. Michael may not be able to offend himself being dead but maybe his fans in New York state can come to his defense and vote this congressman out of office.

Paige Hicks   July 6th, 2009 4:03 pm ET

First of all, in response to that bigot Peter KIng,I would be honored if my kids would of had the chance to spend time with Michael Jackson, he was acquitted of all charges. His first accuser just came out and said he lied on MJ to get money from him. Second of all I dont believe that MJ is getting enough coverage. Do you realize that we just lost the greatest man who ever lived. I have never heard of anyone who was as talented, humble, smart, loving, and caring as MJ. Its no good racist, fat, and ugly people like Peter King and his peers, (including elvis presley, who we need to stop putting in the same class with MJ) that keep the world from having real peace. Michael Jackson loved people of all colors, and did more to help people than Peter King would ever imagine. God blessed us with this beautiful gift for 50 years and we didnt appreciate it. We all turned our back on this gift from god when we didnt agree with him, and it broke his heart in ways we would never know. One Day you will regret what you said about a person that you dont know King and I cant wait for your Karma to come back and bite you up your racist ignorant behind

Chad Burns   July 6th, 2009 4:04 pm ET

As a white man who grew up in the '80s, Iliked MJ,
but followed the trajectory of his career as it was presented in the
mainstream and predominantly "white-view" media. It was only after
marrying my African-American wife 5 years ago that I truly came to seewho MJ was and what he did for music and entertainment.
Michael Jackson's talent and appeal were truly felt and owned by the black community because Michael never doubted where he came from. He may have been confused in himself, but any African-American can tell you Michael stayed true to the black community-but like many things black-that never gets much coverage in the press.

The allegations of child molestation were never proven, Michael was acquitted and one of the QUOTE-UNQUOTE "victims"-recanted the story stating Michael never laid a hand on him. Over and over ANYONE who worked with or really knew Michael categorically declared him innocent and stated over and over he would never do something like that.

Would Mr. King have such verifiable references for his character?

Michael was flawed and imperfect as we all are-his flaws were
amplified because of his celebrity. But there is also an underlying
prejudice that further exacerbates the truism; that to be black
in America is to work twice as hard for half the credit. This is
sadly exemplified in this politician's comment. In his death Michael holds the top 9 spaces on Billboard, he holds the record for highest selling album EVER and the world's record for most charitable celebrity-even in his death 20% of his estate will go to charities.

Michael Jackson is a legend that we unfortunately did not celebrate enough while he was with us; and like so many others we're trying to give him his roses now, rather than during his life like we should have.

Chad Burns
Jacksonville, FL

anett   July 6th, 2009 4:04 pm ET

I live in slovakia...but i think this man is so stupied now he talk about michael jackson?now????U.S. Congressman...its so stuped.....

Ash Paul from PA   July 6th, 2009 4:04 pm ET

In addition: it's not like the media ISN'T talking about ANYTHING ELSE besides Michael Jackson. Ousted president in Honduras, 'President' Ahmadinejad in Iran, President Obama in Russia, riots in China, apparently a pipeline attack in Nigeria, serial killer in S.C, death of McNair–just to name a few. Michael Jackson is not the only news I've heard about in the past two weeks.

Leesabugg70   July 6th, 2009 4:04 pm ET

To the representative who made the slanderous comments about MJ – your comment was just as worthless as you are in congress as you are raping the american people.

michi   July 6th, 2009 4:04 pm ET

OMG i can't believe people he died already and you still talking sh...... about him . let him REST IN PEACE ALREADY and yes we should like STOP judging people , he was a very lonely person you can listen to his songs and you will know what im talking about . NObody needs to like everybody but at least show some RESPET to his soul and his family , because MR. King you wouldn't like if somebody talks the way you do tours one of your family members , so you should put yourself in the Jackson's family right now . He was a great musician with a good heart and a question for you Mr. King you were there to make those acusacions you saw that he did what you said he did ? NO right , in the book of life says on Mathew 7 : Judge Not , that ye be not judge. For with what judgement ye judge, ye shall be judged ; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. THINK about that Mr. king will you . thanks.My heart it's broken becasue my favorite artist it's dead but i'm happy because he is resting now where he is now there's no hate and judgement ; there's peace and a lot of love because he is with the KING OF KINGS ; GOD .i love you Michael , you and your music will be always in my heart, love you .

Audrey in Atlanta, GA   July 6th, 2009 4:05 pm ET

First, the Jackson Family and the executors of MJ's estate should sue
King for slander. The papers should be filed today! Second, if his intent
was to honor the soldiers, then he should have stuck to that thought.
Instead, he chose to tear a dead man down who is internationally acclaimed to build up the service men and women. Third, MJ's song
"Man in the Mirror" comes to mind. King should learn the lyrics to this
song and recite them everyday before he gets out of bed everyday.
Last, everyone who knew and worked with MJ said what a nice, warm,
and giving person he was. This will never be said about King!
Rest in Peace Michael Jackson!!!

Ann   July 6th, 2009 4:05 pm ET

Is this how you make decisions about our government Mr. Peters? By makes decisions without proof, ignorant of terminology definitions, casting out judgements about something you have no idea about, and just flat being cruel and insensitive... REALLY? You made yourself look absolutely rediculous! Don't speak for everyone by saying that everyone is sick of hearing about MIchael Jackson.

Greg   July 6th, 2009 4:05 pm ET

This question for Rick Sanchez. . Rick, if Michael Jackson asked you to let him sleep with one of your young kids, would YOU think he was a pervert? Rick is pandering to the Black audience as usual and ignoring the truth. Typical CNN leftist crap.

Wendy   July 6th, 2009 4:05 pm ET

MJ....talented...Yes...
MJ... abused, strange, weird, YES
MJ..."Get's what he wants" YES
MJ..coverage over blown.. YES

Godsgirl   July 6th, 2009 4:06 pm ET

I feel it wouldn't be so bad if you weren't focusing on the negetive than the positive things Michael Jackson have done in this world and for the world. If you weren't broadcasting his life so much, alot who didn't know much about the wonderful things he has done would not know. He was a gifted and Blessed man that needs to be apprieciated for his works while he lived on this earth.

Dominique Tolomeo   July 6th, 2009 4:07 pm ET

Rick: Let's be honest, the unbelievable amount of coverage can only be nothing more then rubber necking the bizarre, and the media should be ashamed of themselves. Rep. King is correct. The amount of evidence against the deviant, Michael Jackson, should of been enough to lock him up for years, and placed him on the predators list. But, money can buy you love. The staff at the Neverland Ranch should have also been edited for their involvement in the facilitation of the crimes against the young children, namely boys. I am sick to my stomach over the coverage, and thank goodness Rep. King put the truth as, forthright and plain, as possible. The facts are, pornography, pills, pre-loaded hypodermic needles, booze, small boys and a security camera outside of his bedroom, rigged to notify him of any interruption. Sounds like a page out of theJohn Gacy case.

Ashley   July 6th, 2009 4:07 pm ET

I agree with Micheal Markovitch..you hit it right on..and to all the ppl who are bitchin' about CNN covering all the MJ stuff turn the channel if you dont want to hear about,or watch it..take a look at the poll aparentaly there are more ppl who care to hear about than not...MJ was the best! He is and all ways will be the KING OF POP!!!!!

yvan0566   July 6th, 2009 4:07 pm ET

many years ago the media ignore MJ.NOW they're cashing on MJ last moments

robin   July 6th, 2009 4:07 pm ET

re: Peter King and any Republican who says anything...let's face it you are going to slam every Republican out there no matter what they say. No one will ever know if even 100% of Americans agree with them-the 'in the tank' media will not let another side be heard! Sure Micheal Jackson was a 'one reel' wonder and no one denies that he did have a rather sad ending. But, now it's all about being black and who is going to get the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and the children who are bankrolls themselves. Where were all these 'black' people when everyone around him was draining him dry.

arlene lahera   July 6th, 2009 4:08 pm ET

When Michael Jackson said "Don't you want to sleep with the people you love?" I understood him. Everything isn't necessarily sexual or doesn't have to be. I have some friends that sleep with their dogs...People with the filthiest minds are always the first to accuse the innocent of being just like them.

Michael L. Burdett   July 6th, 2009 4:08 pm ET

How Vile, Disgusting, and Perverted can Peter King be?

It's the work of the Devil to pervert a good and truly honest work.

It's those like Peter King, and -yes, some of your commenters that distort and pervert the fantasy-dream that was Michael Joseph Jackson's NeverLand Valley Ranch. He only wanted to share with the downtrodden masses of children his wonderment and vision that he saw in that ranch. Peter King and others should have seen the Special on Larry King Live just the other night with Jermaine Jackson and saw the wonderment of the former Sickamore Ranch – and the vision that Michael Jackson turned it into and shared with those that he could. What a pity that the world had to pervert such a wonderful place – NOT Michael Jackson who was acquitted of the charges of the second accusations trial.

Rebbecca Santistevan   July 6th, 2009 4:09 pm ET

Michael did not molest any kids he was proven innocent so peter king get off that kick are you jealous . yes I think he trying to get some of the
lime light true,true I'm sure you have things locked up in your closet

Kelly Johnson   July 6th, 2009 4:10 pm ET

Peter King better watch what he says. What if he's falsely accused of being a crook, or taking a bribe, or being a sexual deviant in the future? If he goes on trial and is acquitted, do we then get to ignore that and call him a corrupt crook even in death? How terrible of him to say this.

Everyone I've talked to called it an embarrassment and totally classless.

@Angela – That information is not true. He did not correctly identify Jackson's private area. As a matter of fact law enforcement officials said he gave multiple, conflicting descriptions.

@Carol – Chandler hasn't publicly admitted to lying but Michael Jackson's defense attorney confirmed that he tracked down multiple witnesses, prepared to testify back in 2005, who said Jordan Chandler did admit to them he was never molested by Jackson.

It's just a shame Peter King has jumped into this hornet's nest. He should have stayed out of it if he doesn't know all the facts.

Martin in Shoreline, WA   July 6th, 2009 4:10 pm ET

He settled out of court on accusations of child molestation "without admitting any guilt". That is a legal definition. In many minds, he made a $20 million confession.

I marvel at just how stupid Americans have become. How can celebrity excuse Hollywood icons of their sins? Even if Michael was innocent, he should not be worshipped the way he is being worshipped. And it is time for the pretenders in the black community to stop. Ya'll had disowned MIchael as being crazy and white.

If Michael could not sing or dance, he would have been fitted for a nutcoat years ago. If a man in your neighborhood put on a Cap'n Crunch uniform, said he was Peter Pan, and claimed it was okay to slumber with 13 year old boys; he would be locked up in short order. The morons who excuse this behavior because Michael could sing and dance, disgust me to no end.

How about we take "American Idol" into the local nuthouse? The winner will be released and worshipped by morons. If we follow the logic of Michael Jackson fans, this is exactly what we should do.

kIm   July 6th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

Simply he was found INNOCENT he was cleared of all charges.Im from England and I just cant believe that some one who is a U.S congressman can make a statement like that.The world is watching this and its people like this man that gives the world the wrong inpression of America and how they treat people.Michael was loved the world over.I will say again in court he was found NOT GUILTY.

Gus Garcia   July 6th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

Hi Rick: No doubt M. Jackson was a great entertainer, but he was aquitted of charges of pedophilia only for his celebrity status.Remember O.J. trial? He was acquitted too!
Congratulation on your show. You are the proud no only of the latino community but the pride of America!

Carolyn from TN   July 6th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

How sad Michael Jackson had to live with attacks on his integrity and character and now after his death the weak baton is being picked up again and carried by politicians. Michael Jackson was thoroughly investigated after both accusations, no criminal charges in the first although the state went after him with all they had and he settled the civil case probably because he felt sorry for them because he knew they were poor and he had plenty of money and then he was found not guilty in the 2nd court case.

For over 40 years MJ has helped so many people around the world through his music and philanthropy. Learning about his work and his music through the media is so refreshing even if it is over the top. Everyone wants to tell about what a good guy he was.

In the end MJ is getting the love in return throughout the world, probably multiplied but to have ignorance taking up the charges after he's dead is insulting and very sad. Rep. King is classless and Clueless.

Dan Newberry   July 6th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

Would you be celebrating anyother child molester? This is crazy. He might have made great music, in some opinions, but that is all. OMG, just look at him and how he had to change himself...he was sick in the head. He couldn't stop the investigations into his child molestation urges, so he has children by a surrogate so no one can question him, then he has to move to Dubia so there would be no questions....Peter King is correct...wake up people and put on your thinking caps...

Shawn   July 6th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

Thanks Mr. King u just proved Mr. Jackson right... If anyone has payed attention Mic said as a little boy and a adult that there was not a song that he sang he did not mean... My point if u look at his last practice listen to the song and it describes people like Congressman KIng... Wow!! Another racial divided comment and poor black americans see this as disrespect and another which haunt similiar to O.J.... White America we got news for u 3@@$$#%$%%$%%%%^^%$$@##$ but holes.....

Kaye Bohler   July 6th, 2009 4:12 pm ET

Rick,
I am in mourning over one of the greatest influence's on my musical career ever. Why are you even giving this congressmen air time on the eve of Michael Jacksons Funeral?
Why are putting this poll on the air? On the eve of burying one of the greatest entertainers and humanitarians of our lifetime.You are just propelling this horrible ignorant disrespectful attitude of Michael Jackson. You shouldn't even be asking this question and bringing any attention to this horrible man that calls himself a representative of the people. The general public has been a victim of a great marketing campaign to continually bring question to the reputation of Michael Jackson. You tell the public enough times that there were child molestation charges, they will believe it. It's called repeat exposure. If you air that poll you are party to this horrible slanderous rhetoric that was the very cause for the demise of a cherished genius of an artist, that inspired thousands of artist like myself. Please report how many people defended Michael in court. Please report how he was acquitted by a jury of his peers! Please report that he was a victim of a string of extortion attempts. Make this congressman accountable to the facts. The only reason Michael Jackson's name cannot leave the airwaves is because BILLIONS of people loved him. Those are the numbers that drive what news you cover, nothing else. This congressman in his brightest days could never pray to have that kind of attention. And Last but not least...Why would Michael Jackson ever admit to letting kids sleep in his bed if he was guilty? He admitted that because he was innocent and had a heart full of love, kindness and generosity. This congressman is a low class individual that doesn't even have the basic good upbringing to honor the dead. PLEASE DON"T AIR THIS POLL! IT ONLY PERPETUATES THIS UNTRUE MINDSET THAT HAUNTED AND DESTROYED MICHALE JACKSONS LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Greg   July 6th, 2009 4:13 pm ET

It is a FACT that Michael Jackson said on video tape, that I and hundreds of millions of other people saw and heard, that he sleeped with children and saw nothing wrong with it. For all of these morons that supported Jackson's perversion, would you let your kids sleep with him? He also spent millions to pay off parents and kids he had sex with. Almost 50 million in total. Does this sound like someone who is acting innocient? Are you people really that blind and stupid?

Linda   July 6th, 2009 4:13 pm ET

What? ....who is this guy anyway and obviously he does not take the necessary time to gather his facts before opening his big mouth. Never heard of him and how tactless and insensitive of a human being. Shame on him for even showing his face at such a time! Tell him to take of his mask and take a good look in the mirror cause its time he makes a change!

Michael Jackson's death was unexpectedly cut short. His fans all around the world want to know what happened! He helped millions of people using his fame as a tool and his fans know that. Michael Jackson obviously was an easy target whose every move was under a microscope. It is not fair for his accusers to walk away without equal coverage. I would want to really know about them, their parents, their background and motives before making any judgements. I want to see their faces on television. Obviously the money was their motive. Fact is Michael Jackson was acquitted and yet that is not stated enough times!!

Shawn   July 6th, 2009 4:14 pm ET

Thanks Mr. King u just proved Mr. Jackson right... If anyone has payed attention Mike said as a little boy and as adult that there was not a song that he sang he did not mean... My point if u look at his last practice listen to the song and it describes people like Congressman KIng... Wow!! Another racial divided comment and poor black americans see this as disrespect and another which haunt similiar to O.J.... Grandma use to say if you don't have anything to say good about a person it would just be best to say nothing at all....

Bean   July 6th, 2009 4:14 pm ET

I'm tired of the way CNN has created a tsunami of meaningless and redundant coverage of Michael Jackson's death, and that is what an intelligent person would be complaining about. Not being one, Rep. Peter King is attacking a dead man instead of the way his death is exploited.
Never having been a Jackson fan, I'm exasperated byyour useles coverage–including the coverage of Peter King's thugish comments. He's the local LI knuckle-dragging embarrassment,. Why give him a sound-bite?

Samantha Cramer   July 6th, 2009 4:14 pm ET

Yes, this should be obvious, it should have been a scrolling item at the bottom of the news screen at best, from the very beginning, especially given the situation in the world.

Seriously, when Iran was such big news one second, and the next it becomes a side note just because a “star” died… I truly looked for another news source as I lost ALL faith that CNN was reporting news, rather than whatever gets the most ratings.

Rick, you single-handedly saved CNN for me. You make me feel as if the public is being listened to, not just the bottom line $, when it comes to CNN reporting.

But other CNN reporters have lost me for good.

It is highly offensive to anyone compassionate toward children to have a known (OJ wasn’t innocent either, no matter what happened in the courtroom) child molester, a known liar (”only 2 facial surgeries”)
be emulated and treated… well… I am not sure if Jesus would have received this much coverage were He to die during the Iran crisis…
to be treated as a saint and “King”.

This shows such a deep sickness in our global society that I am just beside myself. I had no idea that humanity was THIS blind and unable to see the truth.

How must his little victims feel right about now? Will they EVER recover?

FERNANDO   July 6th, 2009 4:14 pm ET

is anybody sure about Peter King not being a pedophile?
maybe he just hasn't been caught?
If MJ was declared innocent and Peter King calls him guilty,
maybe we can call Peter King guilty, even though he is innocent.

Diana Schwab   July 6th, 2009 4:15 pm ET

Everyone I know is avoiding the long-drawnout-television news coverage with regard to the deceased Michael Jackson. So many other important issues and newsworthy events need featuring and reporting meanwhile. Despite any gifts (truly minor), fame (truly disproportionate) or cultural influence (not on the young adults my son was with at the Rothbury Music festival in Michigan last weekend), media attention is unexplainedly exaggerated. Why does CNN assume it need pander to the interest level of idiots? Enough already! I don't care whether he was a pedophile or not–he settled financial claims on that score. I care that he was NOT a genius, NOT a grown-up at 50, and NOT a role model for a nation of people who need to aspire to higher ideals that those represented by Michael Jackson. My colleagues and I felt that same way about the Paris Hilton story covered exhaustively (easy to do) by the media, including CNN. Please stick with the laudable CNN Heroes and healthy news analysis for which the vicissitudes of pop celebrities are no match. Thanks for letting me voice my opinion, Diana Schwab

Ann   July 6th, 2009 4:15 pm ET

Sorry I have never heard of this man before now as I am from Kansas. I originally posted an opinion and used the wronge name. I called him Mr. Peters instead of Mr. KIng, but does not even deserve the respect of being called "Mr."

Peter King is clearly out of line and very disrespectful. He needs to think before he opens that mouth of his and look up a few words before he tries to use them. His state should be ashamed of him as I am sure many of the others are also.

FERNANDO   July 6th, 2009 4:16 pm ET

all these Republicans claiming the moral ground at the end are caught doing crazy stuff.... maybe Peter King has some crazy stuff hidden in the closet...

sk   July 6th, 2009 4:16 pm ET

Iam not a crazy fan of Micheal Jackosn.But i felt sad to listen to comments made by people like 'Peter King', it only shows the 'Low' and 'Pervert' and 'cruel' mindset of a politician. Micheal Jackson's soul is already killed by these false accusations and Peter King is only proving that how 'disrespectful ' a human can be towards another Human.
It's time for Peter King to buy a Tounge Cleanser to clean his toungue and to watch his words.Media should not pay any attention to people like Peter King.
Micheal Jackson will live in the hearts of people and on this earth forever, make people happy where as Peter King can only make 'mean' comments and grab media attention for a day or two.

Yvette   July 6th, 2009 4:16 pm ET

Peter King needs to watch what he says and wishes on others. God says judge not, lest yee be judged and let anyone who is without sin cast the first stone. The majority of people like himself are usually the ones who are doing the very thing that they accuse others of doing. To keep things respectful, if you do not have anything nice to say just shut up.

Shannon from Canada   July 6th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

King is mean-spirited and heartless. A man dies and he doesn't have the sense not to criticize. What goes around comes around.

Anna   July 6th, 2009 4:18 pm ET

Michael Jackson was not only a great artist (the late Fred Astaire deemed him the best dancer of our times), but also a great humanitarian. He gave millions to improve the lot of those less fortunate.

What has Mr. King done?

It is always so easy to judge and condemn. Mr. King's words are those of a self-loathing man who deserves our pity.

Angela   July 6th, 2009 4:18 pm ET

CONGRESSMAN KING IS NOT FIT FOR HIS JOB, IF HE CAN PASS THESE RIDICULOUS JUDGEMENTS AGAINST A PAST TAX PAYING CITIZEN LIKE MICHAEL WHO HELPS TO PAY HIS SALARY, AFTER HE HAS BEEN ACQUITTED BY THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM. HE IS PASSING JUDGEMENT ON MICHAEL FOR CRIMES HE HAS NOT EVEN BEEN CHARGED FOR. I DID NOT HEAR HIM COME OUT TO MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT THE COVERAGE OF ANNA NICOLE OR ELVIS PRESLEY WHO WERE ALSO CONTRAVERSAL CELEBRATIES. HIS BIGOTRY IS SHOWING. IT IS A SHAME THAT THIS IS HIS PRIORITY AT A TIME LIKE THIS WHEN THE COUNTRY IS TRYING TO HEAL FROM ALL THE PAST INJUSTICES SUFFERED BY SOME OF ITS PEOPLE HE HAS ADDED FUEL TO THE FIRE. WE NEED TO QUESTION HIS ABILITY BE EFFECTIVE IN HIS POSITION. HIS MIND SET IS SHOWING.

nancrn80   July 6th, 2009 4:18 pm ET

I agree with Peter King.....MJ was a creep, a deeply disturbed and ill person...Mr King is saying what many of us are thinking. What's wrong with us that we idolize someone who was so twisted?

Natasha Farquharson   July 6th, 2009 4:19 pm ET

What I want to know is why did king wait until Michael Jackson "King of Pop" died before he showed his face to slander him. It goes to show that King is a spinless cockroach and call MJ names. My god MJ is dead let him rest in peace, because none of you gave him peace when he was among us. What I still don't get is the fact you all report the negative things but not tell the world of the humanitarian things he did which surpassed everything else. I can bet you anything that King does not have that bio to his name, but he's all ready to discredit a dead man for his few minutes on television. If MJ was so bad King shouldn't want to be associated or be sharing airtime with him. I think he should me ashamed of himself, it's not about him it's for MJ's family and fans to say goodbye to a man they consider to be the greatest.

Maria Thompson   July 6th, 2009 4:19 pm ET

I do agree that there has been an extensive amount of coverage regarding Michael Jackson since his untimely passing. However, this is coverage that will minimize itself soon after his memorial & more so after his funeral. That said, I don't understand why Congressman King feels the need to slander Michael with his clearly unnecessary comments. My momma taught me that if I can't say anything nice to not say anything at all...evidently that was one lesson the Congressman missed. I'm glad I don't live in NY, but if I did I would certainly not vote for him.

Spoons58   July 6th, 2009 4:19 pm ET

Yes Rick, After the funneral we are done.When Al Sharpton and
Jessie Jackson show up,You know its to much.Because their only here to promote themselfs. Yes Rick,After he lied about never having
face surgery,I know for A FACT he was the( pidepiper of pedophiles)
Come on.Are we that blind? No Rep. Peter King did not cross the line.
They accused a kid who was dieing of cancer,that he just wanted M.J.s money.Come on. This poor kid was just making this up. Thats just what michael said about never having surgery,Everybody is just making this up to hurt him. And he said it with that same face he used
when he lied on that documentary.

msbay01   July 6th, 2009 4:19 pm ET

Google Jordan Chandlar if anyone wants to know the truth about the molestation charges. I knew I remembered the boy apologizing, in which I never believed him in the first place.

It is so sad we would rather believe a child being coaxed by his parents rather than believe the same boy as a man telling the truth.

Uncle B... M.P.R.   July 6th, 2009 4:20 pm ET

good evening,....let me start by saying, a lot of people including Mr.Peter king is talking about Mr.M Jackson being a child molester, i deeply believe that the law states the law says u r innocent until proven quiltily...they were no evidence that supports the allegations of any of his cases. lets not forget Mr. Woody Allen and his adopted daughter, who became his wife and the mother of his children.....how does the public choose and pick whats morally wrong and right....he had to be at least mentally molesting her...what bout that. Mr. Micheal Jackson is and will always be a very different and special person. He tried to be a great person to everybody and it didn't work...he is now in the lords hands and if he's going to be judge this will be the time...allow him to Rest In Peace.

Lubbock, Texas   July 6th, 2009 4:20 pm ET

I NEVER believed that Michael Jackson was a pedophile. I NEVER believed he would harm any child. How can this congressman or anyone else for that matter accuse someone of something that they did not actually see? Are they God? Do they have ESP? No! Michael Jackson is not like most people. Michael Jackson was not raised like most people. Michael Jackson was gifted beyond words can say. I just watched the congressman again on CNN and it sickens me that someone would go after someone like that in death. Michael Jackson was a Daddy, a son, a brother, and has millions of fans across the Globe. Michael Jackson cared about kids and that does NOT make you a pedophile. He was found innocent. MJ could afford to pay his accuser because he wanted to go on with his life. Look at what happened to those people. That money was come by with lies and deceit. It is heartbreaking that so many turned their backs on MJ and he felt he had to hide out all of those years. We missed out on so much. Michael Jackson backed up his love for children by creating Neverland for all to enjoy. There were children who were ill, in wheelchairs, and all children were welcomed to Neverland. It was Michael's home. It was his children's home. So what...he had locks to his room – anyone would with as many people that were around Neverland. There were nannies, cooks, security guards, and other staff. He made a difference and cared enough about kids to create that magical place. The congressman and others talk like they know exactly what went on. Are they God? Michael Jackson left 20% to children's charities. Will the congressman leave 20% of his estate to children's charities? I grew up on Michael Jackson's music. He made mistakes – we all do. The documentary on MJ was an attack on his character. It was horrible. MJ was honest and he paid the price. Do you think a real pedophile would be as honest? We lost out on Michael Jackson for all of these years because of what people thought may have happened. He was found innocent. It sickens me a congressman would attack his character after his death. Michael Jackson cared about all people – including our military. The secret door in his room was for safety. Many celebrities and even normal people have things like that in their homes. He was a world celebrity and it should not be considered anything but normal in his situation. I feel bad for MJ's kids. I'm sure they miss him terribly. I'm sure he didn't expect to die. Have some compassion people! MJ had compassion and it showed. It wasn't fake – do you think so many people would have followed him if it was fake? There will never be another Michael Jackson. I don't have all the answers. No one does. Just let the man RIP. The most criminal people and liars in society today comes from politicians. Michael Jackson was a child himself. He never got a break. I for one am heart-broken over this great loss. Take away the celebrity – the man helped people and was genuine and kind. He had a caring soul. He was sensitive. He had compassion. We need more people like that in society today. I for one will always miss Michael Jackson.

Helen Brown   July 6th, 2009 4:21 pm ET

Enough is enough....we have more important issues. He was a singer with a screwed view of life and right and wrong. I agree with Peter King.. CNN is running this into the ground...I think I had better turn to Fox Network for some real news...

Tell it Like it really IS   July 6th, 2009 4:23 pm ET

I know my comments probably will never be posted or read to the public because the TRUTH is not what MR KING REALLY wants to hear.

Republican King claims he want to tell it like it is; well then he need to really do that. He needs to tell the truth about the reason there is so much coverage over Michael’s death—CAPITALISM! The networks, advertisers and even people like him get more out of Mike’s death because of GREED—and that is why he took the time to record a video, post it and make his comments known—he want to CAPITALIZE on this opportunity.

How many viewers were tuning into the FOX, CNN or any other network before Mike died—now these network’s ratings are off the chart—because they are all racing to see who can get the best information FIRST about MJ’s situation, then misreporting and over reporting in order to sensationalize. Michael made millions of dollars for industries and institutions before his death and now he is doing it again in his death.

It is sad that grown people like this Senator allows his racism to eat him up so badly inside that he can’t keep his mouth shut long enough to respect the Jackson family. Regardless of what Mike did or did not do, there is a family bereaving the loss of a loved one; and I am sure if the shoe was on the other foot, he would not want his children disrespected in death—and I guarantee you there are some dry bones in his children’s closets.

Military personnel, Fire Fighters, Teachers, and all the people fighting in the trenches are presented a life time achievement award by GOD when the time is right.

But for right now, if billions of people want to memorialize Michael Joseph Jackson to feel better then they have the right to—whether publicly or privately. Who made this senator GOD?

People are not fools. We know all the negative and raciest things republicans say at their private parties. But voicing his personal opinion and hurtful words in the public forum at a time that a family is really hurting like this . . . makes me feel sorry for him, his entire family and especially his children.

HELL is a real place that even the most powerful can’t buy their way out from under. SEE YOU THERE SENATOR AND YOUR CHILDREN.

JESSICA, Texas   July 6th, 2009 4:25 pm ET

Leave MJ alone.
What just because Rep. King (Who I NEVER HEARD OF) wants a name for himself, doesnt mean he can say this stuff. Get back to YOUR job, and leave the people to CNN, to do their's, which is to give us the breaking news. I dont remember hearing or seeing Rep. King's name anywhere until today.

R.I.P Michael Jackson, obviously there's haters out there, and trust me they'll make you MORE FAMOUS !!!

crystle   July 6th, 2009 4:27 pm ET

I do not care about what the Rep.King had to say I know if I saw him on the street I would turn around and walk the other way .

Shawn   July 6th, 2009 4:28 pm ET

U guys will do anything for money... That is why god is punishing us now and this is just the begining...

Linda   July 6th, 2009 4:29 pm ET

In regards to some comments about why Michael Jackson settled the first trial. If I was the parent and knew someone harmed my child, as a parent I would not accept the money to settle and complete the process cause that would prove my motive for money!!! So unfair and so one sided!! Who are his accusers really? I don't even know them by name. I know who Michael Jackson is, his life story, his interviews, comments...I know all about him and can say he was innocent and a target!

pcbrady   July 6th, 2009 4:30 pm ET

Rick:
I do not idolize the "star", I pity the man who died in such a manner, I feel sorry for the human being that was not able to realize his comeback tour. But I am so perplexed here with the circus surrounding him now. MJ was a song and dance man, he was exceptional true-does he merit all this hype and crap...AND, who is going to ultimately pay for this circus tomorrow? Calif is supposed to be so debt ridden that Arnold has made some very serious threats to cut this and withhold that, and how many people across the country are without jobs and hurting...SO who is paying for the security etc and the whole mess...THE JACKSON family SHOULD be forced to since they are pushing this enormous event( they who stand to get 500m and more from MJ estate) for their own agendas later. .
Michael Jackson was a man, not a GOD...We have troops who fight and die EVERY day for OUR COUNTRY and our freedoms, and they do not receive one percent of the credit or celebration or honors or send offs that the Jackson family thinks MJ deserves. OUR WOUNDED and DEAD TROOPS get no parade or celebrations or glory.... I think this whole circus is a real shame and DISGRACE. While MJ was a great enertainer...he also had "questionable behavior and a 20 year drug addiction" reported by CNN. Everyone wants to nail the doctors-his family all knew so nail them too-...but when does the ultimate responsibilty fall to the addicted entertainers themselves? Truly deserving people do not get such honors or send offs and MJ deserves no more than our troops are giving....and far less I think. Disgraceful! I felt sorry for the family till I hear all this being planned...now I see again that they want their 15 of fame on MJ's dead body! It is a real mistake to make GODS out of mere mortals...BIG mistake for kids to idolize an image while hiding the major flaws that possibly caused his untimely death. I am frighten to see this mania taking place over MJ ...WHILE COURAGEOUS TROOPS, FIREFIGHTERS, POLICE AND EMT ETC ARE NOT IDOLIZED TO THE SAME DEGREE...or sent off with half the honors! We truly have become fools!!!

Fred Montesano   July 6th, 2009 4:30 pm ET

Congressman King is a disgrace to the Congressmen of our beautiful county, as well as the state I am proud to born, New York His remarks about Michael Jackson are not called for, nor should be expressed by a United States official. He certainly put a 'dent' in the already 'hurting' the Republican Party.

Renae Goodwin   July 6th, 2009 4:31 pm ET

Michael Jackson was an AMAZING artist/entertainer/father. His contributionsto the world far outweigh the ridiculous allegations made against him. It is sad that the media has focused soo much on only one small aspect of his life, and unfortuneately that aspect has been negative and full of "allegations" that were never proven. Come on, he was the "King of Pop" for crying out loud! He deserves more respect, his mother deserves more respect, and his children deserve more respect. I know that Michael Jackson was bigger than life, but have we forgotten that he was human, and that he is/was someone's son, brother, and father. He deserves to be glorified at his time of death, and Pete King needs to get a life and learn to love himself. Maybe he needs to take a look at the Man In The Mirror!

abdou   July 6th, 2009 4:32 pm ET

Peter king don't deserve to be a representant and don't have a respect.

Tony Karaba   July 6th, 2009 4:32 pm ET

Sold more records than anyone else. Broke the music industry's racial boundaries (somewhat?). I would think there will be a statue of Michael somewhere, someday.

Uncle B... M.P.R.   July 6th, 2009 4:32 pm ET

Also Mr. Peter King, should be working on the New York State Budget. He must be mad, that his family and kids Love Mr. Micheal Jackson.

Shelly   July 6th, 2009 4:33 pm ET

Where is the option in your poll that states simply and clearly: "Michael Jackson was NOT a pedophile." That's the one I'd like to check.

Angela   July 6th, 2009 4:35 pm ET

I agree that the Jackson's family should sue King for Slander. Does he even care about the living children and family of Michael Jackson. Yes the man was acquitted by the u.s justice system. Seems to me King should know something about the law before he became a congressman.. His ability to serve as congressman should be questioned by the people who elected him. Lets not forget that tax payers like Michael Jackson has been paying his salary. Maybe there are a few things in Kings closet we need to be looking at, they are usually the first to condemn others.

Susan from Canada   July 6th, 2009 4:35 pm ET

The man was a genious. To King and all those who are going on about him being a monster.... let's hope that no one in your family gets accused of something, and then spends 6 months in court only to be cleared of all charges. It's life altering... why don't we all ask a teacher who's been accused of such things, and then who was cleared. His name is ruined thanks to people like all of you... DROP IT. LET'S ALL CELEBRATE HIS CONTRIBUTION TO OUR WORLD. AND NOT PAY ATTENTION TO THOSE THAT TRIED TO BLACKMAIL HIM.

arlene lahera   July 6th, 2009 4:36 pm ET

You know how some people bring to mind a particular animal? Well this Peter King creature, many republicans, and some blogger's here remind me of lizards. Look at them long enough, hear what they're saying and you see them take shape... lizard people, really, cold blooded fly eaters.

Drea   July 6th, 2009 4:36 pm ET

Michael was acquitted, Rep. King is just jealous he's not the REAL King!

Jessica   July 6th, 2009 4:37 pm ET

what a shame that the people who are the most critical are the ones hiding the nastiest secrets! You know what I mean Peter King!

Matthew   July 6th, 2009 4:40 pm ET

Pete King has been a renowned supporter of the mass-murdering IRA (although their grievances were legitimate enough)

He therefore disqualifies himself from commenting on any moral issues or the morality of any other human being whatsoever. Michael Jackson never left bombs in cars and garbage bins that blew 12 year old children to pieces along with thousands of others over time.

Rachael Dunstan   July 6th, 2009 4:45 pm ET

First off let me just say that I do agree that the media should back off on the coverage of Michael Jackson’s death and cover some more pressing matters. That said… Shame on Congressman King for his grossly out of line comments in what should be a time of mourning. Does the term ‘Acquittal’ mean anything to him? The only thing Mr. King proved to me is how ignorant he is of Michael Jackson and perhaps if he had followed the trials closely and actually did some research on the man instead of believing all the bad media and tabloid garbage that dogged Michael Jackson his entire life he might learn something. One has to question Mr. King's professionalism and morals – is this to say a person is guilty regardless of whether they're proven innocent or guilty? Instead of being so easily swayed perhaps he should have questioned why the first family accepted the settlement instead of going ahead with convicting a so called pedophile. What parents would put a price on their child? Please tell me this because inquiring minds would love to know.

Sadly Mr. King and so many others will choose to remain ignorant about the real Michael Jackson, a kind, loving, and sweet yet tragic figure whose only fault was to be so trusting of a world that is so cruel. I’ve always believed Michael to be innocent and always will and I will mourn the loss of one of our world’s last great entertainers and humanitarians.

Congressman King please do us all a favor and use a little comment that will serve you well when it comes to your opinion – “NO COMMENT”

Louise   July 6th, 2009 4:45 pm ET

Thanks to Rep. King for courage in speaking truth about M. Jackson. Every honorable person knows it is the truth. Fear created by the politically correct culture diminishes courage in many.

Concern is for the 3 sad terrorized children. Clearly they are victims of groups of people willing, for sums of money, to assist and enable MJ's actions, and are no less greedy or insensitive to others than Madoff and those surrounding Nicole Smith... in fact they are worse because these victims are children directly terrorized from the moment of their births. They were isolated for M.J.'s purposes. Contact with other children only when MJ was present... no chance to have personal close pals. No school - where was the government on this one??? $$$$??? Madonna who has more secure $$ than MJ, takes her child around with her without any veils denying them their identity. What was MJ's intent in covering the childrens' faces and denying the children the right to their personal identities. Get real.

They should be removed from the control of all who have enabled their misery, and be awarded to adoptive parents. Also, the birth mother and bio parents of the little boy called "Blanket" must be revealed and can be revealed because of M. Jackson's death and his never having adopted the children which thereby would nullify any document restricting release of that information. Curious name for a child... Blanket... perhaps M. Jackson thought of his personal childhood and wanted to sleep again with his security "blanket." – –Reminds one of Citizen Kane and the childhood sled Rosebud. – - M. Jackson did not legally adopt the children and therefore has no right by means of a Will or any source, to determine their future home, whether under the care of his mother (not their grandmother by blood or adoption) or any of his friends. M. Jackson does have a responsibility to give the portion of his estate assigned in his Will, to those children for whom he assumed financial responsibilty. Ms. Rowe is not a biological parent and has no rights... she contracted and was paid for her services in carrying 2 of the children to birth.

Invitro laws must be established to protect children from being design-created and purchased (slaves with no rights or claims to heritage) by non-biological, unmarried individuals who are acting in their own interests and purposes and thereby evidence that they have no consideration for welfare or rights of the child/children. Aren't we against slavery in any form??

MJ liked to scare the children by pretending he was dead then popping up to scare them... a "game" his doctor explained in his comments after M.J.'s death, that they thought he was possibly playing.

Yes, MJ was tremendously talented dancer. Unequaled. Moves and musical talent the very best. His childhood was damaged by a father he said terrified and beat him... and a mother who ignored his cries. He wanted to reclaim his childhood and became a very confused man. How tragic for him... and now that he is being comforted by the God who did hear his childhood cries and his heart, I think MJ would be very glad to see those children given a safer and restored childhood and life... away from all who enabled their tragic lives.

Barbara   July 6th, 2009 4:47 pm ET

Let's see. . . 24/7 coverage of Michael Jackson, one of the most accomplished entertainers of our time or. . . 24/7 coverage of Joe the Plumber, a man of no accomplishment except lying about who he is.

Dorian   July 6th, 2009 4:50 pm ET

For those of you who say that MJ was innocent of the charges, do you also say that OJ was innocent? Come on...they didn't go to jail because they had money. Plain and simple. If the average American were in the same situation, he or she would be serving a long prison sentence. That's the how our justice system works.

margaret watkins   July 6th, 2009 4:54 pm ET

At the least Michael Jackson was inappropriate in his actions towards little boys. Yes...he was talented and appeared to be a gentle person, however enough coverage of his death and his life. When there are so many inportant issues facing our country I feel it is wrong for our press and news agencies to take so much time covering this event. It has become a circus instead of a dignified good-bye. I feel it is nothing but a future move to extract as much money out of Jackson's estate by hyping up the Michael Jackson frenzy and machine. I would be sick to death of this type of coverage if it was a President or Pope let alone a rock idol!

Dave Morris   July 6th, 2009 4:56 pm ET

OJ was "aquitted" also. MJ and OJ were able to fund their aquittals, not prove innocence. Giving the world a bunch of pop music does not over-shadow his negatives. MJ's supporters are an example of the worst of American values right now. I wish CNN would choose to be better than they are right now – MJ coverage needs to be cut by at least half, now!, please!!!

ellie   July 6th, 2009 4:57 pm ET

Michael Jackson should be remembered by everyone and most of all by American people for what he really was, a great artist, a genius, and a good man caring for children and not for the rumors that brought him to his very end!! Please leave him alone, at least now he's dead, and he can't defend himself anymore!!

ally   July 6th, 2009 4:57 pm ET

Pathetic Poll ! I cant believe I am actually reading this I am not even an MJ fan but the poll reads yes he was a child molester or No he was not because he created good music.How about No he was aquitted by 12 jurors no evidence.I am stunned beyond belief how BAD the media and Biased it is .It is very clear the media is DANGROUS and one thing I can say is that MJ maybe not to me but to his millions of Fans is INVINCIBLE.Only intelleigent people realise he was actually a good man who done alot more gave alot more than any other celeb I can think of.Who ever does good in this world is brought down! CNN show some respect to the man just dont be bias HE was proved innocent in a court of law even with all the previous history media bias that you guys gave he still was proved innocent accept it !well they do say the truth is hard to accept dont they! r i p the best american there has ever been.

Justice   July 6th, 2009 4:58 pm ET

Shame on you Mr. King...! Michael Jackson is a symbol, a role model for many of us.

We`ll always adore this legend. Rest in Peace Michael.

Jennifer   July 6th, 2009 4:58 pm ET

"Thank the Lord someone has finally told the truth. Michael Jackson was a pedophile. I think it is important that we remember that."- Christine

"What does it say about our country when all we want to report on is the death of someone was only important to a few people (his fans) and not the news that’s actually important to the entire country/world?" – ArmyWife

Who’s glorifying Michael Jackson? I watched CNN’s Man in the Mirror last night, an hour-long program. The first 15 minutes was a quick breeze through of his musical career from 1968 through 1991’s Dangerous. Then the focus changed from music and entertainment to the controversies that plagued him starting with the 1993 molestation allegations. Considering the breadth of his artistic work, the fact that only one fourth of the program celebrated his musical and entertainment genius clearly proves that we are not “glorifying” the man. I would almost argue that we are actually focusing too little on Jackson’s positive influences: music, dance, fashion, messages of acceptance, charitable work, etc,
Why is it “important” that we remember the “truth” (?!) that MJ was a pedophile? We don’t seem to find it as important to remember the “truths” (alcoholism, drug dependency, sexuality, promiscuity, debts, etc) about other artists through the years: Hemingway, Ray Charles, Oscar Wilde, Frank Lloyd Wright, etc. We are fairly content to look back upon their art with admiration.
How can it NOT be important to examine Michael’s life and work, putting into context not only Michael’s influences on our culture, but also the circumstances and events that forged such a phenomenon as Michael Jackson – the state of the record industry, the emergence of MTV, cable TV, globalization, color barriers, paparazzi, etc.?
While I believe in the importance of local political and international news, I think it’s equally important to examine both our national and global cultural fabric. Michael Jackson was an important part of both, touching and inspiring far more than just a few fans. Seems that MJ news IS what’s important to the entire country/world, judging by the number of people who are not only tuning in to the TV coverage, but going out in person to be part of various tributes and memorials in NY, Gary, Indiana, L.A., etc.

H   July 6th, 2009 4:59 pm ET

I am not sure if he was or was not a child molester and frankly i do not care, if he was, if he was a molester, he was no longer a capable ofender in the US, I am just tired of the pointless coverage his death is getting. When he was alive he was a strange yet talanted person, i enjoyed his act as much as anyone else. Once again, MJ was not news worthy when he was alive, he was not Mother Teresa or anything like that kind of a person. He was a troubled soul that found a way to provide great music and fun for many of us via his shows and music. Thats all if he was, he was not a good story when he was alive why is he now the most important story, how about Farah, now thats sad, she was a fighter. MJ died at his own hands the product of a crappy family dynamic and even worst an adult life that was full of fantasy and manipulation by anyone that could get close to him. Good stuff for a book, not the news. Who could he trust in his life ?? no one really, sad but not the end of the world nor the news story of the momentt.

Rosy   July 6th, 2009 5:00 pm ET

I will be calling his office today to let him and his ignorant supporters know how much HE WENT OVER THE LINE SLANDERING Michael Jackson who was found not guilty on 15 counts which included 10 felony charges related to pedophile and kidnapping and other fantasy charges by the DA and the Santa Barbara Police Department!
We should not let King off the hook for this one; it is another example of how insensitive these republicans are to the issues of Americans! I feel he is looking at all the resources going to Michael's estate and it is driving him crazy because "Money" is always the major focus of these right wingers. They always want to control the money flow and stack it up for their RNC campaign strategy!

Elaine in Stone Mtn., GA   July 6th, 2009 5:00 pm ET

As I watched U.S. Representative Peter King speak so negatively with a hatred tone, it reminded me of just how strong prejudice and ignorance still exists among some. Maybe he didn't watch CNN to see that Michael Jackson was acquitted of child molestation, and he said that he would slit his wrist before he ever touched a child. I believed him, and took him at his word. The people who made those allegations will have to live with thier lies.
Let's give Michael Jackson the same respect that we would to any celebrity or great humanitarian. Let's not judge him and say mean things because of his color or culture. This saddened me as a human being and as an American to see there are still people who are public figures who choose to believe "the worst" of people. Do you not have a heart and believe in a God. What about the "golden rule"? Let's celebrate the "genuine" legacy of Michael Jackson!

Dissappointed in People who Hurt or Try to Tear Down Others.

Rita   July 6th, 2009 5:03 pm ET

I APPLAUD MR. KING FOR SPEAKING HIS MIND!
MJ DOES NOT DESERVE ANY NEWS MEDIA COVERAGE BECAUSE HE WAS A SICK-O. LOOK AT WHAT HE DID WITH HIS LIFE. HE WANTED TO SLEEP LIKE HE WAS IN A COMA, SO EVIDENTLY, HE DID NOT WANT TO LIVE IN THIS WORLD. I FEEL SORRY FOR ALL OF THE DYING CANCER PATIENTS THAT JUST WANT TO LIVE & HAVE A LIFE. NO ONE GIVES THEM THE TIME OF DAY! THIS IS WHAT HE WANTED!

Paul D. Jackson   July 6th, 2009 5:12 pm ET

enough about Michael Jackson. Lets get back to what is more important in this country. How about some support for the soldiers who were killed in Afghanistan.

Kimberly   July 6th, 2009 5:22 pm ET

Hey Mr. King... Newsflash – Michael Jackson was acquitted in a court of law by his peers. In America, we have this funny saying: Innocent until proven guilty. Michael was never proven guilty.

I'd think you'd know that given your position, but apparently not.

I think the real question is... What does it say about us when a congressman doesn't even know how our justice system works?

Slander is still against the law, when it's a congressman against a dead celebrity, right?

tangledweb   July 6th, 2009 5:29 pm ET

Audrey – the last thing Michael's family needs to do is sue for slander. They the REAL truth, and ALL of the truth will come out!!!!! disgusting.

Elsie Vaughn   July 6th, 2009 5:30 pm ET

Stephen King, you should be ashamed of yourself for making the comments that you made about Micheal Jackson, especially since he is noy here anymore to defend himself that was loow and uncalled for. I pray for you. obviously our former President Ronald Reagan thought that Micheal's talent was phenomenal, and great because he had him come to the White House and awarded him for all of his accoplishments as an entertainer...So what do you say to that?? you owe his family an apology for the accusations that you made, you really showed your true colors huh?

Bonnie   July 6th, 2009 5:32 pm ET

How would Rep. King be so sure MJ was guilty, unless he, or one of his family members were there.

rita   July 6th, 2009 5:33 pm ET

Michael Jackson is the greatest man and artist ever. E 'was an honor for us its passage on earth. The world should bow before his genius and humanity. He lived to give himself, has spread messages of peace and love.
It 'a shame this poll. Have respect for his immortal soul.
May God have mercy on you!
Michael love you forever.

B Jones   July 6th, 2009 5:36 pm ET

The media is pushing Micheal Jackson life more than anything...CNN is part of the media...right..I am disappointed with Rick Sanchez as well as this congressman...Rick you need to be more professional when on TV.......as for the congressman stop spending our money on yourself......

California

Stan Hannan   July 6th, 2009 5:39 pm ET

Seven Americans died this week in Afghanistan...they are the heroes. They didnt dance as far as we know, they didnt play music nor to our knowledge did they record a song! They deserve the focus of attention, respect and adulation for what they did do ....they gave their lives in service to the United States of America.I have no idea of their ethnic background yet I mourn their death. We should keep the main thing- the main thing! We have gone overboard in our sickening adulation of an excentric so called superstar.

Angel   July 6th, 2009 5:40 pm ET

How horrible that one so reckless is in such a position of power! It is one thing for him to personally believe the allegations against Michael Jackson, but to spread his ill-informed, personal opinion as fact is wrongful and horribly damaging to Michael, who no longer has the opportunity to defend himself.

And what a hypocrite he is. Despite his supposed concerns, he has dragged Michael Jackson into another news story only now the Congressman is not adding any new information or positive contribution to the flow of information in any way. If anything, his ignorance and rush to judgment without having all the facts at hand has made the public dumber for having listened.

The basis for his opinion is a mere conflation of what he perceives to be improper and what is criminal. So he is not only ignorant, but a victim of illogical thinking. And maybe he doesn't realize that the judicial process, unlike Congress, is not about brokering deals and that you have to actually acquaint yourself with all the facts to make a judgment. If this is indicative of his usual thought process, I shudder to think of what he is doing for our country.

Angel   July 6th, 2009 5:45 pm ET

Also, that is a horrible poll. It presupposes that Michael was a "pervert." Where is choice "No. I do not believe the allegations of impropriety" or just plain "No. I do not think he is a pervert"? I'm sure there are enough bright people at CNN to come up with a non-biased poll. You can do better than this.

Emma   July 6th, 2009 5:47 pm ET

Congressman King is an ignorant man to say the least! MJ was found NOT guilty on all those b.s. charges brought on against him! MJ was a kind and gentle soul! God Bless MJ! May you rest in peace Michael Jackson!

Yvette   July 6th, 2009 5:50 pm ET

Michael Jackson was never convicted of a single crime against a single child. People who knew him personally continue to defend him past his dying day. I make no claims that he wasn't eccentric or a bit odd, but I have a hard time believing this man was guilty of such a heinous crime and got away with it more than once. His contributions to the music world were countless, and this is why we talk about him. This is what he should be remembered for. The music defined the man as legend, and all that music which enhanced our lives was bigger than the unproven legal accusations that Rep. King insists should define the man. Maybe Rep. King is just bitter; he will one day fade to obscurity, whereas Michael Jackson will always be the King of Pop.

A Ab Khut Meter   July 6th, 2009 5:54 pm ET

Stehen King's comments are typical of duplicitous republicans who continue to shock the world with their brand of family values. Whether it's emptying the country's coffers, starting illegal, unnecessary wars, polluting the enviornment, sharming their wives and children, desecrating the corpse of the world's most gentle. artist- they have no remorse And it is always done or said in the name of patriotism.

Davina   July 6th, 2009 5:57 pm ET

I voted "No", yet that option is rather badly worded if you ask me. Saying that "His artistry outshone any allegations of impropriety" does imply possible impropriety that was overlooked by fans because of his artistry.

I would have preferred something like "No. He was found not guilty of any impropriety by a court of law. There was never any proof of his alleged misconduct, therefore Peter King has no right to make such defamatory statements."

However, I do agree that the coverage was overblown.

May Michael Jackson rest in peace now, he will never be forgotten. All my prayers to his children.

Romi   July 6th, 2009 6:02 pm ET

I think this Pete Guy should really get a I don't think its possible anymore that one cant be famous anymore if they don't mention Michael Jackson. If he doesn't want to watch Mike on TV. THEN CHANGE THE CHANNEL!!! Its not gonna be a loss 2 us, believe me. This world is already as low as it can be. Michael Tried to bring Love and peace and togetherness to the world. And the Only man who really help the world is Gone now, and We got Nobody anymore.

This world is sooo Messed up that everything that people do is always pointed to "SEX". No wonder why God took him this soon. Its because ppl. Like Pete that the world is an ignorant place.

And the troops are dying because of the decisions People like "PETE" made about the war in the Middle east. I think Bush and his pupates(Republicans) except Arnold, are Dictators. Who else goes to another persons country and start a war.

Pete, you need to Look at ur self in the mirror before talking about Our Beloved Man. Dont worry cuz you wont be as famous and as Loved by others as him.

Dude, You're really crazy to say these things when you know that family and loved ones are watching. What a duchbag. You really have no brain. Isnt it your party that are having an affair with other ppl. other than their wives. And some are gay now, and you dont say anything about that? Just Go back to the rock u came from.

~RIP. MY ANGEL Michael Jackson~

Brad   July 6th, 2009 6:02 pm ET

My answer does not neatly fit any one of your three options, but I think Rep. King is way out of line. His knowledge of the particulars of Jackson's life are no better than mine. All we know is that Jackson was acquitted of pedophilia charges. It seems King doesn't respect the legal system that he's been elected to uphold.

Lynn   July 6th, 2009 6:03 pm ET

The networks have interviewed everyone except victims of sexual predators. Do people realize how horrible it is to be a victim of a sexual predator and then see the most famous one celebrated with complete disregard for the lives he has damaged? He openly discussed his unhealthy and inappropriate relationship with children. I appreciate he had talent but it's no excuse for people to forget the harm he has done. I plan to boycott every artist attending his memorial. Other victims should do the same and speak out about the pain this one sided celebration is causing. Shame on them all. What next? Do we throw a parade on Hitler's birthday? All is not forgiven in death. The victims live on.

FT   July 6th, 2009 6:08 pm ET

the poll is worded stupidly.

we should celebrate michaels life because he was a great artist and never convicted of any crime. if he was actually guilty i would have voted yes...

Ecneralc Htims   July 6th, 2009 6:13 pm ET

Could the Jackson family file a lawsuit against this Congressman on the basis of defamation of character since Michael Jackson do represent that family The Jacksons as a group, etc.. It's time these bashers put their money where they're mouth is and cough up the dough.

Darci Faye   July 6th, 2009 6:16 pm ET

I believe that Peter King is way out of line and is just using Michael Jackson's death as a way to get more fame. Michael Jackson was NEVER found guilty, he is a legend and it's unfortunate that even in his death the media won't stop slandering his name. Just let the poor guy go in peace, he never had any peace when he was living, so out of respect, I believe it's the right thing to do.

I do believe that Michael Jackson rightfully deserves, and has earned all the coverage he is receiving. He may not have been a school teacher, or served in a war, but he has donated over 300 million dollars of HIS OWN MONEY to 39 different charities, so you can't say he has not done his part in trying to save the world. He would have been more successful if it wasn't for all of the money hungry people trying to tear him down. I think it is just as important to remember Michael as a humanitarian, as it is a pop icon.

What I don’t understand is why this guy is getting so much attention? If the media will just ignore him then it wouldn’t turn into this huge thing. And am I the only one who sees him as a hypocrite? If he wants the media to stop giving Michael all this attention, then why is he bringing this much attention to him? If he really wants the media to stop glorifying him then he shouldn’t be adding on to it.

I hope this will ruin his political career. I know if I ever had the chance to vote against him, I would in a heartbeat. He has no morals, and does not understand respect or privacy.

L Bassett   July 6th, 2009 6:20 pm ET

Rep. King and those like him are the reason this nation and world
are in the state we currently find ourselves. False accusations, unfortunately happen everyday and cause extensive and often irreparable harm. Michael Jackson's soul touched millions very deeply. We can honor his life on earth as much and as long as we choose to. (Note: I believe the excessive scrutiny of his finances and personal matters is vulgar and completely unnecessary. It is
extremely disrespectful to he and his family. . .
This is a most sad commentary on an all too prevalent societal mind set. Private affairs are simply no one else's business unless family and those enstrusted choose to share the information. A flagrant deprivation of individual liberty and therefore unconstitutional. As such it most assuredly is illegal. A profession that requires work to be performed for and/or presented to the public does NOT subsequently require that personal lives should be available for public review and commentary. There is a very clear and easily definable line here. It is absolutely ludicrous to conclude that it is acceptable to invade a citizen's privacy simply because they have gained a high level of public recognition and interest as a result of their employment . How completely absurd. It is deeply dissappointing that we would even consider behaving in such a
deameaning manner. The absence of legal actions preventing
such gross violations of individual liberties (to protect all persons in such predictaments) is of grave concern.

Dave in Calgary   July 6th, 2009 6:26 pm ET

He wasn't that good – and yes, millions of people CAN be wrong.

Mike Lewandowski   July 6th, 2009 6:39 pm ET

I Agree,
Plus thanks Mr. Peter King Congressman to have the balls to say what everone is thinking,
its getting to be a joke on how this news is giving Pervert Jackson so much atention. and not Farra Fachet

OJ'S gone now everyone knows he did it but it cost him alot to getout of it.

Michael Jackson is gone an he spent a lot of cash to get out of his charges but look who all helped him pay his leagal fee's .

Now hopefully Obama Husain will be gone soon and pailen will be in Office next and then let the fun begin I think we need a Civil War Again

yobin   July 6th, 2009 6:41 pm ET

Rick,

I have something to say to all the people out their that registered for MJ's services. For the ones that registered with full intentions on attending this special tribute to him and were lucky to receive tickets congrats to you. BUT, to the people out their that registered for the fun of it, for the hell of it, knowing damm will you wouldn't attend if you won the tickets,YOU SUCK!! You have taken away seats from true fans of Michael's. You have not only taken away seats from us his true fans, but now their will be empty seats because you will never be able to sell or give them away in time. You vultures don't deserve to walk the planet!!! MJ was not God, but what he was and will always be is a very talented artist that was admired, appreciated and loved by millions. So I say "GO TO HELL' to the scum of the earth that ruined this day for the fans that truly deserved to be there and has disrespected MJ and the Jackson Family. Now! live with those filthy, greedy hands and that less than a pea size brain that you think you have and go on with your pathetic life and let us morn and celebrate MJ's life.

Ron   July 6th, 2009 6:49 pm ET

First of all there was a poll of who didn't like Michael Jackson and it was Older Republicans males.
Second, what kind of parent would accept money if their child was molested? What kind of parent would sue just to get money from someone who they thought was a "CASH COW"?
third, why didn't Cong. Peter King say ANYTHING about the parents who took money instead of taking Jackson to court? Taking Jackson to court and winning would have cost Jackson more money and pain than milking him for his money.
Con. Peter King is doing it for votes no matter what he says.

Mary   July 6th, 2009 6:51 pm ET

He was a freak both mentally and physically.
He does not deserve the adulation he is getting from the public and the press.
Let it go already.

dj   July 6th, 2009 6:51 pm ET

shame on him for being so insisitive to someone's son ,father , brother before he even was rest to peace
i consider Mj the son of the world so when king said those words he hurt the whole world .
MJ changed the world with his talent what do u have mr king??

Willie V   July 6th, 2009 7:03 pm ET

Enough about jacko, wacko, whatever he was called. The fact stands yes he was not convicted of child molestation charges because it was a media cicus and it was a rich man with plenty of cash and sick parents trying to make money at their kids expense having them exposed ton jacko.....Any grown man that states that he has sleep overs with little boys and girls is a sick pervert no matter who he is. But since it was the Micheal Jackson the so called king of Pop it was ok! Shame on anyone black, white , yellow. brown whatever color that thinks that is ok and normal. But because it was One of the richest entertainers it is all good....no! Peter King just stated what millions wanted to say and did not have what it took! In this day were we have have to be sensitive to the so called black and white America it has become an issue. If you break it down to demographics "most white non-gays, lesbians, or wanna be hip hoppers or gangstas" you would probably find that only those groups metion would be the only ones having a huge problem over what Peter King said.......enough is enough with the jacko coverage!

ally   July 6th, 2009 7:04 pm ET

Typical bad press !!! MJ GAVE MORE TO CHARITY THAN , LADY DI , ELVIS ANY BEATLE AND ANY OTHER AMERICAN I CAN THINK OF!!.

How much coverage does the fact he gave 20% of his will to charity but this is not mentioned. People talk about OJ , well OJ was found guilty in civil court. MJ was not and never was.

The problem is the media are extremely jealous of his wealth and the fact he is loved.Sometimes people cant stand that.

Bashir stated recently he saw no criminal act nor did he believe there was anything criminal.HE WAS ASKED THIS IN COURT!!!!!

WHY DID HE TAKE THE 5TH AMENDMENT INTHE TRIAL BECAUSE HIS REP WOULD BE DAMAGED.

PEOPLE WHO ARE ANTI JACK0 fine he was odd , and eccentric but have the intellengence to see that this does not make him a child molester

j mck   July 6th, 2009 7:21 pm ET

Congressman King finally expressed what alot of viewers feel – the media have crossed the line of responsible news reporting and it should be stopped. While this man had a tremendous talent he was a very sick individual and certainly no role model for our young people. To acknowledge his music – yes – to become involved in rag reporting – no. It is insulting to your profession and to your viewers- tks to Mr. King . Raise the bar CNN.....Please pass this on to Rick Sanchez as well.

Rita   July 6th, 2009 7:29 pm ET

Thank you CNN for the MJ coverage. I love MJ and I'm interested in knowing with what happen to him, I will be glued to the television- CNN for live coverage of the memorial service tomorrow. Thanks again.

Venus   July 6th, 2009 7:32 pm ET

Michael has helped more people than anybody on this earth and because of his wealth people went after him. Accusing him and hurting that man. God bless You Michael Joe Jackson may you rest in peace and love.

spot the racist   July 6th, 2009 7:40 pm ET

Congressman King is a RACIST! He needs to shut up and do his job. He wasn't elected to be the judge and jury on Michael Jackson. I hope this creates a big crack in his congressional seat and someone else takes advantage of it and boots him out of office. VOTE AGAINST KING AND HIS RACIST BIGOTED VOICE.

Tatiana   July 6th, 2009 8:03 pm ET

I think that peter king should stop interfering and stop saying all these nasty, mean things about michael jackson. michael did not do all these things and he is dead and should not be treated this way. Jackson is a great pop icon and king should stop and have some respect!

JSmith   July 6th, 2009 8:26 pm ET

Rick,

Perhaps the Congressmen is right about the media spending too much time on MJ and instead spend more time on the adulterous affairs of Governor Sanford and Senator Enzi.

Jane   July 6th, 2009 8:26 pm ET

He's a republican need I say more! Acquitted by the judical system! obviously that's not good enough for him I hope his constitutes remember this when it's time for election!

JSmith   July 6th, 2009 8:37 pm ET

Rick,

There are a lot of people that lack the capacity to understand or try to be understanding, they like Congressmen King instead get angry and and kling on to the easiest conclusion. Congressmen King not only shows a lack of depth in his character, and as someone else had commented shows a lack of class. If the Congressmen is so concerned about children why wouldn't he show some respect for the three kids that MJ has left behind and keep his mouth shut.

amanda   July 6th, 2009 8:46 pm ET

For all of you that have judged Michael Jackson in life and now in death, I pray for you, for one day you to will all be judged by the only one that matters. Michael has already faced him on june 25th. Know one here on earth has the right to judge him. Be thankful that we were able to witness his talent and his heart. If more of us in this world were more like Michael this would be a much better world. Listen to the lyrics of his songs. He touched the world! Can you say the same? I love you Michael and my prayers toyour children and Family.

fed   July 6th, 2009 8:46 pm ET

OJ Simpson was also found not guilty on murder charges, do you really believe that too!???!!

Rule #1 – money can buy you out of ANYTHING... MJ did just that.

JSmith   July 6th, 2009 8:50 pm ET

Rick,

I wonder who is more benevolent Congressmen King or Michael Jackson?
Also Rick just how benevolent was Michael Jackson anyway, seriously I'd like to know.
That would be a scoop for CNN, since that is NOT being reported.

MJInnocent   July 6th, 2009 9:00 pm ET

Michael is not a child molester. But I know who is.

Tom Sneddon who was the DA who went after Michael Jackson for child molestation all those years was involved in molestation coverups at his own church.

"He (Sneddon) was a parishioner at the Santa Barbara Mission when it was revealed in the early 1990s that 34 boys had been sexually molested by 11 Franciscan friars who helped run St. Anthony's Seminary next door to the Mission.

"Pat (McKinley) and I used to go to church up there, and we were clueless, just clueless" of the molestation cases back then, said Mr. Sneddon, speaking of himself and his second-in-command. "

He was clueless because he was too busy focusing on Michael Jackson then REAL PREDATORS.

REMEMBER WHAT I TOLD YOU, THOSE POINTING THEIR FINGER AT OTHERS ARE PROBABLY GUILTY OF THE ACT THEMSELVES.

Rick, Florida   July 6th, 2009 9:05 pm ET

All these fellow American citizens condemning Michael Jackson... one of our own. Did they forget that he was supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty? I guess this would only apply to THESE people and their loved ones, if they found themselves in trouble. That's American!

Michael had his day in court. He was, subsequently, acquitted by a jury of his peers! It's over!!

Even so-called attorney's that have studied and practiced law, don't get it! The law provides that we are "presumed innocent until proven guilty, in a court of law."

Sometimes, it is embarrassing being American!

Edgar   July 6th, 2009 9:11 pm ET

The sad thing about this public official going on and on about Michael Jackson is that this man he's talking about was a performer who entertained people all over the world. His music is memorable for all to remember and enjoy. His music helped people feel good, bad, sad, all the emotions a human can produce.

Of course, we honor everyday people, but there is only one Michael Jackson, just give him his day. Is it really going to hurt people? Turn off the radio, TV and read a book instead if it bothers you that people are celebrating Michael Jackson's life.

sky   July 6th, 2009 9:19 pm ET

michael jackson was proven innocent! the first allegations against michael were paid off by his INSURANCE COMPANY, therefore he had no control over it. if he was guilty of the next set of charges he would have attempted to pay off the accusers as the media keep saying he did the first time round! michael wanted to CLEAR HIS NAME which is why he attended the trials and knew that justice would be served because he was INNOCENT. he didnt do anything, he was simply taken advantage of by people that wanted to make quick money and make a mockery of him. the least mr king can do is be respectful, if not for michael than at least for his family's sake. do you really think his family want to hear you bull? in the words of michael, BE QUIET YOU FAT HEADED RASCAL. in my words...shut the f*** up!

LM2InLkpt   July 6th, 2009 9:22 pm ET

For the MJ fans: Sure, MJ was acquitted four years ago of the child-molestation charges.

However, the fact ALONE that he paid the mega-millions to hush a similar case against him a dozen years prior to that suggests there was something amiss about him.

But, then again, had he HAD a normal childhood to begin with, then he likely wouldn't have done all these strange things to himself over the years... and he'd likely be still alive by now. Shame on Joe Jackson.

However, MJ had the ability to make choices and judgments about what he was doing... and he let himself get into one too many compromising situations which, sadly, took their toll on him.

I'd like to say something more "positive" for MJ, but I have to agree with the great Pete King... Enough is enough, folks. We have more important matters to deal with in our nation such as protecting America from terrorism, the state of the economy, government getting too big for its britches, the leftist clowns taking "filibuster-proof" control of the US Senate(can you say Big Fat Idiot Al Franken?), and access to domestic oil and energy resources as opposed to depending on foreign sources of the same.

MJInnocent   July 6th, 2009 9:23 pm ET

July 6th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

Michael Jackson had to pay $20 million in hush mom to the family of a boy he molested. If this doesn’t prove he was a child molester and pedophile, nothing else will.
-----------
It wasn't "hush" money. It's obvious most of you don't know the REAL STORY and I'm sure the mainstream media hasn't done their job but I WILL.

Back in 1993, Evan Chandler, the father of the boy, FILES A LAWSUIT in the middle of a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. Do you understand legal repercussions of that? Normally civil lawsuits are filed AFTER NOT BEFORE. The burden of proof is LOWER in a civil lawsuit and hearsay is allowed. From a legal point of view, no one would want a civil lawsuit trial before a criminal trial. A CIVIL LAWSUIT DOES NOT RESULT IN IMPRISONMENT. So, in essence if Michael had won the civil lawsuit, it would have meant NOTHING to him.

Why was Evan Chandler concentrating on MONEY? Let's give you some background. Evan Chandler was a HOLLYWOOD SCRIPT WRITER. He co-wrote "Robinhood Men in Tights." Before the accusations, Evan Chandler wanted Michael to invest $20 MILLION in a movie deal. Michael declined. Several days later, he claimed Michael molested his child.

Evan Chandler's skills as a SCRIPT WRITER would play a part in him CRAFTING his civil lawsuit deposition.

For those saying Michael settled to "hush" the boy. NOT TRUE. Guess what Evan Chandler did after the lawsuit was settled and Michael not charged. Evan Chandler would participate in a book with a man name Victor Guiterez called "Michael Jackson was My Lover," the Jordy Chandler diaries. So, Evan Chandler HAD NOT PROBLEM PROPAGATING HIS STORY JUST NOT TO A JURY!!!!

By the way, WHAT FATHER WOULD REFER TO THEIR SON'S ALLEGED CHILD MOLESTER, AS A "LOVER." ISN'T THAT CHILD ABUSE???

JennysView   July 6th, 2009 10:00 pm ET

I am not shocked by the comments made by Congessman King. He is the stereotype Republican – Judgemental, Self righteous, and ultimately a Fool! We ve seen them preach before, we see them preach everyday, we will continue to see them preach from their temporary pulpits....!
Fact is, we just saw the most recent one among them disgrace himself and his family as viciously as he condemned others.....Gov Mark Sanford.
I betcha that the loud mouthed King is soon to follow.
You mark my words!

Robin Wood   July 6th, 2009 10:02 pm ET

How many times do I have to say this...he was found NOT GUILTY. Mr. Lewandowski, don't presume to speak for me when you say Peter King is speaking for everyone. I, for one, have a mouth of my own and I don't need anyone putting words in my mouth. I think MJ was a very talented singer and performer. I grew up listening to his music and feel as though a part of my childhood has died with him. I do not put him in a pedestal but I do think he was very talented.

As for Peter King, he is just trying to grab on to the coat tails of MJ. He just wants to show how ignorant he is. The last I heard, and I worked for a judge, when you are found NOT GUILTY you are NOT GUILTY.

As for Farrah, learn to spell.

Ngozi K   July 6th, 2009 10:11 pm ET

Do I smell envy here? Michael Jackson is/was a star and is HOT news always, even in death....too bad for Mr King!
Everyone wants to know about MJ. My family and I cannot get enough of the coverage – I am recording them daily on CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, etc. I just bought a TV for the kitchen so that I can watch while I cook for my family!
Rep King and co, please If you do NOT want to see Michael Jackson's coverage on TV, please allow me to quote Ms Kimora Lee Sommons for you: "CLOSE YOUR EYES!"

Nikki   July 6th, 2009 10:13 pm ET

Anybody notice that JORDAN CHANDLER (accuser from 1993) ADMITTED HE LIED now that MJ HAS PASSED AWAY!! Rep King should be sited with slander charges!!

Ogee   July 6th, 2009 10:26 pm ET

Anyone who has a brain in his head and an IQ higher than a pre-K student knows that Michael Jackson would NEVER hurt any one let alone a child. Ho loved children and the great sadness of his life remains that he got his fame at the expense of his childhood.
He was a gentle soul and my heart weeps when I hear people like Mr King. This man was acquitted in a U.S court by a jury (not a judge, mind you!)
Whoever voted Mr King into office should use this opportunity to re-assess their decision because we do not need such people (mis)representing us!

r mancini   July 6th, 2009 10:32 pm ET

If LA wants to charge the Jackson Family for security for his service that would be wrong.
Like if someones adult son starts a fire they are not responsible to pay the damages as long as he is an adult.
No matter what happens at the gathering for Michael Jackson's memorial service the Jackson family is not responsible and so they cannot be made to pay.
If LA is troubled by the sheer numbers of people coming to this event that really should be their problem.
People do have a right to assemble in this country.

r mancini   July 6th, 2009 10:36 pm ET

Will you insensitive clods please just allow the man to be buried before you offer your small and meaningless opinions?

I wouldn't want to be the news station that isn't carrying the Michael Jackson story.

Marsea   July 6th, 2009 10:44 pm ET

I am not a parent, but I can tell you 100% that if someone had molested my child, no amount of money would convince me not to press charges and send the person to prison. That the family of the first child settled out of court essentially proves his innocence, not his guilt. Who could blame the man for wanting to avoid the media circus that subsequently followed in the second trial where, in case people have forgotten, he was acquitted. Congressman King is guilty of nothing less than slander and should be ashamed of feeding into the negative press.

Carol   July 6th, 2009 10:51 pm ET

Very offensive, repugnant and unforgivable! It's also very discouraging that this man is a lawmaker but yet he does not believe in the judicial system that aquitted Michael on all charges! I'm over 50 and this heartbreaking loss has hit me like a ton of bricks! Music is very powerful, and has caused many changes in society that politics could not. The positive message of Michael's music has impacted each of us in someway, and our collective grieving at losing him is very appropriate.
And the Republicans wonder why they are losing all the young people! DUH,?? GO FIGURE!!!

Linda Graham   July 6th, 2009 10:55 pm ET

Mike Lewandowski, it's because of people like you, who have not yet evolved, why there is so much evil, hatred and ignorance in this world. No, not "everyone" is thinking what Congressman King said, only ignorant, bigoted people like you. Haven't you noticed that the majority of comments here are BLASTING the crude remarks made by him? My God, get yourself EDUCATED and learn to SPELL, too...

Linda   July 6th, 2009 11:44 pm ET

I hope that if anyone is falsely accused, they would have their defenders stand with them through the end. Unfortunately, there are evil people in this world, who spend precious energy and time devising schemes and disecting others lives to destroy them and bring them down. May you fall into your own ditch! They are the ones who derive pleasure out of others pain and suffering.

After living in Southern Cali for a few years, I was amazed at the numbers of money focused, sue happy, insensitive, gossipy people who lived in one city! They could not wait to find something on anyone! They were experts at it. Imagine if your a celebrity!

Michael Jackson was on the go all throughout his life, using his amazing energy creating music. Everything he thought and expressed was right...even defending the children who accused him KNOWING how evil parents can be.

Robyn   July 7th, 2009 12:06 am ET

The one thing I have learned (and it was not a big surprise) is that most of the American public have very short memories and twist the facts to suit them. I've seen everything posted regarding the accusations against Michael from lumping both situations together to assuming that because he paid off the first family it automatically means he was guilty. Or that acquittal doesn't mean he didn't do it. . Does anyone remember the 1980's and the child care trial involving things like sacrifices, abuse, and Satanism (the McMartin / Little Rascals day care)? Several people's lives were turned upside down during that trial and they were brought to trial based on children's testimony. However, when it was all said and done, after their lives were ruined, it turns out the things the children said never happened. They were coerced into their testimony by psychologists who implanted false memories and then seeded them by rewarding those who gave the "right answer" when asked. Since none of us were there in Neverland.. how about we drop that subject and move on? I don't think Michael held himself up as a hero... all he ever wanted to do was perform, make songs and help people with his money. Focus on that and leave the rest. I've also seen people say the news coverage is too much, that he doesn't deserve it.. that no one has ever had this much coverage.. again.. short memories... when John Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 the news about it was non-stop and it went on for months. When Elvis died it was the same.. and John Lennon and many many others. (do I really have to list them all?) I've even seen people compare the coverage to 9/11 saying those who died didn't get as much coverage. I guess you slept thru most of the year or two that followed that tragedy.... every time you turned on the TV some channel was showing something about someone who died and every year on the anniversary they show it all over again. And that is as it should be. People need to grieve... and everyone grieves differently, in different ways, and at a different pace. Just because you are "over" the death of Michael Jackson, doesn't mean there isn't someone out there who isn't. Whether or not you agree... this is a horrible loss for many many people who grew up with Michael's music. I do not understand the venomous hatred being spewed onto website after website. If your lives are so perfect, if you are "without sin" then go ahead and cast stones.. otherwise... do as my mother used to say... "If you can't say somethng nice.. then say nothing at all."

Pat   July 7th, 2009 12:12 am ET

My question to Pete King would be – how does he know Michael Jackson was a child molester? Did he do his own independent investigation? Did you research Michael Jackson's accusers? Did you gather evidence? Does he realize Tom Sneddon tried TWICE to find ANYTHING on Jackson and FAILED? If Jackson was a child molester WHY was there NEVER any evidence of his crimes?

Pete King (like a lot of others) is nothing but a self centered glory seeking, media whore. He knows if he comes out and disses Michael Jackson – it will make him headlines.

Before his comments, I never heard of him. And, neither had anyone else.

Pete King...unless you absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt know that Michael Jackson molested children, you need to be quiet. Otherwise, yuor comments are disrespectful, irresponsible, and hypocritical.

Maria   July 7th, 2009 12:31 am ET

I think Mr. King needs to take a look at his own hypocritical party and shut up. Family values my a** Oh yeah, and he has a history of racism, surprise, surprise. So where does your mistress live, Mr. King?

Lois Feldman   July 7th, 2009 12:37 am ET

It is great that we have spent all of this time honoring Micheal Jackson, since Michael has given a lot to humanity through his beautiful singing, creative fabulous dancing and the many important messages that he shared in so many of his songs. I perceive that Michael loved children with all of his heart and soul and never hurt any child in any way. I believe that Michael never molested any child and never would have done so. It is a shame that Congressman Peter King is not perceptive enough to see this and voices a false attack on Michael Jackson in his foolish, brash, ugly, accusatory manner. It was an especially inappropriate time for Mr. King to say this a day before Michael's funeral and memorial. Mr. King has shown a lack of respect for the living and the dead in his display of poor judgement. I extend my deepest sympathy to the family and friends of Michael Jackson. May Michael Jackson rest in peace through all eternity!

Ken Mackie   July 7th, 2009 12:57 am ET

I thought that the first day of Jacksons death.

It shows the lack of morality and sane thinkers in America, especialy the highly over paid under performing media.

The editor of the black magizine does not mention the bribes and highly paid attorneys Jackson had to clear his name. The always following sheep of America are so easily led to the DARK SIDE!!!

What has happened to the original reason of the first congress???

Linda   July 7th, 2009 1:29 am ET

To: 'MJInnocent'

Thank you. I just found info on the script described in Wikipedia and it does mention the name Evan Chandler as the writer. Thank you for your input and as I mentioned in my comment, it is amazing the energy some evil wannabe celebrities will go through for MONEY!

In the end, Michael is really living it up now away from these evil monsters........RIP Michael and I hope to make it through the insanity here to meet you!! PEACE

Goldie-Annabelle Box-Jackson (No relation.)   July 7th, 2009 2:16 am ET

I personally think what Peter King said about MJ is totally false. And further more there is NO REAL PROOF AT ALL. Mr. King sir, you really need to start showing respect and you really need to learn what to and what not to say about someone who has passed on I mean come on now mate.

Does Mr. King not realize that the song They Don't Really Care About Us was written for people like him.

You know his (Mr. Jackson that is.) goal and dream was for there to be world love, world peace and world unity for us all as well as our brothers and sisters across this world that we live in.

PS. I'm quite sorry for being so long winded Mr. Sanchez..

RIP Mike. May you finally get the peaceful sleep that you deserve. up there in Heaven......which is where you diffidently are. Heaven is for good people.

Heck is for hateful people.

Goldie-Annabelle Box-Jackson (like I said no relation)
From London, England.

yangshulie   July 7th, 2009 3:04 am ET

Stupid question, Michael Jackson not guilty, who do you think you are? Prosecutor or the jury?

LyricalQT   July 7th, 2009 3:37 am ET

Not Guilty... I rest my case.

sibbo   July 7th, 2009 3:52 am ET

I would vote: No, there was never any evidence against Jackson, and he was found not guilty.

This poll is biased.

Arlene   July 7th, 2009 7:20 am ET

Rick
First of all I agree with the Senator about his comments on Michael Jackson. I understand that he was acquitted of all charges,but how many people have been acquitted of other things and are still guilty. Only God knows his real heart. I personally would not make a statement like that just out of respect for his family. He is gone now and God is his Judge.Michael Jackson had a tortured soul. His life proved that. I did not care for his music,but then everyone has different music likes.My personal opinion is that He grew up trying to please,and the more you give the more people will take. That is human nature. I am so deeply sorry for his family,and now they have to deal with the greed of the living.It breaks my heart. I do not understand why there has been so much media coverage about this man.(or maybe I do). He was just a man. No better than anyone else. I think if people would be honest with themselves and tell the truth about how they really feel about Michael Jackson personally and as a person and leave his music out of it. He would be seen in a different light. I am so appalled at other peoples comments regarding one of God's children. I think Michael wanted to give to the children of the world what he did not get as a child. I certainly understand that. Michael had a lot issues about himself. Issues which he did not deal with. I think he tried to deal with them by taking drugs,but you can see where that led. At this point all I feel is sorrow, and empathy for his family.
Thank you,and God Bless You
Arlene

Danny   July 7th, 2009 7:47 am ET

THE CONGRESSMAN PETER KING IS RACIST. HE NEEDES TO BE SHOT FOR MAKING THAT KIND OF COMMENTS ON THE KING OF POP, THE BEST SELLING ARTIST OF ALL TIME. WHAT HAVE PETER KING DONE IN HIS SORRY ASS LIFE? HE IS TRYING TO GET AN ATTENTION.

Danny   July 7th, 2009 7:49 am ET

PETER KING IS RACIST!!!!!!!!!!

Yuhua   July 7th, 2009 7:51 am ET

Rep King disgusted me, I am appalled by his comments. What rights does he have to make such demand? This is one time Media does the right thing – to reflect on what people wants, that is remembering Michael Jackson, the best recording artist and the most amazing entertainer there is and one of the most beautiful and pure souls ever lived.

And also I agree with lots of wonderful comments below – King should not be a congressman for he does not even recognize the justice system, MJ was aquitted. And yes, People grow up, don't believe those tabloids anymore, if you want to learn about MJ, listen to himself, listen to his music, stop the hatred and ignorance. Face the great things this man had done and all his contribution to charity and human kind.

Jodi Cecil   July 7th, 2009 7:56 am ET

I have to say that I agree partially with this congressman. He was wrong to have said this after Michael Jackson's death. He should have wait after the hype of MJ's death to talk about his thoughts, but it is a free country and opinions are always tossing in the winds. I don't like to say Michael was a pedophile, but something was wrong somewhere with him. The media glorifies people who are wealthy, on drugs, abuse alcohol, drama queens and other famous hoes like P?. The media looooves to catch famous people screwing up, they get rich off of it, so when Michael Jackson pretended to throw this child over a balcony that was a dumb move on his part to the media and it makes you think what is really going on in some of these famous people's minds. Talking about ignorance. Don't blame the congressman for speaking up he is right in a lot of areas here with people who are well known like Michael Jackson. The media glorifies too much on people who are not good role models and it is only because they are famous and rich. What about normal everyday people who work at department stores or a grocery, they do good things for others all the time, but you rarely see a journalist , media or ever Rick Sanchez out there glorifying them. RS, you can stop with your own back lash to the congressman. Stop making Michael out to be a "Saint" and making the congressman look ignorant when he is right. I liked Michael's music and his dancing, but he was not a man to look up too in his private world. If I were to have visited Never land as a child, I would leave because Michael was scary as hell.

Carolann   July 7th, 2009 7:59 am ET

I for one am wishing the media would stop covering the Michael Jackson issue.
He was not GOD, he was an entertainer.
Yes his music was great, but as a human being what did he do for humanity?????
He was found not guilty but never found INNOCENT
PLEASE PLEASE stop the nonsense.

zixuan0313   July 7th, 2009 8:07 am ET

MJ are died alreary

so we must respect he and he family !!

stop to criticism

Vic   July 7th, 2009 8:10 am ET

While the coverage is over the top, Mr. King overreacted and was way out of line. Yes, our brave soldiers need more recognition, but their tragic stories do not sell commercials. Michael Jackson's incredible talent and the tales of his sad life sold products.

As for being a pedophile, the court found him not guilty. The child, now a teenager, has recanted and said his father made him accuse Michael of molestation. The first father took the money and ran. Let's just say that if my child had been molested I would have wanted to see justice served to the bitter end. I would not have taken the bribe.

Ashley   July 7th, 2009 8:49 am ET

Obviously to these people who continue to label him a pedophile, the rulings of the American justice system holds no weight.

Diana C. Baker   July 7th, 2009 8:50 am ET

Rep. King and others like him are the ones who should be ashamed. This man was a gift from God, a musical genius, the greatest entertainer in world, and an inspirational humanitarian. He was found "not guilty" of those heinous charges. We all know if there were any evidence of hs guilt, his accusers would not have rested until they convicted him. He was innocent and look at how they crucified him. GIve the man his due, celebrate his gifts, let his legacy speak for him, and let the man finally rest in peace. We love you, Michael Joseph Jackson.

LM2InLkpt   July 7th, 2009 9:04 am ET

Hey, folks... If any of us everyday schlupps had to pay millions in "hush money" to silence claims of this nature, would it not cause questions about our reputations... about our integrity... to ensue, and maybe linger? Think about it.

But, then again...

First blame goes to Joe Jackson, MJ's dad, for fouling up his childhood, and thus his life.

Next blame goes to MJ's companions over the years, for fouling up his mind.

And even if he didn't molest kids, he still had some bizarre behaviors over the years... bleaching his skin(I don't buy the "vitiligo" argument), multiple plastic surgeries, sleeping in a hyperbolic chamber, walking around in surgical masks and burquas(and making his kids walk in public like that), and dangling one of his kids over that hotel balcony.

And, in case you haven't heard, he had needle marks on his arms... he was oftentimes injected with a sedative.

But, there are those who will still lionize and idolize him, truth be d–ned.

Cornisha   July 7th, 2009 9:34 am ET

you know that its people like King that made it so easy for this country to fall into a slump so know that there isn't any more damage to do he resort to slander. What king needs to realize is that M.J was acquitted in a court of law and slander is a crime he should be ashamed of himself.
P.s Dont he have work to do besides watching tv.

Bean   July 7th, 2009 10:11 am ET

I'm watching BBC news today to catch up on world news and cricket.

ashley grant   July 7th, 2009 10:17 am ET

OMG!!!

Does Peter King or anyone else have evidence that Michael Jackson was a child molester or pedophile?

Why can't people just have compassion for the family and pray that God will comfort them in their time of grief? Because not only was he an extraordinary artist, but he was as a son, a brother, and a father.

I send my condolences to the family. You are in my prayers.

ashley grant   July 7th, 2009 10:29 am ET

Does Peter King or anyone else have evidence that Michael Jackson was a child molester or pedophile?

Why can't people just have compassion for the family and pray that God will comfort them in their time of grief? Because not only was he an extraordinary artist, but he was as a son, a brother, and a father.

I send my condolences to the family. You are in my prayers.

J   July 7th, 2009 10:30 am ET

Those of you saying stop celebrating should wake up and reconsider because as we know it there aren't very many individuals we can be proud of and say has done and accomplished nearly as much as Michael Jackson did through his music.

The number of lives affected positively by MJ is something no other musician has ever come close to, he was to me a musical activist for change in the world we call home, where the hell were you the last 46 years of his life? If you were in his shoes, how would you feel having your name dragged through filth even after you've passed? Imagine if this was your loved one who has never been convicted of any of the foolishness brought against him.

Remember to judge not, lest thou be judged.

J   July 7th, 2009 10:43 am ET

Look here BOY, you don't seem to recognize you have not done a damn thing for the world yourself, MJ did a heck of a lot for the world.

What have you to say for yourself, don't you realize you bear the name of another black man, Dr. Martin Luther King?

Don't hate on us, appreciate us, quit being a racist ass, "It Don't matter if you're black or white, hee hee..."

gregroy   July 7th, 2009 10:44 am ET

Well as I think about this, who the hell is Pete King. Why are they giving him air time, so he can speak ill of the dead. Just because he doen't like something or his little gang of nobodies don't want to hear about a legend doesn't mean it not news. Sorry Pete you want win this one or the next one with that sad heart and mind. I don't profess to know it all but the man is dead and does have family. Pete take a little time to pray and maybe you want sound so sad and silly next time.

John Delibos   July 7th, 2009 12:00 pm ET

The ignorance surrounding this man's position only goes to prove the power of the press. Once you are tried in the court of public opinion all other courts and all other trials are secondary. Hopefully the fifteen minutes of fame he's receiving from his "rant" will show him just how true that is!

whereabouts67   July 7th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

The great majority of the comments posted here indicate they think King is way out of line for what he said and they also believe the our U.S. justice system has found Michael Jackson NOT GUILTY, as it did. I also believe that Jackson was not guilty just as the jury declared. What is interesting is the poll results because they are so VASTLY out of line with the comments. Is there any chance your techie despises Michael Jackson and is rigging the vote against his innocense?

Matt   July 7th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

I think it is very inconsiderate to be focusing on anything but the fact that a very generous person who did some wonderful charitable work and was a great humanitarian. As far as the previous charges, he was found not guilty so according to the laws that this man helps to pass, a person should be considered innocent if they are found not guilty. Another thing, If you consider his apparent nature and mannerisms coupled with the fact that he was apparantly somebody that didn't quite get how his actions looked to others. In his mind, it seemed to be something extremely innocent to have a child sleep over and to other people, it seemed strange. The more I have learned, the more I am of the opinion that he saw it as a way of comforting them and showing them that someone cared because maybe the kids he had over didn't have a good child hood just like him. And that seems to be the case since the kid from the home alone movies didn't have that great of parents nor did the other one he settled the first law suit with. I think it really came down to a situation that was completely innocent but most people just can't see it that way when you don't know Michael well enough.
But the biggest thing is, the guy just died, his family is grieving so give them a break and don't rip the guy apart. It might be ok to talk about in 6 months or so but not now. In fact, what difference does it make that he was abusing drugs, if in fact he was. I suffer from chronic low back pain and take pain meds for it because nothing else works right now so I get why he was taking them if in fact he was in chronic pain and I totally understand not being able to sleep because I suffer from insomnia due to the meds too. Would I use diprovan to get some sleep, if that is what he did? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!! I'm scared to death of a lot of things like fentynal patches for example. I'll stick with the Ambien or just sleep every other night which happens a lot.
Stop bashing him though congressman.

Rick   July 7th, 2009 12:18 pm ET

Everybody talks about how sad it is that Michael Jackson died... But is it sad to them that there are billions starving to death (even in the US), 60 million unemployed in the US, billions who are ill and cannot get health insurance or proper treatment (for cancer, AIDS, etc...) This is only one man, can't we be sad for the billions... Can't we give as much energy to help those who are alive in need...???

Matt   July 7th, 2009 12:28 pm ET

I posted something else on this yesterday giving my take on the meds and the child molestation charges and again, I think that he was a rich person and someoone saw a way to possibly get a chunk of change and they went for it. I don't believe he ever molested anybody. I think he had a very innocent and naive mind that didn't allow him to understand that other people would not see that the way he saw it.
But I don't like the way this question was posed. I don't think his music would outshine child molestation if in fact he was guilty of that. The bottom line is that he was found not guilty which means there is no proof of it. The medication thing is all allegations at this point as well. Just leave the man alone for a while and let the family grieve without having to hear the media ripping apart his reputation with various comments on the child molesting charge and the drug use. By the way, as far as the drug use, if he was in fact in chronic pain and using pain meds for that, I totally get that. I've been suffering from chronic low back pain for 12-13 years now. I have tried almost everything available to make it stop and that hasn't happened so I am pretty much forced to use prescription meds to deal with it. I know that isn't the most popular way to deal with it for some but if you've never experienced chronic pain, you have no idea how bad that can be. I saw a statistic that 15%-25% of chronic pain sufferers commit suicide and I'm not saying he did that but I can see how this would've happened. When you use Oxycontin or a lot of other similar pain meds, it causes problems with sleep. I suffer from chronic insomnia now as well because of the meds so it's a vicious cycle that sets in. I've used multiple drugs to help me sleep. I would not ever try what Michael allegedly tried. If mine is bad, I'll just go a night without sleep and usually crash the next night.
So my take on the med thing is, I think that should be left to a later time as well and anyone that has never suffered from chronic pain and insomnia will not ever truly appreciate how bad that can be. I've explained it to friends and family as having a really bad tooth ache that never goes away or a headache that never goes away since most people have experienced both at some point. It's fairly easy to put up with that for a period of time but I've been in pain for 13 years and it's horrible at times and when it started being coupled with insomnia, that just made it that much worse because it actually increases the pain or maybe decreases our abiltiy to deal with it. So if he was truly suffering from chronic pain since the pepsi commercial incident and taking meds for that led to insomnia, I understand and that's a horrible way to live. I would never resort to a drug like that. Just reading the warning label I read on the internet made me nervous to ever have it used on me in a surgical setting, let alone having it given at home by anything less than a team of docs.
Anyway, leave the guy alone for a while and let the family grieve. Talk about the other things later but I doubt we'll ever know the truth to any of it.
That's my two cents.

Mark   July 7th, 2009 12:31 pm ET

Life imitates art! If you've seen the movie O Brother, Where Art Though' you probably remember Harold Stokes, the character who was running a winning campaign against the incumbent governor and was also a grand wizard of the kkk. In the movie he stood up and protested the Soggy Bottom Boys who were the most popular bluegrass band in the state. Harold Stokes was booed down and dragged out of the hall by security. The Soggy Bottom Boys picked up from where they left off, everyone cheered, and Stokes lost the to the incumbent.

Differences are that the Soggy Bottom Boys were escaped convicts while Michael Jackson was acquitted in a court of law and whereas Stokes made racist remarks in his tirade, King said nothing about race in his. Apart from those differences King sounds like a modern day stokes.

Kola   July 7th, 2009 1:44 pm ET

The media didn't give Micheal a chance to redeem himself. The people around him took advantage of his character.

prospero   July 7th, 2009 2:20 pm ET

Innocent huh? He paid 20 million dollars to keep one family quiet. I guess that makes him innocent. Would you let him babysit your kids? I suspect not.

george oyemu   July 7th, 2009 2:34 pm ET

Hi Rick,
This is my message to Congressman King. I'm a hundred miles away from Staples Center but watching Michael Jackson's funeral on television brought me to tears. I personally haven't met MJ. Job well done Rick and to your collegues from CNN.

scott   July 7th, 2009 3:04 pm ET

What we all can’t wait for is for the talking heads to shut up about this crap. The dude most likely died from using illegal drugs.

Why are we honoring someone like that? Making him a martyr? The world will soon know that we should be honoring the true king who died 2000 years ago.

Dude was a freak of nature, not comfortable with who he was so he took drugs and bleached his skin to become something OTHER than what God made him.

This world is going to hell in a bucket and I want to be the one holding the handle. This coverage shows future generations how futile those we hold in esteem really are.

He could sing and dance. So could Fred Astaire. He didn't change his skin color. He was proud of what God made him.

Meg   July 7th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

Unless Representative King has legal and personal knowledge that no one else has, he has no business referring to Michael Jackson as a pedophile. I believe that he was not convicted of anything. What he was or wasn't is clearly speculation on anyone's part. And unless King has forgotten, in America we are all innocent until proven guilty of a crime. I think King should apologize for his pedophile remarks–if he doesn't like all the coverage say so, but don't be offensive.

Rob   July 7th, 2009 3:25 pm ET

Rick even you know a majority rules, stop making a big deal over him, the only difference between MJ and thousands of other junkie pedophiles is he was a rags to serious riches black man who was talented but does not outshine his faults!

Robert   July 7th, 2009 3:38 pm ET

I think this whole thing about Micheal Jackson is overblown. He's not the king of pop but the King of Hype!! Even dead he can't get enough of himself! CNN and the other "news" organizations have gone from reporting the news to reporting whats going in the entertainment world... The questions that needs to be asked is How does the custody of MJ kids affect the nation? I would say it doesn't matter..Did MJ contribute to the greater good of the world? I would say No .... One song "we are the world" does not make a contribution. And remember the late George Harrison did more for the world in concert than MJ ever did. – CNN report the facts that's what ur suppose to be doing not joining in on the hype.

Matt   July 7th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Well, I've actually asked myself that question and since I don't konw him, no, I wouldn't but I wouldn't let you or anybody else that I didn't know or only knew from seeing them on tv. I wouldn't let Congressman King babysit either one of my girls either. As a matter of fact, I wouldn't let the president either because I don't know him! So that question really has no relevance. Now if you ask, do I think he's innocent as opposed to not guilty. I really do. I think it's easy for somebody who isn't in that position to say that since he paid $16 million or whatever it supposedly was, as a matter of fact I don't even know what it was. But anyway, I think it's easy for somebody who isn't in that position to say they wouldn't do that if they weren't guilty of the charges. When you think that $20 million was probably something like $1,000 to the average person, I think a lot of average people would pay $1,000 or even $10,000 to avoid a lenthy trial and the probing of a lot of private information. There was a case back in the 80's where a bunch of parents were charged with and found guilty of some crazy sexual crimes against their children, the stories were all later recanted and they were later exonerated. It's amazing the things you can get kids to say. I bet I could get my 4 year old to tell you a lengthy story on how we went to the moon last week and she would believe it with everything in her and she might even make you wonder if it was true with all the detail she would use in telling the story.
As I recall, there were like 12 or more counts of child molestation against him and he was found not guilty on all them. It's kind of hard to beleive that the prosecution had anything on him if 12 people agreed on not guilty on that many counts. Another thing to consider is the guy that brought these charges against him. The guy was obsessed as a lot of prosecutors tend to be. I think a lot of prosecutors feel like most defendents should be locked up based on the fact that in their mind, they are probably guilty of something since they are in that predicament in the first place and I really believe that. Call me crazy but I've seen prosecutors not want to apologize to some of these people that have been exonerated because of DNA evidence wasn't available at the time of trial. They still believe the person is either guilty of that crime or guilty of something simply because they don't want to be wrong. It might dash their political aspirations or something.
Anyway, that's my take on it. I think it was money motivated and no, I don't think he did anything to any kids.

Haslina Jalil   July 7th, 2009 3:50 pm ET

Mr King should worry more about his Republican friends who are all slowly falling from grace for being holier than thou and judgemental!!!! Look at all the Republican Right Wings who can't keep any of there marriage vows and family values!! Leave MJ alone ....at least he is a decent human being who had contribute much to the world!! May God rest his soul!!

MJ   July 7th, 2009 4:50 pm ET

This is funny!!! I was just thinking.

People will forget all about Peter King and his remarks, but we, the entire world will always remember Michael Jackson, until the end of times.

Who's Peter King again?

jason from ocala   July 7th, 2009 5:00 pm ET

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN OR A RACIST. I THINK WE ARE ALL CREATED EQUAL. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. TIME FOR YOU RICK TO START REPORTING THE NEWS. IF MJ IS INNOCENT FOR WHAT HE DID, THEN YOU SHOULD COME OUT PUBLICLY AND SAY THAT OJ IS INNOCENT AS WELL!!! HOW MANY PEOPLE WATCHED THE TRIAL AND COULDN'T BELIEVE IT. NOW EVERYONE IS SAYING MJ WAS FOUND INNOCENT IN A COURT OF LAW. HOW MANY OF THE HIPOCRATS WOULD SAY THE SAME THING ABOUT OJ. THE HIPOCRACY IS DRIVING ME CRAZY!!!!! GOOD IS ALL ABOUT THE ANGLE. COMPARED TO SADDAM HUSSEIN HE IS A SAINT. WHAT ABOUT ALL OF THE OTHER PEOPLE THAT HAVE DONE GOOD? HE WAS JUST ONE MAN THAT YOU CHASTISED IN THE MEDIA AND NOW THAT HE IS DEAD, EVERYONE FEELS GUILTY BECAUSE HE IS DEAD, FROM AN APPARANT DRUG OVERDOSE. WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH EVERYONE? SHAME ON ALL OF YOU FOR NOT FEELING THIS WAY WHEN HE WAS ALIVE??? NOW IT IS SO COOL TO MOURN HIM. RICK, DO YOUR DAMN JOB AND REPORT THE WHOLE SIDE OF THIS. YOU AND YOUR STATION HAD NO PROBLEM CALLING OUT BUSH DURING KATRINA(WHICH WAS COOL) NOW DO THE HARD PART AND REPORT THE UGLY TRUTH WHEN IT IS RIGHT INSTEAD OF PANDERING. ISN'T THAT WHY YOU GOT INTO THIS PROFESSION IN THE FIRST PLACE? TO REPORT THE WHOLE TRUTH. IF THIS BS KEEPS UP I WILL TURN THE CHANNEL AFTER 8 YEARS. SHAME ON YOU RICK!!!!
DO THE RIGHT THING. YOU HAVE CHILDREN. WHAT IF IT WAS YOUR KID?!!! DIFFERENT STORY, HUH? BECAUSE IT DIDN'T HAPPEN TO YOU.

Babyleg   July 7th, 2009 5:09 pm ET

Rick! We will always have Idiots and cockroaches on this planet. Pecker King and others roaches like him unfortunately are part of our society. The only SAD! thing about this entire event is that he is still alive. And for all the KKK members like Pecker King that hides behind our constitution with their hate. And justify it with freedom of speach, that's fine. Because I too is an American! citizen so just DIE! please. The world would definately be a better place.

Simplicitydal   July 7th, 2009 5:32 pm ET

1) While I agree with P.King regarding the fact that the media is going overboard covering the death of MJ, I can't help to think that P.King is a such a petty pathic man. He is racist and America don't need a racist political leader like that. One can like and dislike someone, but at a very emotional time like this, and being a highly public figure, a political leader came out to make such harsh comments is not approppriate, and is hurtful to the family of the deceased and especially the young children of the deceased. He tried to make a point by calling a death man with all kind of names he could think of, that just made him looks petty, if anything, P.King did more harm to his political career than good. Sometime the best thing to say is to say nothing.

2) If anything MJ probably was the victim of the media, and of both child molestation cases. It's easy for anti-MJ fans to think he is a child molester because he is eccentric and different than if not all, most people. Most of us don't live his life for one day, how do we know to judge the man. It's also easy for him to be the target for people to take advantage of, and made a case out of a man to make millions, living large at another's person expense. If my child was really molested by a man, no money can replace the justice. If you were a successful star who just came out with an album which would bring in hundred of million, I am sure you will just pay people to have them off your back and give you peace. It is obvious that MJ was the victim because of his wealth and success. The truth prevail and therefore he was found NOT GUILTY. DO you understand the justice system and understand English? I hope so because you're leading a state. It is clearly that the second case is a scam to make millions, but they ended up in failure.

3) No one can judge MJ, that's not your job, that's God's job. All I know is the man is brilliant, his music touched millions, and while he was living, he did many good things. He visited many sick children, and donated hundreds of millions to charity. Have you even set a aside couple hours a he month to do something good for the community, to visit the homeless shelfter?

Terri from Atlanta   July 7th, 2009 6:06 pm ET

I think this so-called Rep from NYC owes Joe and Katherine Jackson and the entire Jackson family an apology for these disgraceful remarks. The representative from Texas at Michael's memorial today set the record straight with class and conviction when she reminded us that THEY [in Congress--most of them any way] really do know the law and that one is innocent until proven guilty. Not to mention the honor (plaque) for Michael that they will hang in the walls of Congress. And like Rev Al stated when asked his response to Rep King's comments: The WORLD has already answered this criticism [meaning, by its outpouring of support and love for the life and legacy of Michael Jackson]. So he did not even need to comment...period...end of story.

ShannonL52   July 7th, 2009 6:55 pm ET

um. the comments are overwhelmingly in favor of Michael. . .so whats up with the poll numbers? something in the milk aint clean. . .

Quinn   July 7th, 2009 7:23 pm ET

This is written by a young man serving his third tour of duty in Iraq. Thought you might find his take on the Michael Jackson news interesting.
____________________________

Okay, I need to rant.

I was just watching the news, and I caught part of a report on Michael Jackson. As we all know, Jackson died the other day. He was an entertainer who performed for decades. He made millions, he spent millions, and he did a lot of things that make him a villian to many people. I understand that his death would affect a lot of people, and I respect those people who mourn his death, but that isn't the point of my rant.

Why is it that when ONE man dies, the whole of America loses their minds with grief. When a man dies whose only contribution to the country was to ENTERTAIN people, the Amercian people find the need to flock to a memorial in Hollywood, and even Congress sees the need to hold a "moment of silence" for his passing?

Am I missing something here? ONE man dies, and all of a sudden he's a freaking martyr because he entertained us for a few decades? What about all those SOLDIERS who have died to give us freedom? All those Soldiers who, knowing that they would be asked to fight in a war, still raised their hands and swore to defend the Constitution and the United States of America. Where is their moment of silence? Where are the people flocking to their graves or memorials and mourning over them because they made the ultimate sacrifice? Why is it when a Soldier dies, there are more people saying "good riddence," and "thank God for IEDs?" When did this country become so calloused to the sacrifice of GOOD MEN and WOMEN, that they can arbitrarily blow off their deaths, and instead, throw themselves into mourning for a "Pop Icon?"

I think that if they are going to hold a moment of silence IN CONGRESS for Michael Jackson, they need to hold a moment of silence for every service member killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. They need to PUBLICLY recognize every life that has been lost so that the American people can live their callous little lives in the luxury and freedom that WE, those that are living and those that have gone on, have provided for them. But, wait, that would take too much time, because there have been so many willing to make that sacrifice. After all, we will never make millions of dollars. We will never star in movies, or write hit songs that the world will listen too. We only shed our blood, sweat and tears so that people can enjoy what they have.

Sorry if I have offended, but I needed to say it.
Remember these five words the next time you think of someone who is serving in the military;

"So that others may live..."

Isaac

jill bentsil   July 7th, 2009 8:00 pm ET

Hell yes. I would leave my kids with M.J.. Dirty minded Americans do not know how to respond to innocence because they are so entrenched in dirt. He settled because after O.J the white people wanted blood, and they were going to let the lamb Michael bleed for O.J. That is why he settled you evil coveteoius ass holes. Look at this man, listen to him. Look at his life, and pray that you can prove even a tiny bit worthy of the space you accupy on this earth. He was more than worthy you heartless dirty minded monsters!

Susan   July 7th, 2009 8:05 pm ET

Rick–

I cannot believe the outrageous minute-by-minute coverage of Michael Jackson that CNN has aired today. As a long time viewer I’m questioning my own intelligence in choosing your network as my source for credible news. We have men dying in the Middle East, a President traveling in Russia, one of the largest states in the Union is imploding and CNN chooses to devote endless hours to this spectacle. All of this to celebrate the life of a man who has paid millions of dollars to the families of children he has molested. The networks choice to join the free for-all of worshiping fans in idolization of a man who, in later life, caused ruin to many young children is a testament to it’s need to earn a dollar.

This is serious journalism?

Susan N
Chandler AZ

Paul   July 7th, 2009 9:10 pm ET

i cant believe so many think his is innocent of all the charges. why did he pay off families? and besides all those catholic priest were innocent too.

B Garrett   July 7th, 2009 9:56 pm ET

It's really to bad that people can get away with exploiting someone. This world is a very bad place when you let people mistreat other people for their own gain. And yes Michael Jackson was mistreated by people he through was his friends and the media. None of you new him personnaly, you all went off of what you heard. And when you seen something (like the baby hanging out the window) you didn't know the consept of what that was about, you didn't even comment on how he hurried the baby back into the room because you wanted to make him look bad, my Lord why does the news have to be bad all the time. What kind of world are we living in when money is more than a kind hearted word. The truth be told God will have the last word, and you, all of you that think getting paid for your lies and judgements will only hurt you in the end because the word of God says for the same way you judge others, you will be judged and with the measure you use , it will be measured to you. I fell sorry for this world.

abdul Abdullah   July 7th, 2009 10:00 pm ET

Thank you for The Inspiration Michael Jackson!

You truly are a man of Perfection, Passion, & Peace!

The world knows of none who could have endured, tolerated, and survived that brutal negative side of the so call "Freedom Of Speech" (some bad parts of the media)
No one, but You!! Michael, you survived it all and through the madness you never dropped bombs on the innocent nor did you stop giving to the needy to prove a political point. You are an example of True Peace, Compassion, and Love! I' m grateful to God that I had the opportunity to have lived in the life time of a Phenomenon. Michael Joe Jackson May God Be Pleased With You......

My entire family misses you dearly!

Rest In Peace,

Sincerely,

Abdul Abdullah

Cousin Art   July 7th, 2009 10:05 pm ET

Prospero hit the nail right on the head: How many of you defenders of MJ would allow your kid to spende the night w/ him?

ELIZABETH TERRELL   July 7th, 2009 10:21 pm ET

Mr. King needs to study the Constitution–due process especially. This case was already tried in Court with a "not guilty" verdict the result.
I think that in a house with 7 children and 2 bedrooms, sharing beds would be the least of the problems...many families share "family beds" WITHOUT sex. This is MJ's background, and I imagine there was healthy fun and laughter; not evil. King should not impose his cultural judgments (or possibly experiences) on others.

George A, Massachusetts   July 7th, 2009 10:30 pm ET

First and foremost, Mr. Peter King of New York has a bit to be desired, as a Member of the United States Congress. He is a coward in my opinion, because he had to wait until Mr. Jackson death before he could let his words be heard. Mr. King, a dead person can not hear or reply to your unfounded remarks about Mr. Jackson. You have very little self respect for yourself and no respect as a Member of the United States House of Representatives in the United States Congress. In my opinion, you were a coward that came out to try and run down all of the good that is in each of us. My prayers are that you will at some point in the soon, redeem yourself from your remarks made about Mr. Jackson, as a dead person. I forgive you for you know not what you have done, as a person, in my opinion.

ShannonL52   July 7th, 2009 11:08 pm ET

also the people who are saying that it's been too much coverage, were you saying the same when he was being torn apart by the press for the last 20 years? Is it that its too much Michael Jackson coverage or too much POSITIVE coverage. . .I'm sure many of you were perfectly content with the media crush surrounding his trial in 2005. wasnt too much coverage then huh? So ppl want to celebrate his life. . .is a week really too much to ask for a man who's been torn apart for DECADES?? really? why are you ppl soooooo hateful? Let it be. . .if you said nothing then, say nothing now, I promise you'll survive.

B Garrett   July 7th, 2009 11:23 pm ET

Oh and another thing who are you pete king, a nobody, so your comment doesn't even count, especially when you can say things as stupid as that. Don't you know that the world loved Michael Jackson (are you jealous). Who are you, a congressmen with no heart, how did you get in anybodys office talking like that, aren't you suppose to know the law, don't you know what aquitted means or what part of NOT GUILTY you don't understand, I think you better ask sombody. At least Michael didn't just carry the name King he showed the world he was a King. Hey pete what are you doing for the world besides being a disgrace to the area of your office and greedy for trying to capitalize on the death of Michael by your stupid comments. May the Lord God be with you and who ever else is willing to appreciate your dumb allegations and stupid minded thoughts. And another thing were you or anyone else in Michaels house when he was suppose to had molested these children, TRUTH, NO, do you remember the lies they caught these familys in , Michael was emotionaly drained from all this, I bet if you had the money to end something like this you would pay it to have your sanity back. And to that family who lied on Michael for their own gain because they were to lazy to make a pay check for them selfs you need prayer.

Peggi   July 7th, 2009 11:42 pm ET

I'm tired of watching CNN and the other networks pandering to the selfish pandering of another dead rich guy. I had become a news junkie during the election, but I am now officially cured.

Lisa Boyer   July 8th, 2009 1:15 am ET

How about the veterans who have served this country? What about the 9/11 police & fire personnel who gave their lives? This country is screwed – we worship fame and stardom – athletes – we deserve everything we get by this blind and stupid worship. I celebrate the lives of those who have REALLY done a duty to this country...not a freak whose family will make out at the cost of taxpayers! F that! Give our veterans jobs and security in a time when that does not exist for most of us. I just had a mild stoke and walked way with a $27,000.00 bill because my employer could not afford our benefits – where is the equalizer in this world? I have to dya I could care less about Michael Jackson or his freak family or kids

Shawn in Montreal   July 8th, 2009 1:26 am ET

Hi Rick,

It is by simple ignorance that Congressman King and so many others clearly don't remember that Michael Jackson was found not guilty on all counts of these false accusations. Large media hasn't done much to expose the accuser's insane scam artist mother, Janet Arvizo (Now named Janet Jackson by marriage), to help clear Michael's name. Her blackmailing JC Penny for $137,000 in 1998, her 14 bank accounts to collect from different ongoing scams, and even reported attempts to extort Jay Leno and other celebrities as well. Is it not too late to reveal the truth and clear Michael Jackson's name once and for all?

Gordon Miller   July 8th, 2009 2:35 am ET

In one of his first hit songs, Michael Jackson promised "Whenever you need me...I'll be there..." and then in one of his last masterpieces he pleaded, "In my darkest hour...in my deepest despair...will you still care...will you be there?..."
It is tragic that some of his "friends" and family members shedding big tears at the memorial service chose to look the other way so they could ride his gravy train while Michael apparently self-destructed on prescription drugs - instead of teaming up to try to save Michael from himself.

Margaret Murray   July 8th, 2009 8:09 am ET

Rep. King just wants to be in the spotlight. He sure must be surfering from memory loss,because we all know that Michael was found NOT guilty of all charges. He is just angry that his own funeral will not be given this much attention and coverage. He let what's in his head come out of his mouth without much consideration. I dont think he should gather his 'stones' by stooping so low,take a look at your reflection in your house of glass i.e if you have one. You are probably scared of what you will see. Let the man rest in peace. Isnt it enough that his life was made miserable and restless? How can people be so heartless? We are talking of a man who wanted to make a better place for all. Give him some peace.

Raymond James Thibault   July 8th, 2009 10:29 am ET

I agree to a point. If he was innocent why the pay off out of court. He may very well have been the victim of greedy people with an opportunity he couldn't counter. Michael was as much a Victim as any one else. God rest his soul. Now what about billy mays, Ed McMan, and others. Too much coverage of the King of Pop Goes the Wesel. Enough. Move on to the Troops stationed all over the World. It was the same during the Cold War. We faced the Soviet Union, we won. Where is the coverage of the real Heroes defending our country in places Other than Iraq, Afganistan and Korea. I served 22 years. No one Knows my story or the Thousands who died without all the Fan Fare and Glitter. Get real america. Every day Soldiers and Police and Firemen risk their lives for you. Wake up.

Dominique Schwartz   July 8th, 2009 11:11 am ET

Yes he was a talented individual and helped entertain a lot of people but, the coverage is totally out of proportion to his importance in the world. It has gotten to a point where you can't escape some news item, tribute, or other item about him, come on folks he wasn't a god, and there were/are others just as talented as he was. So lets move on and start covering real news please!!!

Danny   July 8th, 2009 11:25 am ET

While I believe the congressman was out of line with his comments, I also tend to (semi) agree with him. It is not my place to judge MJ, but I do have a right to my own opinion.
It is true that MJ was never convicted of any molestation charges, BUT it is also true that he paid our millions of dollars to get the allegations against him dropped! He admitted sleeping with, and giving alcohol to some of the young boys that visited with him at Neverland Ranch; what does that sound like to you?
People are bragging about what a great BLACK MAN he was, but, again in my opinion, it seems that he did not want to be black, nor did he want to be a man.

George A, Massachusetts   July 8th, 2009 12:08 pm ET

Dear Rick:

Thanks for giving me an opportunity to leave my comments about Congressman Peter King of New York. It is my desire to convey a letter to the representative and the Speaker of the House of Representatives concerning Mr. King's conduct as a Member of the United States Congress. I learned many years ago that if you can not speak nice about someone, then, perhaps you shouldn't say anything – and that should be a lesson learned in this situation for Mr. King – words are hard to get back...

Jeanne   July 8th, 2009 1:06 pm ET

Hi Rick, Lived in Miami and remember you from TV down there!!!! I have an idea to help pay for the Memorial Service for Michael Jackson....... The cost is said to be 1-2 Million.... how about all those Hollywood stars that say they loved Michael send a hefty tax deductible contribution with a nice comment on what he meant to them to either the city LA or the State of California . Names and comments from these contributors could be publicly posted somehow. This will pay towards the cost of the event plus give all those other stars a chance to put their money where their mouth is and they would get lots of publicity for helping their city/state. Some stars like Liz Taylor, Liza Minelli, McCuly Colkin, Diana Ross, Oprah, and many many other stars say how much they loved him and could certainly afford to help pay for the wonderful memorial service that was held in his honor and reimburse the tax payers. From Jeanne in Largo, Florida

Maria   July 8th, 2009 1:53 pm ET

Hello, Rick:

I have a suggestion for the Jackson family and families around the world. The family could bring a lot of positive attention to organ donation and medical research by DONATING Michael's Organs, ears, eyes, brain, etc etc etc......It would be very useful and help others, which Michael did throughout his life, and others would enjoy Michael's organs being alive in other people...This would also show compassion for others and be a dream for those who are in need...It would help promote organ donation worldwide. ...Another possibility would be to make the donation for medical research.

Sean   July 8th, 2009 2:25 pm ET

Sir,

I agree with Rep.King,although I believe MJ was also a victim of abuse and molestion. Its classic, abused becomes the abuser. MJ was a tortured soul who was the greatest entertainer of all time. May he finally rest in peace.

Can you please pass on my congratulations to your colleague,Jeffrey Tobin. I'm so impressed by his challenging of Rev Sharpon's comments at the memorial. It needed to be said.

Thank you,

Jonluke   July 8th, 2009 3:11 pm ET

does anyone think he faked his death so he could get away to rest for the tour

SC in Southern Cal   July 8th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Michael wasn't a pedophile. But media needs to send message condoning his illegal prescription drug lifestyle. While it's wonderful celebrating his contributions to the arts, young kids need to know that drugs are wrong. Just as athletes get their reprimand–now let's address it with Michael.

hilda houston   July 8th, 2009 3:23 pm ET

I never heard of that rep. maybe he just want to be on the news I suggest if he want to be recognize he deal with the issues in NY and not worry about CA. I think he has a serious problem if MJ death bothers him so much and maybe he should put those issues he has to work working for the rights of those in his district. I feel sorry for a person who can hate so much they seem like they would go to a grave site and stomp the person 12 feet more down. If I don't like something on my TV set I use my remote and turn or read the newspaper if he is able to and guess what out of all his uncall for remarks it did no good because millions celebrated his life and he was found not guilty, I made no conclusions before the trail however, I watch it daily did not miss as I did other trails and the verdict was correct. I dont know about him, but if he is educated at all and watch the trail his would not make such remarks I dont want to say he is a racist but several others have died of questionable behavior that wasn't in the news and I have never his angry voice before.

Don G   July 8th, 2009 3:27 pm ET

The poll questions are rigged. The way the "No" response is worded implies that if you vote no you think his popularity might excuse any actions he might have taken. My vote is that the guy was not a pervert but the media is making way too much out of this passing. He did, after all, show pretty much ignorance of the results of his actions depending on non experts administering him deadly anestetics. His artistic ability should be celebrated, but his personal stupidity should be publicized more.

gcarter   July 8th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Rick! Remember that Debbie Rowe was the surrogate. Not her eggs!

Kim From Babylon, NY   July 8th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

Rick,

Watch you everyday religiously.... my comment regards whether MJ's kids are his or not (biologically speaking)... it does not matter... in the eyes of those children he was/is there father! The only service provided in reporting this is to hurt those children who have already been thru so much. Flash forward a few years from now and they google there father and find this hurtful reporting. Regardless of opinions, the media needs to leave them alone and let them grieve for the only parent they have known.... no one is served by continuing to inquire about this.... honestly it just doesn't matter and really isn't newsworthy, just hurtful!.

Kim

msbay01   July 8th, 2009 3:36 pm ET

There is REAL news happening in the world other than MJ and those issues are being addressed. No one has neglected our great heroes who sacrafice their lives for us and our country. Last time I looked these honorable men and women are celebrated and recognized every year with a special day set aside for them so everyone can pay homage at the same time. As for the other news worthy stuff going on the "family values" party was knocked out of the limelight with their fornicating when MJ died so King should be happy about the distraction, that Palin woman, who I am personally tired of, is all in the news about her quitting the people of her state and denying it, the republican party continues to criticize the democratic party for at least trying to give us solutions to our economic, energy and health problems while offering no solutions except empty books with no numbers of their own to solve anything, they criticize President O for trying to do something with our overseas potential allies in repairing the damage that Bush and Cheney totally destroyed while they were in office and just want to continue to kill people . . . shall I continue? MJ solds papers when he was alive and still does now that he's dead. But the negativity that surrounds him is nothing compared to what King and his party did and are trying to do to this country. If King really wants to do some good what he should do if he wants to make this world a better place take a look at himself in the mirror and make that change and keep his mouth shut about things he doesn't know about. And yes I would have trusted my children to spend the night with MJ.

Ivan, Tampabay   July 8th, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Rick why nobody interview the team that worked with Michael Jackson hours before he died. Particularly I wish to see interview with the guitarist/singer Orianthi.

P.S. She is a girl who started playing guitars when she was 6. She played with singers like Carlos Santana, Steve Vai and B.B. King. And now Michael Jackson.

Michele Breen   July 8th, 2009 3:47 pm ET

Sarah Palin has shown the world how truly flaky she is.. Most of us already knew. But for anyone who had been giving her more credit than she deserved – now you too know. She is a very pretty lady who (I hope)
is leaving politics forever. That's the best way Sarah can serve her country.

remy   July 8th, 2009 3:53 pm ET

No matter we all think about Michael Jackson I expect CNN to lead the pack and demontrate professional journalism and stop difussing any stories,now or later about his children while they are still minors.PLEASE SAY NO TO THE EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN BY THE MEDIA.

Michele Breen   July 8th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

Michael was a victim of his own peculiarities. I do not believe he was a pedophile – he was sued for the money – acquitted by the jury. If that had been true there would have been proof. The public tended to believe the allegations because of his unusual appearance after too many surgeries. But we've heard enough – let him R.I.P.

JCF   July 8th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

To all MJ haters,

if you can't stand news about him, then turn off the freaking t.v and computer, go outside and build your own tv news station, then there you can say any garbage you want to spread.

Nikki   July 8th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

Michael Jackson's daughter put a human face on this tragedy yesterday. He is guilty of a lack of personal responsibility if his health condition is as bad as reported.

Zack   July 8th, 2009 4:11 pm ET

Hi Rick lets be fare MJ is gone let the man rest in peace, Anyone who is trying to tear his children dwn by asking other man if they are the father is not fare that is the last thing they need, pple should put them self in there shoe, lets not do what we wouldn't like other to do to our children when we are gone we are all heading there.

Ray Lee   July 8th, 2009 4:15 pm ET

For all those MJ supporters and deniers, let me ask you this, "Assuming that MJ was just another 'Hollywood Wannabe' and you knew the allegations later made, would you be willing to send your son or grandson over to MJ's for a sleepover knowing that the sleeping arrangements were MJ's bed with MJ ?

Would your answer be different if MJ was the rich "King of Pop Icon " and your family was going to paid $20,000,000 (in addition to trips and gifts) for allowing the sleepover ?

Unfortunately for many, it turns out to be a $ decision !!!

Damani   July 8th, 2009 4:16 pm ET

I for one would like to get these nay sayers to put up what Michael Jackson put in and put up with. No one proved that Michael did any of these things and in fact one accuser recanted his claim against Michael. In all my years of being involved in the selection of voting for people who claimed to help the poor and bring us a new change, I have not seen one politician step up to the plate and do what Michael did for people. Not only was his music loved but he was loved because of what he did for people of all nations. Step up politicians with the forked tongue and do like Michael or shut up. The people who are talking negative against this man who is no longer here to defend himself will continue to drag his name through the mud, the only difference is that they just haven't gotten caught in their dirt and closet behavior. Before you pass judgment on someone, you first take the thorn out of your own eye. One day you will slip up and put under a microscope and then you will see how it feels to be bombarded with the media invading your life.

Natalia   July 8th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

Hello Rick,
So, this is so called American democracy??? Very funny…and very sad…
When a U.S. Congressmen doesn´t respect the Law and according to the Law Michael Jackson was found INNOCENT of all the charges brought against him, I think you, American people, should pay more attention to the persons who are representing your interests in the Congress or Mr. King is just a kind of harlequin there????
When Paris called Michael “the best father” I think even stones cried at that touching moment or do you need another prove???
I´m sure that this so called “Congressman” knows nothing about Michael´s life and just want to make a PR-action of himself. King, you are disgusting pervert!!! And he´s still in Congress??? NO comments, gays!!!
I want you to see this Michael Jackson:Rest in peace, my beautiful angel, I love you!

DORIS   July 8th, 2009 4:21 pm ET

Mr. King, were you THERE? Did you SEE Michael molest a child? and, do you have ANY PROOF? Remeber the accusations leveled against you that you said weren't true? Mr. King is WAY out of line with his statements. If I were the Jackson Family I would sue this idiot, for slander and defamation, for so much money his great-great grand children would owe Michael's estate money. WHAT would Mr. King say if I was to tell him that we just heard that he is a pervert, child molester and a pedophile?

luckylibra   July 8th, 2009 4:25 pm ET

Your own poll shows 60% in favor of stop the celebrating of jacksons
death. I guess Rep. King was right afterall. Thanks for all those positive comments on Rep. Kings statement too. !!!!!!!

grrace   July 8th, 2009 4:38 pm ET

Rick, What you have to understand is Republicans like Peter King are racists. It's easy to see. Also, Republicans continue to lie about the Iraq war, proving they're also liars. Vote. Vote them OUT.

len   July 8th, 2009 4:43 pm ET

Enough is enough. It is tragic that Michael died, whatever the cause, but he is dead, his service was yesterday. Can we get back to covering events that are critical to those of us who are still alive??? I really feel that the "type of children Michael raised" or "who is the most fit guardian" are personal matters better left for the Jackson family to resolve. The recession, potential conflicts in Korea, Iran and Honduras are of considerable more importance to me.

DORIS   July 8th, 2009 5:08 pm ET

TO EVERYONE WHO THINKS LIKE AND AGREES WITH NY REP. PETER KING:

MICHAEL JACKSON IS THE SECOND GREATEST THING TO EVER HIT THIS PLANET. AND THE WORLD -THE WORLD – PROVED IT YESTERDAY. SO GET OVER YOURSELVES.

SO – O.K. Mr. King, you've had YOUR MOMENT in the SPOTLIGHT. THE ONLY WAY YOU COULD GET IT WAS BY SLANDERING MICHAEL JACKSON. Well, you've had your moment, now you can go away.

I'm SURE MICHAEL SETTLED THAT MATTER OUT OF COURT TO GET PEOPLE LIKE YOU, OUT OF HIS FACE. AND, THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK SHOULD RELIEVE YOU OF YOUR SEAT.

I suppose Mr. King does not know that Michael donated 300 million dollars of HIS (MICHAEL'S) PERSONAL money to hungry chjildren in Africa. That Michael donated to 39 (THIRTY NINE) charities, and gave SO MUCH to COUNTLESS others.

If we were to believe EVERYtTHING we're told, it would be easy to believe that Mr. King IS A RACIST, OR A PERVERT OR A PEDOPHILE, EVEN A CHILD MOLESTER. What came out of YOUR mouth WAS psycho babble.

AND – BECAUSE IT BEARS REPEATING – Michael Jackson IS the SECOND GREATEST thing that ever hit this planet. AND THE WORLD – THE WORLD – PROVED IT YESTERDAY.

Herbert Pairitz   July 8th, 2009 6:24 pm ET

Equal Protection for Some

In the 2000 presidential election the U.S. Supreme Court used the Constitutional equal protection principle to stop the recount of certain counties in Florida. They did not recommend a recount in all counties and thus selected the next President of the United States, George Bush. I am requesting the Supreme Court to apply the same equal protection principle to our current inequality problem where lobbhyists are permitted personal contact with members of Congress, a personal contact that is denied the average citizens who do not have the millions of dollars required to negotiate a desired ppolicy.

boggy nights   July 8th, 2009 6:36 pm ET

Peter King referring to Micheal Jackson as a "child molester" and "pedophile" on television when the family is mourning was disrespectful and outright evil. The House leadership needs to call him out for making such outlandish comments. I would side with King if it was proven in a court of law that he was guilty but he was found innocent. Now allot of people argue that he paid 25 million dollars to settle with the one kid’s family so that’s proof he was a child molester.

But, I pose this question to everyone. Would you allow someone who molested your child to go free in exchange for 25 million dollars?

If Micheal was so terrible and committed such a terrible crime then why did’nt the kid’s parents turn down the settlement offer and cooperate with prosecutors to put Micheal Jackson behind bars. They could have sued him later after the conviction. I find it more belivable that the motive was to get money from Micheal.

The cases involving both kids sound fishy and they don’t warrant MJ being labeled a pedophile.

Micheal Jackson has a had a incredible positive impact on this world. Peter King what have you done lately except use this occasion to put yourself in the spotlight. Micheal Jackson – RIP. You are in a better place.

Justin   July 8th, 2009 7:00 pm ET

Michael Jackson's death reveals a fundemental problem with today's society. Any death is tragic, but this has gone overboard. Our country has lost over 4,000 soldiers in conflict since 2001. Most of these people making a meager $40,000 a year (compared to the civilian contractors earning six figures). These people don't even get their names across the ticker. It's time for everyone to step back and re-evaluate what is important to them, and time for the "news" to cover THE NEWS! I think we will be okay without any more songs from MJ.

LM2InLkpt   July 8th, 2009 8:52 pm ET

Four things we all can, and should, learn from Michael Jackson's life:

1: Beware how you treat your body.(1 Corinthians 6:13-20; 9:27a)

2: Beware who you keep company with.(Provebs 13:20; 1 Corinthians 15:33)

3: Beware the places you go, and the scenarios into which you place yourself(Proverbs 4:26; 1 Thessalonians 5:22)

4: WHO are you seeking to please?(John 12:43; 1 Corinthians10:31)

And one last thing... let wisdom and understanding guide your actions.(Proverbs 4:7)

LM2InLkpt   July 8th, 2009 9:28 pm ET

Faye in Arizona, two things you said call for responses:

"Mr. King is a homophob who sees things in terms of black & white."

First, since you seem to be in the "MJ was proven innocent of pedophilia" crowd, can you prove-beyond the shadow of doubt-that Congressman King is a homophobe? Also, what is wrong with seeing things in terms of black and white? Oftentimes, that's the ONLY way to call things.

"MJ’s admission of 'sleeping' with children had nothing to do with a sex act or molestation."

However, my dear... MJ's very own admissions of sleeping with kids in his bed surely do open up questions about his character, his reputation, and his integrity. Add to this that he paid $20 million to hush up a similar claim a decade or so before the 2005 acquittal, and you have to conclude that something about him is totally amiss.

Go ahead, though, keep crying, "he was acquitted." That's a fact. However, his own admissions about sleeping with kids are FACT; his paying $20 million to hush up a similar claim is a FACT. These facts CANNOT be ignored.

Sharbo   July 9th, 2009 2:30 am ET

MJ is the new OJ! I understand why white people like Michael Jackson, but I can't understand why black people like him SO much. He didn't embrace his African roots. White skin, nose and hair. White wives and children. Al Sharpton said, "Michael isn't strange...." NOW, that is strange!

Clif   July 9th, 2009 9:46 am ET

Micaheal Jackson compared to my brother-in-law. My bro just died unexpectedly at age of 56 from surgery complications. He was the husband of one wife, was putting 2 boys thru college, (downsized his house to get the money) , spent what money he had wisely, ( didnt build an unneeded amusement park where there were other parks within a short drive) loved everbody, didnt molest little boys, didnt try to be something he wasnt via cosmetic surgery, didnt grab his crotch obscenely in public, didnt danlge his young children over railings, didnt take unprescribed drugs and didnt jerk his body around on stage to satisfy the entertainment whims of young girls when he was 50 yrs old. He got a half hour memorial service celebrated by 150 people. So who do you think I value as the better person?

Ms. Addertongue   July 9th, 2009 10:25 am ET

Michel Jackson is “The King of Pop” BUT…

The media circus/frenzy is grossly overdone to the point of the usual voyeuristic perversion that some Americans seem to have with the lives of the famous and the media merely inflames these perversion with it’s non-stop airing while instilling disgust within some of their viewers that may not be as prone to obsession with the 24/7 of Michael all the time. I must admit I am one of them. I liked him- I found him curious- but enough is enough as the world is in so much turmoil and trouble and this is has been the top story???? Hello… is there anybody out there?

Michael Jackson while definitely talented and he was a huge groundbreaker in the music industry both creatively and socially by selflessly promoting racial harmony would have to take some of the blame for all the negative scrutiny of his life and even his death by his own personal actions and public displays of his strange and often bizarre behavior. Everything about him seemed to scream for attention- from his countenance to the unusual way he related with adolescents. Leaving this pop star open for public critique whether good or bad or even to the downright disgust felt by some but all of these reactions came by Michael Jackson’s own hand.

Now for Peter King- Peter King is doing nothing more than voicing his own opinion to which of course he is free to do as we do have the protection of our Freedom of Speech (for now) granted to us under the Constitution. Of course, he is also showing his "True "Party Colors" of one of those soon to be extinct animals that are struggling with the change of public opinion and even party opinion as they desperately try to maintain a hold on the dwindling single-mindedness of the over-the-top right wing faction of the Republican Party… you know the Middle Aged, White Male that makes over 250,000.00 grand a year or drives a pick-up truck with a dixie flag in the rear winddow and beer cans bouncing around in the bed and that thinks that everyone should be straight and Christian and that the Caucasian male is still the majority.
Hello! Mr. King have you looked out the window lately?

Richard Warren Morris   July 9th, 2009 12:17 pm ET

No credibility~~ALL JACKSON'S WIDE OPEN LIERS

With your report this morning,

RE; Jackson fleeing country after molestation trial and all family members trying "intervention", then later the family composes and signs a legal document denying ever having tried to intervene,

MAKES ALL OF THEM PROVEN "WIDE OPEN LIERS" WITHOUT ANY

CREDIBILITY ON PAPER~~TO HELL WITH THE WHOLE "FREAK ACT"

luckylibra   July 9th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

Your poll still shows by 61% to 36% that people want the celebration
of mj's death to stop. Why does it continue. Just proves Rep. Pete
King was right all along. Get over it, it's over, he is DEAD !!!!!

Raymond James Thibault   July 9th, 2009 2:02 pm ET

I feel that Michael was miss understood. He needed help. He was a child at heart. A little kid in a Grown Up body. Reality wasn't his forte.
All he really tried to do was make it fun form himself and others. People see what they want to see. No one got his Rose Colored Glasses off his eyes soon enough for him to grow up. Adults have an obligation to be examples and inspire the young. Michael had a bad child hood thanks to Joe Jackson. To say he was weird at times is an accurate statement.
I just in time those who took advantage of him and an opportunity to STEAL from a rich person, have the courage to tell the truth. We don't know or may never know the truth. I hope someone looks at the GOOD and forgets the bad. All can be forgiven in the light of truth.

Lisa   July 9th, 2009 2:13 pm ET

OMG can't we just move on from Jackson? There are more IMPORTANT things going on in the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

claudio, italy   July 9th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

Tracy Shook July 6th, 2009 11:05 am ET

The interest in MJ represents such a small portion of the population. Give us something else to “chew” on for a while, I’m bored with MJ.
_________________________________

Two billions people – estimated – around the world watched his memorial, through televisions but most of all Internet and social networks. The appreciation for the man, despite of 20 years of complete humiliaton by the press, come from the people who recognized his talent and his art.
michael jackson was a genius, an amazing global artist who reached with his language the entire world, from the classy man in Manhattan to the poorest family in India...Everybody in the world knows who Michael Jackson is thanks to his music, his lyrics and his dancing. What a character, what an artist. You American People should be proud of this guy, I tell you as an italian who admire USA but sometimes...i don't know, i can't undersand this...

chris riggs   July 9th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

It's on the Internet that jason chandler the guy that accused him of molestation in 1993 has admitted that he lied he said "michael did nothing to me my father made me lie to get out of being poor" he admitted it was a lie to get rich

Kathy   July 9th, 2009 3:52 pm ET

MJ was never convicted. Being weird is not a crime. Talking soft and caring for children is not a crime. Stop the judgement. People used MJ for financial gain: (including his family.)

Kathy   July 9th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

KING should be sued for defamation! MJ was cleared! Let KING prove his allegations! Let us judge KING like he has judged MJ.

goli   July 9th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

I think Iran's coverage has been put away for a long time, please notify us of what's going on in Iran and I hope these students are not giving up, something I dreaded all along from happening.

We don't want anymore votes back , ONE CANDIDATE IS WORST THAN THE OTHER we want Iran back and complete REGIME CHANGE

Luckygal   July 9th, 2009 4:39 pm ET

Where did my previous comment go? Was is that offensive? Puh--lease!

Michelle Pernula   July 9th, 2009 5:15 pm ET

What proof was there of pedophilia? His white skin (due to a skin condition where cells fight itself)? Or was it the secret room (lined with cedar walls–like all the other closets and complete with a clothing bar and shelves and where he most likely stored costumes so that no one could preview them, and to keep them dust free and to hide valuables in case of a robbery). Or was it his botched nose jobs (because he fell off stage and had surgery, then family poked fun of his nose, then he couldn't breath, then they botched the nose, then they removed cancer from his nose). Hum. Maybe it was the moon walk (he slides on the floor and spins too fast)?

Congressman listened to the Vultures on CNN (Nancy Grace & Jane Valez and Queen of Vulture Diane Diamon who brags she's written a book about Mike and pushed the notion that Mike was on drugs during the trial/&right when Anna Nichol died). She really made me so mad that I wrote CNN back then and said that Mike could be driven to depression and then resort to drugs if people like Diane and Nancy and Jane keep labeling Michael and look what happened. First of all we don't know that he did drugs, just because there's tracks on his arm. It could be that all he had was an IV for dehydration! People look at evidence in all sorts of ways because it's their OWN lives they are injecting, they aren't truly objective they force feed us their SICK thoughts. The most sick thoughts are the prosecutors like this congressman that take individuals and label them and when the person gets hurt, they dig up even more sheot.

This congressman should lose his seat. He doesn't see the beauty of what Michael did, the charity work, the softness of his heart, his soul BLED for starving and ill children (because he KNEW the pain), but that doesn't make a pedophile. He was compassionate and sensitive to needs of others...unlike Nancy, Jane, Diane and this congressman...all evil people. They could all hang out on FOX News with Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter and fit in perfectly.

I'm truly disgusted with CNN and I used to have it on 24/7, now I can barely listen to their negativity. Anderson Cooper and Larry King are sensitive to Deb Rowe and Mike, they listen, but refrain from calling names (although Anderson did call him Whacko Jacko in the past).

The biggest point that is missed is: when this negativity is aired, we risk having Michael's children hear this and it's already traumatic enough that their father passed away, possibly murdered, or negligence, or even suicide by proxy that they shouldn't have to hear "Where is the body? Where is the coffin? Did u hear he's BALD? They took his brain! He has tracks up his arm! Deb Rowe just wants the money..." yada. CNN is the MOST Insensitive, the MOST Conclusions Drawn and Most Innaccurate and MOST Irresponsible and MOST DISRESPECTFUL! AJ Hammer is just another female vulture in heat. Gossip mongers that thrive off sensationalizing and dramatizing the news. I agree with a mich here, they are mean people and the media that drove Michael underground and drove him to wear a mask (they made fun of his face)...I'd wear a mask too, then they turned around and poked fun of the masks. And WHO wears the Mask now? You KNOW who you are! Then they drove him to his death, but who will take responsibility. We ALL had a part in it. Mike was a VICTIM, he didn't victimize anyone! He probably had a simple glass of water through his vein to feed his gaunt body that went through many hours of heat to practice dancing to cause joy in our hearts and he's accused of the heinous stuff...drugs. NO ONE was there, so STOP saying that crap! Just do what Mike said and BEAT IT!

Start watching shows that demonstrate HOW they do autopsies and you'll understand why his head was shaved to view the skull and brain matter. We won't KNOW why he died until the coroner says so, so don't listen to Nancy Grace (she's apparently highly inexperienced in medicine). It takes MORE than oxygen to get the diprivan too. Having the equipment in the home doesn't prove if, or how often he even had any procedure (surgical). STOP judging others Nancy, or I will pray for paparazzi to follow you and hit you with their cameras and venomous – suggestive questions–but no one is as perfect as you NANCY. Right? Phifffh.

Michelle Pernula   July 9th, 2009 5:40 pm ET

"He was a child molester. He was a pedophile." Those were the heinous words spewed from Peter King. I learned when filing reports about others to stick to the facts, offer proof, and to refrain from opinions or labeling the person you are reporting on; and to let the examiner witness the offender themselves.
All King did was "label" wrongfully and this could get him into a defamation of character suite if he continues to do this to "live" people. Although, there is proof too, that Mike did not molest anyone. He was found NOT GUILTY by American court system.
Also, when you add the words "IS" or "WAS" into a sentence about someone else...those are words you've chosen to "pin" something on someone because you are admitting by definition that you know it as a fact, so King should refrain from using "IS" and "WAS" and "ARE". If he were an attorney (in order to be a congressman and professional), he'd know that using this language "is" or "was" or "are" are words to be careful about or libel for slander, or defamation of character. How could King be a congressman without this simple knowledge?
My step father used to spout off something ugly about the Beattle's, the Monkeys, the Jackson's, or other people when he wanted to control what we viewed on TV. It's control, it's uneducated people, ignorance and authoritarians. King is acting like an Authoritarian. (See, I injected he "IS" but I used word acting like to soften it). People are better ruled with authoritative words, not an authoritarian.

Saying ugly things about beautiful people that have done MUCH good to address worldly causes: lonely/suffering troops, suffering child cancer patients; and is only guilty of projecting being soft spoken and loving and highlighting what we SHOULD be doing to mother Earth, instead of being reckless in life, is unforgivable! Get lost Mr. King! Just Beat it. You just don't get it, so don't keep pressuring us to believe the way you do!

LM2InLkpt   July 9th, 2009 5:54 pm ET

Clif, you will be in my prayers. For your family to lose such a caring person who lived his life with class and dignity is a tragedy.

Sadly, though, today's "advanced and enlightened" society seeks to prop up the less-than-savory elements in our midst... Jon and Kate, Hulk Hogan's family, the Kardashian girls, Paris/Perez Hilton, Michael Jackson, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Bucky Philips...

Need I say more?

LM2InLkpt   July 9th, 2009 5:57 pm ET

In my prior remarks about the "less-than-savory" in our midst, I forgot to add these two: Jerry Springer and Howard Stern.

Elaine   July 9th, 2009 6:27 pm ET

Thank you, Rick Sanchez, for reporting the side of Michael Jackson that some do not want to face. Rep. King has voiced it loud and clear. I respect both of you for that.

Michael Jackson had a drug problem. That is something he did to himself. Child molestation is something he perpetrated on other human beings. That, IMO, makes him a criminal.

Elaine

Jeff B   July 9th, 2009 6:36 pm ET

In this country, unless you are CONVICTED for a crime, it is slander and liabel to say what this congressman has said about MJ. He can have his own opinion, but to make public statements like that without any proof of any such EVIDENCE? I hope that the Jacksons sue him for slander! I am not such a Michael Jackson fan but I believe that if he has done any of these things that were ALLEGED, he probably did them while he was under the influence of medication and the Devil got in him. This same Congressman that is waving the flag of morality, is just like the other Congressmen that were preaching the moral high ground and then having mistresses, soliciting sex from men in bathroom stalls, and molesting kids themselves. It is because of these moral morons, that I decided to leave the Republican party and become an Independent! That idiot should learn to keep his opinions to himself and STOP judging lest he be judged!

Terrell Hart`   July 9th, 2009 10:55 pm ET

Michael Jackson was cleared of molestation by the court.That's the law of our country, this is USA.He's innocent.

anne   July 10th, 2009 12:14 am ET

Will Micheal jacksons memorial be shown on tv again??

Sharon W   July 10th, 2009 10:07 am ET

Remember: Michael Jackson was cleared of the allegations of pedophilia and/or molestation. TWICE! He was a likely target and seems to continue to be a target even in death.
The Congressman is out of line and perhaps headline seeking himself by his comments to the contrary. Let's not given King or his comments any more attention than deserved. Can't we just let Jackson's family continue with their grieving without tearing their family member down? Hasn't Jackson and his family suffered enough without the slurs and slanders of people who only wish to get their name out there on the coat tails of tragedy?

cross   July 10th, 2009 10:29 am ET

this vote is unfair for MJ and his fans. I will not vote it, it is meaningless. just let MJ rest in peace. peter king don't repect dying people, i wish other people didn't do that.

Ryan Reininga   July 10th, 2009 12:50 pm ET

Last time I checked Michael Jackson was acquitted of all charges. Also last time I checked, once you've been acquitted you are NOT GUILTY. Michael Jackson lead an extraordinary life. A life that gave more to this world than the fear-mongering Peter Kings or the so-called "conservatives". Face it Republicans, you've failed us for the better part of a decade. "The times they are a changing" as Bob Dylan once said. But I'm sure none of them have ever heard a Dylan song. They're more of a Debbie Reynolds fan base.

jr   July 10th, 2009 3:20 pm ET

Is this guy for real, this is one of our leaders? No wonder we are in such bad shape. Our leadership is full of lunatics, narcissists and all of the above,

JB   July 10th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

Simple question to those who say Jackson was acquitted of all charges: How did those children know that he had several marks on his genitalia? And how is it OK for Jackson to give "jesus juice" (wine) to children? Why the alarms on the bedroom door? A 44 yo sleeping with little boys? He setled out of court for millions. Innocent people charged with pedophilia do not settle. He was a great artist, and humanitarian, but that does not give anyone a pass on pedophilia. Hitler was a great artist. Should we forget that he killed millions, and just concentrate on his art? Of course not. And yes, pedophilia is just as bad as murder. Those children will never be the same, and do not care if he gave alot to charity.

Carol   July 10th, 2009 3:49 pm ET

Hey Rick first sorry that has happened to you. Now for Michael Jackson I am glad that cnn keeps on reporting about him, we all need to learn more about drug abuse. It really has become a really big problem. It was a problem seven teen years ago and has gotten even worse.

Dar   July 10th, 2009 5:15 pm ET

Rick, Thanks for sharing your story. People need to understand that the prescription drug problem is not a Michael Jackson problem or a Hollywood problem or a problem for celebrities or people of means or even teenagers. The problem is complex, and intervention is not easy.

There is also no quick or easy fix to understanding how deep and broadly spread this problem is. It can happen to anyone, and at some point it would seem that we need to examine our views on what healthcare and medical care are, how doctors are trained, how relationships work between doctors and drug companies and between drug companies and insurance companies. It's complicated and frightening. Who do we turn to if only those available to us are doctors quick to write prescriptions? And if anything other than treatment with drugs is considered alternative or holistic medicine because they are not practiced by MDs, what are we to do? There are MDs, DOs, Chiropractors, etc. What is the difference? How do they work together? Do they work together? Some people may die due to differences in philosophies and which philosophy dominates. There's "integrative medicine" but it is no easy task finding a doctor who practices it, and one which accepts insurance.

I don't expect you to post this, and that's okay. It is more important to cover this problem more in depth and not let it die or fade away. Sadly, the death of Michael Jackson has brought the problem to the forefront. Your story illustrates that it can happen to any of us. Don't let this problem die with Michael Jackson or your loved one. I am sorry for your loss.

DrJudiC   July 10th, 2009 8:11 pm ET

The fact is, the man was acquitted. Regardless of what anyone has to say personally, as a representative of any state, the representative has a responsibility to uphold certain little tidbits like "innocent until proven guilty”.
I do have an issue with this celebration of Michael Jackson that has started since his passing. Where was everyone at this time like month? All of it is pointless to the man now. He needed all this outpouring of love and support when he was alive and could have received some positive energy from this. On his bad days, that's when he needed to know what the world thinks of him. Now, celebrate him or not, what's in it for him? I heard discussion of taking a scene out of a movie after he died, because the scene was poking fun at MJ. So why now? Should the makers of this movie not have thought of how Jackson would feel hearing this? Now suddenly they care what people may say. The man suffered years of abuse and then grew up to have some issues resulting from his being deprived the opportunity to experience normal development, then had to endure the judgments on his life. The world needed to care, but most importantly it needed to when he was able to know and experience that care. His abuse or reliance on substances was a result of all that was going on around him. The poor man never had a chance to live. Let’s hope that more kindness will be shown to his children.

Martin   July 10th, 2009 8:17 pm ET

Hi Rick. I do believe Michael Jackson was a pedophile. He may have been acquitted at trial, but that does not mean he is innocent. And to be honest with you, I'm getting tired of all these news about him. Who gives a damn as to why he died? No one cares when a convicted pedophile dies and no one cares as to how he died. So everyone, get over it. He's dead and good riddance.

armandi7   July 11th, 2009 6:36 am ET

MJ was indeed the king of pop, no doubt and he should rest in peace. However, his artistic career is one thing, where his personal life is another, even though they do affect each other.

As a gay person that knows what attraction to men is, I never agreed and never understood the attraction some guys have for little boys. It is sickening and wrong and those kids will never be the same after going through that. Even the "straightest" guy could and should be able to tell when he sees a feminine high-pitched-voice man, that he's gay, so everybody wake up: MJ was one, though liked little boys. How come he never hung out with little GIRLS, and only little BOYS were by his side? What normal adult sleeps with little boys, gives them wine and spends days/weeks with them inside behind closed doors?

I grew up with MJ's music and I loved it, but that is one thing, versus the pedo-wacky thing. Two trials/not guilty? So what? OJ wasn't found guilty either, and we all know the truth. He paid all kids to shut them up. Yes, some kid's families took advantage and asked for a lot, but hey, they got it. And he lied, as he lied to Basheer's face when asked about plastic surgery which he denied... plllleeeeeeeeease...

As about the Media intoxicating us with these news, whoa, it's far from over (yes, Larry King, especially you). Wait till the toxicology report comes back, and there'll be round two of rambling about it. One should not talk bad about a deceased person, but the entire circus did get on my nerves, so consider this as noticing the so obvious facts and not as bad-mouthing.

Henry   July 11th, 2009 7:31 am ET

Who would leave there kid with a known pedophile , only to file a suit later. I mean Cha-mon , man lets be for real.

He was a money target like welfare mothers targeting guy after guy after guy, same with ambulance chasers, etc;

the poll that led me to this link , was leaving out anyother possibility that he is not a pedophile, but we see the Rethuglikkkans , bashing everyone in society who is not of their party or is of different nationality.

yeah, go figure.

Henry   July 11th, 2009 7:34 am ET

let him die in peace and be buried in peace and let his family have some dignity and respect, problem with republican racists is they lack self respect for others.
an integrated society and diversity is inevitable .

anonymous   July 11th, 2009 10:34 am ET

I am a white female who was sexually abused as a child. In my opinion, I really do not think Michael Jackson molested children. I would think my opinion would count a little, since I know what it is like to be a victim. After finding out how much money the parents received, and the books that were publish by Jordan Chandler, his sister and his uncle, it is so obvious the entire family wanted to ruin Michael Jackson's career and life for money. Jordan Chandler's father Evan Chandler knew the worst thing a man could EVER be accused of is "child molesting". Evan Chandler did a terrific job convincing the world. Maybe people should put Evan Chandler's under a microscope, now..
After what happened to me, I could never publish a book about what happened. I think I would have jumped off a bridge if my family started telling my story and publishing books. People who are legitimate victims do not want to talk about this unless they know it is going to help other people and maybe not even then.
I was never a Michael Jackson fan but these accusations should really stop, whenever I hear them I just want to scream. I never heard the biggest child advocate in the world "John Walsh" warning parents about Michael Jackson. Has anyone?
It was clearly the parents fault for allowing their children to stay with him, which makes me believe the parents had ulterior motives. Even after the first allegations, parents allowed it ! Seem a little odd?
I bet other victims would agree with me..

David   July 11th, 2009 1:46 pm ET

To armandi7, you said "As a gay person that knows what attraction to men is, I never agreed and never understood the attraction some guys have for little boys. It is sickening and wrong and those kids will never be the same after going through that. "
Why do you find it sickening or even surprising? Many people find homosexuality sickening after all and you don't approve of that.
I don't think there is a whole lot of point in condemning people for what they feel as opposed to what they do.
It is the cult thing right now to demonize and humiliate pedophiles, but frankly I don't think this is either fair or humane. People often can't help what they feel particulary with sexual impulses, and society has created such a stigma round this issue that it would be impossible for a responsible person who felt attraction to a child to go to a sex therapist BEFORE they hurt a child. Of course we have to enforce a strong prohibition on acting out these feelings, because it can result in harm to other people.
Given the huge Internet business in things like "barely legal teen pornography" or even outright child porn, or the Japanese penchant for dressing models up as school girls often coupled with extreme violence, it is the current opinion in the psychological community that there is a much higher percentage of men in the US (and elsewhere) that feel sexual attraction to underage kids than people might be comfortable with.
The fact is that human sexuality is like a wild animal, we need it for propagation of the species, but we also need to learn how to keep it under control since it can run wild otherwise. It can only be properly controlled when we base our behavior on a strong moral and spiritual system and exercise strong personal self-discipline and even then it can be difficult to keep under control (e.g. Catholic priests).
The problem is that we have a society that glorifies limitless self- indulgenece and immediate satisfaction of our desires, sexual or otherwise, and frankly Michael Jackson is absolutely a poster child for that lifestyle. His way of life, his appearance, the imagery used in his dancing, his out of control drug use are iconic for self-indulgence and degenerate values. Frankly it would not surprise me at all if he tossed in a bit of sexual deviancy into the mix. The fact that our society holds him up as a hero says more about the society than him as far as I am concerned. The fact that we combine this type of attitude with outrage at pedophiles is really ridiculous. We claim to be outraged at anyone who could hurt a child, but frankly I think most of that is just an affective over-reaction. If the child is black and lives in inner city DC or somewhere, I can promise you, very few people give a damn. If the children are actually foreign and live in the Sudan or somewhere, most people in the US don't actually really care if thousands of them are starving to death let alone being sexually assaulted and if you are Republican, you actually probably think they deserve it.
I would think it would be much healthier for our society if we stopped demonizing pedophiles and others for what feel internally since they can't really help that. We need to find ways to identify, treat and/or control the condition and prevent the feeling translating into actions that risk harming a child.
Since I am ranting here, I will finish with one final rant. I think modern psychology and the legal system does a huge amount to greatly exacerbate the trauma that children feel from sexual abuse. They rub salt into the wound and almost force children to see themselves as traumatized victims rather than using some of the resilience that children have and just shaking it off. I know that this cannot always be the case, but when I was around 11, my friend and I were accosted by a classic dirty old man when were playing in the woods behind our house. He physically constrained us, exposed his privates and tried to sexually assault us. For his trouble got a number of heavy punches in the genitals and for about 30 mins after that he was followed (at a distance) by the two of us shouting insults, laughing at him and throwing stones at him. We then went home and for the next 2 weeks embellished the story beyond all recognition for the benefit of our friends. We went back every day with a large group of friends to see if we could see him again, but never did. The fact is, we were sexually assaulted, but we dealt with it in a healthy way. If that had been today, I can guarantee you that I would have been forced to sit through endless counciling sessions and my psychology manipulated until I felt violated and victimized. Then they would be happy and present me to the lawyers as evidence for their case.

valkyrie22   July 12th, 2009 3:42 am ET

MJ was a pedophile in the true sense of the word- he loved children. Stop judging him. Look at the man in the mirror 1st! Stop convicting people on talk shows! You are not judge and jury. He was acquited. Period.What you do not know was that he was hormonally/chemically castrated when he was still very young (think Vienna Choir boys to keep their voices high) so he WAS A BOY HIMSELF! He never developed like the rest of us. So he had more in common with kids who were at his stage of development. This arrogant congressman should focus on fixing our economy after ruining it. Why don't you do something real for once to help boys- like pass laws to outlaw circumcision, like every other civilized nation has done. Or, how about giving boys the right to have Fathers without interference from the psycho-parasitologists and judges.This politician will have less impact on history than a pimple on MJ's face- he's just jealous.

ab lafontain   July 12th, 2009 6:25 pm ET

Peter King My hat goes off to you Sir. Having the balls to tell it like it IS!!!

Stefanie   July 13th, 2009 9:41 am ET

The whole thing is a big conspiracy! I personally think Peter King's comment shows that he just tried to get the public attention that made him become a big joke.

Denise   July 13th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

To all the negative comments at Michael, know this, you are not hurting Michael in the least. That goes double for that a**hole name Peter King. This a**hole is so quick to judge him and didn't know Michael personally. The samething about the rest of you all. I don't understand why people look at negative things and NEVER focus on the positive. This especially goes out to main stream media. I didn't know Michael was so giving to alot of charities. More charities then any celebrity alive AND dead. Yes that includes Americas fav, ELVIS PRESLEY. A drunken drug addict who stole songs & dance moves that didn't originate with him. People......leave mike alone. he's not here to defend himself.

Ann   July 15th, 2009 12:04 pm ET

WoW, I don't believe that News speech when I saw, how come can no manners like that to the pass away people??? That's American Style???
Bad mind then Asian. U make American write people Sham !

Even he's a superstar or not, he's the citizen, your country people. Son of America, u need fare for everyone. Specially u is represent for the Gov & Citizen.

If I say u Oldfashion....???? Can I ask how u feeling????

delgado jose   July 15th, 2009 7:06 pm ET

The JURY is the pueblo the republicans are sarcastic enployees they offend a the new JUDGE SOTOMAYOR . Why they only talk the immigration they are racists but they implement the new mandate the free marital status for lesbians and homosexual they destroy the world where we live .

ab lafontain   July 16th, 2009 9:33 am ET

Peter King.......... Tells it like it IS?! Hats off to him!!

Catherine Myers   July 16th, 2009 4:34 pm ET

I don't know if Michael Jackson was a "pervert". He seemed to be completely out of touch with societal norms of behavior. Drug abuse will do that to you. Michael Jackson was a drug addict. And it WASN'T because he got his hair on fire. It wasn't even because he was so famous. He was a drug addict because HE CHOSE that behavior.

Starting at the age of 22 months, I have undergone 11 surgeries with anesthesia (sedation) during and analgesia (pain relief) after. I have never abused prescription drugs and have never been addicted to them. But I do know how they make you feel. Like any other drug addict, Michael Jackson evidently liked that feeling and would go to any lengths to perpetuate it – even to his death. Unlimited access resulted in unlimited abuse – just like the lab rats in the studies.

No one made Michael Jackson take drugs. No one murdered him by giving him drugs. HE CHOSE behavior that evidently resulted in his premature death. The Jackson family is now dealing with the same thing thousands of other American families deal with every year. As a society we have yet to figure out how to successfully intervene when people choose to destroy their minds, their bodies, and their lives with drug and alcohol abuse. What a shame. What a National Shame.

matthew   July 17th, 2009 3:56 pm ET

pete king lost my vote 4ever, by pk response to mj 2 stop admiring him he just added to the story of mj ,hey pete consentrate on the issues at hand your autrorize to do ,ok rep pk

simone   July 20th, 2009 12:15 pm ET

It is unbelievable that this is even up for debate. This man beat the case all together and in this country we are INISENT until PROVEN GUILTY. This man was not proven Guilty and it is over. Further more I take big offense to a congressman having made this statement when he should know that Michael was acquitted of all charges and he is suppose to make sure your rights as individuals are up held. It seems he has made his own opinion up and thinks it should be law. I am an African American and I am a New Yorker all the way and Michael’s family has my full support. I also want to say that though I was very young at the time of Elvis there were no short opinions of his character and the believe that he was a racist. Was that the truth? Should that be the way he was remembered? Similar situations. Both big stars in there own right and both died of what seems to be an OD. What is the difference? The difference being Michael was not guilty and in this country racism is not a crime. Only difference I see.

Serious Page   July 20th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

Michael Jackson was never proven to be a pervert, what bothers me people love calling him something they really have no evidence of .. He settled with a family I get that, there are many questions about that settlement.. GQ magazine had a story how this man was doping his kid and put him up to saying Michael Jackson fondled him. The main stream media won`t cover that as it may have vindicated the man... The kid he went to trial for , the jury said clearly the kid was lying....One thing we know about perverts they are compulsive out of the 10`s of thousands of kids that he had at his house/Neverland ; you got 2 complaints. So you tell me Does this sound like a pervert or what. Sounds more like people tried to get paid and were victorious at least once...

donald   July 20th, 2009 3:37 pm ET

mj may have been found not guilty at trial, however, he just did not have one molestation case. he was a pedophile/child molester. he paid cash to be exonorated. the man was a homosexual predator, who prayed on children. he was a sick individual.where i grew up, they would have flayed mj if some child accused him. believe that.

Margaret Collins   July 20th, 2009 3:58 pm ET

Michael Jackson deserves the coverage that has been given about his death. He is not a child molester. He was cleared by his jury of peers. The verdict did not clear him of the mean remarks made by the public. Let the man rest in peace. If you believed him to be a monster, you can rest assured that all children are safe. He is dead. He is not the first famous person to be accused and cleared of charges like the ones that were made. Or are you upset that he is black In the past 10-15 years prominent black men have ben cleared of charges. Except his acquital and leave i alone. Those involved with the case were well comphensated. They saw their oppurtunitity and ran with it. If my lie could bring me millions, I'd tell one too.

Dustin Platt   July 20th, 2009 4:00 pm ET

Obviously, the honorable Mr. King is one of those
Republicans who believe in preemptive war, racial profiling, and guilty until proven innocent.

simone   July 20th, 2009 4:12 pm ET

As to MJ only having one trial and more than one person accusing him of child molestation I only have one thing to say “INICENT UNTILL PROVEN GUILTY.” If another mother thought there child was molested then they should have had him arrested. All of this speculation kills me. Just because the man decided not to go through another long drawn out trail and to just give the Mother of the child money not to continue this circus does not make him GUILTY. It makes him tired. Get off it. It was not proven. And Obviously, the DA did not think that case was viable or we would have seen another trial BELIEVE THAT!

Yvonne A.   July 20th, 2009 7:53 pm ET

He went broke defending himself to no end! Then he even paid off his victims. His "so-called staff" even were quoted off the record they believed he was guilty of being a child molester! C'mon people, a great music icon, YES, but also a would-be (if not for all his money and being a celebrity) child predator. Michael Vick, MLB players, Michael Jackson, etc. what's wrong with our celebrity-driven society? How about honoring real heroes, like teachers, police officers, soldiers, etc....

Sean   July 21st, 2009 12:08 am ET

In regards to Michael Jackson's demise

How is it no one has done a follow up story on those two families that accused him of Child molestation. I for one would like to see how they are spending their blood money. Please do an expose on their new found wealth. I am surprised the media isn't burning a path to their doors for statements up to now.

Sean

2fargone   July 21st, 2009 3:30 pm ET

rick,

why are you allowing the republicans to play the same old game - if they won't come on and debate the canadian gentleman from yesterday why wste time letting them on to repeat the same old tired talking points, propaganda and lies. -they won't debate him because he'll rip them to shreds and you know it!

Carlos Rivera Moreno   July 21st, 2009 3:33 pm ET

Hey Sanchez,

How about sending someone from CNN to cover the story on how the government of Puerto Rico is handling the outbreak of the Swine Flu....19 dead and hundreds infected...all because some head of the Health Dept said that the Flu will never reach the Island...these are the people that lead us and we the People are dumb enough to believe.... Please, send someone..If you dare!!!!

CRMJ

Karl   July 21st, 2009 3:35 pm ET

He may have been aquitted but we saw some of the evidence, like that little hidden room with the child pictures on the wall. He paid off the family and they took the money because they would have gotten much less in court and additional unecessary trauma to their child.

Carlos Rivera Moreno   July 21st, 2009 3:39 pm ET

Hey Sanchez,

Just sent a message and for some reason I think it didn't get through.... Please send someone to report the situation on the AH1N1 in Puerto Rico..... 19 dead and hundreds infected!!!!

CRMJ

Karen   July 21st, 2009 3:53 pm ET

Rick,

I don't twit or facebook, so here's my comment on the Canadian Healthcare system. The fact is, YES there can be long waits for certain procedures, in conjunction with non-life-threatening conditions. Cataracts are a good example. My 75 year old mother is currently waiting for the surgery. But- there is NO truth whatsoever that she's waiting or excluded because of her age. The fact is, we are an aging population and you have to take a number. If your situation is dire, whatever the medical condition, you move to the front of the line, which is in part why you might have to wait if the procedure is elective. YES, some rich Canadians might go to America for an MRI rather than wait. Why? Because maybe they lost their place in line because a homeless person needed an MRI more urgently than they. I hope this clears up some issues you asked about. JFYI, a year or so ago Canadians were asked to nominate a person for the title of "Greatest Canadian", and overwhelmingly, Tommy Douglas, the "father of Canadian healthcare" was the choice. So if our system was so awful, do you really think that would have been the result? The lies perpetrated by that guest on your show are simply the result of ignorance and fear.

Respectfully,
Karen

John Anaya   July 21st, 2009 4:20 pm ET

Rick,

I am a resident of the Netherlands and a citizen of the US. I have experience of both systems. I find that when it comes to urgent care both systems are at par. There are waits in Netherlands, however the wait is for conditions that are not life threatening or urgent. I live in the states now, and to be honest with you I prefer the Netherlands. Everyone has coveage. Their system is fairer and much cheapter. For the Dutch health care is a right, not an option.

Americans are indoctrinated to believe that we have the best of everything, i. e. standard of living and health care, However, we lack when it comes to the standard of living. The Dutch have a better standard. They have a better educational system; and trust me, better health care.

Respectfully yours,

John

simone   July 22nd, 2009 9:48 am ET

Give me a break people. Both adults and children lie.. Especially when the adult is the parent of the child telling them to lie.. Please.. This man had just finished a child abuse case and was acquitted. Period.. Then another mother comes along and wants her child to spend the night with Michael at his house with no supervision. And guess what? She "Says" he touched her child. Please!... this is a joke then and a joke now. For argument sake, let’s say he did touch that child. The mother should have been charged for child endangerment. She put her child in that situation knowing that he had just finished dealing with the same kind of case. OK gang.. lets get her!

Dennis Junior   August 5th, 2009 2:45 am ET

I am in complete agreement with U.S. Congressman King, that Michael Jackson was a "pervert" and, the Media should reported on the story and moved on....

Spoons58   August 5th, 2009 5:51 pm ET

In my judgement of his actions and his lies.I know he went for the little boys.No conflicits. Thats why most of them do things like that. Somethings wrong with their personailty.

Barry Tesh   September 26th, 2009 2:54 pm ET

Yea, last time I understood it, O.J. Simpson was acquitted too! Do these fools who turn their heads the other way to MJ's perversion also think the "Man on the Moon" (or the "man in the mirror") was green? As a matter of fact, if human beings were truly honest with themselves, we all have something about ourselves we are less than proud of, afraid others might learn about. The biggest difference of which is people like MJ and O.J. can afford to be perverse or homicidal. We really need to stop making excuses for these people – as well as ourselves!

LM2InLkpt   September 26th, 2009 7:37 pm ET

"We really need to stop making excuses for these people – as well as ourselves!"

Right on, Barry!

And... we need to stop lionizing such people.

Just last Saturday, in Buffalo, for example: Jon Gosselin appeared at a local "haunted house" shop. People paid $7 to get to meet him and get his autograph.

Very sad for our society when too many among us worship celeb's in this fashion...

jusme   September 26th, 2009 10:16 pm ET

Rena, go to therapy!!! If you were molested it's not MJs fault. Is your molester dead?? Get a grip. As long as ypounfocus on your molestation you'll never heal..

jusme   September 26th, 2009 10:22 pm ET

Rick and Peter, both of you are sad and using this article so that someone will give you some recognition!! Let's open upo you closets and find out what kind of poeple you are.

Peter you are absolutely pathetic to spend your energy on MJ when the country is in the shape that it's in. Rick, you obviously don't have anything going for yourself to entertain Peter!!

thomas   September 28th, 2009 4:48 pm ET

Out of the hundreds and thousands of kids at Neverland 2 complained of being molested... One the jury said lied and the other GQ magazine did a story of how the Dentist father was drugging and told to make up the story so they could get paid... One thing we know perverts are compulsive and can`t stop why has there never ever been another complaint over all these years of Michael Jackson touching another kid think about it people. I know some of you out there have been molested , I am sorry but to make MJ your posterboy for your pain is unfair..

JOJO   October 13th, 2009 1:47 am ET

I WISH THEY WOULD NOT MAKE A CIRCUS.
WHEN USHER, BEYONCE AND MARIAH CAREY TRY TO MAKE FANS CELEBRATE MIKE´S LIFE THEY WERE MAKING FUN OF ALL OF IT AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT.

HAD IT BEEN PRETTY BOY ELVIS NO ONE WOULD BE COMPLAINING. I DO NOT CARE ABOUT IRAQ NOR THE SOLDIERS THAT DIED BECAUSE IT IS BUSH´S FAULT THAT THEY DIED.
HOW MANY MEN IN THE PAST HAVE DIED OF WAR, IF U THINK THAT I AM GOING TO CELEBRATE HOW THEY KILL PEOPLE THERE U ARE A BUNCH OF IDIOTS. ASSHOLES.

Ruby Pace   October 13th, 2009 10:39 am ET

I sure hope you're not an American JoJo. That was the worse remark I ever heard! I like Michael Jackson and don't think he done no wrong.but to say that about our soldiers is too much. They are the reason you can lay down and sleep at night.

Spoons58   October 13th, 2009 7:03 pm ET

I think who ever JOJO is that made the comment about he didn't care about our guys dieing over seas so his stupid ass can live free. Should Fucking just kill himself,Or get the hell out of our country..
People like him who live under the protection of our government and then question the manner in which we provide it.Like Jack said: Just pick up a gun and walk a post,or shut the fuck up....Jack didn't say it
just like that but close enough. He doesn't care that our marines are getting killed.Hes a piece of garbage.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About Rick Sanchez

Rick's newscast is not a CNN newscast...it's YOUR newscast! Every day from 3:00 to 4:00 PM ET, Rick Sanchez presents an audience-driven, interactive hour of the day's news and smart conversation. Want to get involved? Sure you do! So get online. Now!

Follow Rick on Twitter. Join Rick's friends on Facebook and MySpace. Text your feedback with your mobile device.

Does Rick read your messages and comments and questions? Yes, he does. Really. All day, every day. Seriously, he's hooked. He's probably logged in right now.

This show lives and breathes with your input, it's shaped by your opinions and concerns, and there's no program like it anywhere on CNN. Anywhere ON EARTH! (OK, settle down...)

Click through the pages here to see clips and interviews from Rick's newscast. There's plenty of pictures of Rick on the CNN set and behind the scenes with his production team. And you know those moments when Rick speaks his mind? His "interstitials"? We've collected them, too.

Rick Sanchez, weekdays from 3:00 to 4:00 PM ET.

Now let's hear from you!

Open & Standing

These people have all been asked to come on Rick's newscast and talk to him live. In person, on the phone, by morse code, WE DON'T CARE! They've all either declined our invitation or simply chosen to not respond.

C'mon...what are you afraid of? We'd love to scratch your name off this list!

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Rush Limbaugh
Homeland Sec. Secy. Janet Napolitano
President Evo Morales
Michael Goldfarb
Sarah Palin
Alberto Gonzales
Andrew Cuomo
RNC Chairman Michael Steele
Karl Rove
Sean Hannity

Connect with Rick Sanchez


This is how you get involved with the show and get your voice on the air! Sign up for Twitter or Facebook, find Rick, and let him know what you think about the issues of the day. What's making you mad? What's got you concerned? Where are we missing the boat?
Follow Rick on Twitter
Connect with Rick on Facebook
Connect with Rick on MySpace

Powered by WordPress.com VIP